簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳俊寬
Wu, Jun-Kuan
論文名稱: 應用平板具狹縫斜肋於通道熱源之層流強制對流熱傳增益研究
Study on Heat Transfer Enhancement for Laminar Forced Convection over Heat Sources in a Channel by a Narrow Plate with Slits and Inclined Ribs
指導教授: 吳鴻文
Wu, Horng-Wen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 系統及船舶機電工程學系
Department of Systems and Naval Mechatronic Engineering
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 121
中文關鍵詞: 通道斜肋狹縫層流強制對流熱傳增益
外文關鍵詞: Channel, rib, slit, laminar flow, forced convection, heat transfer
相關次數: 點閱:52下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文探討運用數值分析具有狹縫之散熱片之三維層流流場及熱傳現象。本文利用有限體積法(FVM)離散Navier-Stokes方程式和能量方程式,並化成代數方程組。接著運用解壓力耦合方程一致的半隱式方法(SIMPLE, Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equation Consistent) 迭代至收斂,獲得流場及溫度場。此模擬將兩種有狹縫與無狹縫的平板放置於通道內總長度的1/3處,改變放置高度(3/4通道高度、1/2通道高度及1/4通道高度)和雷諾數(500, 1000, 1500, 2000),分析不考慮重力作用強制對流之溫度場與速度場分佈。
    研究結果顯示: 放置平板於通道有效改善通道內的熱傳現象,雷諾數等於2000時與C2(狹縫)(3/4通道高度)相比,平均紐賽數最大增加率為27.7%。平板具有狹縫可以在斜肋間影響渦流,改變擺放位置高度可影響流道內部的流場,在所有情況下具有狹縫的鰭片的流道內最高溫度都有所降低。從斜肋之平均紐賽數上看到,在雷諾數等於1000時,C1(狹縫)和C4(非狹縫)(1/2通道高度)相比,C1的平均紐賽數最大增加率為5.07%。在雷諾數等於500-1500時,C1的平均紐賽數最高,而在雷諾數等於2000時,C2(狹縫)(3/4通道高度)的平均紐賽數超過C1。

    This study investigates the three-dimensional heat transfer of plate with slit and inclined rib module by numerically analyzes the laminar flow field and heat transfer performance. The Navier-Stokes equations and energy equation are constructed by the Finite Volume Method (FVM) and then are discretized to a system of algebraic equations and dimensionless of mathematical formulation. They can be solved by semi-implicit method for pressure linked equations-consistent (SIMPLEC). The solutions must be iterated to converge within each step to obtain the temperature and flow field.
    This simulation places two different plate inclined ribs (slit or not) on the 1/3 of the total length and changes the heights of placement (3/4 channel height, 1/2 channel height and 1/4 channel height) with four different Re levels (500, 1000, 1500, 2000) to investigate the temperature and flow field without gravity in forced convection.The results indicate that place the plate can effectively improve the heat transfer. Compared with C2 (slit) (3/4 channel height), at Re=2000 the max increasing rate is 27.7%. For plate with the slits and inclined rib module, the maximum temperature in all cases is reduced. From averaged Nu profiles, compared to C1 (slit) and C4 (non-slit) (1/2 channel height), the maximum increase rate in average Nu of C1 of races is 5.07% at Re=1000. At Re=500-1500, the Nu of C1 is highest. At Re=2000, the Nu of C2 (slit) (3/4 channel height) exceed C1 becomes to the highest.

    Content 摘要 I 誌謝 II Abstract III Content V List of Table VII List of Figure VIII Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1-1 Background 1 1-2 Literature reviews 3 1-3 Objectives and motivation of present study 9 Chapter 2. Numerical theory and geometry 11 2-1 Principle 11 2-2 Mathematical formulation 11 2-2-1 Parameters 13 2-2-2 Dimensionless of mathematical formulation 15 2-3 Discretization method 16 2-3-1 Finite volume method 16 2-3-2 Least squares cell based method 17 2-3-3 Discretization of momentum equation 18 2-3-4 Discretization of energy equation 19 2-4 SIMPLEC method 19 2-4-1 Velocity-correction equation 20 2-4-2 Computational process 23 2-4-3 Under-relaxation factor 23 2-5 Geometry model and mesh 24 2-5-1 Numerical model 24 2-5-2 Geometry 24 2-5-3 Mesh 25 2-5-4 Boundary conditions 26 2-5-5 Convergence criterion 26 Chapter 3 Results and discussion 27 3-1 Grid independent test 27 3-2 Accuracy of simulation 28 3-3 Influence of slits on flow field and heat transfer performance 28 3-4 Influence of different heights of placement on flow field and heat transfer performance 32 Chapter 4 Conclusions and future work 35 4-1 Conclusions 35 4-2 Future work 36 References 37 List of Table Table 1 Properties of air 41 Table 2 Properties of aluminum 41 Table 3 Mesh for each model 42 Table 4 Result of mesh independent test for average Nusselt Number 43 Table 5 Dimension of plate with slit and inclined rib 45 Table 6 Summery of literature review 46 List of Figure Figure 1 Cell centroid evaluation 48 Figure 2 Structure of plate with slit and inclined rib 48 Figure 3 Detail of plate with slit and inclined rib size 49 Figure 4 Three-dimensional flow geometries and the relevant boundary conditions 50 Figure 5 Data points 51 Figure 6 Grid independent test of Mesh1, Mesh2 and Mesh3 52 Figure 7 Comparison of results between Ahmadali [17] and present study 52 Figure 8 Pressure contour and streamline of C0 from z=H/4 to 3H/4 for Re=500 on x-z plane 53 Figure 9 Pressure contour and streamline of C1 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=500 on x-z plane 54 Figure 10 Velocity contour and streamline of C1 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=500 on y-z plane 55 Figure 11 Pressure contour and streamline of C2 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=500 on x-z plane 56 Figure 12 Velocity contour and streamline of C2 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=500 on y-z plane 57 Figure 13 Pressure contour and streamline of C3 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=500 on x-z plane 58 Figure 14 Velocity contour and streamline of C3 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=500 on y-z plane 59 Figure 15 Pressure contour and streamline of C4 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=500 on x-z plane 60 Figure 16 Velocity contour and streamline of C4 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=500 on y-z plane 61 Figure 17 Pressure contour and streamline of C5 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=500 on x-z plane 62 Figure 18 Velocity contour and streamline of C5 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=500 on y-z plane 63 Figure 19 Pressure contour and streamline of C6 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=500 on x-z plane 64 Figure 20 Velocity contour and streamline of C6 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=500 on y-z plane 65 Figure 21 Pressure contour and streamline of C0 from z=H/4 to 3H/4 for Re=1000 on x-z plane 66 Figure 22 Pressure contour and streamline of C1 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1000 on x-z plane 67 Figure 23 Velocity contour and streamline of C1 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1000 on y-z plane 68 Figure 24 Pressure contour and streamline of C2 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1000 on x-z plane 69 Figure 25 Velocity contour and streamline of C2 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1000 on y-z plane 70 Figure 26 Pressure contour and streamline of C3 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1000 on x-z plane 71 Figure 27 Velocity contour and streamline of C3 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1000 on y-z plane 72 Figure 28 Pressure contour and streamline of C4 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1000 on x-z plane 73 Figure 29 Velocity contour and streamline of C4 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1000 on y-z plane 74 Figure 30 Pressure contour and streamline of C5 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1000 on x-z plane 75 Figure 31 Velocity contour and streamline of C5 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1000 on y-z plane 76 Figure 32 Pressure contour and streamline of C6 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1000 on x-z plane 77 Figure 33 Velocity contour and streamline of C6 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1000 on y-z plane 78 Figure 34 Pressure contour and streamline of C0 from z=H/4 to 3H/4 for Re=1500 on x-z plane 79 Figure 35 Pressure contour and streamline of C1 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1500 on x-z plane 80 Figure 36 Velocity contour and streamline of C1 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1500 on y-z plane 81 Figure 37 Pressure contour and streamline of C2 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1500 on x-z plane 82 Figure 38 Velocity contour and streamline of C2 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1500 on y-z plane 83 Figure 39 Pressure contour and streamline of C3 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1500 on x-z plane 84 Figure 40 Velocity contour and streamline of C3 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1500 on y-z plane 85 Figure 41 Pressure contour and streamline of C4 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1500 on x-z plane 86 Figure 42 Velocity contour and streamline of C4 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1500 on y-z plane 87 Figure 43 Pressure contour and streamline of C5 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1500 on x-z plane 88 Figure 44 Velocity contour and streamline of C5 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1500 on y-z plane 89 Figure 45 Pressure contour and streamline of C6 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=1500 on x-z plane 90 Figure 46 Velocity contour and streamline of C6 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=1500 on y-z plane 91 Figure 47 Pressure contour and streamline of C0 from z=H/4 to 3H/4 for Re=2000 on x-z plane 92 Figure 48 Pressure contour and streamline of C1 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=2000 on x-z plane 93 Figure 49 Velocity contour and streamline of C1 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=2000 on y-z plane 94 Figure 50 Pressure contour and streamline of C2 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=2000 on x-z plane 95 Figure 51 Velocity contour and streamline of C2 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=2000 on y-z plane 96 Figure 52 Pressure contour and streamline of C3 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=2000 on x-z plane 97 Figure 53 Velocity contour and streamline of C3 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=2000 on y-z plane 98 Figure 54 Pressure contour and streamline of C4 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=2000 on x-z plane 99 Figure 55 Velocity contour and streamline of C4 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=2000 on y-z plane 100 Figure 56 Pressure contour and streamline of C5 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=2000 on x-z plane 101 Figure 57 Velocity contour and streamline of C5 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=2000 on y-z plane 102 Figure 58 Pressure contour and streamline of C6 at (a) upstream (b) downstream for Re=2000 on x-z plane 103 Figure 59 Velocity contour and streamline of C6 of cross section (y-z) at the front part of plate, 7th rib and rear part of plate for Re=2000 on y-z plane 104 Figure 60 (a) Temperature contour of C0 (b) Temperature contour of C1 (c) Temperature contour of C2 (d) Temperature contour of C3 for Re=500 on x-y plane 105 Figure 61 (a) Temperature contour of C4 (b) Temperature contour of C5 (c) Temperature contour of C6 for Re=500 on x-y plane 106 Figure 62 (a) Temperature contour of C0 (b) Temperature contour of C1 (c) Temperature contour of C2 (d) Temperature contour of C3 for Re=1000 on x-y plane 107 Figure 63 (a) Temperature contour of C4 (b) Temperature contour of C5 (c) Temperature contour of C6 for Re=1000 on x-y plane 108 Figure 64 (a) Temperature contour of C0 (b) Temperature contour of C1 (c) Temperature contour of C2 (d) Temperature contour of C3 for Re=1500 on x-y plane 109 Figure 65 (a) Temperature contour of C4 (b) Temperature contour of C5 (c) Temperature contour of C6 for Re=1500 on x-y plane 110 Figure 66 (a) Temperature contour of C0 (b) Temperature contour of C1 (c) Temperature contour of C2 (d) Temperature contour of C3 for Re=2000 on x-y plane 111 Figure 67 (a) Temperature contour of C4 (b) Temperature contour of C5 (c) Temperature contour of C6 for Re=2000 on x-y plane 112 Figure 68 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C1, C4 and C0 for X direction at Re=500 113 Figure 69 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C1, C4 and C0 for X direction at Re=1000 113 Figure 70 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C1, C4 and C0 for X direction at Re=1500 114 Figure 71 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C1, C4 and C0 for X direction at Re=2000 114 Figure 72 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C2, C5 and C0 for X direction at Re=500 115 Figure 73 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C2, C5 and C0 for X direction at Re=1000 115 Figure 74 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C2, C5 and C0 for X direction at Re=1500 116 Figure 75 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C2, C5 and C0 for X direction at Re=2000 116 Figure 76 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C3, C6 and C0 for X direction at Re=500 117 Figure 77 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C3, C6 and C0 for X direction at Re=1000 117 Figure 78 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C3, C6 and C0 for X direction at Re=1500 118 Figure 79 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C3, C6 and C0 for X direction at Re=2000 118 Figure 80 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C0 to C6 for X direction at Re=500 119 Figure 81 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C0 to C6 for X direction at Re=1000 119 Figure 82 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C0 to C6 for X direction at Re=1500 120 Figure 83 Comparison of average Nusselt number for C0 to C6 average for X direction at Re=2000 120 Figure 84 Variation of averaged Nusselt number with Re for C0 to C6 121 Figure 85 Variation of averaged mass fluid rate with Re for C0 to C6 121

    References
    [1] C. Chen and J.-T. Teng, “A study on fluid flow and heat transfer in rectangular microchannels with various longitudinal vortex generators”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. ,Vol.69, pp.203-214, 2014.
    [2] G. Zhou, Z. Feng, “Experimental investigations of heat transfer enhancement by plane and curved winglet type vortex generators with punched holes”, Int. J.Therm. Sci. ,Vol.78, pp.26-35, 2014.
    [3] S. Taneda, “Experimental investigation of vortex streets”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , Vol.20, pp.1714-1721, 1965.
    [4] N.C. DeJong, A.M. Jacobi, “An experimental study of flow and heat transfer in parallel-plate arrays: local, row-by-row and surface average behavior”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol.40, pp.1365–1378, 1997.
    [5] S.A. El-Sayed, S.M. Mohamed, A.M. Abdel-latif, and A.E. Abouda, “Investigation of turbulent heat transfer and fluid flow in longitudinal Rectangular-Fin arrays of different geometries and shroud din array”, Experimental Thermal and fluid Science, Vol.26, pp.879-900, 2002.
    [6] Xianli Li, Chao Li, Bojia Li, “Net heat gain assessment on a glazed transpired solar air collector with slit-like perforations”, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 99, pp.1-10, 2016.
    [7] R. Bessaih, and M. Kadja, “Turbulent natural convection cooling of electronic components mounted on a vertical channel”, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.20, pp.141-154, 2000.
    [8] H.R. Goshayeshi, M. Fahiminia, and M.M. Naserian, “Numerical modeling of natural convection on various configuration of rectangular fin arrays on vertical base plates”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol.73, pp.91-96, 2011.
    [9] R.L. Linton, and D. Agonafer, “Coarse and detailed CFD modeling of finned heat sink”, IEEE Transactions On Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology-Part A, Vol. 18, no. 3,1995.
    [10] R.A. Wirtz, W. Chen, and R. Zhou, “Effect of flow bypass on the performance of longitudinal fin heat sink”, Journal of Electronic Packaging, Vol.116, pp.206-211, 1994.
    [11] M. Dastmalchi, A. Arefmanesh, G. A. Sheikhzadeh, “Numerical investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop of heat transfer oil in smooth and micro-finned tubes”, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Vol.121, pp.294-304, 2017.
    [12] J.B. Copetti, M.H. Macagnan, D. de Souza, RDC. Oliveski , “Experiments with micro-fin tube in single phase”, Int J Refrig, Vol.27, pp.876-83, 2004.
    [13] Gun Woo Kim, Hyun Muk Lim, Gwang Hoon Rhee, “Numerical studies of heat transfer enhancement by cross-cut flow control in wavy fin heat exchangers”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol.96, pp.110-117, 2016.
    [14] Zhi-Min Lin, Cai-Ping Liu, Mei Lin, Liang-Bi Wang, “Numerical study of flow and heat transfer enhancement of circular tube bank fin heat exchanger with curved delta-winglet vortex generators”, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.88, pp.198-210, 2015.
    [15] Shobhana Singh, Kim Sørensen, Anders Schou Simonsen, Thomas J. Condra, “Implications of fin profiles on overall performance and weight reduction of a fin and tube heat exchanger”, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.107, pp.612-624, 2016.
    [16] H. Jonsson, B. Palm, “Thermal and hydraulic behavior of plate fin and strip fin heat sink under varying bypass conditions”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Vol.23, pp.47-54, 2000.
    [17] Ahmadali Gholami, Mazlan A. Wahid, H. A. Mohammed, “Thermal–hydraulic performance of fin-and-oval tube compact heat exchangers with innovative design of corrugated fin patterns”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol.106, pp.573-592, 2016.
    [18] G. Ledezma, and A. Bejan, “Heat sinks with sloped plate fins in natural and forced convection”, International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer, Vol.39, pp.1773-1783, 1996.
    [19] W.K. Anderson, D.L. Bonhus, “An Implicit Upwind Algorithm for Computing Turbulent Flows on Unstructured Grids”, Computers Fluids, Vol.23, pp.1-21, 1994.
    [20] S.V. Patankar, “Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
    [21] A. Bejan, “Convection heat transfer”, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1985.
    [22] F.P. Incropera, D.P. Dewitt, “Fundamentals of heat transfer and mass transfer”, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1997.

    [23] Feng Xin, Zhichun Liu, Si Wang, Wei Liu, “Study of heat transfer in oscillatory flow for a Stirling engine heating tube
    inserted with spiral spring”, Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.143, pp.182-192, 2018.
    [24] Wenbin Tu, Zhenying Xu, Yingxia Zhu, Yun Wang, Yong Tang, “Boundary layer redevelops with mesh cylinder inserts for heat transfer enhancement”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol.109, pp.147-156, 2017.
    [25] Peng Liu, Nianben Zheng, Feng Shan, Zhichun Liu, Wei Liu, “Heat transfer enhancement for laminar flow in a tube using bidirectional conical strip inserts”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol.127, pp.1064-1076, 2018.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2023-09-06公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE