發展優質大眾運輸為解決都市運輸問題最具效力之良方，亦是朝向永續發展的重要策略。都市運輸政策之擬定須經完整之規劃程序，從目標及衡量指標之確立、到政策方案的研擬與評估，均須全盤考量且環環相扣，方能獲致理想且有具體內容的運輸政策而可發揮最大之效果。目前一般所使用的都市運輸規劃程序可大別為以投資為主的傳統運輸規劃程序以及涵蓋內容較廣的策略性規劃程序，二者各有其所長及不足。本研究擷取二者之優點，嘗試構建一整合式都市運輸政策評估架構，以作為連結目標、政策方案以及系統績效三者間之分析評估工具。其中，整合式都市運輸政策涵蓋投資、費率、補貼、管制等四政策構面，透過系統化程序將各構面下之策略予以配套，形成替選方案以進行評估作業；在政策目標方面，則建立都市運輸目標體系權重模式，用以歸納都市運輸之重要衡量指標，並作為其後績效評估之依據。

再者，政策評估程序中須預測未來運輸需求，由於一般所使用的運具選擇模式有所不足，故本研究亦嘗試於運具選擇模式中納入都市環境變數並分析其可行性。先由因素分析選取步行空間及商圈環境作為重要都市環境屬性，續以敘述性偏好數據建立高雄都會區運具選擇模式，實證結果顯示模式解釋能力良好，都市環境變數顯著，且在大眾運具之選擇上有正向之影響。

最後，本研究以高雄都會區作為個案，利用實際都市特性與運輸系統資料進行所構建的評估架構之操作評估。模擬結果顯示在單一政策構面中，運輸投資建設所帶來之成效未必一定高過費率策略；於多構面政策模擬中顯示，不論策略效果大小為何，均會產生一加一大於二之加成效果。多構面整合模擬之組合方案均可產生顯著之效果，大眾運輸使用率均可有效提高至30%以上。研究結果顯示，高雄都會區若欲提高大眾運輸使用率存在著相當多的做法，除積極建設軌道系統及強化公車外，同步佐以費率策略及私人機動運具使用管制策略，其加成效果將會更加之明顯。

The most effective way to deal with urban transport problems is to develop an excellent public transport, and it is also an important way towards sustainability. To reach the idealized effects for transport policies, a comprehensive planning process of including the formulation of objectives and measurable indicators is necessary.
Urban transport planning process can generally divided into two categories, i.e., traditional four steps transport planning process and strategic transport planning process. The traditional one pays more attention to investment projects evaluation and has the complete network coding to do traffic assignment and more precise calculation. The strategic one emphasizes the combinations of multi-dimensions transport policies and the linkage between urban development and transport. This research extracts the advantages of these two planning processes, with considering objectives, policy combinations and performances, to develop an integrated urban transport policy evaluation framework. Urban transport policies can be classified into four dimensions, namely, Investment, Pricing, Subsidies and Regulations. These four dimensions are systematically integrated in this research to generate the integrated transport policy alternatives for evaluation.
Besides, an urban transport goal system weighting model is also proposed, with four hierarchies, total goal, goals, objectives, and measurable indicators. The weightings of seven indicators can be used to assess the optimal integrated urban transport policy through evaluation framework.
Moreover, this research also estimated a mode choice model fully considering urban related environmental variables. Two attributes, walk space quality and commercial environment, are selected by the factor analysis. Then, a multi-logit model is established through SP data to construct the Kaohsiung metropolitan area mode choice model. The results show that urban environmental variables indeed had positive effects on public transportation choice.
Finally, the Kaohsiung metropolitan is taken as an empirical case study site to illustrate the evaluation framework. The results show that an integrated transport policy with the four dimensions is more effective than the traditional single one. The optimal integrated urban transport policy can raise the public transport market share more than 30%. The contents of the policy are included to construct the LRT system, to improve the level of service of bus system, to increase the parking fee of private cars and motorcycles, to regulate the use of private cars and motorcycles in Kaohsiung. Form the empirical study can show that the proposed policy evaluation framework can be implemented in the commonly used urban transport planning process.

日本國土交通省，White paper on land, infrastructure and transport in Japan, 2004，國土交通白書，(http://www.mlit.go.jp)，日本國土交通省。
王小璠，多準則決策分析，滄海書局，2005。
王慶瑞，運輸系統規劃，第三版，正揚出版，2001。
台中市交通局，交通局施政白皮書，台中市政府，2003。
台中市政府，台中市交通處施政白皮書，台中市政府，2006。
台中市政府，台中市政府交通處99年度施政計畫，台中市政府交通處，2010。
台北市交通局，台北市政府交通政策白皮書，台北市政府，2002。
台北市交通局，交通局97年年刊，台北市政府，2009。
台北市交通局，台北市政府交通局施政報告，台北市政府，2010。
台北市政府警察局交通警察大隊，歷年交通違規統計，2010。
台北市政府，台北市綜合運輸規劃研究，台北市政府，1972。
台北縣交通局，台北縣政府交通局95年度施政計畫，台北縣政府，2006。
台北縣交通局，(http://www.traffic.tpc.gov.tw)，2010。
台北縣交通局，台北縣政府交通局99年度施政計畫，台北縣政府，2010。
台南市政府，台南市交通政策白皮書，台南市政府，2000。
台南市政府主計室，台南市重要施政指標，台南市政府，2004。
台灣新生報，北市首條低底盤公車線上路，2008。
台灣省政府住宅及都市發展局，桃園都會區大眾捷運系統規劃，台灣省政府，1994。
交通部，運輸政策白皮書，交通部，1995。
交通部，交通政策白皮書，交通部，2002。
交通部，交通統計要覽，交通部，2008。
交通部統計處，臺灣地區汽車延車公里統計推估之研究，交通部，2007。
交通部統計處，臺灣地區機車延車公里統計推估之研究，交通部，2007。
交通部統計處，民眾日常使用運具狀況調查，交通部，2010。
交通部統計處，臺灣地區相關運具使用率指標簡析及探討，交通部，2010。
交通部運輸計劃委員會，中華民國台灣地區整體運輸規劃報告，交通部，1976。
交通部運輸研究所a，中華民國台灣地區整體運輸規劃，1986。
交通部運輸研究所b，台灣地區整體運輸規劃之修訂專題報告(三)：台灣地區貨物運輸需求分析與預測，1986。
交通部運輸研究所，公路客車行車成本調查與分析，1988。
交通部運輸研究所，台灣地區公路車輛行車成本調查，1994。
交通部運輸研究所，制定都市地區運輸系統績效指標及建立定期監測制度之研究，1997。
交通部運輸研究所，高雄都會區住戶交通旅次調查，1998。
交通部運輸研究所，第三期台灣地區整體運輸系統規劃—整體運輸系統供需預測與分析，1999。
交通部運輸研究所，公路車輛行車成本調查，2000。
交通部運輸研究所a，永續運輸之量化指標研究，2002。
交通部運輸研究所b，都市地區運輸系統績效監測制度之推廣與績效指標合理值之檢討修訂，2002。
交通部運輸研究所，國家永續發展之城際運輸系統需求模式研究(1/4)，2005。
交通部運輸研究所，永續運輸綜合評估指標系統之研究(第一年期) ，2005。
交通部運輸研究所，國家永續發展之城際運輸系統需求模式研究(2/4)，2006。
交通部運輸研究所，永續運輸綜合評估指標系統之研究(第二年期) ，2006。
交通部運輸研究所，城際運輸觀察展望分析研究，2006。
交通部運輸研究所，城際運輸觀察展望分析研究，2007。
交通部運輸研究所，國家永續發展之城際運輸系統需求模式研究(3/4)，2007。
交通部運輸研究所，國家永續發展之城際運輸系統需求模式研究(4/4)，2008。
交通部運輸研究所，城際運輸觀察展望分析研究，2008。
交通部運輸研究所，台灣綜合運輸發展規劃，2009。
永續會，93年國家永續發展年報，行政院國家永續發展委員會，2004。
永續會，94年國家永續發展年報，行政院國家永續發展委員會，2005。
永續會，2008台灣永續發展指標現況報告，行政院國家永續發展委員會，2008。
行政院，國家永續發展願景與策略綱領，行政院，2004。
行政院，永續能源政策綱領，行政院，2008。
行政院經建會都市建設及住宅計畫小組，台北地區綜合運輸規劃調查報告，1972。
經建會，台灣二十一世紀議程－國家永續發展願景與策略綱領，行政院經濟建設設委員會， 2004。
行政院環境保護署，移動污染源管制網(http://mobile.epa.gov.tw/index.aspx)，2010。
行政院環境保護署，運輸部門溫室氣體推估架構、清潔發展機制建立暨車輛二氧化碳減量技術評估計畫，2008。(http://epq.epa.gov.tw/project/projectcp.aspx?proj_id=WNSXJKDIHL)
朱淑娟，汽機車排放二氧化碳將嚴格管制，聯合報，2009年2月23日，2009。
李明儒、陳元暢，澎湖石滬發展生態旅遊永續指標之建構，運動與遊憩研究，第2卷，第1期，頁101-115，2007。
李家儂、賴宗裕，大眾捷運車站周邊土地使用規劃模型之探討-多目標與多評準決策方法之應用，都市交通半年刊，第22卷，第1期，頁35-49，2007。
吳萬益、林清河，企業研究方法，華泰圖書出版公司，2001。
姜渝生，台北市運輸需求研究，中國文化大學實業計畫研究所都市與區域計畫組碩士論文，1969。
姚景星、劉睦雄，實驗設計，二版，華泰書局，1995。
施鴻志、段良雄、凌瑞賢，都市交通計劃－理論與實務，國立編譯館，1994。
段良雄、王郁珍，整合顯示偏好與敘述偏好數據的運具選擇模式，運輸計劃季刊，第28卷，第1期，頁25-60，1999。
香港運輸署，二零一零交通運輸資料月報，香港特別行政區政府，2010。
香港運輸署，香港特別行政區政府運輸署(http://www.td.gov.hk)。
香港運輸署，交通運輸資料月報，香港特別行政區政府運輸署統計組，1995。
香港運輸署，第三次整體運輸研究：研究報告，香港特別行政區政府運輸署，1999。
香港規劃署，香港2030：規劃願景與策略，香港特別行政區政府規劃署，2007。
高高屏地方永續發展資訊網 (http://kkp.hibec.com.tw)。
高雄市政府，高雄市交通政策白皮書，高雄市政府，2000。
高雄市政府，高雄市交通政策白皮書(修訂)，高雄市政府，2004。
高雄市政府，高雄市交通系統整合策略規劃暨推動執行計畫，高雄市政府，2005。
高雄市交通局a，高雄市政府交通局98年度施政計畫提要，高雄市政府，2009。
高雄市交通局b，高雄都會區家戶旅次訪問調查，高雄市政府，2009。
高雄市交通局c，高雄市交通統計參考指標，高雄市政府交通局，2009。
高雄市交通局，高雄市交通局網站(www.tbkc.gov.tw/policy-01.asp)，2010。
高雄市主計處，高雄市政府97年統計年報，高雄市政府，2009。
高雄市主計處，高雄市統計月報，高雄市政府，2010。
高雄市捷運工程局a，高雄都會區大眾捷運系統長期路網運輸規劃，高雄市政府，2000。
高雄市捷運工程局b，臨港線發展為輕軌捷運之規劃報告，高雄市政府，2000。
高雄市議會，高雄市中低底盤公車何時上路，議會會刊，高雄市議會，2006。
高雄縣主計處，高雄縣97年度統計要覽 ，高雄縣政府，2009。
張有恆，運輸計畫評估與決策－模糊理論之探討與應用，華泰書局，1998。
張有恆、傅耀南，台灣地區整體運輸政策之評析，工程，第71卷，第7期，頁2-22， 1998。
張新立、張則斌，我國車輛事故鑑定制度之研擬與評估，運輸計劃季刊，第31卷，第3期，頁523-552，2002。
張學孔、郭瑜堅，都市旅次總成本模式構建之研究，運輸計劃季刊，第36卷，第2期，頁147-182，2007。
陳武正，台北市大眾運輸政策分析，經濟前瞻雙月刊，第85期，111-116頁，2003。
陳俊成，交通管理策略對都會空氣品質之影響評估，淡江大學水資源及環境工程學系博士論文，2001。
陳耀茂、黃廷彬，品質工程Excel應用手冊，一版，中國生產力中心，2006。
楊志文，應用整合性選擇模式探討新運具的選擇行為，運輸計劃季刊，第36卷，第2期，頁183-208，2007。
新加坡運輸部，(http://www.mot.gov.sg)。
嘉義市政府，嘉義市政府交通處99年度施政計畫，嘉義市政府交通處，2010。
嘉義市政府交通局，嘉義市政府交通局為民服務白皮書，嘉義市政府交通局，2003。
經濟部能源局，經濟部能源局九十七年報，2009。
廖美容，歐洲地區的都市運輸政策，運輸政策與管理報導，第9期，頁5-14，1996。
鄧振源，計畫評估方法與應用，海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心，2002。
鄭志強、徐作聖，路線方案多準則決策之應用-以新竹都會區輕軌運輸路網選線為例，中華管理學報，第6卷，第1期，頁75-104，2005。
關東運輸局，(http://www.ktt.mlit.go.jp)，2010。
關東運輸局，地域交通的活化性 再生的進化調查報告書，國土交通省關東運輸局，2010。
Anderson, W. P., Kanaroglou, P. S. and Miller, E. J. (1996) Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy, Urban Studies, Vol.33(1), pp.7-35.
Armstrong, J. S. (2001) Prinicples of forcasting: A handbook of researchers and practitioners, Kluwer Academoc Publishers, pp.126-135.
Ardila, A. (2008) Limitation of competition in and for the public transportation market in developing countries- lessons from Latin American cities, Transportation Research Record, No.2048, pp.8-15.
Badland, H. and Schofield, G. (2005) Transport, urban design, and physical activity: an evidence-based update, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.10(3), pp.177-196.
Badoe, D. A. and Miller, E. J. (2000) Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.5(4), pp.235-263.
Baublys, A. and Išoraitė, M. (2005) Improvement of external transport cost evaluation in the context of Lithuania's integration into the European Union, Transport Reviews, Vol.25(2), pp.245-259.
Begg, D. and Gray, D. (2004) Transport policy and vehicle emission objective in the UK: is the marriage between transport and environment policy over? Environmental Science and Policy, Vol.7, pp.155-163.
Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bonnel, P. (1995) Urban car policy in Europe, Transport Policy, Vol.2(2), pp.83-95.
Buckley, J. J. (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.17, pp.233-247.
Buckley, J. J. and Yunxia, Q. (1990) On using alpha-cuts to evaluate fuzzy equations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.38, pp.309-312.
Buckley, J. J. and Yunxia, Q. (1991) Solving fuzzy equations: a new solution concept, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.39, pp.291-301.
Buckley, J. J. and Yan, Y. (2000) Fuzzy functional analysis (I): basic concepts, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.115(3), pp.393-402.
Buckley, J. J., Feuring, T. and Yoichi, H. (2001) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.129(1), pp.48-64.
Cameron, I., Lyons, T. J. and Kenworthy, J. R. (2004) Trends in vehicle kilometres of travel in world cities, 1960–1990: underlying drivers and policy responses, Transport Policy, Vol.11(3), pp.287-298.
CATS (1962) Chicago Area Transportation Study, Bartelsmeyer, R. R.(Study Chairman), Chicago, US.
(http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/uploadedFiles/planning_activities/transportation/sp2030/historic/CATSPlan_1962.pdf).
Cervero, R. (1996) Mixed land-use and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.30(5), pp.361-377.
Cervero, R. and Radisch, C. (1996) Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods, Transport Policy, Vol.3(3), pp.127-141.
Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.2(3), pp.199-219.
Chan, C. K., Cheung, Bernard K.-S., and Langevin, André (2003) Solving the multi-buyer joint replenishment problem with a modified genetic algorithm, Transportation Research Part B, Vol.37(3), pp.291-299.
Chang, Y. H., Yeh, C, H. and Liu, Y. L. (2006) Prioritizing management issues of moving dangerous goods by air transport, Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol.12(4), pp.191-196.
Chen, Y. W., Chen, J. F., Chiang, Y. S. and Wei, C. H. (2007) Multi-Dimensional Integrated Transport Policies Optimization Based on Genetic Algorithm, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.7, pp.1354-1363.
Cheshire, P. C., Evans A. W., and Gorla G. (1998) Long-term system adjustment to traffic restriction：the example of Milan, Environment and Planning A, Vol.30(7), pp.1313-1322.
COMSIS (1994) MINUTP technical user’s manual, MINUTP Bulletin Board System, Maryland, US.
CST (2003) Sustainable transportation performance indicators, Centre for Sustainable Transportation (www.cstctd.org). (http://cst.uwinnipeg.ca/completed.html)
DETR (1998) A new deal for trunk roads in Emglnad: Understanding the new approach to appraisal (NATA), Department of the Environment, Transport and the Reigions, London, UK.
DETR (2000) Transport 2010: The ten year plan, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Reigions, London, UK.
DfT (1998) A new deal for transport: better for everyone, Department of Transport, UK. (www.dft.gov.uk/itwp paper index.htm)
DfT (2004) The Future of transport_a network for 2003, Department of Transport, UK. (www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_about/documents/page/dft_about_031286.pdf)
DTO (2001) A platform for change final report_An integrated transport strategy for the Greater Dublin Area 2000-2016, Dublin Transport Office, Dublin, Ireland. (www.dto.ie/platform1.pdf)
European Commission (2000) LEDA Final Report, European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission (2001) European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide-White paper, European Commission, Brussels. (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/strategies/2001_white_paper_en.htm)
European Commission (2009) A sustainable future for transport-Towards an integrated, technology-led and user-friender system, Directorate-General for energy and transport, European Commission, (ec.europa.eu/transport/index_en.htm). (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/publications/doc/2009_future_of_transport_en.pdf)
European Conference of Ministers of Transport (1995) Urban travel and sustainable development, Report to the Council of Ministers, OECD, Paris.
European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT) (2002) Implementing sustainable urban travel policies, Final report, Report to the Council of Ministers, OECD, Paris.
Ferrari, P. (2003) A method for choosing from among alternative transportation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.150(1), pp.194-203.
FHA (2010) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Database, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, US. (www.planning.dot.gov)
Fowkes, A. S., Bristow, A. L., Bonsall, P. W. and May, A. D. (1998) A short-cut method for strategy optimisation using strategic transport models, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.32(2), pp.149-157.
Frank, L. and Pivo, G. (1994) Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single occupant vehicle transit and walking, Transportation Reserch Record, No.1466, pp.44-52.
Friedrich, R. and Bickel, P. (2001) Environmental external costs of transport, Berlin, Springer, New York.
Gibbons, M. and O'Mahony, M. (2000) Transport policy prioritisation for Dublin, Transportation. Amsterdam, Vol.27(2), pp.165-178.
Geerlings, H. and Stead, D. (2003) The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research, Transport Policy, Vol.10(3), pp.187-196.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning, Addison-Wesley, Boston.
Gordon, I. (1997) Densities, urban form and travel behavior, Town and Country Planning, Vol.66(9), pp.239-241.
Gordon, P.; Richardson, H. and Liao, Y.-C. (1997) A note on the travel speeds debate, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.31(3), pp.259-262.
Greenwald, M. J. (2003) The road less traveled: new urbanist inducements to travel mode substitution for nonwork trips, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol.23(1), pp.39-57.
Handy, S. L. and Clifton, K. J. (2001) Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel, Transportation, Vol.28(4), pp.317-346.
Hilbers, H.D., Wilmink, I. R. and Droppert-Zilver, M. N. (1999) Evaluatie mobiliteitseffecten VINEX-locaties. TNO Inro, Delft.
Hickman, R. and Banister, D. (2007) Looking over the horizon: transport and reduced CO2 emissions in the UK by 2030, Transport Policy, Vol.14(5), pp.377-387.
Hull, A. (2008) Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, Vol.15(2), pp.94-103.
Jones, A. D., May, A. D., and Wenban-Smith, A. (1990) Integrated transport studies: lessons from the Birmingham study, Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol.31(11), pp.572-578.
Jones, P. and Lucas, K. (2000) Integrating transport into ‘joined-up’ policy appraisal, Transport Policy, Vol.7(3), pp.185-193.
Jones, P., Lucas, K., and Whittles, M. (2003) Evaluating and implementing transport measures in a wider policy context: the ‘Civilising Cities’ initiative, Transport Policy, Vol.10(3), pp.209-221.
Jong, J-C and Schonfeld, P. (2003) An evolutionary model for simultaneously optimizing three-dimensional highway alignments, Transportation Research Part B, Vol.37(2), pp.107-128.
Kenworthy, J. F., Laube, F. B., Newman, P. W. G., Bater, P. A., Raad, T., Poboon, C., and Guia, B. (1991) An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities, 1960-1990, University Press of Colorado.
Kenworthy, J. R. and Laube, F. B. (1996) Automobile dependence in cities: an international comparison of urban transport and land use patterns with implications for sustainability, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.16 (4-6), pp.279-308.
Kenworthy, J. R. and Laube, F. B. (1999) Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.33(7-8), pp.691-723.
Kirchhoff, P. (1995) Public transit research and development in Germany, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.29(1), pp.1-7.
Kraay, J. H. (1996) Dutch approaches to surviving with traffic and transport, Transport Reviews, Vol.16, pp.323-343.
Larrhoven, P. J. M. and Pedrycz, W. (1983) A fuzzy extension of Satty’s priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.11, pp. 229-241.
Litman, T. (2007) Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and sustainable transport planning, Transportation Research Record, No. 2017, Journal of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp.10-15.
Litman, T. (2008) Sustainable transportation indicators- A recommended research program for developing sustainable, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, (http://www.vtpi.org/sustain/sti.pdf).
Litman, T. (2009) 2009 Urban transport performance spreadsheet, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, (http://www.vtpi.org/Transit2009.xls).
LTA (1996) White paper-A world class land transport system, Land Transport Authority, Republic of Singapore.
LTA (2005) Journeys-moving people moving you, Land Transport Authority, Republic of Singapore.
LTA(2010) Land Transport Authority, Singapore. (http://www.lta.gov.sg/index.html)
Lyons, J. T., Kenworthy, J. R., Moy, C. and dos Santos, F. (2003) An international urban air pollution model for the transportation sector, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.8(3), pp.159-167.
Marsden et al. (2005) Appraisal of sustainability: environment indicators, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds (www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/sustainability/resources/Appraisal%20of%20Sustainability%20in%20Transport%20-%20Environment%20Indicators.pdf).
Matthews, B., Jopson, A., and May, A. D. (2002) Developing a Method for the Assessment of Evidence on the Impacts of Transport Policy Instruments, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Homerton College, London.
May, A. D. and Gardner, K. E. (1990) Transport policy for London in 2001 - The case for an integrated approach, Transportation, Vol.16(3), pp.257-277.
May, A. D. (1991) Integrated transport strategies: a new approach to urban transport policy formulation in the U.K., Transport Reviews, Vol.11(3), pp.223-247.
May, A. D. and Roberts, M. (1995) The design of integrated transport strategies, Transport Policy, Vol.2(2), pp.97-105.
May, A. D., Bonsall, P. W., Bristow, A. L. and Fowkes, A. S. (1995) A streamlined approach for the preparation of package approach bids, Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol.32(2), pp.68-72.
May, A. D., Shepherd, S. P. and Timms, P. M. (2000) Optimal transport strategies for European cities, Transportation, Vol.27(3), pp.285-315.
May, A. D., Jopson, A. F., and Matthews, B. (2003) Research challenges in urban transport policy, Transport Policy, Vol.10(3), pp.157-164.
May, A. D. (2004) Singapore: the development of a world class transport system, Transport Reviews, Vol.24(1), pp.79-101.
May, A. D., Shepherd, S. P., Emberger, G., and Ash, A. (2005) Optimal land use-transport strategies methodology and application to European cities, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1924, pp.129-138.
May, T. and Crass, M. (2007) Sustainability in Transport – implications for policy makers, Journal of the Transportation Research Record, No.2017, Washington, D. C., pp.1-9.

Mayeres, I., Ochelen, S. and Proost, S. (1996) The Marginal External Costs of Urban Transport, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.1(2), pp.111-130.
Meurs, H. and Haijer, R. (2001) Spatial structure and mobility, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.6(6), pp.429–446.
Meyer, M. D. (1988) Strategic Management in a Crisis-Oriented Environment, Transportation Research Record, Vol.1156, pp.88-95.
Meyer, M. D. and Miller, E. J. (2001) Urban Transportation Planning, 2nd Edition, McGRAW-Hill internation edition, Singapore.
Michalewicz, Z. (1999) Genetic Algorithms+Data Structure=Evolution Programs, 3rd, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
Mitchell, M. (1996) An introduction to genetic algorithms, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
MLIT (2004) White Paper on Land, Infrastructure and Transportation in Japan 2004, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation, Japan.
Newman, P. W. G. and Kenworthy, J. R. (1988) The Transport Energy Tradeoff: fuel efficient traffic versus fuel-efficient cities, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.22(3), pp.163-174.
Newman, P. W. G. and Kenworthy, J. R. (1991) Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook, Gower, Aldershot, UK.
Newman, P. W. G. and Kenworthy, J. R. (1996) The land use-transport connection: An overview, Land Use Policy, Vol.13(1), pp.1-22.
Newman, P. W. G. and Kenworthy, J. R. (1999) Cost of automobile dependence: Global survey of cities, Transportation Research Record, No.1670, pp.160-171.
OECD (1995) Urban Transport and Sustainable Development, European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT), Paris.
OECD (1999) Environmentally Sustainable Transport-Final Report On Phase II Of The OECD EST Project, Volume 1: Synthesis Report, Paris.
OECD (1999) Indicators for the Integration of Environmental Concerns into Transport Policies, Paris.
Oldfield, R. H. (1993) A Strategic Transport Model for the London Area, Research Report 376, Transport Research Laboratory, Department of Transport, Berkshire, UK.
Percoco, M. (2007) Urban Transport Policies and the Environment: Evidence from Italy, Sustainability Indicators and Environmental Valuation (SIEV), Italy.
(http://www.feem.it/userfiles/attach/Publication/NDL2007/NDL2007-059.pdf)
Phang, S-Y and Toh, R. S. (1997) From manual to electronic road congestion pricing: the Singapore experience and experiment, Transportation Research Part E, Vol.33(2), pp.97-106.
PlaNYC (2009) PlaNYC progress report 2009-a greener, greater New York, the city of New York (http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/downloads/pdf/planyc_progress_report_2009.pdf).
Plummer, A. V. (1962) The Chicago Area Transportation Study Creating the First Plan , (www.surveyarchive.org/Chicago/cats_1954-62.pdf).
Poh, K. L. and Ang, B. W. (1999) Transportation fuels and policy for Singapore: an AHP planning approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol.37(3), pp. 507-525.
Potter, S. and Skinner, M. J. (2000) On transport integration: a contribution to better understanding, Futures, Vol.32, pp.275-287.
Publicpurpose, Urban transport fact book, 2001 Urban transport data: 230 US metropoltan areas public transport market share, 2001. (http://www.publicpurpose.com/ut-2001urbanshare.htm)
Friedrich, R. and Bickel, P. (2001) Environmental External Costs of Transport, Berlin, Springer, New York.
Richardson, B. C. (1999) Toward a policy on a sustainable transportation system, Transportation Research Record, No.1670, pp.27-34.
Richardson, B.C. (2000) Role of the motor-vehicle industry in a sustainable transportation system, Transportation Research Record, No.1702, pp.21-27.
Richardson, B.C. (2001) Freight trucking in a sustainable transportation system, Transportation Research Record, No.1763, pp.57-64.
Richardson, B. C. (2005) Sustainable transport: analysis frameworks, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.13(1), pp.29-39.
Saaty, T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sayers, T. M., Jessop, A. T. and Hills, P. J. (2003) Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Transport Options- Flexible, Transparent and User-friendly? Transport Policy, Vo.10(2), pp.95-105.
Shiftan,Y., Kaplan, S. and Hakkert, S. (2003) Scenario Building as a Tool for Planning a Sustainable Transportation System, Transportation Research Part D, Vol.8(5), pp.323-342.
Shepherd, S. P., Zhang, X., Emberger, G., Hudson, M., May, A. D., and Paulley, N. (2006) Designing optimal urban transport strategies: The role of individual policy instruments and the impact of financial constraints, Transport Policy, Vol.13(1), pp.49-65.
Sinha, K. C. and ASCE, F. (2003) Sustainability and Urban Public Transportation, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol.129(4), pp.331-341.
Snellen, D. (2001) Urban form and activity-travel patterns- An activity-based approach to travel in a spatial context, University of Technology, Eindhoven.
Stead, D. (2001) Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors, and travel patterns in Britain, Environment and Planning B, Vol.28(4), pp.499-529.
Steiner, T. J. and Bristow, A. L. (2000) Road pricing in National Parks: a case study in the Yorkshire Dales National Park, Transport Policy, Vol.7(2), pp.93-103.
Straatemeier, T. (2008) How to plan for regional accessibility, Transport Policy, Vol.15(2), pp.127-137.
Timms, P. M., May, A. D. and Shepherd, S. P. (2002) The sensitivity of optimal transport strategies to specification of objectives, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.36(5), pp.383-401.
Toh, R. S. and Phang, S-Y (1997) Curbing Urban Traffic Congestion in Singapore: A Comprehensive Review, Transportation Journal, pp.24-33.
Tolly, R. (2001) The future of walking in Europe: A Delphi project to identify expert opinion on the future walking scenarios, Transport Policy, vol.8(4), pp.307-315.
Topp, H. H. (1991) Parking policies in large cities in Germany, Transport, Vol.18, pp.3-21.
Tudela, A., Akiki, N. and Cisternas. R. (2006) Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: an application to urban transport investments, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.40(5), pp.414-423.
Tzeng, G. H. and Teng, J. Y. (1993) Transportation investment project selection with fuzzy multiobjectives, Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol.17, pp.91-112.
United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (UNWCED) (1987) Our common future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Van Wee, B. and Van der Hoorn, T. (1996) Employment location as an instrument of transport policy in the Netherlands- Fundamentals, instruments and effectiveness, Transport Policy, Vol.3(3), pp.81-89.
Van Wee, B. (2002) Land use and transport: research and policy challenges, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.10(4), pp.259-271.
VenW (2010) Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management, (http://www.verkeerenwaterstaat.nl/english/topics/organization/).
Walton, W. and Shaw, J. (2003) Applying the new appraisal approach to transport policy at the local level in the UK, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.11 (1), pp.1-12.
Wang Chiang, S. E. and Chen, Y. W. (2005) Cost structure and technological change of local public transport: the Kaohsiung city bus case, Applied Economics, Vol.37 (12), pp.1399-1410.
Weiner, E. (2008) Urban transportation planning in the United States: history, policy, and practice, 3rd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
World Bank (1975) Urban Transport, A World Bank Policy Paper, Washington, D.C.
World Bank (1986) Urban Transport: Sector Policy Paper, A World Bank Policy Paper, Washington, D.C.
World Bank (1996) Sustainable Transportation, Washington, D.C.
World Bank (2002) Cities on the Move-A World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review, A World Bank Policy Paper, Washington, D.C.
Wittneben, B., Bongardt, D., Dalkmann, H., Sterk, W. and Baatz, C. (2009) Integrating sustainable transport measures into the clean development mechanism, Transport Reviews, Vol.29(1), pp.91-113.
Yedla, S. and Shrestha, R. M. (2003) Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi, Transporationt Research Part A, Vol. 37(8), pp.717-729.
Zeleny, M. (1982) Multiple criteria decision making, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Zurcher Kantonalbank (ZKB) (2007) Sustainability rating for countries comparison of the 30 OECD countries, short version, (http://www.endseurope.com/docs/70628b.pdf).