簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 沙瓦瑪
Kumar, Sarah Ravi
論文名稱: Bond Performance between Ultra-High Performance Concrete and High Strength Steel using Pull-out tests
Bond Performance between Ultra-High Performance Concrete and High Strength Steel using Pull-out tests
指導教授: 洪崇展
Hung, Chung-Chan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 79
外文關鍵詞: Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC), High-strength steel (HSS), Bond strength, Bond stress-slip
相關次數: 點閱:107下載:15
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is an advanced cementitious material, which has enhanced mechanical characteristics: 1) ultra-high compressive strength (exceeding 100 MPa), 2) high durability, 3) high tensile strength, 4) low drying shrinkage and low permeability. With these superior material properties, the Ultra-high-performance concrete provide an improved and innovative way to design high-rise building and long-span bridges.
    Several experimental results indicated that the inclusion of steel fibers in UHPC increased the bond strength between UHPC and reinforcing bars. In addition, inclusion of steel fibers controls the sudden crack propagation and changes the mode of bond failure from brittle to ductile. In this study, the interaction between UHPC and the HSS rebars have been studied.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES ix ABSTRACT 1 CHAPTER 1 2 INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER 2 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 2.1 UHPC 3 2.2 Bond Interaction between steel and concrete 4 2.3 Bond mechanism and influencing factors 6 2.4 Testing Methods 8 2.5 Introduction of Bond Models 10 CHAPTER 3 14 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 14 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Parameters for experiment 14 3.3 Design of Pullout specimen 17 3.4 Fabrication 20 3.5 Instrumentation and Testing 22 CHAPTER 4 30 RESULTS 30 4.1 Compressive strength – Concrete 30 4.2 Tensile Strength – Concrete 32 4.3 Tensile Strength – Reinforcement bar 35 4.4 Pullout tests 40 4.4.1 High Strength Steel D16 40 4.4.2 High Strength Steel D25 44 4.4.3 SD 420 D16 and D25 49 4.4.4 High Strength Steel- Headed D25 52 CHAPTER 5 54 DISCUSSIONS 54 5.1 Bond performance of all the specimens 54 5.1.1 Overall test behavior and Failure modes 54 5.1.2 Bond strength and slip response 56 5.1.3 Influence of rebar diameter on the bond strength 60 5.1.4 Influence of the effect of rebar type and comparison with literature 61 5.1.5 Influence of the effect of different of type of fibers on bond strength 63 5.1.6 Influence of relative area of ribs (Rr) on the bond strength 64 5.1.7 Influence of headed-end compared to straight end HSS rebar on bond strength 65 5.2 Bond performance of non-yield specimens 66 5.2.1 Bond strength and slip 66 5.2.2 Comparison of experimental results with bond model equations 69 CHAPTER 6 72 SUGGESTIONS 72 CHAPTER 7 73 CONCLUSIONS 73 REFERENCES 75

    1. 洪崇展, et al., 新世代多功能性混凝土材料-高性能纖維混凝土. 土木水利, 2017. 44(1): p. 33-161.
    2. Saleem, M.A., et al., Development length of high-strength steel rebar in ultrahigh performance concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2013. 25(8): p. 991-998.
    3. Committee, A., Bond and development of straight reinforcing bars in tension (ACI 408R-03). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, US, 2003: p. 49.
    4. Fu, X. and D. Chung, Effect of corrosion on the bond between concrete and steel rebar. Cement and Concrete Research, 1997. 27(12): p. 1811-1815.
    5. Fu, X. and D. Chung, Improving the bond strength between steel rebar and concrete by increasing the watercement ratio. Cement and concrete research, 1997. 27(12): p. 1805-1809.
    6. Harajli, M.H., B.S. Hamad, and A.A. Rteil, Effect of confinement of bond strength between steel. ACI Structural Journal, 2004. 101(5): p. 595-603.
    7. Bingöl, A.F. and R. Gül, Residual bond strength between steel bars and concrete after elevated temperatures. Fire Safety Journal, 2009. 44(6): p. 854-859.
    8. Yoo, D.-Y. and H.-O. Shin, Bond performance of steel rebar embedded in 80–180 MPa ultra-high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018. 93: p. 206-217.
    9. Reda, M., N. Shrive, and J. Gillott, Microstructural investigation of innovative UHPC. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999. 29(3): p. 323-329.
    10. Farzad, M., M. Shafieifar, and A. Azizinamini, Experimental and numerical study on bond strength between conventional concrete and Ultra High-Performance Concrete (UHPC). Engineering Structures, 2019. 186: p. 297-305.
    11. Ganesh, P. and A.R. Murthy, Tensile behaviour and durability aspects of sustainable ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with GGBS as cementitious material. Construction and Building Materials, 2019. 197: p. 667-680.
    12. Harajli, M., Bond stress–slip model for steel bars in unconfined or steel, FRC, or FRP confined concrete under cyclic loading. Journal of structural engineering, 2009. 135(5): p. 509-518.
    13. Chao, S.-H., A.E. Naaman, and G.J. Parra-Montesinos, Bond behavior of reinforcing bars in tensile strain-hardening fiber-reinforced cement composites. ACI Structural Journal, 2009. 106(6): p. 897.
    14. Bujňák, J. and M. Farbák, Tests of Short Headed Bars with Anchor Reinforcement Used in Beam-to-Column Joints. ACI Structural Journal, 2018. 115(1).
    15. di Prisco, M., M. Colombo, and D. Dozio, Fibre‐reinforced concrete in fib Model Code 2010: principles, models and test validation. Structural Concrete, 2013. 14(4): p. 342-361.
    16. Hwang, H.-J., H.-G. Park, and W.-J. Yi, Development Length of Headed Bar Based on Nonuniform Bond Stress Distribution. ACI Structural Journal, 2019.
    17. Gil Sedano, A., Numerical Analysis of Bond between Steel and Concrete under Elevated Temperatures. 2018.
    18. Wang, H., An analytical study of bond strength associated with splitting of concrete cover. Engineering Structures, 2009. 31(4): p. 968-975.
    19. Azizinamini, A., et al., Bond performance of reinforcing bars embedded in high-strength concrete. Structural Journal, 1993. 90(5): p. 554-561.
    20. Wassouf, M., Bond and ductility of concrete reinforced with various steel bars surface and ductility conditions. 2015, University of Birmingham.
    21. Swenty, M.K. and B.A. Graybeal, Influence of differential deflection on staged construction deck-level connections. 2012, United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure ….
    22. Fehling, E., P. Lorenz, and T. Leutbecher. Experimental investigations on anchorage of rebars in UHPC. in Proceedings of Hipermat 2012 3rd International Symposium on UHPC and Nanotechnology for High Performance Construction Materials. 2012.
    23. Holschemacher, K., D. Weiße, and S. Klotz. Bond of reinforcement in ultra high strength concrete. in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete. 2004. Kassel University Press Kassel, Germany.
    24. Rilem, T., RC 6 Bond test for reinforcement steel. 2. Pull-out test, 1983. RILEM recommendations for the testing and use of constructions materials, 1994: p. 218-220.
    25. Lin, H., et al., The bond behavior between concrete and corroded steel bar under repeated loading. Engineering Structures, 2017. 140: p. 390-405.
    26. Chu, S. and A. Kwan, A new method for pull out test of reinforcing bars in plain and fibre reinforced concrete. Engineering Structures, 2018. 164: p. 82-91.
    27. Orangun, C.O., J. Jirsa, and J. Breen. A reevaulation of test data on development length and splices. in Journal Proceedings. 1977.
    28. Darwin, D., et al., Development length criteria for conventional and high relative rib area reinforcing bars. 1995, University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.
    29. Esfahani, M.R. and B.V. Rangan, Bond between normal strength and high-strength concrete (HSC) and reinforcing bars in splices in beams. Structural Journal, 1998. 95(3): p. 272-280.
    30. béton, C.e.-i.d. and F.I.d.l. Précontrainte, CEB-FIP model code 1990: Design code. Vol. 1993. 1993: Thomas Telford Publishing.
    31. Tepfers, R., Bond clause proposals for FRP bars/rods in concrete based on CEB/FIP Model Code 90. Part 1: Design bond stress for FRP reinforcing bars. Structural concrete, 2006. 7(2): p. 47-55.
    32. Derzsi, Z. and R. Volcic, MOTOM toolbox: MOtion Tracking via Optotrak and Matlab. Journal of neuroscience methods, 2018. 308: p. 129-134.
    33. Standard, A., C172/C172M (2010),". Standard Practice for Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete," ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003.
    34. ASTM, C., 39 (2012) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM, West Conshohocken.
    35. Lemnitzer, L., et al. Bond behaviour between reinforcing steel and concrete under multiaxial loading conditions in concrete containments. in 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 20), Espoo, Finland, 9-14 August 2009. 2009.
    36. Khaksefidi, S., M. Ghalehnovi, and J. De Brito, Bond behaviour of high-strength steel rebars in normal (NSC) and ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). Journal of Building Engineering, 2020. 33: p. 101592.
    37. Lundgren, K. and J. Magnusson, Three-dimensional modeling of anchorage zones in reinforced concrete. Journal of engineering mechanics, 2001. 127(7): p. 693-699.
    38. Yuan, J. and B. Graybeal, Bond of Reinforcement in Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 2015. 112(6).
    39. Mirza, S.M. and J. Houde. Study of bond stress-slip relationships in reinforced concrete. in Journal proceedings. 1979.
    40. Soroushian, P., et al., Bond of deformed bars to concrete: effects of confinement and strength of concrete. Materials Journal, 1991. 88(3): p. 227-232.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE