現代人普遍生活在步調迅速及高度壓力之社會，長時間處在無自然元素之人為環境，忽略了自然環境帶來之身心健康優勢。本研究為釐清欲何種自然元素顯著影響人們的環境療癒感知，以及療癒效果、透過聯合分析及其它分析方法檢視各別元素對受訪者帶來的感受，以及身心恢復程度。進一步探討各別元素對受訪者的環境療癒感知、療癒效果及其構面因子之間的關聯性，此外，透過受訪者的不同背景屬性探討其評價差異，作為提供促進國人身心健康之環境規劃設計上的建議。
本研究將以三維建模軟體，建構自然元素之數種排列組合場景，作為建立模擬自然環境圖像並提供受訪者評估之視覺刺激媒介。研究流程中觀測受訪者進行療癒性體驗之過程，並透過不同的研究方法，逐步檢視受訪者對自然元素與環境療癒感知、療癒效果之間的關聯性。研究對象以國立成功大學之大學生、碩士生和博士生作為受測樣本，運用大型投影幕設備在投影片中放映十組模擬環境圖像，並進行問卷調查。共發放424份問卷，回收有效問卷為398份。經由數據彙整及逐步分析得出研究結果，其結果顯示，自然元素各個屬性水準之偏好程度、成份效用値，依權重之重要性依序為「陽光」元素、「植物」元素、「開敞性」、「水」元素。
「陽光」元素對環境療癒感知、療癒效果之影響力最高，其次是「植物」元素。在環境療癒感知的構面中，可分為「遠離感」、「延伸感」、「迷戀感」，以及「相容感」等四個因子，其中「陽光」對遠離感、迷戀感的影響程度較高；「植物」元素對相容感之影響力較大；「開敞性」對延伸感之影響力最高；而「遠離感」對療癒效果之影響最高。綜觀上述，可得知自然元素、環境療癒感知與療癒效果之關聯性和重要程度。
自然環境中的重要自然元素，不僅可納入都市、景觀和建築環境規劃設計之考量，更可顯著提升人們的生心理健康。本研究之結果，可釐清如何建立具有環境療癒感知、療癒效果和友善之場域，進而提升造訪者、使用者之身心健康。在規劃設計時，可分析基地之日照範圍，以提供舒適的自然採光；亦可增添植物之多樣性與整體性之景觀計畫，並充分了解造訪者需求，使其在場域內感到舒適。綜觀上述，將自然元素納入規劃設計，不僅能使造訪者獲得療癒並提升其效果，更使都市環境與建築環境達到提供國人休憩、解壓之目的，進一步使我們的生活能邁向更友善、健康之環境。

Natural environments can create positive physiological and psychological reactions in the human body, achieving restorative effects. However, people are used to spending the majority of their time in modernized cities and buildings without ever noticing the benefits of nature. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of elements of nature in the environment (“sun,” “plants,” and “water”) and environmental properties (such as “openness”) on human body restoration. More specifically, what are the different types of restorative perceptions they create that can bring about restorative effects? Apart from exploring the restorative elements of nature, the author arranged them in different permutations and combinations to generate 10 “images of natural environment.” In total, 424 NCKU students participated in the survey, and 398 valid responses were recovered. Finally, the conjoint analysis technique was used to determine the importance of elements and properties of nature in environmental restorative perception and restorative effects. Results showed that “sun” was the most important of the four factors, followed by “plants,” “openness,” and “water.” In addition, the 10th image of natural environment was the most popular among the participants.

Angileri, V., & Toccolini, A. (1993). The assessment of visual quality as a tool for the conservation of rural landscape diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 24(1-4), 105-112.
Al-Arouj, M., Assaad-Khalil, S., Buse, J., Fahdil, I., Fahmy, M., Hafez, S., ... & Al-Madani, A. (2010). Recommendations for management of diabetes during Ramadan: update 2010. Diabetes care, 33(8), 1895-1902.
An, M., Colarelli, S. M., O'Brien, K., & Boyajian, M. E. (2016). Why we need more nature at work: effects of natural elements and sunlight on employee mental health and work attitudes. PloS one, 11(5), e0155614.
Balling, J. D., & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14(1), 5-28.
Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3), 249-259.
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological science, 19(12), 1207-1212.
Beute, F., & De Kort, Y. A. W. (2014). Natural resistance: Exposure to nature and self-regulation, mood, and physiology after ego-depletion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 167-178.
Bagot, K. L., Allen, F. C. L., & Toukhsati, S. (2015). Perceived restorativeness of children's school playground environments: Nature, playground features and play period experiences. Journal of environmental psychology, 41, 1-9.
Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50.
Brooks, A. M., Ottley, K. M., Arbuthnott, K. D., & Sevigny, P. (2017). Nature-related mood effects: Season and type of nature contact. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 91-102.
Beute, F., & de Kort, Y. A. (2018). The natural context of wellbeing: Ecological momentary assessment of the influence of nature and daylight on affect and stress for individuals with depression levels varying from none to clinical. Health & place, 49, 7-18.
Colinge, J. P., Lee, C. W., Afzalian, A., Akhavan, N. D., Yan, R., Ferain, I., ... & Kelleher, A. M. (2010). Nanowire transistors without junctions. Nature nanotechnology, 5(3), 225.
Cracknell, D., White, M. P., Pahl, S., Nichols, W. J., & Depledge, M. H. (2016). Marine biota and psychological well-being: A preliminary examination of dose–response effects in an aquarium setting. Environment and behavior, 48(10), 1242-1269.
Conniff, A., & Craig, T. (2016). A methodological approach to understanding the wellbeing and restorative benefits associated with greenspace. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 19, 103-109.
Colley, K., & Craig, T. (2019). Natural places: Perceptions of wildness and attachment to local greenspace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 71-78.
De Vries, S., Van Dillen, S. M., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, 94, 26-33.
Francis, J., Wood, L. J., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2012). Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Social science & medicine, 74(10), 1570-1577.
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban forestry & urban greening, 2(1), 1-18.
Gidlow, C. J., Jones, M. V., Hurst, G., Masterson, D., Clark-Carter, D., Tarvainen, M. P., ... & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2016). Where to put your best foot forward: Psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 22-29.
Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: a systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(4), 4354-4379.
Grassini, S., Revonsuo, A., Castellotti, S., Petrizzo, I., Benedetti, V., & Koivisto, M. (2019). Processing of natural scenery is associated with lower attentional and cognitive load compared with urban ones. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 1-11.
Herzog, T. R. (1984). A cognitive analysis of preference for field‐and‐forest environments. Landscape research, 9(1), 10-16.
Herzog, T. R. (1985). A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(3), 225-241.
Hull IV, R. B., & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and behavior, 21(3), 323-345.
Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and behavior, 23(1), 3-26.
Herzog, T. R., & Bosley, P. J. (1992). Tranquility and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 12(2), 115-127.
Hartig, T., & Evans, G. W. (1993). Psychological foundations of nature experience. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 96, pp. 427-457). North-Holland.
Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A., & Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 17(2), 165-170.
Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian housing and planning research, 14(4), 175-194.
Herzog, T. R., & Miller, E. J. (1998). The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference. Environment and behavior, 30(4), 429-449.
Han, K. T. (2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and urban planning, 64(4), 209-232.
Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of environmental psychology, 26(3), 215-226.
Hartig, T. (2007). Three steps to understanding restorative environments as health resources. In Open space: People space(pp. 183-200). Taylor & Francis.
Han, K. T. (2010). An exploration of relationships among the responses to natural scenes: scenic beauty, preference, and restoration. Environment and Behavior, 42(2), 243-270.
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibanez, V. (2010). Beyond savanna: An evolutionary and environmental psychology approach to behavioral effects of nature scenery in green advertising. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 119-128.
Herzog, T. R., Ouellette, P., Rolens, J. R., & Koenigs, A. M. (2010). Houses of worship as restorative environments. Environment and Behavior, 42(4), 395-419.
Johnsen, S. Å. K. (2013). Exploring the use of nature for emotion regulation: Associations with personality, perceived stress, and restorative outcomes. Nordic Psychology, 65(4), 306-321.
James, V. H. T., Landon, J., & Wynn, V. (1962). Effect of an anabolic steroid (methandienone) on the metabolism of cortisol in the human. Journal of Endocrinology, 25(2), 211-220.
Kaplan, R., & Herbert, E. J. (1987). Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings. Landscape and urban planning, 14, 281-293.
Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and behavior, 19(1), 3-32.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. CUP Archive.
Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L. V., & Slakter, D. B. (1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment and Behavior, 25(6), 725-742.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of environmental psychology, 16(3), 221-233.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
Korpela, K. M., Klemettilä, T., & Hietanen, J. K. (2002). Evidence for rapid affective evaluation of environmental scenes. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 634-650.
Kaufman, A. J., & Lohr, V. I. (2004, June). Does it matter what color tree you plant?. In VIII International People-Plant Symposium on Exploring Therapeutic Powers of Flowers, Greenery and Nature 790 (pp. 179-184).
Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., & Silvennoinen, H. (2008). Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health & place, 14(4), 636-652.
Kabisch, N., & Haase, D. (2014). Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 129-139.
Kardan, O., Gozdyra, P., Misic, B., Moola, F., Palmer, L. J., Paus, T., & Berman, M. G. (2015). Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center. Scientific reports, 5, 11610.
Kardan, O., Gozdyra, P., Misic, B., Moola, F., & Palmer, L. J. (2017). Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center. In Urban Forests (pp. 77-108). Apple Academic Press.
Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 31-44.
Lohr, V. I., & Pearson-Mims, C. H. (2006). Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded, and conical tree forms. Environment and Behavior, 38(5), 667-688.
Lindal, P. J., & Hartig, T. (2015). Effects of urban street vegetation on judgments of restoration likelihood. Urban forestry & urban greening, 14(2), 200-209.
Lottrup, L., Stigsdotter, U. K., Meilby, H., & Claudi, A. G. (2015). The workplace window view: a determinant of office workers’ work ability and job satisfaction. Landscape Research, 40(1), 57-75.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Zhu, R. (2007). The influence of ceiling height: The effect of priming on the type of processing that people use. Journal of consumer research, 34(2), 174-186.
Matsuoka, R. H. (2010). Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links. Landscape and urban planning, 97(4), 273-282.
Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., & Warber, S. L. (2014). Examining group walks in nature and multiple aspects of well-being: A large-scale study. Ecopsychology, 6(3), 134-147.
Marselle, M., Irvine, K., Lorenzo-Arribas, A., & Warber, S. (2015). Moving beyond green: Exploring the relationship of environment type and indicators of perceived environmental quality on emotional well-being following group walks. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(1), 106-130.
Malekinezhad, F., & bin Lamit, H. (2018). Restoration Experience Measurement Methods in Contact with Green Open Spaces.
Menatti, L., Subiza-Pérez, M., Villalpando-Flores, A., Vozmediano, L., & San Juan, C. (2019). Place attachment and identification as predictors of expected landscape restorativeness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 36-43.
Nelson, T., Johnson, T., Strong, M., & Rudakewich, G. (2001). Perception of tree canopy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 315-324.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303-322.
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological science, 22(9), 1101-1106.
Orians, G. H., & Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes.
Okken, V., Van Rompay, T., & Pruyn, A. (2013). Room to move: On spatial constraints and self-disclosure during intimate conversations. Environment and behavior, 45(6), 737-760.
Okken, V., van Rompay, T., & Pruyn, A. (2013). When the world is closing in: Effects of perceived room brightness and communicated threat during patient-physician interaction. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(1), 37-53.
Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. Psychology Press.
Parsons, P. A. (1991). Biodiversity conservation under global climatic change: the insect drosophila as a biological indicator?. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 77-83.
Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (1984). Landscape perception: An examination and empirical investigation of two central issues in the area. Journal of Environmental Management, 19(1), 31-63.
Pitt, D. G., & Zube, E. H. (1987). Management of natural environments. Handbook of environmental psychology, 2, 1009-1042.
Purcell, A. T. (1987). Landscape perception, preference, and schema discrepancy. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 14(1), 67-92.
Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (1998). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and urban planning, 42(1), 57-66.
Park, B. J., Furuya, K., Kasetani, T., Takayama, N., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2011). Relationship between psychological responses and physical environments in forest settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(1), 24-32.
Park, S. A., & Lee, M. (2016). An Analysis of the Healing Effects by Types of Forest Space-Focused on Psychological Restorativeness and Satisfaction. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 44(4), 75-85.
Palanica, A., Lyons, A., Cooper, M., Lee, A., & Fossat, Y. (2019). A comparison of nature and urban environments on creative thinking across different levels of reality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 44-51.
Relf, P. D. (1998). People-plant relationship. Horticulture as therapy: Principles and practice, 21-42.
Regan, C. L., & Horn, S. A. (2005). To nature or not to nature: associations between environmental preferences, mood states and demographic factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 57-66.
Schroeder, H. W., & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of leisure research, 16(2), 178-194.
Smardon, R. C. (1988). Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15(1-2), 85-106.
Skehan, P. W., Ulrich, E., Sanderson, J., Sanderson, J. E., & Parsons, P. J. (1992). Qumran Cave 4: Palaeo-Hebrew and Greek Biblical Manuscripts. IV (Vol. 9). Oxford University Press.
Sommer, R., & Summit, J. (1995). An exploratory study of preferred tree form. Environment and Behavior, 27(4), 540-557.
Summit, J., & Sommer, R. (1999). Further studies of preferred tree shapes. Environment and Behavior, 31(4), 550-576.
Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. (2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(2), 147-157.
Stigsdotter, U. A., & Grahn, P. (2004). A garden at your workplace may reduce stress. Design & Health, 147-157.
Scopelliti, M., & Giuliani, M. V. (2004). Choosing restorative environments across the lifespan: A matter of place experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 423-437.
Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental psychology, 38, 104-115.
Staats, H., Jahncke, H., Herzog, T. R., & Hartig, T. (2016). Urban options for psychological restoration: common strategies in everyday situations. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146213.
Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and urban planning, 69(4), 403-416.
Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., & Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 1-9.
Tabrizian, P., Baran, P. K., Smith, W. R., & Meentemeyer, R. K. (2018). Exploring perceived restoration potential of urban green enclosure through immersive virtual environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 99-109.
Ulrich, R. S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well‐being. Landscape research, 4(1), 17-23.
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Springer, Boston, MA.
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421.
Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 13, 29-44.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. The biophilia hypothesis, 7, 73-137.
Ulrich, R. S., Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes, 73-137.
Ulrich, R. S. (1999). Effects of gardens on health outcomes: Theory and research. Healing gardens: therapeutic benefits and design recommendation.
Van den Berg, A. E., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of social issues, 63(1), 79-96.
Van den Berg, A. E., Jorgensen, A., & Wilson, E. R. (2014). Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 173-181.
Van den Berg, M., Wendel-Vos, W., van Poppel, M., Kemper, H., van Mechelen, W., & Maas, J. (2015). Health benefits of green spaces in the living environment: A systematic review of epidemiological studies. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 806-816.
van Rompay, T. J., & Jol, T. (2016). Wild and free: Unpredictability and spaciousness as predictors of creative performance. Journal of environmental psychology, 48, 140-148.
von Lindern, E. (2017). Perceived interdependencies between settings as constraints for self-reported restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 8-17.
Wohlwill, J. F. (1983). The concept of nature. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 5-37). Springer, Boston, MA.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Massachusetts.
Wilson, M. I., Robertson, L. D., Daly, M., & Walton, S. A. (1995). Effects of visual cues on assessment of water quality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 53-63.
White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482-493.
White, E. V., & Gatersleben, B. (2011). Greenery on residential buildings: Does it affect preferences and perceptions of beauty?. Journal of environmental psychology, 31(1), 89-98.
Zhu, R., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2007). Exploring the cognitive mechanism that underlies regulatory focus effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 89-96.
曾慈慧. (2003). 景觀環境與福祉及復癒關係之硏究 (Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University).
翁珮怡, 江彥政, & 張俊彥. (2010). 土地開發程度對自然度感受及生心理反應之影響, 造園景觀學報, 17 (1), 41-60.
張麒威. (2015). 公園療癒環境與成功老化關係之研究. 成功大學建築學系學位論文, 1-129.
葉婉柔, & 歐聖榮. (2013). 探討水體不同類型尺度對受測者心理感受之影響. 造園景觀學報, 19(3), 15-34.
蔡麗秋, & 邱英浩. (2017). 樹形對心理感知之影響研究. Journal of architecture, 18(2), 129-150.