簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林委正
Lin, Wei-jeng
論文名稱: 藥師介入抗生素不當使用之成效 - 以血液培養污染菌為例
Intervention of pharmacist on inappropriate use of antibiotics in blood culture contamination
指導教授: 柯文謙
Ko, Wen-Chien
高雅慧
Yang, Yea-Huei Kao
廖麗香
Liao, Li-Hsiang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 臨床藥學研究所
Institute of Clinical Pharmacy
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 117
中文關鍵詞: 血液培養污染偽菌血症藥師介入抗生素不適當使用
外文關鍵詞: blood culture, contamination, pharmacist, inappropriate use, pseudobacteremia, antibiotic, intervention
相關次數: 點閱:166下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • (一) 研究背景

      菌血症為所有細菌感染中最為嚴重的感染,而血液培養是唯一能確立菌血症診斷的依據。然而,採血過程中常受皮膚表面菌叢污染,而導致培養結果誤判及抗生素的不適當使用。過去有關臨床判讀血液培養結果為污染或確實感染的標準,卻以臨床醫師是否使用抗生素治療為依據,且這些標準缺乏實際臨床介入的研究證實。本研究參考過去相關判別標準與感染科醫師之意見,訂定一套處置流程及判別標準,以藥師實際臨床介入探討其對抗生素使用之影響及介入之成效。

    (二)研究目的

    1.了解藥師介入對節制血液培養污染導致抗生素不當使用之影響,探討的重點包括抗生素使用天數、使用量、花費,及醫師之處置行為。
    2.了解藥師介入抗生素之使用對病患死亡率及住院情形之影響。

    (三)研究方法

    研究分實驗組及對照組進行分析及比較:
    1.實驗組-採前瞻性介入方式:(1)擬訂懷疑血液培養污染處置流程,於各病房宣導。(2)針對2004年2月至5月間血液培養結果為常見血液培養污染菌(簡稱「偽菌血症」)之個案,進行個別追蹤,對不適當處置之個案作建議性之介入。
    2.對照組-採回溯性評估方式:針對2003年2月至5月間血液培養結果為常見血液培養污染菌之個案,進行病歷查閱分析,評估醫師處方抗生素情形、加作血液培養或照會感染科醫師情形,及抗生素使用天數、花費。
    3.結果評估-比較兩組偽菌血症病患抗生素使用率、使用天數及花費、醫師加作血液培養率,以及病患之死亡率及住院情形。

    (四)研究結果

    實驗組與對照組分別收納106位病患,其中偽菌血症病患分別有91位及87位。血液培養污染率分別為86%及82%。實驗組加護病房病患比率明顯較對照組少(23% v.s. 37%,p=0.046)。在比較兩組之抗生素使用率時,實驗組抗生素使用率明顯較對照組少(33% v.s. 49%,p=0.026)。個別分析非加護病房病患,則發現實驗組之抗生素使用率明顯較對照組少(34% v.s. 56%,p=0.014)。實驗組病患於血液培養報告日後抗生素使用天數明顯較對照組短(中位數3.5天v.s. 5.0天,p=0.022),而抗生素使用量及花費則有下降趨勢,但未達統計上顯著差異之程度。實驗組與對照組病患在報告日後第7天及第14天之死亡率、住院率、出院率皆無顯著差異。顯示藥師介入抗生素使用,並未影響到病患之預後。醫師之處置方面,實驗組加作血液培養率明顯較對照組高(34% v.s. 21%,p=0.046),有使用抗生素之病患加作血液培養率增加更為明顯(63% v.s. 16%,p<0.001)。

    (五)結論
      藥師介入能降低非加護病房偽菌血症病患之抗生素使用率,即使對於使用抗生素之病患,亦能縮短其抗生素使用天數。醫師處置方面,藥師之介入提升了臨床醫師加作血液培養確認之比率,特別是在使用抗生素病患。病患死亡率及住院情形並不會因藥師介入而顯著改變。

    OBJECTIVE
      To assess if pharmacist’s intervention reduces inappropriate uses of antibiotics in blood culture contamination, and to know the impact of pharmacist intervention on patients’ outcomes.

    DESIGN
      This study was a prospective intervention protocol using historical group as control. We developed a management guideline for adult cases with suspected pseudobacteremia. The management guideline was advocated in the inpatient wards in National Cheng-Kung University Hospital in February 2004. From February 2004 to May 2004, the pharmacist followed the patients with positive blood cultures of common contaminants. The pharmacist gave suggestions to physicians if their managements did not comply with the guideline. Moreover, the medical charts of adult cases with pseudobacteremia during February 2003 to May 2003 were reviewed, regarding as the control group. The antibiotic uses and the outcomes of patients with pseudobacteremia were compared.

    SETTING
    National Cheng-Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.

    RESULTS
      Each of the intervention group and the control group enrolled 106 cases. Ninety-one patients in the intervention group and 87 in the control group were considered to have pseudobacteremia, with similar contamination rates of 86% and 82%, respectively. The proportion of patients in the intensive care units (ICU) was significantly less in the intervention group (23% v.s. 37%, p=0.046). Antibiotics were prescribed less frequently in the intervention group (33% v.s. 49%, p=0.026), and a similar result was noted for the non-ICU patients in the intervention group (34% v.s. 56%, p=0.014). Among those with pseudobacteremia treated with antimicrobial agents, the duration of antibiotic therapy in the intervention group was shorter (median duration, 3.5 v.s. 5.0 days, p=0.022). Repetition of blood cultures at the availability of results of initial blood cultures occurred more often in the intervention group (34% v.s. 21%, p=0.046), especially among the cases with antibiotic therapy (63% v.s. 16%, p<0.001). Clinical outcomes, such as case mortality rate, hospitalization rate or discharge rate at day 7 or day 14 were not significantly different between the two groups.

    CONCLUSION
      Antimicrobial agents are quite frequently used for cases with contaminated blood cultures. In cases with suspected pseudobacteremia, pharmacist intervention based on established guidelines can decrease the unnecessary prescriptions of antimicrobial agents. For those using antibiotics, pharmacist intervention can reduce the duration of usage. Such interventions do not affect their clinical outcomes.

    中文摘要 I 英文摘要 III 誌謝 V 縮寫 VI 目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 壹 研究背景 1 貳 研究目的 3 參 文獻回顧 4 一. 血液培養之適應症及流程 4 二. 常見血液培養污染菌及其所導致的問題 10 三. 判讀血液培養結果為污染或真實感染 12 四. 血液培養污染所導致之醫療資源花費 22 肆 研究方法 37 伍 研究結果 48 一. 培養結果菌種分佈及污染率 45 二. 偽菌血症病患抗生素使用情形 50 三. 偽菌血症病患Glycopeptide類抗生素使用情形 53 四. 死亡率與住院情形 55 五. 醫師對於培養結果之處置 57 陸 討論 78 一. 判別標準與血液培養污染率 78 二. 抗生素使用情形 81 三. 死亡率與住院情形 87 四. 醫師對於培養結果之處置 89 五. 本研究與其他研究之比較 92 六. 藥師介入抗生素不當使用之角色 97 七. 藥師介入抗生素不當使用所遭遇之困難 99 八. 研究限制 101 柒 結論 104 捌 建議 105 玖 未來的研究方向 106 壹拾 參考文獻 107 壹拾壹 附錄 114

    1. Ammendolia M G, Dosa R D, Montanaro L, Arciola C R, Baldassarri L. Slime production and expression of the slime-associated antigen by staphylococcal clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3235-8
    2. Andriole V T, Lyons R W. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus. Ann NY Acad Sci 1970;174:533-44
    3. Arciola C R, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol 39;2151-6
    4. Arnold F W, McDonald L C, Newman D, Smith R S, Ramirez J A. Improving antimicrobial use: longitudinal assessment of an antimicrobial team including a clinical pharmacist. J Manag Care Pharm 2004;10:152-8
    5. Arpi M, Gahrn-Hansen B, Rosdahl V T. Contaminating coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated in a lysis-centrifugation (IsolatorÒ) blood culture system: Application of different epidemiological markers for deduction of mode of contamination. APMIS 1988;96:611-7
    6. Bates D W, Cook E F, Goldman L, and Lee T H. Predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients: a prospectively validated model. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:495-500
    7. Bates D W, Lee G, Lee T H. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA 1991;265:365-9
    8. Bates D W, Lee T H. Rapid classification of positive blood cultures. Prospective validation of a multivariate algorithm. JAMA 1992;267:1962-6
    9. Bennett I L, Beeson RB. Bacteremia: a consideration of some experimental and clinical aspects. Yale J Biol Med 1954;262:241-62
    10. Boisson K, Thouverez M, Talon D, Bertrand X. Characterisation of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood infections: incidence, susceptibility to glycopeptides, and molecular epidemiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:660-665
    11. Bryant J K, Strand C L. Reliability of blood cultures collected from intravascular catheter versus venipuncture. Am J Clin Pathol 1987;88:113-6
    12. Cotton D J, Gill V J, Marshall D J, et al. Clinical features and therapeutic interventions in 17 cases of bacillus bacteremia in an immunosuppressed patient population. J Clin Microbiol 1987;25:672-4
    13. Dobins B M, Kite P, Kindon A, McMahon J M, Wilcox M H. DNA fingerprinting analysis of coagulase-negative staphylococci implicated in catheter related bloodstream infections. J Clin Pathol 2002;55:824-8
    14. Dunagan W C, Woodward RS, Medoff G, Gray J L, Casabar E, Smith M D, et al. Antimicrobial misuse in patients with positive blood cultures. Am J Med 1989;87:253-9
    15. Esel D, Doganay M, Alp E, Sumerkan B. Prospective evaluation of blood cultures in a Turkish university hospital: epidemiology, microbiology and patient outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9:1038-44
    16. Finkelstein R, Fusman R, Oren I, Kassis I, Hashman N. Clinical and epidemiologic significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteremia in a tertiary care university Israeli hospital. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:21-5
    17. Garcia P, Benitez R, Lam M, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: clinical, microbiological and molecular features to predict true bacteraemia. J Med Microbiol 2004;53:67-72
    18. Gibb A P, Hill B, Chorel B, Brant R. Reduction in blood culture contamination rate by feedback to phlebotomists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:503-7
    19. Gross P A, Barrett T L, Dellinger E P, et al. Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:189-92
    20. Herwaldt L A, Geissa M, Kao C, Pfaller M A. The positive predictive value of isolating coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:14-20
    21. Huebner J, Goldmann D A. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Annu Rev Med 1999;50:223-36
    22. Isaacman D J, Karasic R B. Lack of effect of changing needles on contamination of blood cultures. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990;9:274-8
    23. Khatib R, Riederer K M, Clark J A, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococci in multiple blood cultures: strain relatedness and determinations of same-strain bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:816-20
    24. Kim S, McDonald L C, Jarvis W R, et al. Determining the significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures at a community hospital: A role for species and strain identification. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:213-7
    25. Kirchhoff L V, Sheagren J N. Epidemiology and clinical significance of blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus. Infect Control 1985;6:479-86
    26. Kitao T. Survey of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from the fingers of nursing students. J Infect Chemother 2003;9:30-4
    27. Knox K, Lawson W, Dean B, Holmes A. Multidisciplinary antimicrobial management and the role of the infectious diseases pharmacist – a UK perspective. J Hosp Infect 2003;53:85-90
    28. Konig C, Schwank S, Blaser J. Factors compromising antibiotic activity against biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001;20:20-6
    29. Levin P D. Routine surveillance blood cultures: their place in the management of critically ill patients. J Infect 1997;35:125-8
    30. Levin P D, Hersch M, Rudensky B, Yinnon A M. The use of the arterial line as a source for blood cultures. Intensive Care Med 2000;26:1350-4
    31. Li J, Plorde J J, Carlson L G. Effects of volume and periodicity on blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:2829-31
    32. Link H, Bohme A, Cornely O A, et al. Antimicrobial therapy of unexplained fever in neutropenic patients. Ann Hematol 2003;82 suppl 2:S105-17
    33. Little J R, Murray P R, Traynor P S, Spitznagel E. A randomized trial of povidone-iodine compared with iodine tincture for venipuncture site disinfection: effects on rates of blood culture contamination. Am J Med 1999;107:119-25
    34. MacGregor R R, Beaty H N. Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Arch Intern Med 1972;130:84-7
    35. Madarasa-Kelly K. Optimizing antibiotic use in hospitals: the role of population-based antibiotic surveillance in limiting antibiotic resistance. Insights from the society of infectious diseases pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy 2003;23:1627-33
    36. Martin M A, Pfaller M A, Wenzel R P. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia. Mortality and hospital stay. Ann Intern Med 1989;110:9-161
    37. Matsumoto S, Suenaga H, Naito K, Sawazaki M, Hiramatsu T, Agata N. Management of suspected nosocomial infection: an audit of 19 hospitalized patients with septicemia caused by Bacillus species. Jpn J Infect Dis 2000;53:196-202
    38. Mermel L A, Maki D G. Detection of bacteremia in adults: consequences of culturing an inadequate volume of blood. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:270-2
    39. Mimoz O, Karim A, Mercat A, et al. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine as skin preparation before blood culture: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:834-7
    40. Mirrett S, Weinstein M P, Reimer L G, Wilson M L, Reller L B. Relevance of the number of positive bottles in determining clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3279-81
    41. Mylotte J M, Tayara A. Blood cultures: clinical aspects and controversies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;19:157-63
    42. Peacock S J, Bowler I C J W, Crook D W M. Positive predictive value of blood cultures growing coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet 1995;346:191-2
    43. Rupp M E, Archer G L. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: pathogens associated with medical progress. Clin Infect Dis 1994;19:231-45
    44. Schifman R B, Pindur A. The effect of skin disinfection materials on reducing blood culture contamination. Am J Clin Pathol 1993;99:536-8
    45. Schifman R B, Strand C L, Meier F A, Howanitz P J. Blood culture contamination. A college of American pathologists Q-probes study involving 640 institutions and 497134 specimens from adult patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:216-21
    46. Schulin T, Voss A. Coagulase-negative staphylococci as a cause of infections related to intravascular prosthetic devices: limitations of present therapy. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7 suppl 4:1-7
    47. Seifert H, Cornely O, Seffewiss K, et al. Bloodstream infection in neutropenic cancer patients related to short-term nontunnelled catheters determined by quantitative blood cultures, differential time to positivity, and molecular epidemiological typing with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:118-23
    48. Seo S K, Venkataraman L, DeGirolami P C, Samore M H. Molecular typing of coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood cultures dose not correlate with clinical criteria for true bacteremia. Am J Med 2000;109:697-704
    49. Sharma M, Riederer K, Johnson L B, Khatib R. Molecular analysis of coagulase-negative staphylococcus isolates from blood cultures: prevalence of genotypic variation and polyclonal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:1317-23
    50. Souvenir D, Anderson D E, Palpant S, Mroch H, Askin S, Anderson J, et al. Blood culture positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1923-6
    51. Strand C L, Wajsbort R R, Sturmann K. Effect of iodophor vs iodine tincture skin preparation on blood culture contamination rate. JAMA 1993;269:1004-6
    52. Thylefors J D, Harbarth S, Pittet D. Increasing bacteremia due to coagulase-negative staphylococci: fiction or reality? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:581-9
    53. Trautner B W, Clarridge J E, Darouiche R O. Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:397-401
    54. Washington J A. Blood cultures: principles and techniques. Mayo Clin Proc 1975;50:91-8
    55. Weinstein M P, Reller L B, Murphy J R, Lichtenstein K A. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5:35-53
    56. Weinstein M P, Towns M L, Quartey S M, Mirrett S, Reimer L G, Parmigiani G, et al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:584-602
    57. Weinstein M P. Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:2275-8
    58. Widdowson W M, Walker L, Havill J H, Sleigh J W. Microbial contamination of three-way taps on arterial lines. Anaesth Intens Care 1998;26:51-5
    59. Wilson M L, Weinstein M P, Mirrett S, et al. Comparison of iodophor and alcohol pledgets with the Medi-Flex Blood Culture Prep Kit II for preventing contamination of blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:4665-7

    下載圖示 校內:2005-08-09公開
    校外:2005-08-09公開
    QR CODE