近年來由於環保意識的抬頭下，綠色產品的興起，已為一股全球的趨勢潮流，並在省能源及省電力的概念下，耗電量大的相關產品，則成為改良及創新的目標商品。而占電力頗高的傳統照明，則為未來燈源創新的目標。目前已有固態式照明的興起，如：LED及OLED等燈源。而本研究則以OLED Lighting為研究的商品主題，因其發光效率高，不必靠輔助燈具，又有面光源的效果，並具有輕、薄、軟、高發光效率(200 lm/W)、低熱能等良好的特性，對整個照明產業而言，是為重大的技術轉變。
而OLED Lighting目前處於研發及導入階段，各國陸續投入資源並配合研發計畫，開始佈局未來的照明產品，而國內廠商大多數處於觀望的階段。觀察國內廠商的生產能量發現，部分面板廠商是具有OLED Display的生產能力，因此對具有相關技術的OLED Lighting的生產是有潛力的。因此本研究將針對OLED Lighting產業的技術商品化模式加以分析研究，並以專家意見，分層分析選出適合我國OLED Lighting產業技術商品化的模式，將有助我國於OLED Lighting產業中占有一席之地。
本研究的層次為產業層次，文中將以文獻探索，及同為LED之固態照明產業的經驗做為參考，並以高科技產業特性，找出適合的技術商品化模式，加以探討並列舉。而OLED Lighting產業之技術商品化模式選擇時，對於技術面的考量，及市場面考量等因素，也將以文獻探討的收集及彙整，還有科技產業的特性，及適用方式加以列舉，在此產業選擇技術商品化模式之時，也同時了解考量的相關因素。
研究方法是以AHP分層分析法的質性分析，以產、學、研為問卷對象，即擁有相關生產能力的業界代表，及研究OLED Lighting相關技術的學校、研究機構等，具代表性的訪問對象為分析的樣本，分析我國選擇OLED Lighting之技術商品化模式為何。

As the rise of environmental consciousness in recent years, energy conservation has been as a global trend, therefore, saving energy with related improvement and innovation become an important target in the world.
The traditional lighting have large power consumption, therefore Solid-state lighting (SSD) become another better alternatives. SSD holds the promise of huge energy savings and long-lasting light sources, such as: LED and OLED light .OLED Lighting has light weight, thin, soft, high luminous efficiency (200 lm / W) and low heat etc. It is a significant technology changes in lighting industry.
Currently, OLED Lighting is in development and implementation stage, many countries have been put into R&D program, but domestic manufacturers still not involve so much. Overview domestic firms, some panel makers have OLED Display production capacity, so they have potential to produce OLED Lighting.
This study will focus on the mode of commercialization of the OLED Lighting technology, and selected the most appropriate commercialization model of Taiwan OLED Lighting Industry as well as help domestic player in the OLED Lighting industry.
This study is focus on industry level, and Commercialization mode choice is considerate about technical and marketability factors, as well as technology industry characteristics, and mode of application to be listed in this commercialization model.
This research methodology is AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process Theory) approach. AHP approach is hierarchical analysis method of qualitative analysis. Object-based questionnaire will be the academic, academia, and research institute. According to the representative sample of respondents, and analysis the choice of commercialization mode of OLED Lighting industry.

一、中文部分
1. 方世杰，「技術取得模式與技術取得績效之研究－電子業之實證分析」，管理學報，第十六卷第一期頁151-174，(1999)
2. 周政德，新產品上市價格衡量因素之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文(2005)
3. 謝添壽，“從2009 FINETECH JAPAN看OLED Lighting發展趨勢”，材料最前線，材料世界網(2009)
4. 林炯垚，企業評價-投資銀行實務，台北：禾豐文教基金會(1999)
5. 林博文、陳怡之、洪慈霙，策略聯盟傾向、技術研發與企業無形資產之蓄積，台灣管理學刊第3卷第1期，pp.59-74(2003)
6. 林政道，「台灣中小企業以策略聯盟創新知識技術之研究」，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文(1999)
7. 柏德葳，“從東京國際照明探討OLED照明未來趨勢與商機＂，拓璞產研，(2009/04)
8. 洪永杰，「專利申請的策略與專利佈局的模式」。元智大學最佳化設計實驗室(2005)。取自
http://designer.mech.yzu.edu.tw/article/articles/technical/file/(2005-05-10)%20%B1M%A7Q%A5%D3%BD%D0%AA%BA%B5%A6%B2%A4%BBP%B1M%A7Q%A7G%A7%BD%AA%BA%BC%D2%A6%A1.pdf
9. 梁恬漪，臺灣自行車產業超層級競爭現象之研究，國立中山大學，企業管理學系研究所碩士論文(1999)
10. 陳麗娟，“國立大學研究成果商品化過程中激勵誘因之研究”，生物科技與法律研究/問題與研究，第28期(2010)
11. 劉常勇，“技術商業化模式及成功關鍵”(2008)，經濟部智財局，IPO專利商品化網站http://pcm.tipo.gov.tw/pcm/01_classroom/classroom-3-3.asp
12. 褚志鵬，Analytic Hierarchy Process Theory層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作，壽豐鄉，花蓮縣，東華大學企業管理學系暨研究所教學講義，(2009)
13. 鄭秋蘋、江柏風、覃禹華“2009日本橫濱光電展儼然成為OLED Lighting的競技”，ITIS智網(2009)
二、英文部分
1. Anita M.Mc Gahan, Brain S .Silverman, “Profiting from technological innovation by others: the effect of competitor patenting on firm value”, Journal of business research v.35 1222-1242, 2006
2. A jay Menon, Jhinuk Chowdhury, Bryan A .Lukas, “Antecedents and outcomes of new product development speed an interdisciplinary conceptual framework”, Industrial marketing management v.31 317-328, 2002
3. Anna, Nosella, Giorgio Petroni, Chiara Verbano, “Characteristics of the Italian biotechnology industry and new business models：the initial result of an empirical study”, Technovation 25, 841-855, 2005
4. Atul Nerkar&Scott Shane, “Determinants of invention commercialization：An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions”, Strategic Management Journal J 28：1155-1166, 2007
5. David J.Teece, “reflections on profiting from innovation”, Journal of business research V.35 1131-1146, 2006
6. T.Michael Nevens, Gregory L.Summe,and BRO Uttal, “Commercializing Technology:what the best companies do”, Harvard Business review, (May-June), 1990
7. Roger Svensson, “Commercialization of patents and external financing during the R&D phase”, Journal of business research v.36 1052-1069, 2007
8. Courtney Price, Richard Huston and Arlen D. meyers, “From the Classroom a new approach to improve technology commercialization in university medical schools”, April, Journal of commercial biotechnology, v.14.No.2 96-102, 2008
9. Chung –Jen Chen, “Technology commercialization,incubator and venture capital and new venture performance”, Journal of business research, v.62 93-103, 2009
10. Barbara Bigliardi, Anna Nosella, Chiara Verbano, “Busniess models in Italian biotechnology industry：a quantitative analysis”, Technovation 25 1299-1306, 2005
11. Kazuyuki Motohashi, “licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic us of patents by Japanese firms”, research policy 37, 1548-1555, 2008
12. Gary L. Lilien and Eunsang Yoon, “The timing of competitive market enty:an exploratory study of new industrial products”, management science v.36 no.5 may, 1990
13. Susumu Kurokawa, “Make or buy decisions in R&D：Small technology based firms in the United States and Japan”, IEEE Transactions on engineering management.v.44 No.2 May, 1997
14. C.Jay Lambe and Robert E. Spekman, “Alliances ,external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change”, J PROD INNOV MANAG;14;102-116, 1997
15. Edward B Roberts; Charles A Berry, “Entering New Businesses：Selecting Strategies for Success” Sloan Management Review(pre-1986);26,3;spring, 1985
16. Jeremy Howells, “Research and Technology Outsourcing”, Technology analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.11, No.1, 1999
17. Sherie E Zhan, “choosing a market entry strategy”, world trade, May, 1999
18. Farok J Contractor, “choosing between direct investment and licensing: theoretical considerations and empirical tests”, journal of international business studies, winter, 1984
19. Yigang Pan &David K.Tse, “The hierarchical model of market entry modes”, journal of international business studies;535-554, 31, 4, fourth quarter, 2000
20. David J Teece, “Capturing value from technological innovation: Integration , strategic partnering, and licensing decisions”, InterfaceVo.18,3,(p46-61), May-Jun, 1998
21. Noel Capon&Rashi Glazer, “Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment”, Journal of Marketing Vol.51, 1-14, July, 1987
22. Stanley F. Slater and Jakki J. Mohr, “Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation:insights based on strategy type”, J PROD INNOV MANAG; 23;26-33, 2006
23. Segil, Larraine, “Strategic Alliances for the 21th Century”, Strategic Leadership, ptember-October, pp.12-16, 1998
24. Simon Wakeman, “A DYNAMIC THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY”, European School of Management and Technology, Schlossplatz 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany, 28 March, 2008
25. ATHANASIOS HADJIMANOLIS, “A Resource-based View of Innovativeness in Small Firms”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2000
26. Edward B Roberts and Cherles A.Berry, “Entering new business selecting strategies for success, Sloan Management Review, 26:3, p.3, 1985, Spring
27. Raul Anibal Gonzalez, “From the Lab to the market: The Commercialization Strategy of Patented Inventions”, Department of Economics and Business Universitat Pompeu Fabra, October, 2005
28. Shaker A. Zahra and Anders P. Nielsen, “SOURCES OF CAPABILITIES, INTEGRATION AND TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION”, Strategic Management Journal Strat Mgmt. J., 23: 377-398, 2002