在全球化的時代，人們皆能透過網路獲取所需要的資訊，而各國政府也努力將資訊與服務放上網路，希望可以使國民的生活更加舒適與便利。根據文獻可知政府的電子化屬於組織創新的過程，領導者在其中扮演一個重要的角色，公家機關人員不易調動其職位卻可能出現不利於進行組織創新的領導行為。目前台灣政府電子化已有相當的準備度，本研究目的即在探討電子化政府和領導行為相關文獻，並彙整各學者們對於電子化政府的領導行為之建議，再從認知心理學觀點設計創新實驗情境，以深入了解台灣電子化政府各級領導者的領導行為。
　　本研究依據Bass & Avolio(1997)所設計的多維度領導行為問卷(稱為MLQ, Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire)，結合「認知心理學的視覺感受性測試」與「領導行為的感受性測試」發展創新的領導行為動畫實驗情境，以檢測領導者的領導行為，探討高雄市政府任職的公務人員在電子化政府此創新的組織型態下，對其部會首長的領導行為所具有的認知。
　　本研究共355位高雄市政府員工觀看動畫實驗情境，並回收336份有效資料。主要的實證結果如下：（1）教育程度為「高中(含)以下」的填答者對於其領導者的領導行為認知是偏向「非轉換型領導」，「大學、專科」的填答者則是偏向「轉換型領導」；（2）「高中(含)以下的女性」的填答者對於其領導者的領導行為認知是偏向「非轉換型領導」；（3）「教育程度高中(含)以下且服務年資超過17年」的填答者對於其領導者的領導行為認知是偏向「非轉換型領導」。研究發現，影響高雄市政府員工領導行為認知最大的因素是「教育程度」。
　　此研究有助於未來擔任台灣電子化政府各階層領導者，能適度的給予員工鼓勵或實際上的獎賞，以激發其工作潛力，為組織做出更大的貢獻。預期未來的台灣電子化政府各部門和整體政府提供國民更有效率的服務，也充分發揮台灣在世界上電子化政府的優勢。

In the era of globalization, people can easily retrieve information from the Internet. Governments around the world are thus dedicated to provide online services to ease people's life. For example, Taiwan government has been electronized in every aspect of the services and has been regarded a well-constructed e-government around the world according to the literature. To be noted, the electronization of the government (or called e-government) is a type of organizational innovations that leaders usually play important roles in the organization.
However, the organizational leaders are easily replaceable if necessary. It is unusual to replace a governmental leader when improper behaviors or attitudes found in the process of leading this type of innovative organization. This research is to discuss the related literature of e-government and leadership. Kaohsiung government, a city level of Taiwan government in the southern part of Taiwan, is the data source of this research. The employees’ perceived leadership to their supervisors of Kaohsiung government is this research’s focus.
To examine the supervisors’ leading behaviors of Kaohsiung city government, an innovative animated design in different experimental situations is developed based on the concepts of Bass & Avolio’s (1997) Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). The innovative design is combined with 'the visual conception test of cognitive psychology' and ‘the conception of leadership’. Thus, Kaohsiung city e-government employees’ perceived leadership to their supervisors is found and discussed.
This research invites 355 employees of Kaohsiung city e-government to participate in all experimental situations (14). As a result, 336 valid samples are collected and analyzed. It is found that: (1) The employees whose highest education are at senior high schools or even below tend to perceive their supervisors having transaction and Laissez-Faire leadership. Contrarily, the employees who receive bachellor’s or above highest degrees tend to perceive their supervisors having transformation leadership. (2) The female employees whose highest education are at senior high school or even below tend to perceive their supervisors having transaction and Laissez-Faire leadership. (3) The employees whose highest education are at senior high school (or even below) and have served in Kaohsiung city e-government for more than 17 years tend to perceive their supervisors having transaction and Laissez-Faire leadership.
Overall, the influential factor to the employees’ perception in Kaohsiung city e-government is their ‘education background.’ This research finally discusses ways to encourage the governmental employees having on-job training. It is expected that in this way the employees find their working potential and make more contributions to the government they serve. It is also expected that in the near future more evidences of efficient services are found in Kaohsiung city e-government as well as the whole Taiwan e-government. Taiwan shall be going to continuously possess its advantages in the electronization of the government around the world.

一、中文部分
1. 丘昌泰，2000，公共管理：理論與實務手冊，台北市：元照。
2. 行政院研考會，1997，電子化／網路化政府中程（八十七至八十九年度）中程計畫，台北市：行政院研考會。
3. 行政院研考會，2001，電子化政府推動方案（九十至九十三年度），台北市：行政院研考會。
4. 行政院研考會，2007，優質網路政府計畫（九十七到一百年度），台北市：行政院研考會。
5. 李雪津，1998，「推動電子化/網路化政府，創造競爭優勢」，研考報導，42卷，24-34。
6. 吳萬益，2005，企業研究方法，台北市：華泰。
7. 范錚強，1999，「先進國家網路申辦之推動現況」，研考雙月刊，23卷1期，15-21。
8. 酒井隆，2004，問卷設計、市場調查與統計分析實務入門，台北縣：博碩文化股份有限公司。
9. 高雄市政府網站：http://www.kcg.gov.tw
10. 孫以清、郭冠廷，2004，政治與資訊科技，台北市：揚智。
11. 陳啟光、鄭傑升、王國明，2002，「電子化政府推動成效評估量表之建構—民眾主觀認知構面之探討」，中國工業工程學刊，19卷2期，39-52。
12. 榮泰生，1999，企業研究方法，台北市：五南。
13. 榮泰生，2006，SPSS與研究方法，台北市：五南。
14. 蕭文龍，2007，多變量分析最佳入門實用書－SPSS+LISREAL(SEM)，台北市：碁峰資訊。

二、英文部分
Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: an examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261-295.
Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & Einstein, W. O. (1988). Transformational leadership in a management game simulation - Impacting the bottom line. Group & Organization Studies, 13(1), 59-80.
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness - Through transformational leadership: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development - Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, California: Mind Garden, Inc.
Basu, A., & Muylle, S. (2007). How to plan E-business initiatives in - Established companies. Mit Sloan Management Review, 49(1), 28-36.
Bossink, B. A. G. (2007). Leadership for sustainable innovation. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 135-149.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Cheng, E. W. L. & Heng, L., (2001). Analitic hierarchy process - An approach to determine measures for business performance. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(3), 30-36.
Dargan, L., & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 274-291.
DenHartog, D. N., VanMuijen, J. J., & Koopman, P. L. (1997). Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 19-34.
Doig, J. W., & Hargrove, E. C. (1987). Leadership and innovation: a biographical perspective on entrepreneurs in government. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are women really the "fairer" sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46(4), 423-429.
English, F. W., & Steffy, B. E. (1995). Using film to attain a cultural and contextual understanding of moral leadership. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of Vision, 7(1), 1-29.
Graham, S., & Aurigi, A. (1997). Virtual cities, social polarization, and the crisis in urban public space. Journal of Urban Technology, 4(1), 19-52.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of dispersion of multinomial response. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 568-580.
Heeks, R. (1999). Reinventing government in the information age. New York: Routledge.
Hegarty, S. F. (1978). Film perception under ordinary viewing conditions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 43-54.
Ho, T. K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-Government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444.
Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C.A. . (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317-341.
Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47-71.
Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465-485.
Isaksen, S., & Tidd, J. (2006). Meeting the innovation challenge: leadership for transformation and growth. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Jackson, P., & Harris, L. (2003). E-business and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 497-511.
Johnson, D. (1998). Government - Leadership in a connected world. Futurist, 32(8), 15-15.
Johnson, J. R. (2002). Leading the learning organization: Portrait of four leaders. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23(5), 241-249.
Kim, S. (2005). Gender differences in the job satisfaction of public employees: A study of seoul metropolitan government, Korea. Sex Roles, 52(9-10), 667-681.
Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2005). Just in time, total quality management, and
supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on
business performance. Omega, 33(2), 153-162.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from: http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=35052
Kotter, J. P. (1999). John Kotter on what leaders really do. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.
Maccoby, M. (2000). Understanding the difference between management and leadership. Research-Technology Management, 43(1), 57-59.
McClure, D. L. (2001). Electronic Government - Challenges Must be Addressed with Effective Leadership and Management. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01959t.pdf
McConnell International. (2002). The global E-Government outlook. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from: http://www.mcconnellinternational.com/ereadiness/
The_Global_E-Government_Outlook.pdf
McGinnis, P. (2002). Electronic government. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from: http://www.computerworld.com/managementtopics/
ebusiness/story/0,10801,48989,00.html
Miranda, R. (2000). The building blocks of a digital government strategy. Government Finance Review, 16(5), 9-13.
Moodley, S. (2003). The challenge of e-business for South African apparel sector. Technovation, 23(7), 557-570.
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G.M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J.M. (2002). Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-750.
Ndou, V. (2004). E-Government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1-24.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and emprical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157-187.
Puccio, G. J., Murdock, M. C., & Mance, M. (2007). Creative leadership - Skills that drive change. Thousands Oaks, California: SAGE publications.
Relyea, H. C., & Shuler, J. A. (2001). E-gov: the Federal overview? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(2), 131-149.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2002). Management (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Rowley, J. (1998). What is information? Information Services & Use, 18(4), 243-254.
Rowold, J., & Heinitz, K. (2007). Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 121-133.
Soto-Acosta, P., & Merono-Cerdan, A. L. (2008). Analyzing e-business value creation from a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28(1), 49-60.
Tanaka, J. S. (1987). How big is big enough - Sample-size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent-variables. Child Development, 58(1), 134-146.
Tapscott, D., & Caston, A. (1993). Paradigm shift: The new promise of information technology. New York: Macmilliam.
Taylor, M., & Murphy, A. (2004). SMEs and e-business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(3), 280-289.
ten Klooster, P. M., Visser, M., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2008). Comparing two image research instruments: The Q-sort method versus the Likert attitude questionnaire. Food Quality and Preference, 19(5), 511-518.
Thong, J. Y. L. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small business. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187-215.
Tung, L. L., & Rieck O. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(4), 417-440.
United Nations DPEPA and ASPA. (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective: Assessing the progress of UN member states. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from: http://egov.dubai.ae/opt/CMSContent/Active/EGOV/
ar/Documents/Benchmarking_E-Government_A_Global_Perspective.pdf
VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4), 454-461.
Wang, S., & Cheung, W. (2004). E-business adoption by travel agencies: prime candidates for mobile e-business. International Journal of Eletronic Commerce, 8(3), 43-63.
WorldBank. (2000). Definition of E-Government. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/
EXTINFORMATIONANDCOMMUNICATIONANDTECHNOLOGIES/
EXTEGOVERNMENT/0,,contentMDK:20507153~menu
PK:702592~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSite
PK:702586,00.html
Wu, F., Mahajan, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2003). An analysis of e-busniess adoption and its impact on business performance. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 31(4), 425-447.
Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1985). Must all affect be mediated by cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 363-364.
Zhuang, Y., & Lederer, A. L. (2003). Aninstrument for measuring the business benefits of e-commerce retailing. International Journal of Eletronic Commerce, 7(3), 65-99.