簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郝嘉萱
Hao, Chia-Hsuan
論文名稱: 跨國併購與公司現金持有:以亞洲九國為例
Cross-border M&As and Corporate Cash Reserves: Evidence of Nine Asian Countries
指導教授: 陳嬿如
Chen, Yenn-Ru
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 國有企業家族控股公司所有權亞洲現金持有跨國併購
外文關鍵詞: cross-border M&As, cash reserves, Asia, family-controlled, state-owned
相關次數: 點閱:231下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 跨國併購是海外直接投資最常採用的形式之ㄧ。而在跨國併購活動中,企業融資能力扮演重要的腳色。過去文獻指出大部分的跨國併購是以現金作為支付工具且其交易金額通常比國內併購為大。更甚者,公司會因為海外併購存在較大的資訊不對稱,而面對較其在本國併購活動中更高的外部融資成本與負債代理成本。在此情況下,從事海外併購活動的公司可能會較傾向以自有資金作為融資管道,故而與國內併購相比,公司持有之現金在跨國併購活動中扮演著更重要的角色。本研究主要探討公司現金持有對於其從事跨國併購活動的影響。
    家族控股公司與國有企業在許多亞洲國家中是很顯著的現象。由家族或是國家所持有的企業通常會享有較佳的外部融資條件,故與國內併購相比,公司所持有的現金對於其從事跨國併購活動的影響,是否仍會有顯著的影響呢?此亦為本研究探討的主題。
    本研究發現,與國內併購的投資決策相比,公司採取跨國併購活動的投資決策確實受其所持有的現金所影響。然而,將在考量公司所有權的情況下,公司現金持有的多寡對於家族公司及國有企業其海外併購活動投資決策並無顯著不同於其國內併購投資決策。此結果亦反映,亞洲公司海外投資活動,在家族及國家控股公司所有權的影響下,其內部融資能力非為關鍵因素。

    Cross-border M&A activities is one of the popular types of foreign direct investment in recent years. Financing feasibility plays a critical role in cross-border M&A activities. Existing studies indicate that international deals are more likely to be paid in cash and the values of international deals are usually larger than domestic deals. Furthermore, firms would have higher cost in external financing and greater agency cost of debt due to information asymmetry in overseas acquisitions. In such cases, firms engaging in foreign acquisitions would more likely to finance the international deals with internal funds. As a result, corporate cash reserves play a more important role in cross-border M&As relative to domestic M&As.
    Firms controlled by family and state are pronounced in many Asian countries. Firms with ownership concentrated in family or state have better financial feasibility in external financing. Therefore, corporate cash holdings would not play a critical role in cross-border M&As, in comparison with domestic M&As. As a result, this study is to investigate the relation between preserving excess cash and attempting cross-border M&As by examining the sample of nine Asian countries via the methodology of logistic regression.
    According to the findings, preserving excess cash possesses significant effect on the intension of cross-border acquisition relative to domestic acquisitions. Nevertheless, as compared with domestic M&As, the occurrence of cross-border M&As is not significantly related to corporate preserving excess cash for both family-controlled firms and state-owned enterprises.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................1 1.1. Research Background and Motivation.....................................................1 1.2. Objectives of research and major findings...............................................2 1.3. Importance of the research ......................................................................4 1.4. Structure of the Study..............................................................................5 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURES REVIEW....................................................................6 2.1. Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions...................................................6 2.2. Cash Reserves and M&A activities .........................................................9 2.3. Corporate cash reserves and M&A activities in Asian market ................11 CHAPTER 3 DEVELOPMENT OF HYPOTHESES ...............................................14 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY AND EMPIRICAL MODEL................................19 4.1. Data Collection and Sampling...............................................................19 4.2. Variable Definition................................................................................20 4.3. Methodology.........................................................................................28 CHAPTER 5 EMPERICAL ERSULTS ....................................................................30 5.1. The attempts to cross-border M&As relative to domestic M&As...........30 5.2. Success in cross-border M&As. ............................................................37 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................38 REFERENCE...........................................................................................................40

    REFERENCE

    1.Braga Dos Santos, M.; Errunza, V. R.; Miller, D. P.,Does
    corporate international diversification destroy value?
    Evidence from cross-border mergers and acquisitions.
    SSRN: 2003.
    2.Bris, A.; Cabolis, C., The value of investor protection:
    firm evidence from cross-border mergers. Working paper,
    2004.
    3.Bruner, R. F., The use of excess cash and debt capacity
    as motive for merger. Journal of Financial and
    Quantitative Analysis, 23 (2), p.199-217, 1988.
    4.Bruns, N., The role of cross-listed stock as an
    acquisition currency: Evidence from takeovers of US
    firms. Working paper, 2004.
    5.Burch, T. R.; Morgan, A. G.; Wolf, J. G., Is acquiring-
    firm shareholder approval in stock-for-stock mergers
    perfunctory? Financial Management, 33 (4), p.45-69, 2004.
    6.Bodnar, G.; Charles, T.; Joseph W., Both sides of
    corporate diversification: the value impacts of
    geographic and industrial diversification. Working
    Paper, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International
    Studies, Johns Hopkins University, 1990
    7.Chandler, A. D.; Hikino, T., Scale and scope: the
    dynamics of industrial capitalism. The Belknap Press of
    Harvard University Press, 1990.
    8.Chang-Soo, K.; Mauer, D. C.; Sherman, A. E., The
    determinants of corporate liquidity: Theory and
    evidence. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis,
    33(3), p. 335-360, 1998.
    9.Chari, A.; Ouimet, P.; Tesar, L. L., Cross border
    mergers and acquisitions in emerging markets: the stock
    market valuation of corporate control1. Working paper,
    2004.
    10.Claessens, S.; Djankov, S.; Lang, L. H. P., The
    separation of ownership and control in East Asian
    Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, p.81-
    112, 2000.
    11.Coffee, J., The future as history: the prospects for
    global convergence in corporate governance and its
    implications. Northwestern University Law Review, 93,
    p.641-708, 1999.
    12.Christophe, S., Hysteresis and the value of the U.S.
    multinational corporation. Journal of Business, 70,
    p.435-462, 1997.
    13.Denis, D.; Diane, D.; Keven, Y., Global
    diversification, industrial diversification, and firm
    value. Journal of Finance, 57, p.1951-1979, 2002.
    14.Dittmar, A.; Mahrt-Smith, J.; Servaes, H.,
    International corporate governance and corporate cash
    holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative
    Analysis, 38(1), p.111-133, 2003.
    15.Doukas, J. A.; Kan, O. B., Excess cash flows and
    diversification discount. Financial Management, 33(2),
    p.71-88, 2004.
    16.Drucker, P. F., The five rules of successful
    acquisition. The Wall Street Journal 1981, Thursday 15,
    October.
    17.Faleye, O., Cash and corporate control. Journal of
    Finance, 59(5), p.2041-2060, 2004.
    18.Fama, E. F.; Jensen, M. C., Separation of ownership and
    control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, p.301-326,
    1983.
    19.Findlay, C. C. a. C., A review of cross-border mergers
    and acquisitions in APEC, p.14-38, 2003.
    20.Frank, T. P.; Daniel, J. P., Merger strategy: an
    examination of Drucker's Five Rules for successful
    acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal (pre-1986), 5
    (2), p99, 1984.
    21.Giovanni, J. d., What drives capital flows? The case of
    cross-border M&A activity and financial deepening.
    Journal of International Economics, 65, p.127-129, 2005.
    22.Globerman, S.; Shapiro, D., Assessing international
    mergers and acquisitions as a mode of foregin direct
    investment. Working paper, 2004.
    23.Harford, J., Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions.
    Journal of Finance, 54(6), p.1969-1997, 1999.
    24.Harford, J., What drives merger waves? Journal of
    Financial Economics, 77(3), p.529-560, 2005.
    25.Harrison, A. E.; McMillan, M. S., Does direct foreign
    investment affects domestic credit constraints? Journal
    of International Economics, 61, p.73-10, 2003.
    26.Ho, S. S. M.; Wong, K. S., A study of the relationship
    between corporate governance structures and the extent
    of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International
    Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 10, p.139-157, 2001.
    27.Jensen, M. C.; Meckling, W. H., Theory of the firm:
    managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership
    structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, p.305-
    365, 1976.
    28.Jensen, M. C., Agency costs of free cash flow,
    corporate finance and takeovers. The American Economic
    Review, 76, p.323-330, 1986.
    29.Junga, K.; Kwonb, S. Y., Ownership structure and
    earnings informativeness: Evidence from Korea. The
    International Journal of Accounting, 37, p.301-326,
    2002.
    30.Kaufmann, D.; Kraay, A.; Mastruzzi, M., Governance
    matters V: aggregate and individual governance
    indicators for 1996-2005. The World Bank, 2006.
    31.Kim, W. S.; Esmeralda, L., Excess market value, the
    multinational corporation, and Tobin’s Q-ratio.
    Journal of International Business Studies, 17, p119-
    125, 1986.
    32.Kuipers, D. R.; Miller, D.; Patel, A., The legal
    environment and corporate valuation: evidence from
    cross-border takeovers. Working paper, 2003.
    33.Kumer, P.; Ramchand, L., Takeovers, market monitoring,
    and international corporate governance. Working paper,
    2006.
    34.La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.;
    Vishny, R. W., Law and Finance. The Journal of
    Political Economy, 106, p.1113-1157, 1998.
    35.La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.,
    Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of
    Finance, 54, p.471-519, 1999.
    36.LaPorta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.;
    Vishny, R., Investor protection and corporate
    valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3), p.1147-1170, 2002.
    37.La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.;
    Vishny, R., Investor protection and corporate
    governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2),
    p.3-27, 2000.
    38.Lien, Y.-C.; Piesse, J.; Strange, R.; Filatotchev, I.,
    The role of corporate governance in FDI decisions:
    Evidence from Taiwan. International Business Review, 1
    14, p.739-764, 2005.
    39.Mak, Y. T.; Li, Y., Determinants of corporate ownership
    and board structure: evidence from Singapore. Journal
    of Corporate Finance, 7(3), p.235-256, 2004.
    40.Meyer, M. W.; Zucker, L. G., Permanently Failing
    Organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 95
    (5), p.1362-1364, 1990.
    41.Moel, A., The role of information disclosure on stock
    market listing decision: the case of foreign firms
    listing in the US. Working paper, Harvard University,
    1999.
    42.Moeller, S. B.; Schlingemann, F. P.; Stulz, R. M., Firm
    size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of
    Financial Economics, 73(2), p.201-228, 2004.
    43.Moeller, S. B.; Schlingemann, F. P., Global
    diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between
    cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of B
    Banking & Finance, 29(3), p.533-564, 2005.
    44.Morck, R.; Bernard, Y., Why investors value
    multinationality? Journal of Business, 64, p165-187.
    45.Naldi, L.; Nordqvist, M.; Sjöberg, K.; Wiklund., J., E
    Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and
    performance in family firms. Family Business Review,
    20, p.33-48, 2007.
    46.Nam, S.-W., Family-based business groups: degeneration
    of quasi-internal organizations and internal markets in
    Korea. ADB institute research paper, 2001.
    47.Opler, T.; Pinkowitz, L.; Stulz, R.; Willianmson, R.,
    The determinants and implications of corporate cash
    holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, p.3-47,
    1999.
    48.Ozkan, A.; Ozkan, N., Corporate cash holdings: an
    empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of
    Banking & Finance, 28(9), p.2103-2134, 2004.
    49.Pagano, M.; Röell, A. A.; Zechner, J., The geography of
    equity listing: why do companies list abroad? The
    journal of Finance, 57, p.2651-2702, 2002.
    50.Paine, F. T.; Power, D. J., Merger strategy: an
    Examination of Drucker's five rules for successful
    acquisitions Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), p.99-
    111, 1984.
    51.Pinkowitz, L.; Williamson, R., Bank power and cash
    holdings: evidence from Japan. The Review of Financial
    Studies, 14, p.1059-1082, 2001.
    52.Pinkowitz, L., The market for corporate control and
    corporate cash holdings. Working paper, 2002.
    53.Rossi, S.; Volpin, P. F., Cross-country determinants of
    mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial
    Economics, 74, p.277-304, 2004.
    54.Stulz, R. M., Managerial discretion and optimal
    financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26,
    p.3-28, 1990.
    55.Tolmunen, P.; Torstila, S., Cross-listings and M&A
    activity: transatlantic evidence. Financial Management,
    34(1), p.123-142, 2005.
    56.Wurgler, J., Financial markets and the allocation of
    capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), p.187-
    214, 2000.
    57.Yeh, Y.-H.; Lee, T.-s.; Woidtke, T., Family control and
    corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan.
    International review of finance, 2, p.21-49, 2001.
    58.Zahra, S. A.; Hayton, J. C.; Salvato, C.,
    Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A
    resource based analysis of the effect of organizational
    culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4),
    p.363-383, 2004.
    59.Zahra, S. A., Entrepreneurial risk taking in family
    firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), p.23-40, 2005.

    下載圖示 校內:2012-09-05公開
    校外:2012-09-05公開
    QR CODE