國內第一座投入營運且規模最大之捷運系統為臺北捷運，自1996年木柵線通車，迄今已營運26年，其運量隨各條路線陸續建置也逐年增加，依據臺北大眾捷運股份有限公司統計，於2019年12月其日運量已達約237萬人次。有了臺北捷運之經驗，國內其他都市亦陸續建置屬於各自之捷運系統，而臺南市雖然對於先進運輸系統之討論起源於1989年，並不晚於除臺北市以外之其他都市，惟因古蹟存留、路幅狹小等諸多因素導致各界對於路線規劃之共識凝聚不易，規劃未果下臺南市也成為六都中唯一尚未具有捷運系統之都市。
近年隨臺南市先進運輸系統整體路網評估作業經交通部核備，並宣布系統型式採用高架單軌系統，各規劃中之路線也陸續進入交通部審查作業程序，屬於臺南市的先進運輸系統指日可待。惟長年以來，臺南市民早已習慣以機車代步，後續民眾對於臺南市先進運輸系統之使用意圖值得探討。
過往國內對於大眾捷運系統使用意圖之文獻分析，多以營運多年之都市作為案例，如：臺北市、高雄市等，甚少有對於尚未營運之捷運系統進行研究。本研究以科技接受模式為理論基礎，納入五大人格特質、政府政策、使用環境等外部因素後建構因果模式，透過結構方程模式驗證本研究建構之模式，藉以分析先進運輸系統使用意圖與各外部因素間之關連性。透過網路問卷調查形式，蒐集有效樣本數共計614份，分析結果顯示，人格特質和善性、人格特質開放性、人格特質嚴謹性、政府政策等外部變數確能透過科技接受模型來影響民眾使用臺南市先進運輸系統之使用意圖。人格特質穩定性、人格特質外向性、使用環境對使用意圖並無直接影響關係。本研究之預期成果可提供政府相關單位作為後續政策規劃參考，期能提升臺南市先進運輸系統之使用意圖。

In recent years, as part of the overall evaluation of the transportation network in Tainan City, the Ministry of Transportation has approved the assessment and announced that the advanced transportation system will adopt an elevated monorail system. The planned routes for the advanced transportation system are currently undergoing review by the Ministry of Transportation. The implementation of the advanced transportation system in Tainan City is on the horizon. However, over the years, Tainan City residents have been accustomed to using motorcycles for transportation. Therefore, it is worth exploring the willingness of the public to use the advanced transportation system in Tainan City.
Previous literature analyzing the willingness to use mass rapid transit systems in Taiwan has mostly focused on cities that have been in operation for many years, such as Taipei City and Kaohsiung City. There is limited research on pre-operational metro systems. This study is based on the Technology Acceptance Model and incorporates five major personality traits, government policies, and the usage environment as external factors to construct a causal model. The structural equation model is employed to validate the proposed model and analyze the relationships between willingness to use the advanced transportation system and the external factors. Through an online questionnaire survey, a total of 614 valid samples were collected. The results indicate that personality traits (agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness), government policies, and other external variables can influence the public's willingness to use the advanced transportation system in Tainan City through the technology acceptance model. Personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion) and the usage environment do not have a direct impact on willingness to use. The expected outcomes of this study can provide government agencies with reference for future policy planning, with the aim of enhancing the willingness to use the advanced transportation system in Tainan City.

白崑成，大眾捷運概論，千華數位文化， 2020。
危芷燕，以科技接受模式探討使用者接受電子帳單呈遞支付服務的行為意圖，碩士論文，國立交通大學管理科學系所，2009。
李佩憶，人格特質對於駕駛行為特性影響與駕駛風險分級制度之研究─以國道客運駕駛員為例，碩士論文，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所，2017。
吳可兒，步行環境對影響民眾搭乘捷運意願之探討—以臺北市為例，碩士論文，國立政治大學地政學系私立中國地政研究所，2019。
吳治勳、陳慶餘、許志成、吳英璋、臺灣老化態度量表之編製與心理計量特性，中華心理衛生學刊，29卷2期， P159 – 186，2016。
林嘉茵，以科技接受模式探討路邊停車費行動支付之使用意圖-以臺中市為例，碩士論文，國立成功大學交通管理科學系碩士在職專班，2021。
黃玉蓮、陳淑惠，成人依戀量表台灣修訂版的心理計量特性與預測心理適應之探討，中華心理學刊，53卷2期， P209 – 227，2011。
黃芳銘，結構方程模式理論與應用，五南文化，2002。
黃俊英，企業研究方法，東華書局暨新月圖書公司，1999。
黃敏媛，人格特質因素對科技接受模式核心構念之影響：以行動銀行為例，碩士論文，東海大學高階經營管理碩士在職專班，2014。
張思嘉、周玉慧、黃宗堅，新婚夫妻的婚姻適應：概念測量與模式檢驗，中華心理學刊，50卷4期， P425 – 446，2008。
邱皓政，結構方程模式-LISREL/SIMPLIS 原理與應用(二版)，雙葉書廊有限公司，2011。
臺南市政府，臺南市大眾捷運系統整體路網評估（先進運輸系統）整體路網評估報告，2022。
臺南市政府，臺南市先進運輸(大眾捷運)系統第一期藍線建設及周邊土地開發計畫-綜合規劃報告書，2022。
鮑玨蓉，Facebook使用意圖影響因素之探討-科技接受模式與社會資本整合性觀點，碩士論文，國立成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程，2011。
歐勁麟，以科技接受模式探討智慧型手機購買之行為意圖-以iPhone手機為例，碩士論文，國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士在職專班，2012。
陳芊灼，乘客搭乘高雄捷運滿意度影響因素之分析，碩士論文，國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文，2007。
陳怡靜，影響捷運運量因素之探討-以高雄捷運為例，碩士論文，國立中山大學經濟學研究所，2014。
陳峯鳴，人格特質與危險駕駛行為之關連性研究，碩士論文，國立成功大學交通管理科學系碩士在職專班，2020。
陳寬裕、王正華，論文統計分析實務SPSS與AMOS的運用(四版)，五南圖書出版公司，2021。
蕭宇軒，影響大眾運輸使用因素之研究，碩士論文，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩博士班，2010。
Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi,Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science volume 16, pp.74–94. 1988.
Bollen, K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. 1989.
Boomsma, A. and Hoogland, J.J. Robustness Studies in Covariance Structure Modeling: An Overview and a Meta-Analysis. 1982.
Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K., Travel Demand and The 3Ds: Density and Design, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3): 199-219. 1997.
Costa, T., & McCrae, R. R.P. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychololgical Assessment Resources. 1985.
Costa, T., & McCrae, R. R.P. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychololgical Assessment Resources. 1985.
Costa, T., & McCrae, R. R.P. Professional manual for the NEO PI-R and. Odessa, FL: Psychololgical Assessment Resources. 1985.
Costa, T., & McCrae, R. R.P. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). 1992.
Cronbach, L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, pp.297-334. 1951.
Davis, F.D. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1986
Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.319-339. 1989.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., and Torkzadeh, G. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), pp.357-369. 1994.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1975.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 39-50 1981.
Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. H. Agreeableness: a dimension of personality. Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 795-824. 1997.
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods. 1942.
Hair, J. A. Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Upper Saddle River, Prentice-Hall. 2006.
Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. Conscientiousness and integrity at work. Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego ,CA: Academic Press. Pp.849-870. 1997.
John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. The big five trait taxonomy : history measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp.102-138). New York: Gulidford. 1999.
Joreskog, & Sobom. LISREL 6: Analysis of linear stuctures. Biomstrila, 57, 239-251. 1992.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193-210. 1997.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Trait explanations. European Journal of Personality, 9 , pp. 231-252. 1995.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 2004.
Sun, Guibo, Zacharias, John, Ma, Ben and Oreskovic, Nicolas M. How do metro stations integrate with walking environments? Results from walking access within three types og built environment in Beijing, Cities, 56: 91-98. 2016.
Taylor, S. & Todd, P. A. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research, 6(2), pp.144-176. 1995.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), pp.157-178. 2012.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204. 2000.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. Extraversion and its positive emotional core. Handbook of Personality psychology. San Fiego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 761-793. 1997.
臺北大眾捷運股份有限公司，https://www.metro.taipei/
全國法規資料庫，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=K0120001
高雄捷運股份有限公司，https://corp.krtc.com.tw/
臺南市政府捷運工程處，https://traffic-tsb.tainan.gov.tw/RTO
交通部統計查詢網，https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100