簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃盈綺
Huang, Ying-Chi
論文名稱: 初次委任審計定價與市場定價策略:台灣證據
Audit Pricing and Market Pricing Strategy in Initial Audit Engagements: Evidence from Taiwan
指導教授: 黃華瑋
Huang, Hua-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 26
中文關鍵詞: 滲透定價法聲望定價法審計公費定價財務報導品質初次審計委任
外文關鍵詞: penetration pricing, prestige pricing, audit pricing, financial reporting quality, initial audit engagements
相關次數: 點閱:238下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Huang, Feng, and Mandry (2017) 用市場定價策略的角度,檢視初次審計委任時, 審計公費與財務報導品質的關係,並得出結論:在美國,比較有錢的會計師事務所 比較可能採用聲望定價法,而比較沒有錢的會計師比較可能採用滲透定價法。也就 是說,比較有錢的會計師比較可能向初次審計服務的新客戶收取審計公費溢酬,而 比較沒有錢的會計師比較可能向初次審計服務的新客戶提供審計公費折扣。本文使 用與 Huang, Feng, and Mandry (2017)相同的模型來研究台灣審計市場。不同於美 國的審計市場,在台灣,不管是國家層級或是城市層級的有錢會計師事務所都會在 初次審計委任時使用滲透定價法並提供審計公費折扣。台灣與美國審計市場的差異 可能起源於台灣較低的法律強度與較競爭的審計市場。

    Huang, Feng, and Mandry (2017) examine audit pricing and financial reporting quality in initial audit engagements from the perspective of audit market pricing strategies and indicate that richer audit firms in the U.S. are inclined to adopt a prestige pricing strategy in the initial audit engagement while poorer audit firms tend to use a penetration pricing strategy. That is, richer audit firms are more likely to charge an initial fee premium for new clients while poorer audit firms are more likely to provide an initial fee discount to new clients. Using the same method as in Huang et al. (2017), it is found that in Taiwan, audit firm leaders at the national level tend to provide higher discounts than non-leaders to compete for greater market shares of new clients. Likewise, audit firm leaders at the city level also provide audit fee discounts for initial engagements. Both use a penetration pricing strategy. The less intense law enforcement and high competition in Taiwan audit market may explain the discrepancy.

    ABSTRACT I 摘要 II 誌謝 III LIST OF TABLES V INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT 3 DATA AND METHOD 5 Sample Selection 5 Audit Fee Model: Leaders Analyses 8 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 9 Descriptive Statistics 9 Univariate Analyses 10 Multivariate Analyses 11 Additional Analysis 13 CONCLUSION 14 REFERENCES VI ENDNOTE IX

    Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., and Mayhew, B. W., “Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence,” The Accounting Review, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 611-639, 2003.
    Aier, J. K., Comprix, J., Gunlock, M. T., and Lee, D, “The financial expertise of CFOs and accounting restatements,” Accounting Horizons, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 123-135, 2005.
    Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., and Subramanyam, K. R. (1998), “The effect of audit quality on earnings management,” Contemporary accounting research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 1998.
    Basioudis, I. G., and Francis, J. R., “Big 4 audit fee premiums for national and office- level industry leadership in the United Kingdom,”Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 143-166, 2007.
    Cahan, S. F., Jeter, D. C., and Naiker, V., “Are all industry specialist auditors the same?,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 191-222, 2011.
    Chen, A., Chen, C. Y., and Lee, W., “The effect of passing rate of CPA examination on the industrial structure of accounting firms in Taiwan,” Pan-Pacific Management Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155-170, 2002.
    Chen, K.Y. and Wu, S. Y., “Industry specialists, audit fees and auditor size: evidence from Taiwan,” Taiwan Accounting Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41-69, 2004.
    Chen, C. Y., Lin, C. J., and Lin, Y. C., “Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality?,” Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 415-445, 2008.
    Chin, C. L., and Chi, H. Y., “Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise,” Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 729-765, 2009.
    Chi, W., Huang, H., Liao, Y., Xie, H., “Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan,” Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 359–391, 2009.
    Chen, S., Sun, S. Y., and Wu, D., “Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis,” The Accounting Review, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 127-158, 2010.
    Chi, W., Douthett, E. B., and Lisic, L. L., “Client importance and audit partner independence,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 320-336, 2012.
    Czerney, K., Schmidt, J. J., and Thompson, A. M., “Does auditor explanatory language in unqualified audit reports indicate increased financial misstatement risk?,” The Accounting Review, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 2115-2149, 2014.
    Chu, P. Y., “What’s wrong with the cost deduction strategy?” Harvard Business Review - Traditional Chinese Edition, March 2015.
    Dao, M., Huang, H. W., Chen, K. Y., and Huang, T. C., “Can Management Turnover Restore the Financial Statement Credibility of Restating Firms? Further Evidence,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 41, no. 7-8, pp. 893-925, 2014.
    Dean, J., “Pricing Policies for New Products.” Harvard Business Review. vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 141–153, 1976.
    Ettredge, M., and Greenberg, R., “Determinants of fee cutting on initial audit engagements.” Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 198-210, 1990.
    Feng, Y., “Taiwan and Gatt: The political, legal and economic issues raised by the possibility of Taiwan joining GATT,” The World Economy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 129–143, 1990.
    Fama, E. F., and French, K. R., “Industry costs of equity,” Journal of financial economics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 153-193, 1997.
    Francis, J. R., Stokes, D. J., and Anderson, D., “City Markets as a Unit of Analysis in Audit Research and the Re‐Examination of Big 6 Market Shares,” Abacus, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 185-206, 1999.
    Ferguson, A., Francis, J. R., and Stokes, D. J., “The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing,” The accounting review, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 429-448, 2003.
    Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., and Wang, D., “The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the US audit market,” The accounting review, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 113-136, 2005.
    Fung, S. Y. K., Gul, F. A., and Krishnan, J., “City-level auditor industry specialization, economies of scale, and audit pricing,” The Accounting Review, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1281- 1307, 2012.
    Gittings, C. ,The Advertising Handbook. New York: Routledge, 2002.
    Huang, H. W., Raghunandan, K., and Rama, D., “Audit fees for initial audit engagements before and after SOX,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 171-190, 2009.
    Huang, H. W., Raghunandan, K., Huang, T. C., and Chiou, J. R., “Fee discounting and audit quality following audit firm and audit partner changes: Chinese evidence,” The Accounting Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1517-1546, 2014.
    Huang, T. C., Chiou, J. R., Huang, H. W., and Chen, J. F., “Lower audit fees for women audit partners in Taiwan and why,” Asia Pacific Management Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 219-233, 2015.
    Huang, H.W., Z.Y. Feng, and D. Mandry., “Audit Pricing and Financial Reporting Quality in Initial Audit Engagements: US Evidence from Market Pricing Strategy,” unpublished, 2017.
    Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., and Wasley, C. E., “Performance matched discretionary accrual measures,” Journal of accounting and economics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 163-197, 2005.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny., “Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy,” vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1113–55, 1998.
    Liao, H. M., Wang, C. C., and Chi, W. C., “What does the complete disclosure of audit fee information tell us in Taiwan.” Taiwan Accounting Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49-88, 2012.
    Linck, J. S., Netter, J., and Shu, T., “Can managers use discretionary accruals to ease financial constraints? Evidence from discretionary accruals prior to investment,” The Accounting Review, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2117-2143, 2013.
    Michael J. Peel, “Addressing Unobserved Selection Bias in Accounting Studies: The Bias Minimization Method,” European Accounting Review, vol. 0, no: 0, pp. 1-11, 2016.
    Pirinsky, C., and Wang, Q., “Does corporate headquarters location matter for stock returns?,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1991-2015, 2006.
    Reynolds, J. K., and Francis, J. R., “Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions,” Journal of accounting and economics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 375-400, 2000.
    Romanus, R. N., Maher, J. J., and Fleming, D. M., “Auditor industry specialization, auditor changes, and accounting restatements,” Accounting Horizons, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 389-413, 2008.
    Simunic, D. A., “The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence,” Journal of accounting research, pp. 161-190, 1980.
    Simon, D. T., and Francis, J. R., “The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery,” Accounting Review, pp. 255-269, 1988.
    Wilson, R., “Auditing: Perspectives from multi-person decision theory,” Accounting Review, pp. 305-318, 1983.
    Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., and Raghunandan, K. , “Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non‐audit fees,” Journal of accounting research, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 721-744, 2003.
    Wang, Q., Wong, T. J., and Xia, L., “State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China,” Journal of accounting and economics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 112-134, 2008.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2023-01-01公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE