簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林千琪
Lin, Chien-Chi
論文名稱: 高科技產業共同研發行為之研究-歐盟與台灣競爭法比較
A Study of Joint R&D in High-Tech Industries:From the Perspectives of Competition Law in European Union and Taiwan
指導教授: 陳俊仁
Chen, Chun-Jen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 科技法律研究所
Institute of Law in Science and Technology
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 124
外文關鍵詞: Article 81 of the EC Treaty, Taiwan Fair Trade Commission, Article 81(3) of the EC Treaty, hardcore restrictions, R&D Block Exemption, EC Competition Law, joint R&D, block exemption, Taiwan Fair Trade Law
相關次數: 點閱:157下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Traditionally, Taiwan’s economic growth depends upon labor-intensive manufacturing industries, but nowadays it greatly relies on high-tech industries. To meet the global competition, high-tech technology has to undertaken innovation in each aspect: management, product, manufacture process, marketing and services, etc.
    Joint R&D is a popular solution to provide continuous innovation. A joint R&D by definition is a joint action. In Taiwan, such joint action is subject to the approval of Fair Trade Commission before executing. However, the procedural requirements for application of approval of exceptions are simply burdensome and time-consuming (an average of three months, and subject to a three-month extension, if deemed necessary). Let alone the time required for preparing for the cumbersome application documents, the waiting period for processing the review by the Fair Trade Commission usually lasts for more than two months and may be as long as six months. Corporations (Corporate participants) who undertake joint action must wait until the approval of the Fair Trade Commission before proceeding to joint R&D. Obviously, this system of advance review for approval is not in line with the rapid change in the high-tech industries. It goes without saying that this system will affect the advancement of the high-tech industries.
    Thus, the Thesis recommends that joint R&D should not be regarded as the joint actions as prescribed under the anti-competition laws. A block exemption system should be adopted to better serve the industrial needs, which in turn will benefit the national economy and the society as a whole. Thus, this Thesis calls for the reform of Article 14 and proposes of amendments Article 14-1 of the Taiwan Fair Trade Law.
    In addition, the joint R&D Block Exemption originally provided by the EC in 1971 may serve as a guideline. After execution for a period of 30 years and being revised in 2000, the rules are defined more clearly and complete. Accordingly, this Thesis incorporates the EC block exemption as a basis, and excludes some special rules which are only applied to the EC to propose a Taiwan joint R&D Block Exemption Regulation.

    ABSTRACT I CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purposes of the Research 1 1.2 Research Scope and Methods 2 1.3 Framework 3 CHAPTER 2 JOINT R&D IN HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES 4 2.1 High-Tech Industries in Taiwan 4 2.2 The Advantages of Joint R&D in High-Tech Industries 5 2.2.1 Setting Standard 5 2.2.2 Keeping Pace with Technological Changes 7 2.2.3 Obtaining Capital and Share the Risk 10 2.2.4 Accessing the Global Market 11 CHAPTER 3 THE HISTORY AND THE COMPETITION LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 13 3.1 The History and Growth of the European Union 13 3.2 The Institutions of the EC 14 3.2.1 The Council 14 3.2.2 The Commission 15 3.2.3 Parliament 17 3.2.6 The Court of First Instance 18 3.2.7 The Court of Justice 18 3.2.8 The Competition Authorities of the Member States 19 3.2.9 National Courts 22 3.3 The EC Competition Law 23 3.3.1 Introduction 23 3.3.2 Article 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty 24 CHAPTER 4 ARTICLE 81 OF EC TREATY 28 4.1 The Definition of Undertaking 30 4.2 Forms of Prohibited Conduct 31 4.2.1 Agreement 31 4.2.2 Decisions by Associations of Undertakings 34 4.2.3 Concerted Practices 35 4.2.4 Distinction Between Concerted Practices and Agreements 36 4.3 Restriction of Competition 37 4.3.1 Restriction by Object or Effect 37 4.3.2 Appreciable Restriction of Competition 41 CHAPTER 5 EXEMPTION FROM THE PROHIBITION – ARTICLE 81(3) OF THE EC TREATY 45 5.1 Introduction 45 5.2 General Principles 45 (a) Four Substantive Conditions are all Fullfilled 46 (b) Hardcore Restrictions 46 5.3 The Application of the Four Conditions of Article 81(3) 47 5.3.1 First Condition: Efficiency Gains 48 5.3.2 Second Condition: Fair Share for Consumers 51 5.3.3 Third Condition: Indispensability of the Restrictions 57 5.3.4 Fourth Condition: No Elimination of Competition 59 5.4 Block Exemptions 61 CHAPTER 6 R&D BLOCK EXEMPTION IN THE EC 63 6.1 Introduction 63 6.2 The Horizontal Guidelines for Assessing Whether an R&D Agreement falls within Article 81(1) 64 6.2.1 Agreements that Generally Do Not Constitute a Restriction or Distortion of Competition under Article 81(1) 65 6.2.2 Agreements That Almost Always Constitute a Restriction or Distortion of Competition under Article 81(1) 67 6.2.3 Factors Used to Determine Whether R&D Agreements Constitute a Restriction or Distortion of Competition under Article 81(1) 68 6.3 R&D Agreements Block Exemption 71 6.3.1 Prerequisites for the Grant of the Exemption 71 6.3.2 Threshold Conditions for Exemption 72 6.3.3 Market Share Threshold and Duration of Exemption 75 6.3.4 Hardcore Restrictions 79 6.3.5 Scope of the Exemption - Ancillary Restrictions Covered 83 6.3.6 Withdrawal of the Exemption 84 6.4 The Horizontal Guidelines for Assessing Whether an R&D Agreement falls within Article 81(3) 85 6.4.1 Creation of Benefits that are Passed on to Consumers 86 6.4.2 No Elimination of Competition 87 6.4.3 Time of the Assessment and Duration of the Individual Exemption 88 CHAPTER 7 THE REGULATIONS IN TERMS OF JOINT R&D UNDER TAIWAN FAIR TRADE LAW 89 7.1 Introduction 89 7.2 The Conditions of Joint Action 90 (a) Horizontal Competing Undertakings 91 (b) Mutual Understanding 92 (c) The Specific Contents 93 (d) Which Would Affect the Market Function 93 7.3 The Conditions for Legal Exception 94 (a) The Actions Must be Helpful and Beneficial to Whole Economic and Public Interests 95 (b) Forms of Legal Exception 95 (c) Prior Approval by Fair Trade Commission 97 7.4 The Conditions of Joint R&D for Legal Exception 98 CHAPTER 8 THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TAIWAN FAIR TRADE LAW AND EC COMPETITION LAW AND THE POSSIBILITY TO ADOPT R&D BLOCK EXEMPTION REGULATION IN TAIWAN 101 8.1 The Comparison between Taiwan Fair Trade Law and EC Competition Law 101 8.1.1 The Comparison in Terms of Article 14 of the Taiwan Trade Law and Article 81 of the EC Treaty 101 8.1.2 The Comparison of Execution 106 8.2 The Possibility to Adopt R&D Block Exemption Regulation in Taiwan 108 8.2.1 Proposed Amendments of the Fair Trade Law Concerning Joint Action 110 8.2.2 Proposed Joint R&D Block Exemption Regulation 112 CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSION 118 BIBLIOGRAPHY 121

    I. Books
    BROWN, LIONEL NEVILLE, THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1989).
    Bael, Ivo Van, Competition Law of the European Community (2007).
    Court of First Instance, The Court of First Instance of the European Communities (2008).
    Court of Justice of the European Communities, The Court of Justice: Composition, jurisdiction and procedures (2007).
    Court of Justice of the European Communities, Your Questions on the Court of justice of European Communities (2007).
    Chiang, Ping-Chun, The New Introduction on Fair Trade Law (Edited by Yuan-Ho Lai), Angle Publishing Co., Ltd. (2005).
    (姜炳俊, 聯合行為規範,收錄於公平交易法新論(賴源河編審),元照出版公司,2005。)
    Council, Council of the European Union & General Secretariat of the, The Council of the European Union's rules of procedure and organization of its proceedings (2007).
    Dabbah, Maher M., EC and UK Competition Law: Commentary, Cases and Materials (2004).
    European Commission, Key facts and figures about Europe and the Europeans (2007).
    European Commission, European Commission 2007-09 (2007).
    European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee (2007).
    European Commission, The European Parliament (2007).
    European Commission, EU competition policy and the consumer (2004).
    Folsom, Ralph H., European Union Law in a nutshell (2005).
    Hovenkamp, Herbert & Janis ,Mark D., IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law (2007).
    Kirkwood, John B., Antitrust law and economics (2004).
    Korah, Valentine, An Introductory Guide To EC Competition Law And Practice (2007).
    Lemley, Mark A., Software and Internet Law (2001).
    Liao Yi-Nan, The Theory of Fair Trade Law, San-Min Book Co., Ltd. (1995).
    (廖義男,公平法之理論,三民書局,1995。)
    MARK A. LEMLEY, SOFTWARE AND INTERNET LAW (2001).
    McCormick, John, Understanding the European Union: A Concise Introduction (2005).
    Ritter, Lennart, European Competition Law: A Practitioner's Guide (2004).
    Warleigh, Alex, European Union: the Basics (2004).
    Wang Du-Cun, Taiwan Fair Trade Law, Wunan Book Co., Ltd. (2007).
    (汪渡村, 公平交易法,五南圖書,2007。)

    II. Periodicals
    Albertina, Albors-Llorens, Horizontal agreements and concerted practices in EC competition law: Unlawful and legitimate contacts between competitors, 51 The Antitrust Bull. (2006).
    Basedow, Jrgen, The Modernization of European Competition Law: A Story of Unfinished Concepts, 42 Tex. Int'l. L.J. (2007).
    Baldi, Livio, Sharing the wealth of the joint R&D, 4 Electronic Engineering Times (2005).
    Brenner, Alfred E., Moore's Law, 275 Science (1997).
    Chen, Ming-Yu, Semiconductor Industry Development, 33 Semiconductor Equipment Quarterly (2008).
    (陳銘煜,半導體產業發展,半導體設備季刊, 第33卷,2008。)
    Dolamns, Maurits, Standards for standards, 26 Fordham International Law Journal (2002).
    Edgington, David W., The Japanese Innovation System: University-Industry Linkages, 2 Small Firms and Regional Technology (2008).
    Fan, Chien Te & Chuang, Chuen-Fa, A study on the Guidances to Review the exemption of joint R&D regulation, 12 Fair Trade Law Quarterly (2004).
    (范建得、莊春發,有關事業共同研發之聯合行為例外許可申請審查原則之研究,公平交易季刊, 第二十卷第四期,2004年10月。)
    Hagedoorn, John, A Note on International Market Leaders and Networks of Strategic Technology Partnering, 16 Strategic Management Journal (1995).
    Huang, Mie-Chi, High Technology Industries Introduction, 33 Semiconductor Equipment Quarterly (2008).
    (黃美琪,高科技產業介紹,半導體設備季刊, 第33卷,2008。)
    Kanter, Rosabeth M., Collaboration Advantage, 96 Harv. Bus, Rev. (1994).
    Mller, Felix, The New Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition, 5 German L. J. (2004).
    Pitofsky, Robert, Antitrust and High-tech Industries: A New Challenge, 43 Antitrust Bull. (1998).
    Shapiro, Carl, Information Rules: A strategic Guide to the Network, 13 Economy Harv. Bus. Rev. (1999).
    Sufrin, Brenda, The evolution of Article 81(3) of the EC Treaty, 51 Antitrust Bull. 915, 917 (2006).
    Tsai, Tian-Yu, 2008 Biotechnology Review, 25 Taiwan Biotechnology Industry Quarterly 139, 144 (2008).
    (蔡田裕,2008 生技回顧,台灣生技季刊, 第25卷,2008。)
    Wu, Chi-Chih, 2008 High Technology Industries Review, 33 Semiconductor Equipment Quarterly (2008).
    (吳谿志,2008 高科技產業回顧,半導體設備季刊, 第33卷,2008。)
    Wu, Wen-Wen, Semiconductor Industries News, 33 Semiconductor Equipment Quarterly (2008).
    (吳文文,半導體產業新聞,半導體設備季刊, 第33卷,2008。)

    下載圖示 校內:2011-02-10公開
    校外:2011-02-10公開
    QR CODE