| 研究生: |
潘詩瑞 Prasertpol, Natnaree |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
Impact of Green Investment on Sourcing Strategies under Cap and Trade Regulation Impact of Green Investment on Sourcing Strategies under Cap and Trade Regulation |
| 指導教授: |
謝中奇
Hsieh, Chung-Chi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系 Department of Industrial and Information Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 38 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Sourcing strategy, Co-opetition, Cap and trade, Green investment |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:127 下載:10 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
This research investigates the environmental-friendly sourcing decision of a manufacturer under the carbon cap and trade regulation. The manufacturer can purchase the component from either a non-competing supplier (NS) who has a limited capital for carbon emissions abatement or an abundant competing supplier (CS) who is more willing to cut the carbon emissions, but sells substitutable products in the end consumer market. In addition, we examine under what scenarios the manufacturer should support the NS in reducing carbon emissions.
We develop three models which consider the suppliers' investments in reducing carbon emissions as well as the consumers' environmental awareness: the competition, the integration, and the co-opetition models. The manufacturer purchases the parts from the NS in the first two models, but in the integration model, it cooperates with the NS to reduce carbon emissions. For the co-opetition model, the manufacturer switches to buying the parts from the CS. Through the numerical analysis, we found that whether co-opetition occurs is solely dependent on the manufacturer's decision. The co-opetition model is beneficial to the manufacturer under some conditions, while the CS always gains a greater profit compared with the other models since its carbon emission abatement can generate a higher price and extra revenue from the sales of leftover carbon. Otherwise, the manufacturer switches to the integration model. Furthermore, the carbon abatement level of the CS has no effect on the manufacturer's product quantity and profit in the co-opetition model.
An, S., Li, B., Song, D., and Chen, X. (2021). Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(1):125–142.
Arya, A., Mittendorf, B., and Sappington, D. E. M. (2007). The bright side of supplier encroachment. Marketing Science, 26:651–659.
Bian, J. and Zhao, X. (2020). Competitive environmental sourcing strategies in supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 230.
Cao, E., Du, L., and Ruan, J. (2019). Financing preferences and performance for an emission-dependent supply chain: Supplier vs. bank. International Journal of Production Economics, 208:383–399.
Chen, X., Wang, X., and Xia, Y. (2019). Production coopetition strategies for competing manufacturers that produce partially substitutable products. Production and Operations Management, 28(6):1446–1464.
Ding, H., Zhao, Q., An, Z., and Tang, O. (2016). Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps. International Journal of Production Economics, 181:191–207.
Dong, B., Tang, W., Zhou, C., and Ren, Y. (2021). Is dual sourcing a better choice? the impact of reliability improvement and contract manufacturer encroachment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149.
Dong, C., Shen, B., Chow, P.-S., Yang, L., and Ng, C. T. (2014). Sustainability
investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2):509–531.
Fang, L. and Xu, S. (2020). Financing equilibrium in a green supply chain with capital constraint. Computers Industrial Engineering, 143.
Ghosh, D. and Shah, J. (2012). A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2):568–583.
Ghosh, D. and Shah, J. (2015). Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. International Journal of Production Economics, 164:319–329.
Gu, C., Wei, J., and Wei, Y. (2021). Sourcing under competition: The implications of supplier capital constraint and supply chain co-opetition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149.
Guo, S., Choi, T.-M., and Shen, B. (2020). Green product development under competition: A study of the fashion apparel industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 280(2):523–538.
Heese, H. S., Kemahlioglu-Ziya, E., and Perdikaki, O. (2020). Outsourcing under competition and scale economies: When to choose a competitor as a supplier. Decision Science, 52(5):1209–1241.
Hong, Z. and Guo, X. (2019). Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega, 83:155–166.
IEA (2021). Co2 emissions by sector, world 1990-2019. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data browser/country=WORLD\&fuel=CO2\%20emissions&indicator=CO2BySector.
Inderst, G., Kaminker, C., and Stewart, F. (2012). Defining and measuring green investments: Implications for institutional investors’ asset allocations. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, 24.
Jiang, S., Ye, F., and Lin, Q. (2021). Managing green innovation investment in a co-opetitive supply chain under capital constraint. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291.
Kuiti, M. R., Ghosh, D., Basu, P., and Bisi, A. (2020). Do cap-and-trade policies drive environmental and social goals in supply chains: Strategic decisions, collaboration, and contract choices. International Journal of Production Economics, 223.
Lee, J.-Y. and Choi, S. (2021). Supply chain investment and contracting for carbon emissions reduction: A social planner’s perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 231.
Lee, K.-H., Min, B., and Yook, K.-H. (2015). The impacts of carbon (co2) emissions and environmental research and development (rd) investment on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 167:1–11.
Lee, S. and Park, S. J. (2020). Who should lead carbon emissions reductions? upstream vs. downstream firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 230.
Li, D., Chen, J., and Liao, Y. (2021). Outsourcing strategy in the presence of the customer returns. International Journal of Production Economics, 240.
Li, W. and Zhao, X. (2021). Competition or coopetition? equilibrium analysis in the presence of process improvement. European Journal of Operational Research.
Li, Z., Gilbert, S. M., and Lai, G. (2013). Supplier encroachment under asymmetric information. 60(2):449–462.
Niu, B., Li, J., Zhang, J., Cheng, H. K., and Tan, Y. R. (2019). Strategic analysis of dual sourcing and dual channel with an unreliable alternative supplier. Production and Operations Management, 28(3):570–587.
Raz, G., Druehl, C. T., and Blass, V. (2013). Design for the environment: Life-cycle approach using a newsvendor model. Production and Operations Management, 22(4):940–957.
Shen, Y., Su, Z. W., Malik, M. Y., Umar, M., Khan, Z., and Khan, M. (2021). Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? a provincial panel analysis of china. Sci Total Environ, 755(Pt 2):142538.
Sim, J., El Ouardighi, F., and Kim, B. (2019). Economic and environmental impacts of vertical and horizontal competition and integration. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 66(2):133–153.
Song, H. and Gao, X. (2018). Green supply chain game model and analysis under revenue-sharing contract. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170:183–192.
TSMC (2021). Tsmc commits to reach net zero emissions by 2050, acting on responsibility to environmental sustainability. https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/2865.
UNCC (2015). The paris agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/
the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement.
Unilever (2021). Climate action strategy and goals. https://www.unilever.com/planet-and-society/climate-action/strategy-and-goals/.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2019). Sustainable innovation: Pushing the boundaries of traditional operations management. Production and Operations Management, 28(12):2930–2945.
Venkatesh, R., Chintagunta, P., and Mahajan, V. (2006). Research note—sole entrant, co-optor, or component supplier: Optimal end-product strategies for manufacturers of proprietary component brands. Management Science, 52(4):613–622.
Wang, Y., Niu, B., and Guo, P. (2013). On the advantage of quantity leadership when outsourcing production to a competitive contract manufacturer. Production and Operations Management, 22(1):104–119.
Wei, K. and Gu, W. (2018). Apple launches new clean energy fund in china. https://www.apple.com/hk/en/newsroom/2018/07/apple-launches-new-clean-energy-fund-in-china/. Accessed: 2021-09-30.
Xu, J., Chen, Y., and Bai, Q. (2016). A two-echelon sustainable supply chain coordination under cap-and-trade regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135:42–56.
Xu, X., He, P., Xu, H., and Zhang, Q. (2017). Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap andtrade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 183:433–442.
Xu, Y., Gurnani, H., and Desiraju, R. (2010). Strategic supply chain structure design for a proprietary component manufacturer. Production and Operations Management, 19(4):371–389.
Yang, L., Zheng, C., and Xu, M. (2014). Comparisons of low carbon policies in supply chain coordination. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 23(3):342–361.