簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃石發
Huang, Shih-Fa
論文名稱: 人格特質、高績效工作系統與工作滿意度及工作適應性間關係之研究—以研發人員為例
The Relationships between Personality, High Performance Work System and Job Satisfaction and Job Adaptability-An Empirical Study of R&D Employees
指導教授: 史習安
Shih, Hsi- An
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 高績效工作系統人格特質研發人員特質工作適應性工作滿意度
外文關鍵詞: Job adaptability, Job satisfaction, The high performance work systems (HPWS), The personalities, The personalities of R&D employees.
相關次數: 點閱:149下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要是探討研發人員的人格特質、高績效工作系統以及研發人員對組織實施高績效工作系統之認知程度的落差,三者間與研發人員之個人工作滿意度及工作適應性的相互影響關係。應用非機率之便利抽樣方式,以在台灣地區製造業廠商之研發人員以及人力資源部門兩個研究族群為研究對象。

    本研究的結果有三點發現:研發人員人格特質中,具備「開放外向性人格」、「謹慎成就型人格」與「學習內控型人格」對研發人員之「整體工作滿意度及工作適應性」、以及個別之「工作滿意度」與「工作適應性」皆呈現顯著且正向的影響效果;高績效工作系統中之「正式且廣泛的訓練」、「正式員工參與」、「以績效為基礎的薪資設計」、「團隊自主性」以及「長期僱傭關係」之措施的採用,對研發人員之個人整體工作滿意度及工作適應性有正向且顯著的影響;以及研發人員對組織實施高績效工作系統之認知程度的落差愈小,對研發人員之「整體工作滿意度及工作適應性」、以及個別之「工作滿意度」與「工作適應性」則愈佳,呈現顯著且負向的影響效果。探究其原因可能為:當員工知覺到組織實際採行工作系統的管理措施之落差愈大時,員工的行為與態度將因心理認知落差的影響而造成工作適應性的不良,其工作滿意度亦會因此而受到負面影響。

    依本研究結果推論,研發部門若能依自己的組織特性以建構其高績效工作系統,將有助於減少研發人員對組織實施高績效工作系統之認知程度的落差,除有助於提高研發人員個人工作滿意度及工作適應性以外,也將進一步提升研發組織的能力。另外,高績效工作系統之衡量問項多發展自西方學者的研究結果,建議後續學者可採探索性之研究方式,發展出更適合台灣企業特性之高績效工作系統的衡量問項,以強化適用性。

    This research applies a convenient sampling method to gather responses from two studied groups of 4 R&D employees and one HR supervisor from each sampling manufacturer in Taiwan. Three main purposes to study are: The interrelation between the personalities of R&D employees and their individual job satisfaction and job adaptability; the interrelation between the high performance work systems (HPWS) and the job satisfaction and job adaptability of R&D employees; and the interrelation between cognitive differences of R&D employees to what an organization actually performs HPWS and their job satisfaction and job adaptability.

    Three findings are concluded from this research results: Those R&D employees who characterize such personalities as Openness and Extroversion、Conscientiousness and Accomplishment-oriented、and Learning with intro-control traits are more likely to show a significantly positive relationship to their job satisfaction and job adaptation; an organization where HPWS practices such as Formal and Extensive Training Programs、Employee Participation、Performance-Based Payment System、Team Work、and Long-Term Job Warranty are more introduced, will result in better job satisfaction and job adaptability of their R&D employees; the smaller the R&D employees’ cognitive differences between what an organization actually performs HPWS and what they sense the organization is performing HPWS, the better job satisfaction and job adaptation will R&D employees have.

    Based on the findings in this research, it is suggested that R&D departments can set up its own HPWS in accordance with it’s organizational characteristics, which will contribute to reduce R&D employee’s cognitive difference to what an organization actually performs HPWS, but also uplift both job satisfaction and job adaptability of R&D employees and R&D organizational performance. On the other hand, most of the HPWS measurements are actually developed by the western researchers, it is suggested for the future researchers to make use of exploratory research to develop some kind of HPWS measurements with much more practicality to those enterprises in Taiwan.

    第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………7 第三節 研究流程……………………………………………………8 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………9 第一節 台灣產業研究發展的趨勢…………………………………10 第二節 研發人員特質、五大人格特質與整體認知能力…………16 第三節 研發人員之工作滿意度與工作適應性……………………26 第四節 高績效工作系統……………………………………………30 第五節 研發人員特質與其工作滿意度與工作適應性之關係……39 第六節 高績效工作系統與研發人員工作滿意度及 工作適應性之關係…………………………………………42 第七節 認知與實際施行之高績效工作系統間的差異 對工作滿意度與工作適應性的影響………………………48 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………50 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………50 第二節 研究假設……………………………………………………52 第三節 研究變數定義與問卷發展…………………………………53 第四節 研究對象與資料蒐集………………………………………57 第五節 問卷信度檢驗………………………………………………58 第六節 資料分析方法………………………………………………60 第四章 研究結果與分析……………………………………………63 第一節 問卷回收與樣本統計資料分析……………………………63 第二節 各構面之因素分析與信度分析……………………………66 第三節 研發人員人格特質與研發人員工作滿意度與工作 適應性間關係之探討………………………………………67 第四節 高績效工作系統與研發人員工作滿意度與工作 適應性間關係之探討………………………………………75 第五節 知覺與實際施行之高績效工作系統與工作滿意度 與工作適應性間關係之探討………………………………83 第六節 研究假設檢定結果…………………………………………91 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………93 第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………93 第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議…………………………………96 第三節 對學術界之建………………………………………………99 參考文獻………………………………………………………………101

    中文部份
    李叔霞,民82,高科技研發人員人力資源管理需求之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,82學年度,頁1-35
    吳政哲,民88,中級技術人力職能模式建立---以半導體業為例,中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    林娟,民88,針對需求設計人力資源管理策略---以資訊軟體業研發人員為例,管理雜誌,第302期,頁54-58
    柯惠玲,民78,工作滿足、工作績效與離職傾向之關係研究,政治大學企業
    管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    許士軍,民81,戰略生產力雜誌,第9期,頁108
    國科會,科技發展標竿,Benchmarking Sci-Tech Development,Volume 1,Issue 2,P2、9、13、14
    孫震,民88,技術進步與台灣傳統產業的發展,頁1-4
    張昭仁,民83,研究發展管理理論與案例,翰蘆圖書出版社,頁27-33
    張博堯,民91,研發技術部門之人力資源管理實務,頁11-13
    張添洲,民88,組織生涯管理基礎-生涯之錨定位,勞工行政,第133 期,頁52-56。
    陳一姍,民91,亞洲十二個國人力資源大調查,天下雜誌2002年11月1日,頁80-88
    新聞社論:如何提升民間的研發活力,經濟日報2002年12月17日
    蔡宏明(民89),我國中小型企業升級問題及對策,頁8、9、13、14、15
    蔡德輝、吳學燕等人,民82,基層員警對工作環境及家庭生活之適應問題,行政院研究發展考核委員會編印。
    劉鶴龍,民89,資訊電子產業科技人員與非科技人員創造力之研究,科技管理學刊,第五卷第一期,頁128
    龔 昶 銘,民91,基層員警工作困擾、組織投注感與工作適應關係研究,國立中正大學/犯罪防治研究所碩士論文
    顧鳳姿,民82,資訊業海外人員適應之研究,政大企研所博士論文。

    英文部份
    Adams, J.S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422.436.
    Afsaneh, N. and Ali, R. M. 1998. Organizational Behavior: The person-organization fit. N.I.: Prentice Hall.
    Agho, A.O., Mueller, C.W., & Price, J.L.1993. Determinant of employee job satisfaction. Human Relations, 46: 1007-1027.
    Ahuja, M. K., Galletta, D. F., & Carley, K. M. 2003. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: an empirical study. Management Journal, 49(1): 21-38.
    Allport, G.W., & Odbert, H.S. 1936.Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47: 211.
    Arkoff, A. 1968. Adjustment and Mental Health. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Arthur, J.B. 1992. The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and Labor Review, 488-506
    Arthur, J.B. 1994 Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 670-687.
    Ashforth, B. E., Saks, A. M. and Lee, R. T. 1998. Socialization and newcomer adjustment : The role of organizational context. Human Relations, 51(7): 897-926.
    Barney, J. 1991. Integrating organizational behavior and strategy formulation research: A resource based analysis. In P. Shrivastava, A. Huff, & J.Dutton (Eds). Advances in Strategic Management, 8: 39-61. Greenwich, CT: JAT Press.
    Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44: 1-26.
    BarrickM, R., & Mount, M.K. 1993. Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 111-118.
    Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. 1994. Antecedents of involuntary turnover due to a reduction in force. Personnel Psychology, 47: 515-535.
    Berg, P. 1999. The effects of high performance work practices on job satisfaction in the United States steel industry. Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 54(1):111-134.
    Boretsky, M., 1982. The Threat to U.S. High Technology Industries:Economic and National Security Implications Draft. International Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
    Boudreau, J. W., Boswell, W. R., & Judge, T. A. 2001. Effects of personality on executive career success in the united States and Europe. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 53-81.
    Brief, A.P., Butcher, A.H.& Roberson, L. 1995. Cookies,disposition, and job attitudes: The effects of positive mood inducing events and negative affectivity on job satisfaction in a field experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62: 55-62.
    Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc. UK.
    Chen, P.Y., & Spector, P.E. 1991. Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. Journal of applied psychology, 76: 398-407.
    Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. 1991. Facts scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12: 887-898.
    Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. 1992a. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13: 653–665.
    Cropanzano, R., James, K., & Konovsky, M.A. 1993. Dispositional affectivity as a predictor of work attitudes and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior,14: 595-608.
    Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. 1991. The impact on economic performance of a transformation in industrial relations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44: 241-260.
    Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R. M. 1980. The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
    Delaney, J. T., Lewin, D. & Ichniowski, C. 1989. Human resource policies and practices in American firms. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
    Delaney, J. T. & Huselid, M. A. 1996. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949-969.
    Drucker, P. F. 1985. Principles of successful innovation. Research Management, 28(5): 10-12.
    Fisher, V.E., & Hanna, J.V. 1931. The Dissatisfied Worker. New York: Macmillan.
    Furnham, A. & Zacherl, M. 1986. Personality and job satisfaction. Personality and individual Differences, 7: 453-459.
    Goldberg, L. R. 1990. An alternative “description of personality”: The big five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1216-1229.
    Gould, J. & Kolb, W. L. 1964. A Dictionary of the Social Science. New York: The Free Press.
    Guest, D. E. (1997) Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8: 263-276.
    Guimaraes, T. A. et al. 2001. Forecasting core competencies in an R&D environment. R&D Management,31(3): 249-255.
    Gundry, L. K. & Rousseau, D. M. 1994. Critical incidents in communicating culture to newcomers: The meaning is the message. Human Relations, 47(9): 1063-1088.
    Guthrie, J. P., Snell, C. S & Nyamori, R. O. 2002.Correlates and consequences of high involvement work practices: The role of competitive strategy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1): 183-197.
    Hershenson D. B. 1996. Work adjustment : a neglected area in career counseling, Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(4): 442-446.
    Herzberg, F. 1956. Job attitudes: Review and opinion. Pittsburg, PA: Psychological Services of Pittsburg.
    Herzberg B. M. 1959. The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley.
    Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. 1997. Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849-870). San Diego, Academic Press.
    Hoppock, R. 1935. Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.
    Hunter, J. E. & Hunter, R. F. 1984. Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance. Psychology Bulletin, 96: 72-98.
    Hunter, J. E. 1986. Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29: 340-362.
    Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 38: 635-672.
    Huselid, M. A, Jackson, S. E. & Schuler, R. S. 1997. Technical and strategic human resourcement management effectiveness as determinations of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 171-188.
    Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. & Prennushi, G. 1997. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. The American Economic Review, 87(3): 291-313.
    Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., & Durham, C.C. 1997.The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19: 151- 188.
    Judge, T. A., Locke ,E.A.,& Durham ,C.C. 1998. Dispositonal effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83: 17-34.
    Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. 1999. The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52: 621-652.
    Kanfer, R. & Ackermlan, P. L. 1989. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 826-835.
    Lado, A. A., and Wilson, M. C.. 1994. Human resource systems and sustained competive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19: 699-727.
    Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A. & Ledford, G. E. 1995. Creating high performance organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Leavitt , Sternthal, Brian; Dholakia, Ruby; & Clark, 1978. The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4): 255
    Lepine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. 2000. Adaptability of changing task contexts: effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53: 563-593.
    Locke, E.A.1969.What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4: 309-336.
    Locke, E.A. 1976. The case against legislating quality of work life. The Personnel Administrator, May: 19-21.
    Lofquist, L. H., and R. V. Dawis 1984. A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment. Minneapolis, Minn : University of Minnesota Press.
    Lu, L. 1999. Work motivation, job stress and employees’ well-being. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(1): 61-73.
    MacDuffie, J. P. 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 197-221
    McCrae,R.R.,& Costa,P.T. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52: 81-90.
    McCrae,R.R. & Costa,P.T. Jr. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Anerican Psychologist, 52: 509-516.
    Morrison, R. f. 1997. Career adaptability: The effective adaptation of managers to changing role demands. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62: 549-558.
    Mount, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. 2000. Incremental validity of empirically keyed biod ata scales over GMA and the five factor personality constructs, Personnel Psychology, 53: 299-323.
    Mumford, M. D., Bauhman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Uhlman, C. E., & Costanza, D. P. 1993. Personality, adaptability, and performance: Performance on well-defined and ill-defined problem-solving tasks. Human Performance, 6: 241-285.
    Murphy, K. R. 1989. Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Performance, 2: 183-200.
    Norman, W.T. 1963. Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66: 574-583.
    Osterman, J. 1994. How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(2): 173-188.
    Pfeffer, J. 1996. When it comes to “Best Practicess”—Why do smart organizations occasionally do dumb things? Organizational Dynamics, 25: 33-44.
    Pil, F. K. & MacDuffie, J. P. 1996. The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Industrial Relations, 35(3): 423-455.
    Porter, L. W., Pearce, J. L., Tripoli, A. M. & Lewis, K. M. 1998. Differential perceptions of employers' inducements: Implications for psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(Spec.): 769-782.
    Pulver, A. Allik, J. Pulkkinen, L., & Hamalainen, M. 1995. A big five personality inventory in tow nonIndo-European languages. European Journal of Personality, 9: 109-124.
    Ree MJ, Earles JA, Teachout MS. 1994. Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518-524
    Richard, O. C. & Johnson, N. B. 2001. Strategic human resource management effectiveness and firm performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(2): 299-310.
    Robinson, S. L. & Rousseau, D. M. 1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3): 245-259.
    Rousseau, D. M.; Greller, M. M. 1994. Human resource practices: Administrative contract makers. Human Resource Management, 33(3): 385-401.
    Salgado, J. F. 1997. The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 30-43.
    Sanchez, R. 1995 Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategy Management Journal, 16: 135-159.
    Sanz-Valle, R., Sabater-Sanchez, R. & Aragon-Sanchez, A. 1999. Human resource management and business strategy links: An empirical study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(4): 655-671.
    Seashore, S. E. & Taber, T. D. 1975. Job satisfaction and their correlates. American Behavioral Scientists, 18:333
    Seibert, J S. E.& Kraimer, M. L. 2001. The five-factor models of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 1-21.
    Shanklin, W. L. & John K. R. Jr., 1984. Organizing for high-tech marketing. Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec.: 164-171.
    Smith, P.C. 1955.The prediction of individual differences in susceptibility to industrial monotony. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39: 322-329.
    Smith, P.C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C.L. 1969. The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago:Rand McNally.
    Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 653-663.
    Snow, C. C. & Snell, S. A. 1993. Staffing as strategy. In N. Schmitt, W. Borman & Associates (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations: 448-479. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
    Sternberg, R. J. 1997. The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. American Psychologist, 52: 1030-1045.
    Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., & Clausen, J. A. 1986. The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 56-77.
    Suls, J., Green, P., & Hillis, S. 1998. Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 127-136.
    Tokar, D. M. & Subich, L. M. 1997. Relative contributions of congruence and personality dimensions to job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50: 482-491.
    Varma, A., Beatty, R. W., Schenier, C. E. & Ulrich, D. O. 1999. High-performance work systems: Exciting discovery or passing fad? Human Resource Planning, 26-37
    Watson, D. & Clark, L. A. 1997. Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 767-793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Wright, P. M. & Snell, S. A. 1991. Toward an integrative view of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 1: 203-225.
    Wright, P. M. & Boswell, W. R. 2002. Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of Management, 28(3): 247-276.
    Youndt, M. A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J. W. & Lepak, D. P. 1996. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 836-856.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2003-08-08公開
    QR CODE