「停限電運轉圖資系統」(OMS)是台電公司24個區營業處共同推行的第一個圖資資訊數位化的專案系統，也是各個區營業處的一個前所未有的新任務與考驗。原先在OMS專案導入時，或受限於專案的契約限制，或欠缺類似專案經驗，故僅能以專案時程的控管與數化的品質，做為專案系統完成的依據。對於專案系統導入時的其他問題，或許無法發現，或許發現時也無法根據契約要求廠商解決，提出相關解決方式，對整個專案的執行與改善並無深入著墨。
本研究以ALADWANI(2002)提出的「資訊系統導入專案整合模式」為本研究基礎架構，依據的專案的六大特性與文獻探討，整理出專案成效的評估要點，以建立本研究的研究架構。所以本研究依據研究架構中的六大專案特性(技術、任務、組織、團隊、人員與處理程序)，對台電公司原專案OMS導入過程，重新檢視分析：
1.原專案導入時發現的問題點。
2.發現問題時的處理。
3.專案成效的評估要點項目與六大專案特性之關聯性。
4.最後，提出結論與建議，提供後續相關新系統導入時參考。

OMS (Outage Management System) is the first special project of digital map information system which implement by 24 districts of Taiwan Power Company, and by the mean time, this is also an unprecedented new task and test for all these districts to work on.
Initially, part of the limitation by the agreement of the project, part of pausing similar project experience, and therefore, it can only taking the control result and digital quality during the implementation schedule to be the foundation when the special project is finished.
Regarding to other problems when carry out this special project, they may not able to be found nor the problems found can not be solved from the manufactures by providing a better relative solution according to the contract. And according to this result, that’s why it did not take further discussion to the execution achievement and the improvement to the whole project.
The fundamental of this research is based on ALADWANI (2002) ' An Integrated performance model of information systems projects' to build its frame work, and arrange the main evaluation points according to the literature and six major characteristics as mention as above for the special project. As said of these six major characteristics (Technology Characteristics, Task Characteristics, Organization Characteristics, Project Characteristics, Process Characteristics, People Characteristics), the research look over again and analyses the following issues during the process of OMS project:
1. What were the original problems when leaded the project.
2. How the problems be disposed to.
3. The connection between the evaluation points and the six major characteristics
4.Finally, to propose the conclusion and suggestion, to offer reference for follow-up to lead up to relevant new systems later on.

1.信懷南,“不確定時代的專案管理”,聯經出版,1998。
2.信懷南,“不確定時代的生存策略”,1998,3月,世界經理文摘。
3.孫本初,呂育誠,“分析單元論的意義及其對公共管理的影響”, 政大學報第七十三期,1996。
4.曹延傑,“專案管理”,台北,格致圖書有限公司,1990。
5.陳萬淇,”個案研究法”,華泰書局,民84
6.陳松柏,“技術移轉的理論與實務”,台北,華泰書局,2000。
7.陳家聲,“商業心理學”,東大圖書公司,1990。
8.黃敏萍, “跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能-任務特性與社會系絡之影響”國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文,民88。
9.賴士葆、謝龍發、曾淑婉、陳松柏,“科技管理”,國立空中大學出版,民86。
10.PMBOK,專案管理知識體系導讀指南,華文繁體版,2000。
11.Aladwani,A. AL-Owaihan, A,and Al-Ajmi,R.”The role of manning level in information systems projects.” ,Arab Journal of Administrative Sciences,6,3,pp481-493,1999.
12.Aladwani,A. M.,”An Integrated Performance Model of Information Systems Projects”,Journal of Management Information Systems Summer, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.185–210,2002
13.Archibald, R. O.”Managing High-Technology Programs and Projects”, John Wiley & Sons.,1976.
14.Banker,R.D. and Slaughter,”A field study of scale economies in software maintenance.” ,Management Science,43,12,pp1709-1725,1997.
15.Cleland, D. I. and W. R. King,”System Analysis and Project Management”,McGraw-Hill, Inc.1983
16.David I.Cleland & Lewis R.Ireland,”Strategic Design And Implemention”, McGraw-Hill,Inc,2004
17.Emery, F. E., & Thorsrud, E. “Democracy at Work.” Leiden, the Netherlands Martinus Nijhoff,1976.
18.Gaddis, P. O.”The Project Manager”, Harvard Business Review, 35,pp89-97.1959
19.Hackman, J. R. Oldham.G.R ,”Work Redesign” ,MA:Addison Wesley,1980.
20.Henderson, J.C. and Lee ,S.”Managing I/S design teams; A control theries perspective.”, Management Science ,38,6,pp757-777,1992.
21.Hollenbeck,J., and Klein,H,”Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problem, prospects, and proposals for the future”, Journal of Applied Phschology, 72,2,pp212-220,1987
22.James P. Lewis,”Mastering Project Management” ,New York：McGraw-Hill. Inc,1998
23.Johar, H.V. SoftCord,”An intellogent agent for coordinstion in software development projects”, Decision Support Systems, 20,1 .pp65-81,1997
24.Kerzner, H., Project Management,”A System Approach to Planning,Scheduling and Controlling”, 2nd ed. ,Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Inc.1984
25.Kogut, B. & Zander, U.”Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and replication of technology”,Organization Science, 3/(Aug)：pp383-397,1992
26.Koushik, M., and Mookerjee, V.S. “Modeling coordination in software construction: An analysis approach.”, Information System Research,6,3,pp220-254,1995
27.Latane, B; Willians, K; and Harkins, S.”Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing”, Journel of Personality and Social Psychology, 37,6.pp822-832,1979
28.Leonard-Barton, Dorothy,"Wellsprings of Knowledge : building and sustaining the source of innovation", MA, Harvard Business School Press.1995.
29.Locke, E; Shaw, K; Saari, L; and Latham, G. “Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980”. Psychological Bulletin, 90,1,pp125-152, 1981
30.McKeen, J.D.; Guimaraes, T.; and Wetherbe, J.C. “The relationship between user participation and user sattisfaction: An investigation of four contingency factors.”, MIS Quarterly,18,4,pp427-451,1994.
31.Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M. Jr.”Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.1995.
32.Nonaka, I and Takeuchi, H., “The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation”, Oxford University Press, New York,.1995
33.Pearce, Jone L.,”Toward an organizational behavior of contract laborers: Their psychological involvement and effects on employee co-workers”, Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), pp1082-1096 ,1993
34.Perrow, C., “A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations “,American Sociological Review, 32,pp197-208.1967.
35.Rai, A., and Patnayakuni, R. “A structural model for CASE adoption behavior”, Journal of Management Information Systems. 13,2 (Fall),pp205-234, 1996
36.Ravichandran, T. ,”Software reusability as synchronous innovation: A test of four theoretical models.”, European Journal of Information System, 8,3,pp183-199,1999.
37.Ralph Currier Davis,”The Fundamentals of Top Management “,New York, Harper,pp169,1951.
38.Robbins, S. P.“Organizational Behavior”. 4ed.,New-Jersey:Prentice Hall,Inc.1993.
39.Sarrinen, T. “System development methodology and project success: An assessment of situational approaches.”, Information & Management, 19,3,pp183-193,1990.
40.Schultz, R., and Slevin, D.P.”Implementation and Organizational Validity: An Empirical Investigation.’, Implementing Operations Research and Management Science. Elsevier, pp153-182 ,1975
41.Simonin,B.L.,”Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances.”,Strategic management journal,20,pp595-623. ,1999
42.Singley, M.K. and Anderson, J.R., “The Transfer of Cognitive Skill”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
43.Souder, W.E. and Song X. M., “Analysis of U.S. and Japanese Management, Process Associated with New Product Success and Failure in High and Low Familiarity Market,” Journal of Prduct Innovation Management,15, pp208-223,1998
44.Swanson, K; McComb, D,: Smith, J.: and McCubbrey, D. ,”The application software factory: Applying total quality techniques to systems development.”, MIS Quarterly, 15,4,pp566-579,1991
45.Thompson, J. D.,”Organizations in Actions.”. New York,1967
46.Tziner A., and Eden, D. “Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts ?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 1,pp85-93,1985
47.Whitten,J.L.and Bentley, L.D.,”Systems analysis & design methods”,4th,ed., Mirror/Mosby Colleg publishing,1998