簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 羅義程
Luo, Yi-Cheng
論文名稱: 台灣晚期腎細胞癌病患使用Sunitinib之處方型態分析
Prescribing Pattern of Sunitinib in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients in Taiwan
指導教授: 高雅慧
Yang, Yea-Huei Kao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 臨床藥學與藥物科技研究所
Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical sciences
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 119
中文關鍵詞: 腎細胞癌sunitinib處方型態健保資料庫
外文關鍵詞: Renal cell carcinoma, sunitinib, prescribing pattern, health insurance database
相關次數: 點閱:172下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 研究背景
    腎細胞癌(Renal cell carcinoma)為發源於腎臟的惡性腫瘤,在我國的發生率有逐年上升的趨勢。近年來,隨著藥物的發展,轉移型的腎細胞癌主要是以標靶治療中的酪胺酸酶抑制劑(tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TKI)來進行治療,其中sunitinib於2010年1月於我國核准健保給付,現在已是腎細胞癌治療中重要的藥物,但是缺乏我國相關的使用資料。
    研究方法
    本研究為觀察性回溯性研究,利用我國2004年至2013年全民健保資料庫,分析因腎細胞癌被處方sunitinib者的處方型態。以研究對象被處方全身性治療的日期為指標日期,比較sunitinib以及其他使用者之差異。在處方型態部分,會分析資料庫中所有sunitinib使用者之基本資料、指標日期前接受的治療、初次處方劑量以及sunitinib治療結束後選擇的藥物。最後,會將sunitinib使用者使用sunitinib的期間每90天為一觀察區間(period),計算每個病人每期內的sunitinib使用量,作為sunitinib使用劑量的參考,並進一步分析使用高低劑量者之特質差異。
    研究結果
    於2010年1月1日後,一共有1069名晚期腎細胞癌病人開始使用全身性治療,其中719名(67.26%)為sunitinib使用者。其他350名病人,大多是使用傳統的interferon-α(佔142名,13.32%)。
    所有腎細胞癌病人中,共828名病人有sunitinib的使用紀錄。大多數的病人都是2010年1月1日後才開始使用,只有3名於健保核准給付前即開始。828名使用者中有87.20%在使用sunitinib前沒有接受過任何全身性治療,而其他有接受過全身性治療的病人中,則以interferon-α的使用比例最高。Sunitinib的初次處方劑量中,有一半以上因為資料缺乏的關係無法取得精確劑量,但是大多數有劑量資料的病人(18.60%)使用的是仿單所建議的較低劑量37.5 mg,每天服用一次,而完全遵照仿單建議者只佔13.53%。使用sunitinib的期間,有許多病人在第一觀察區間中被處方的劑量並沒有達到仿單建議的標準。進一步分析後發現,使用較低劑量者的年齡較高(p<0.0001)、女性比例較高(p=0.0030)、且National Cancer Institute(NCI) cormorbidity index共病症風險較高(p=0.0001)。
    結論
    本研究分析的期間,sunitinib是我國晚期腎細胞癌最常被使用的第一線藥品,但是實際使用的劑量卻有偏低的情形。劑量偏低是否為副作用的考量以及治療效果是否會有所差異還需要進一步的研究。

    Background
    Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a kind of malignancy originated within the kidneys, which has an increasing incidence in Taiwan. In these years, some new drugs were approved for RCC treatment, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are recommended as the standard treatment for advanced RCC patients. Among all TKIs, sunitinib was listed in reimbursement scheme of the National Health Insurance for RCC on 2010/1/1, but there is no utilization information in Taiwan population.

    Methods
    A retrospective study was conducted using the National Health Insurance claims database spanning the period from 2004 to 2013, to analyze the prescribing pattern of sunitinib in advancde RCC patients. Advanced RCC was defined as those who had registered for catastrophic illness for kidney cancer, and started systemic therapy after 2010/1/1. Then the characteristics of sunitinib users are cmaompared to non-users. As for sunitinib prescribing pattern, this study analyzed the baseline characteristics, treatment before and after sunitinib, drug interaction, initianl dosage and dosage change during sunitinib therapy. To analyze the dosage change of sunitinib, this study used 90 days as a period after sunitinib started, then calculated the sum of sunitinib dosage prescribed in every period. Furthermore, the characteristic difference between patients on high dosage and low dosage was analyzed.

    Results
    There were 1069 advanced RCC patients started systemic treatment after 2010/1/1, and 719 (67.26%) of them were sunitinib users. As for other 350 patients, most of them were using interferon-α (142 patients, 13.32%).
    In all RCC patients, 828 patients were prescribrd with sunitinib. Most of them started sunitinib after 2010/1/1, only 3 started in 2009. 87.20% of these sunitinib users had not received other systemic therapy before sunitinib. As for others previously treated users, most of them received interferon-α. More than half of the sunitinib prescriptions did not document dosage and frequency, but most of the complete initial prescriptions (18.60%) were recorded with lower dose (37.5 mg once daily), only 13.53% initial prescriptions adhered to the dosage recommendation on the package insert. During the sunitinib treatment, lots of the sunitinib users did not receive recommended dosage. After further analysis, patients using lower dosage were older (p<0.0001), more female (p=0.0030) and higher score in NCI cormorbidity index (p=0.0001).

    Conclusions
    Sunitinib was the most commonly used systemic therapy in advanced RCC patients in Taiwan. However, the actual prescribed dosage was lower than recommendation. Whether the lower dosage is due to intolerance and the effectiveness of the lower dose require further research.

    中文摘要 I Abstract III 誌謝 V 目錄 VI 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第一篇 台灣晚期腎細胞癌病患使用Sunitinib之處方型態分析 1 第一章 研究背景 1 第二章 文獻回顧 2 第一節 腎細胞癌簡介 2 第二節 腎細胞癌治療 5 第三節 Sunitinib簡介 12 第三章 研究目的 15 第四章 研究方法 16 第一節 研究材料 16 第二節 資料串連方式 17 第三節 研究設計 19 4.3.1 納入條件 19 4.3.2 排除條件 20 4.3.3 病患篩選流程 20 4.3.4 第一目的之指標日期及追蹤時間軸 23 4.3.5第二目的之指標日期及追蹤時間軸 23 4.3.6追蹤終點 24 第四節 研究變項及操作定義 24 4.4.1病患資料操作定義 24 4.4.2研究結果測量 28 4.4.3 Sunitinib處方型態分析方法 32 第五節 統計分析 36 4.5.1 統計工具 36 4.5.2 統計分析方法 36 第五章 研究結果 38 第一節 我國腎細胞癌病患第一線治療藥品的選擇 38 第二節 Sunitinib使用者之基本資料分析 43 第三節 Sunitinib處方型態 51 第六章 研究討論 62 第一節 我國腎細胞癌病患第一線治療藥品的選擇 62 第二節 Sunitinib使用者之基本資料分析 64 第三節 Sunitinib處方型態 66 第四節 研究限制 70 第七章 結論 73 第八章 未來研究方向 74 第二篇 抗凝血劑及抗血小板劑對經尿道前列腺切除手術的影響 76 第一章 研究背景 76 第二章 研究目標 80 第三章 研究方法 81 第一節 研究設計 81 3.1.1 研究類型 81 3.1.2 研究對象 81 第二節 研究變項及操作定義 82 第三節 研究流程 89 第四節 訪談大綱 93 第五節 統計分析 94 第四章 研究結果 96 第五章 討論 101 第六章 服務心得與建議 103 參考文獻 113

    1. 衛生福利部國民健康署. 本署健康統計. http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/Stat/Statistics.aspx. Accessed 6月3日, 2016.
    2. Campbell SC, Lane BR. Malignant Renal Tumors. In: Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol 2. 10th ed. United States of America: Alan J. Wein; 2012:1413-1474.
    3. SUTENT®[package insert]. PR: Pfizer Inc.; 2009. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/021938s13s17s18lbl.pdf, May 28,2016.
    4. Administration USFaD. FDA Approval for Sunitinib Malate. http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-sunitinib-malate, June 14,2016.
    5. Edge SB. AJCC cancer staging handbook : from the AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
    6. Ljungberg B, Campbell SC, Choi HY, et al. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. Oct 2011;60(4):615-621.
    7. Muglia VF, Prando A. Renal cell carcinoma: histological classification and correlation with imaging findings. Radiologia brasileira. May-Jun 2015;48(3):166-174.
    8. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 藥品給付規定 http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=18&menu_id=683&webdata_id=2919. Accessed 6月22日, 2016.
    9. Bianchi M, Sun M, Jeldres C, et al. Distribution of metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. Apr 2012;23(4):973-980.
    10. Network NCC. Kidney cancer. 2016; http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed Nov. 28, 2015.
    11. Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. Sep 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii49-56.
    12. Bedke J, Gauler T, Grunwald V, et al. Systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. World journal of urology. Jun 9 2016.
    13. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 健保用藥品項查詢. http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Query/query1.aspx?menu=20&menu_id=712&WD_ID=831. Accessed 7月4日, 2016.
    14. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet (London, England). Dec 22 2007;370(9605):2103-2111.
    15. Houglum JE. Interferon: mechanisms of action and clinical value. Clinical pharmacy. Jan-Feb 1983;2(1):20-28.
    16. NTRON® A[package insert]. PR:Merck & Co., Inc.; 2016. https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/i/intron_a/intron_a_pi.pdf, May 28,2016.
    17. PROLEUKIN®[package insert]. PR:Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2011. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/103293s5130lbl.pdf, May 28,2016.
    18. AVASTIN®[package insert]. PR:Genentech, Inc.; 2009. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/125085s0169lbl.pdf, May 28,2016.
    19. NEXAVAR ®[package insert]. PR: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2010. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/021923s008s009lbl.pdf, May 28,2016.
    20. VOTRIENT ®[package insert]. PR: GlaxoSmithKline Inc.; 2009. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/022465lbl.pdf, May 28,2016.
    21. TORISEL®[package insert]. PR: Pfizer Inc.; 2015. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/022088s018lbl.pdf, May 28,2016.
    22. AFINITOR®[package insert]. PR: Novartis Inc.; 2016. https://www.pharma.us.novartis.com/sites/www.pharma.us.novartis.com/files/afinitor.pdf, May 28,2016.
    23. Srinivasan R, Linehan M. Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. In: Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol 2. 10th ed. United States of America: Alan J. Wein; 2012:1475-1491.
    24. Morais C. Sunitinib resistance in renal cell carcinoma. 2014. 2014-04-30 2014;1(1):11.
    25. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine. Jan 11 2007;356(2):115-124.
    26. Quivy A, Daste A, Harbaoui A, et al. Optimal management of renal cell carcinoma in the elderly: a review. Clinical interventions in aging. 2013;8:433-442.
    27. Imbulgoda A, Heng DYC, Kollmannsberger C. Sunitinib in the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors. In: Schlag PM, Senn H-J, eds. Small Molecules in Oncology. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2014:165-179.
    28. 高雅慧, 鄭靜蘭. 健保給付藥品品項的藥理治療分類代碼之建立. 100年度委託科技研究計畫期末報告2011.
    29. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 2001年ICD-9-CM疾病碼一覽表. 2001; http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Resource/webdata/Attach_3469_2_ICD2001-%e6%9b%b4%e6%96%b0%e7%89%88.pdf. Accessed 2月3日, 2016.
    30. Mani S, Todd M, Poo WJ. Recombinant beta-interferon in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. American journal of clinical oncology. Apr 1996;19(2):187-189.
    31. Motzer RJ, Rakhit A, Thompson J, et al. Phase II trial of branched peginterferon-alpha 2a (40 kDa) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. Nov 2002;13(11):1799-1805.
    32. Porta C, Gore ME, Rini BI, et al. Long-term Safety of Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. Feb 2016;69(2):345-351.
    33. (NCI) NCI. SEER-Medicare: Calculation of Comorbidity Weights. http://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/seermedicare/program/comorbidity.html. Accessed 4月22日, 2016.
    34. Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, Baldwin LM, Schrag D. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Annals of epidemiology. Aug 2007;17(8):584-590.
    35. Brodie MJ, Mintzer S, Pack AM, Gidal BE, Vecht CJ, Schmidt D. Enzyme induction with antiepileptic drugs: Cause for concern? Epilepsia. 2013;54(1):11-27.
    36. Punyawudho B, Cloyd JC, Leppik IE, et al. Characterization of the time course of carbamazepine deinduction by an enzyme turnover model. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2009;48(5):313-320.
    37. Day D, Kanjanapan Y, Kwan E, et al. Patterns of care for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Australia. BJU international. Oct 2015;116 Suppl 3:36-41.
    38. Scher H, Rosenberg JE, Motz RJ. Bladder and Renal Cell Carcinomas. In: Kasper D, Hauser S, Fauci A, Longo D, Jameson L, Loscalzo J, eds. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 19th ed. United States of America: McGraw-Hi11 Education; 2015:575-578.
    39. 衛生福利部國民健康署. 2007 年完成之「臺灣地區高血壓、高血糖、高血脂之追蹤調查研究」. 2013; http://health99.hpa.gov.tw/Article/ArticleDetail.aspx?TopIcNo=790&DS=1-life. Accessed 5月3日, 2016.
    40. Singh G, Rees JH, Sander JW. Seizures and epilepsy in oncological practice: causes, course, mechanisms and treatment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. Apr 2007;78(4):342-349.
    41. Brunello A, Basso U, Sacco C, et al. Safety and activity of sunitinib in elderly patients (>/= 70 years) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter study. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. Feb 2013;24(2):336-342.
    42. van der Veldt AA, Boven E, Helgason HH, et al. Predictive factors for severe toxicity of sunitinib in unselected patients with advanced renal cell cancer. British journal of cancer. Jul 22 2008;99(2):259-265.
    43. Josephs D, Hutson TE, Cowey CL, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with severe renal impairment or on haemodialysis. BJU international. Oct 2011;108(8):1279-1283.
    44. Kim HR, Park HS, Kwon WS, et al. Pharmacogenetic determinants associated with sunitinib-induced toxicity and ethnic difference in Korean metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. Oct 2013;72(4):825-835.
    45. Oya M, Kikuchi E. Evidenced-based clinical practice guideline for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (summary--Japanese Urological Association, 2014 edition). International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. Jan 2015;22(1):3-13.
    46. Cheng CL, Kao YH, Lin SJ, Lee CH, Lai ML. Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. Mar 2011;20(3):236-242.
    47. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine. Aug 22 2013;369(8):722-731.
    48. Kim JH, Park I, Lee JL. Pazopanib versus sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. Jun 21 2016.
    49. Carlo MI, Voss MH, Motzer RJ. Checkpoint inhibitors and other novel immunotherapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Nature reviews. Urology. Jun 21 2016.
    50. Grunwald V. T-cell checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Current opinion in urology. Sep 2015;25(5):411-415.
    51. Guess HA, Arrighi HM, Metter EJ, Fozard JL. Cumulative prevalence of prostatism matches the autopsy prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Prostate. 1990;17(3):241-246.
    52. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG. American Urological Association Guideline: Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia(BPH). [PDF]. 2010. Accessed 6/16, 2016.
    53. Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC, Elinson J, Keller AM, Henderson WG. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. The New England journal of medicine. Jan 12 1995;332(2):75-79.
    54. Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. Eur Urol. Jun 2015;67(6):1066-1096.
    55. Culkin DJ, Exaire EJ, Green D, et al. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in urological practice: ICUD/AUA review paper. The Journal of urology. Oct 2014;192(4):1026-1034.
    56. Naspro R, Rossini R, Musumeci G, Gadda F, Pozzo LFD. Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Stent Undergoing Urologic Surgery: Is It Still No Man's Land? European Urology. 2013;64(1):101-105.
    57. Descazeaud A, Robert G, Lebdai S, et al. Impact of oral anticoagulation on morbidity of transurethral resection of the prostate. World journal of urology. Apr 2011;29(2):211-216.
    58. D. J, Kaatz S. Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant Therapy Before and After Surgery: A Practical, Patient-Focus Approach. Managing oral anticoagulation therapy. 3 ed. St. Louis: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.; 2009:205-212.
    59. Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Spencer FA, et al. Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. Feb 2012;141(2 Suppl):e326S-350S.
    60. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: executive summary. European heart journal. Jul 2013;34(27):2094-2106.
    61. van Veen JJ, Makris M. Management of peri-operative anti-thrombotic therapy. Anaesthesia. Jan 2015;70 Suppl 1:58-67, e21-53.
    62. Pradaxa [package insert]. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2012. http://docs.boehringer-ingelheim.com/Prescribing%20Information/PIs/Pradaxa/Pradaxa.pdf, May 28,2016.
    63. Xarelto [package insert]. Gurabo, PR: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2012. https://www.xareltohcp.com/shared/product/xarelto/prescribing-information.pdf, May 28,2016.
    64. Raj MD, McDonald C, Brooks AJ, et al. Stopping anticoagulation before TURP does not appear to increase perioperative cardiovascular complications. Urology. Dec 2011;78(6):1380-1384.
    65. Taylor K, Filgate R, Guo DY, Macneil F. A retrospective study to assess the morbidity associated with transurethral prostatectomy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. BJU international. Nov 2011;108 Suppl 2:45-50.
    66. Bang OY, Hong KS, Heo JH. Asian Patients with Stroke plus Atrial Fibrillation and the Dose of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants. Journal of stroke. May 2016;18(2):169-178.
    67. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, Jr., O'Leary MP, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. The Journal of urology. Nov 1992;148(5):1549-1557; discussion 1564.
    68. Lip GY. Implications of the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED Scores for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. The American journal of medicine. Feb 2011;124(2):111-114.
    69. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 健保特約醫事機構查詢. 2016; http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Query/query3.aspx. Accessed 7月10日, 2016.
    70. 吳祥恩, 鄭美玲, 盧豐華, 張智仁. 服藥自我報告: 簡易高血壓遵醫囑性方法之評估. 中華家醫誌. 1995;5:84-91.
    71. Watanabe T, Maruyama S, Maruyama Y, et al. Seasonal changes in symptom score and uroflowmetry in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. 2007;41(6):521-526.
    72. Hsieh TF, Yang YW, Lee SS, et al. Use of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors did not increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia: a five-year follow-up study. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0119694.
    73. Vo T, Vazquez S, Rondina MT. Current State of Anticoagulants to Treat Deep Venous Thrombosis. Current cardiology reports. 2014;16(3):463-463.
    74. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin-K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. European heart journal. Jun 9 2016.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2026-09-01公開
    校外:2026-09-01公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE