簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 施柏任
Shih, Po-Jen
論文名稱: 基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係
The Relationship Between Fund Managers' Characteristics and Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure Performance
指導教授: 顏盟峯
Yen, Meng-Feng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 經營管理碩士學位學程(AMBA)
Advanced Master of Business Administration (AMBA)
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 87
中文關鍵詞: 基金經理人特徵企業自願揭露股票型基金環境保護ESG
外文關鍵詞: fund manager characteristics, corporate voluntary disclosure, equity mutual fund, environmental protection, ESG
相關次數: 點閱:8下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討基金經理人個體特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關聯性。研究以2015至2024年之台灣股票型共同基金為樣本,透過資源基礎理論與高階梯隊理論等觀點,聚焦四項經理人特徵:性別、教育程度、任期及年資,建立基金經理人特徵(自變數)和基金投組之企業環境資訊揭露績效分數(應變數)兩者之間的假說,並進一步透過迴歸模型,檢驗基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效的關聯性,以揭示不同特徵之基金經理人特徵的持股偏好。其次,再將台灣金管會實施相關環境政策「上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖」後之時間點,作為研究之調節變數納入分析,並進一步檢驗調節變數在自變數與應變數之間的影響性。
    研究結果顯示,男性基金經理人與企業環境資訊揭露績效呈現顯著正相關;其次,具碩士以上學歷的基金經理人與企業環境資訊揭露績效呈現顯著負相關;第三,基金經理人任期同樣與企業環境資訊揭露績效呈現顯著負相關;最後,基金經理人年資與企業環境資訊揭露績效呈現顯著正相關。而在監管機關實施相關環境政策後,此政策調節變數在環境構面揭露績效及其四大子構面中皆呈現正向顯著之關聯性。此外,實施相關政策後,部份子構面的性別及任期特徵則出現反轉,顯示女性、任期較長之基金經理人在特定環境構面較傾向將環境資訊揭露表現佳的企業納入投組之結果。
    本研究針對基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效的關聯進行系統性分析,不僅彌補了過往文獻在此議題上的空缺,也為相關企業與監理機關提供具體的治理與監管參考。研究證據顯示,不同的經理人特徵確實與其管理之投組企業環境資訊揭露績效相關聯,企業可據此調整管理團隊的任用以及人才培訓策略。此外,金管會等主管機關亦可利用本研究結果,檢視並優化現行關於企業環境資訊揭露規範,確保其在提升永續治理品質方面具有實質效益。

    This study investigates how the personal attributes of fund managers shape the environmental information disclosure performance of the companies they hold in Taiwanese equity mutual-fund portfolios. Drawing on the resource allocation lens and Upper Echelons Theory, we analyze the corporates’ environment information disclosure performance in equity mutual-fund portfolios of Taiwanese market and its relationship with fund managers’ characteristics: gender, education level, tenure and industry-wide experience through 2015 to 2024. Data of environmental information disclosure performance of the companies were collected from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) and data related to fund and fund managers’ characteristics were collected from FundDJ. The empirical tests were conducted using multiple regression. The results of the regression show that fund managers’ gender, education level, tenure and industry-wide experience are significantly related to environmental information disclosure performance of equity mutual-fund portfolios. It also indicates that fund managers with personal characteristics of male, education level less than the master’s degree, shorter tenure, longer industry experience, tend to hold companies with better environmental disclosure performance in their portfolios. In contrast, fund managers with personal characteristics of female, with postgraduate degrees, longer tenure, shorter industry experience, are more inclined to hold firms with weaker environmental disclosure performance in their portfolios. By presenting empirical findings drawn from an emerging market context, this study enriches the ESG governance literature and supplies practical guidance for corporate leaders and regulators as they refine governance structures.

    摘要 I 目錄 VI 表目錄 IX 圖目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 5 1.3 研究流程 8 第二章 文獻探討與假說推論 10 2.1 機構投資人與企業環境資訊揭露 10 2.1.1 機構投資人 11 2.1.2 企業環境資訊揭露 12 2.1.3 理論基礎 14 2.2 基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效 16 2.2.1 基金經理人特徵:性別與企業環境資訊揭露績效 16 2.2.2 基金經理人特徵:教育程度與企業環境資訊揭露績效 17 2.2.3 基金經理人特徵:任期及年資與企業環境資訊揭露績效 18 2.3 市場制度壓力與企業環境資訊揭露績效 19 第三章 研究方法 22 3.1 研究樣本 22 3.2 研究變數 23 3.2.1 應變數—企業環境資訊揭露績效 23 3.2.2 自變數—基金經理人特徵 24 3.2.3 控制變數 25 3.3 實證模型 27 3.3.1 基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關聯性探討 27 第四章 實證結果 30 4.1 敘述統計分析 30 4.2 相關性係數分析 32 4.3 基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之差異性檢定 33 4.4 基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係 35 4.4.1 基金經理人性別特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係 36 4.4.2 基金經理人教育程度特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係 37 4.4.3 基金經理人任期特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係 39 4.4.4 基金經理人年資特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係 40 4.4.5 基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係:合併模型之觀察 41 4.5 基金經理人特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係:實施「上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖」後之變化 42 4.5.1 基金經理人性別特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係:實施「上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖」後之變化 43 4.5.2 基金經理人教育程度特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係:實施「上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖」後之變化 44 4.5.3 基金經理人任期特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係:實施「上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖」後之變化 45 4.5.4 基金經理人年資特徵與企業環境資訊揭露績效之關係:實施「上市櫃公司永續發展路徑圖」後之變化 46 第五章 研究結論 48 5.1 研究結論 48 5.2 學術及實務意涵 49 5.3 研究限制與研究建議 50 參考文獻 52

    李昀修. (2024). 學歷是否重要? 探討臺灣基金經理人特徵對基金績效的影響. 國立臺灣大學財務金融學系學位論文, 1-56.
    金融管理監督委員會(2017). 建議修正證券投資信託公司向貴公會申報證券投資信託基金週轉率公式一案. 發文字號:金管證投字第1060016951號函.
    國立臺北大學企業永續發展研究中心.(2024). 2024臺灣永續投資調查報告. 臺灣證券交易所公司治理中心.
    詹朵亞. (2023). 基金經理人特質與基金績效之關係-探討永續投資 (ESG) 的中介效果
    Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of michigan Press.
    Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social Learning Theory (Vol. 1). Prentice hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.
    Bär, M., Kempf, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2011). Is a team different from the sum of its parts? Evidence from mutual fund managers. Review of Finance, 15(2), 359-396.
    Barg, J. A., Drobetz, W., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Schröder, H. (2024). Institutional dual ownership and voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 89, 102671.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Becker, G. S. (2002). Human capital. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, 2, 1-12.
    Benuzzi, M., Klaser, K., & Bax, K. (2024). Which ESG+ F dimension matters most to retail investors? An experimental study on financial decisions and future generations. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 41, 100882.
    Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.
    Boone, A. L., & White, J. T. (2015). The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3), 508-533.
    Bower, J. L. (1972). Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment. Irwin Homewood, IL.
    Busch, T., Bauer, R., & Orlitzky, M. (2016). Sustainable development and financial markets: Old paths and new avenues. Business & Society, 55(3), 303-329.
    Cesarone, F., Martino, M. L., Ricca, F., & Scozzari, A. (2024). Managing ESG ratings disagreement in sustainable portfolio selection. Computers & Operations Research, 170, 106766.
    Chen, H.-Y., & Yang, S. S. (2020). Do investors exaggerate corporate ESG information? Evidence of the ESG momentum effect in the Taiwanese market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 63, 101407.
    Chen, X., Harford, J., & Li, K. (2007). Monitoring: Which institutions matter? Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), 279-305.
    Cheng, G., Jondeau, E., Mojon, B., & Vayanos, D. (2024). The Impact of Green Investors on Stock Prices.
    Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1999). Career concerns of mutual fund managers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 389-432.
    Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
    Costa, B. A., Jakob, K., & Porter, G. E. (2006). Mutual fund performance and changing market trends 1990-2001: Does manager experience matter? Journal of Investing, 15(2).
    David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
    Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209-222.
    Di Giuli, A., Garel, A., & Romec, A. (2023). The voting behavior of women-led mutual funds. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper(875).
    DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
    Döttling, R., & Kim, S. (2024). Sustainability preferences under stress: Evidence from COVID-19. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(2), 435-473.
    Duong, H. K., Wu, Y., Schiehll, E., & Yao, H. (2024). Environmental and social disclosure, managerial entrenchment, and investment efficiency. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 20(3), 100435.
    Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116.
    Eccles, R. G., & Stroehle, J. C. (2018). Exploring social origins in the construction of ESG measures. SSRN Electronic Journal.
    Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
    Ferreira, M. A., Keswani, A., Miguel, A. F., & Ramos, S. B. (2013). The determinants of mutual fund performance: A cross-country study. Review of Finance, 17(2), 483-525.
    Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 499-533.
    Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758-781.
    Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
    Gibson Brandon, R., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104-127.
    Gibson, R., Krueger, P., & Mitali, S. F. (2020). The sustainability footprint of institutional investors: ESG driven price pressure and performance. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper(17-05).
    Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495-511.
    Golec, J. H. (1996). The effects of mutual fund managers' characteristics on their portfolio performance, risk and fees. Financial Services Review, 5(2), 133-147.
    Gottesman, A., & Morey, M. R. (2018). Mutual Fund Manager Educational Background and Activeness. Pace University Finance Research Paper(2018/06).
    Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
    Hoepner, A. G., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L. T., & Zhou, X. Y. (2024). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Review of Finance, 28(2), 483-510.
    Hu, J.-L., Yu, H.-E., & Wang, Y.-T. (2012). Manager attributes and fund performance: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 2(4), 85.
    Huang, S. K. (2013). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 234-244.
    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (pp. 99-127). World Scientific.
    Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067-1111.
    Lin, J.-H., Yen, M.-F., & Hsieh, W.-C. (2023). Do manager characteristics matter in equity mutual fund performance? New evidence based on the double-adjusted alpha. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101925.
    Liu, X., & Anbumozhi, V. (2009). Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 593-600.
    Luo, L., Lan, Y. C., & Tang, Q. (2012). Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23(2), 93-120.
    Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. C. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective. Accounting Research Journal, 26(1), 6-34.
    Niessen-Ruenzi, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2019). Sex matters: Gender bias in the mutual fund industry. Management Science, 65(7), 3001-3025.
    Porter, G. E., & Trifts, J. W. (1998). Performance persistence of experienced mutual fund managers. Financial Services Review, 7(1), 57-68.
    Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2022). Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 822-863.
    Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1157-1178.
    Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302-322.
    Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.
    Üsdiken, B. (1992). The impact of environmental change on the characteristics of top management teams. British Journal of Management, 3(4), 207-219.
    Wang, Y., Wang, R., Tanaka, K., Ciais, P., Penuelas, J., Balkanski, Y., Sardans, J., Hauglustaine, D., Liu, W., & Xing, X. (2023). Accelerating the energy transition towards photovoltaic and wind in China. Nature, 619(7971), 761-767.
    Wermers, R. (2000). Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock‐picking talent, style, transactions costs, and expenses. The Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1655-1695.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE