在經濟全球化和競爭日益加劇的背景下，個人的創意和富有創造力的產業已被認定為持續經濟增長和繁榮的重要驅動力(Moriset, 2014)。共同工作空間(Coworking Space)以進駐的門檻低、彈性的辦公空間以及不定期的社群聚會活動，大受新創公司與個人工作者歡迎。有別於過往產業群聚，共同工作空間被視為一種都市內的產業微型群聚(Microcluster)，大量小型新創公司聚集於此，透過辦公空間的共享大大增加公司間面對面接觸的機率，以製造更多商業機會，同時藉由活動聚會，促進內部新創公司與外部大型企業合作，以達到新創公司的成長，並帶動周邊地區的發展。而台灣於2019年經濟部中小企業白皮書中將新創企業視為是推動未來經濟前進的關鍵力量，若能針對提供新創團隊創育輔導的機構-共同工作空間在區位選擇上有更深入之了解，即可作為未來政府輔導或設置創育機構的重要參考來源。
過去文獻對於共同工作空間區位相關之研究，僅停留在質性訪談所獲得之現象歸納，但共同工作空間類型眾多，難以針對不同區位的共同工作空間有更詳細的因果關係解釋。故本研究以台北都會區為研究範圍，首先透過文獻回顧針對共同工作空間進行重新定義，並選取商務中心與共享辦公室作為主要研究對象，再利用質性訪談所歸納出的七個假說，以原始多項羅吉特模型(Original MNL)進行實證。
研究結果顯示在面對不同都市區位下，共同工作空間的經營者確實會有不同的經營模式，其中都市市中心(A級商辦區位)的共同工作空間業者，相較其他區位有更多比例的業者有設置單人座位出租，顯現出共同工作空間的使用者在都市市中心當中比起其他區位更能接受承租單人座位的形式進行工作；而在市中心周圍(B級商辦區位)的共同工作空間業者，相較其他區位有更多比例的業者設置獨立辦公室出租，顯現出在此區位的使用者較傾向承租隱密性高的獨立辦公室進行工作。此外，土地價值的成長將會造成業者營運成本提升，而降低業者於方案內設點之意願。

Coworking Space is popular among startups and individual workers due to its low entry barrier, flexible office space and occasionally community activities. It is regarded as a microcluster, which number of startups gather to share their office space, it could increase the chance of face-to-face contact, create more business opportunities, and promote the growth of startups, even drive the development of local area. In White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan, 2019, startups are regarded as the key force to promote future economic.
In this paper, we redefined the coworking space through the literature review, and then made five interviews with different operators to create the hypothesis about the relation between coworking space and location choice. At the quantitative empirical, this paper uses Original Multinomial Logit Analysis to verify whether different characteristic of coworking space would influence their location choice or not. The result shows that the operator would set on different location by different rental unit. There are more percentage of operators on CBD location would provide rental of single seat than other location, it means there are more users accept to lease a single seat for working on CBD location. And the operators on surrounded CBD location would provide private office mainly, it shows that the users in this location prefer to lease the office with high privacy for working. In addition, the growth of land value will increase operating costs and reduce the willingness of operators to set up coworking spaces.

Bernstein, P. L. (1993). Capital ideas: the improbable origins of modern Wall Street: Simon and Schuster.
Bessant, J., & Rush, H. (1995). Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy, 24(1), 97-114.
Bodenman, J. E. (2000). Firm characteristics and location: The case of the institutional investment advisory industry in the United States, 1983–1996. Papers in Regional Science, 79(1), 33-56.
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1-14.
Capdevila, I. (2013). Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. Available at SSRN 2414121.
Cheng, S., & Stough, R. R. (2006). Location decisions of Japanese new manufacturing plants in China: a discrete-choice analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(2), 369-387.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harved Business School Press.
Clapp, J., Pollakowski, H. O., & Lynford, L. (1992). Intrametropolitan location and office market dynamics. Real Estate Economics, 20(2), 229-258.
Clark, D. (2003). Urban world/global city: Psychology Press.
Cohendet, P., Grandadam, D., & Simon, L. (2010). The anatomy of the creative city. Industry and innovation, 17(1), 91-111.
Coworking.com., Coworking.com. Retrieved from http://coworking.com/ (September 5, 2020).
Coworking.com., Coworking.com Wiki. Retrieved from http://wiki.coworking.com/w/page/16583831/FrontPage#WhatisCoworking (September 5, 2020).
Deskmag (2019). 2019 State of Coworking: Over 2 Million Coworking Space Members Expected. Retrieved from http://www.deskmag.com/en/2019-state-of-coworking-spaces-2-million-members-growth-crisis-market-report-survey-study (August 27, 2020)
Elgar, I., Farooq, B., & Miller, E. J. (2009). Modeling location decisions of office firms: Introducing anchor points and constructing choice sets in the model system. Transportation Research Record, 2133(1), 56-63.
Fiorentino, S. (2019). Different typologies of ‘co-working spaces’ and the contemporary dynamics of local economic development in Rome. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1768-1790.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative-and how it is transforming leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Fuchs, V. R. (1968). The service economy. New York National Bureau of Economic Research.
Fuzi, A. (2015). Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales. Regional studies, regional science, 2(1), 462-469.
Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. ephemera, 15(1), 193.
Gottfredson, M., Puryear, R., & Phillips, S. (2005). Strategic sourcing: from periphery to the core.
Greenfield, A. (2010). Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing: New Riders.
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative science quarterly, 716-749.
Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715-728.
Howells, J. (2012). The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 1003-1020.
Huang, H., Liu, Y., Liang, Y., Vargas, D., & Zhang, L. (2020). Spatial Perspectives on Coworking Spaces and Related Practices in Beijing. Built Environment, 46(1), 40-54.
Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Raper, M. D. (1990). The intrametropolitan location of new office firms. Land Economics, 66(2), 182-198.
Jakobsen, S.-E., & Onsager, K. (2005). Head office location: Agglomeration, clusters or flow nodes? Urban studies, 42(9), 1517-1535.
Koramaz, E. K., & Öztürk, E. (2019). Coworking spaces and urban quality of life in Istanbul.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W., Hart, O., & Perry, G. L. (1992). The structure and performance of the money management industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1992, 339-391.
Liang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Liu, Y. (2019). Location choices of Chinese enterprises in Southeast Asia: The role of overseas Chinese networks. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(8), 1396-1410.
Lynn, L. H., Mohan Reddy, N., & Aram, J. D. (1996). Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework. Research Policy, 25(1), 91-106.
Malecki, E. J. a. M., B. (2008). The Digital Economy: Business Organization, Production Processes and Regional Developments. London: Routledge.
Mantel, S., & Rosegger, G. (1987). The role of third-parties in the diffusion of innovations: a survey. Innovation: Adaptation and growth, 123-134.
Mariotti, I., Pacchi, C., & Di Vita, S. (2017). Co-working spaces in Milan: Location patterns and urban effects. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(3), 47-66.
McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontier in Economics, Ed. P. Zaremka, Academic Press, New York.
Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. ephemera, 15(2), 121-139.
Michalak, W., & Fairbairn, K. J. (1993). The location of producer services in Edmonton. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 37(1), 2-16.
Mills, E. S. (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. The American Economic Review, 57(2), 197-210.
Moriset, B. (2013). Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces. Proceedings of the 2nd Geography of Innovation, International Conference 2014, Utrecht University, Utrecht (The Netherlands)
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day: Paragon House Publishers.
Petch, Z. (2015). The urban planner’s guide to coworking: a case study of Toronto, Ontario. RULA Digital Repository, 1-68.
Porter, M. E. (1998a). Clusters and the new economics of competition (Vol. 76): Harvard Business Review Boston.
Porter, M. E., & Porter, M. P. (1998b). Location, clusters, and the" new" microeconomics of competition. Business economics, 7-13.
Rohrer, J. (1990). Money management powerhouses. Institutional Investor January, 44-49.
Sassen, S. (1995). On concentration and centrality in the global city. World cities in a world system, 63, 71.
Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399-441.
Statista.com . Number of coworking spaces worldwide from 2005 to 2020. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/554273/number-of-coworking-spaces-worldwide/ (August 23, 2020)
Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything: Penguin.
Wolpert, J. D. (2002). Breaking out of the innovation box. Harvard business review, 80(8), 76-83.
余宣和(2020)。基於多尺度的創新系統觀點初探台北市創育機構對於創新創業環境發展的影響。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
金家禾(1999)。邁向世界都市之台北都會區產業結構與空間分佈變遷。都市與計劃, 26(2), 95-112。
金家禾(2007)。創意產業於台北都會中心區群聚發展之研究。都市與計劃, 34(4), 343-361.
段必文(2020)。都市經濟建成環境因素影響金融機構區位選擇之實證研究－以高雄都市地區為例。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
陳彥仲(1997)。住宅選擇之程序性決策模式.。住宅學報(5), 37-49.
陳彥仲(1998)。對多項 Logit 模型參數指定方式之比較分析。交大管理學報, 171-185。
曾冠凱(2017)。大台北都會區共同工作空間使用者需求特性之研究。國立政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班。
游舜德(2018)。使用者觀點下都會區無樁式自行車系統之規範與管理：從共享財之財產權特性與外溢效果進行探討。都市與計劃, 45(4), 301-333.
黃名義(2001)。不同產業企業總部辦公室之區位選擇。建築學報(38), 129-146.
黃名義(2002)。辦公室市場租區與區位之研究。國立政治大學地政學系博士班。
黃名義、張金鶚(2005)。台北都會區大型企業的辦公室區位變遷研究。管理評論, 24(4), 83-102.
溫彩苓(2017)。共享經濟脈絡下共同工作空間的可及、社群與協力的關係研究-以台北市為例. 國立臺北教育大學社會與區域發展學系碩士班。
經濟部中小企業處(2019)。2019年中小企業白皮書。
羅文憲(2008)。集團企業辦公室區位選擇之研究。國立屏東商業技術學院不動產經營所。