企業創新不再只是依賴企業內部人員的創意、專業知識與技能，也從外部獲取為企業所適用的創意、技術、知識與專利，並進行整合以達成更有效率的創新，這種創新的新做法稱之為開放式創新。雙面兼備創新的企業能夠同時成就探索性創新與開發性創新以達到企業永續經營。其中，探索性創新是指運用新知識以創造新的技術或競爭力；而開發性創新則為強化現有的技術與競爭力，以改善現有的設計與提升銷售效率。為加速企業創新速度，企業從外部獲取專業人才，成立所謂的開放式創新團隊。雖然開放式創新團隊擁有多元的行為職能使創新團隊更輕易達成創新的目標，但是團隊人員的多樣性反而會提高團隊人員之間的衝突，因此輔以激勵機制有效整合團隊人員使其更輕易達成創新。
本研究利用判斷抽樣方法以問卷的方式，對主要參與學生創新競賽的台灣學生進行發放。共回收有效樣本數為188份，以探討開放式創新學生團隊「行為職能多樣性」、激勵機制之「共享目標」、「獎賞」、「信任」、「自我效能」與「雙面兼備創新」之關係。研究結果顯示開放式創新學生團隊行為職能多樣性的程度越高，對於達成雙面兼備創新的程度越高；開放式創新學生團隊的行為職能多樣性與共享目標、獎賞、信任和自我效能皆有正向關係。在團隊中，學生團隊擁有越高程度的行為職能多樣性，團隊整體展現的共享目標程度、獎賞程度、信任程度與自我效能程度也就越高。在激勵機制的研究上，共享目標與自我效能確實能夠整合行為職能多樣性達成雙面兼備創新；獎賞與信任則無法有效整合行為職能多樣性達成雙面兼備創新。

For innovations, company not only depends on ideas, expertise, and skills from staffs, but also acquires adequate ideas, technologies, and knowledge from outside. This method is called as open innovation. The ambidexterity represents that company can generate exploratory and exploitative innovations simultaneously. More and more companies try to acquire other expertise to set up the open innovation team. Although open innovation team possesses various behavioral competences to achieve innovation easily, the diversity of people also increases the conflicts between members. Hence, motivation mechanism may be used to integrate these people for better innovations.
This study adopted judgmental sampling to survey students who participated in the innovative competitions for exploring the relationships between behavioral competence diversity, motivation mechanism such as shared goals, reward, trust, and self-efficacy, and the ambidexterity of innovations. The findings are as following: more degree of behavioral competence diversity the open innovation student team possesses, more degree of the ambidexterity of innovations can be achieved; behavioral competence diversity has positive relationships with shared goals, reward, trust, and self-efficacy. In the examination of motivation mechanism, shared goals and self-efficacy show functionally to integrate behavioral competence diversity to achieve the ambidexterity of innovations; reward and trust didn’t show to be the significant functions as to integrate behavioral competence diversity to achieve the ambidexterity of innovations.

Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3), 321-341.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. G. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(May), 411-423.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation for structural equation models. Journal of hte Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-191-215.
Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60(6), 945-951.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162).
Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 1-44.
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., et al. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525-534.
Chatenier, E. d., Verstegen, J. A. A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2010). Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R&D Management, 40(3), 271-280.
Cheetham, G., & Chivers, G. (1996). Towards a holistic model of professional competence. Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(5), 20-30.
Chen, M. H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity & Innovation Management, 15(1), 105-116.
Chen, M. H., Chang, Y. C., & Hung, S. C. (2008). Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 38(1), 21-34.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003a). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.
Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.
Chesbrough, H., & Schwartz, K. (2007). Innovating business models with co-development partnerships. Research Technology Management, 50(1), 55-59.
Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57-76.
Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team socail networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740-751.
Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107-128.
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095-1121.
de Visser, M., de Weerd-Nederhof, P., Faems, D., Song, M., van Looy, B., & Visscher, K. (2010). Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance. Technovation, 30(5/6), 291-299.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450-467.
Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18-31.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18(1), 39-50.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. I., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. NY: Paulist press.
Hall, D. J., Cegielski, C. G., & Wade, J. N. (2006). Theoretical value belief, cognitive ability, and personality as predictors of student performance in object-oriented programming environments. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 237-257.
Han, H., & Kemple, K. (2006). Components of social competence and strategies of support: Considering what to teach and how. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(3), 241-246.
Haon, C., Gotteland, D., & Fornerino, M. (2009). Familiarity and competence diversity in new product development teams: Effects on new product performance. Marketing Letters, 20(1), 75-89.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045.
Henry, J. W., & Stone, R. W. (1994). A structural model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information systems. Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3), 21-33.
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Socail capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165.
Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 675-702.
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797-811.
Kaifi, B. A., & Noori, S. A. (2011). Organizational behavior: A study on managers, employees, and teams. Journal of Management Policy & Practice, 12(1), 88-97.
Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 39(4), 331-341.
Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., et al. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 445.
Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385-399.
Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence? Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27-46.
Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Chu, C. P. (2008). The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision, 46(7), 1002-1026.
Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135-149.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Yan, L., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 1015-1039.
Mom, T. J. M., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers' ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812-828.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18(1), 71-88.
Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3), 492-507.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502-517.
Rickards, T., Chen, M. H., & Moger, S. (2001). Development of a self-report instrument for exploring team factor, leadership and performance relationships. British Journal of Management, 12(3), 243.
Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9-25.
Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 38(1), 73-85.
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503.
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1999). Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25(2), 207-228.
Stone, D. N. (1994). Overconfidence in initial self-efficacy judgments: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 452-472.
Tabachnick, B. J., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Rost, K. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907-918.
Taylor, T. (2010). The challenge of project team incentives. Compensation & Benefits Review, 42(5), 411-419.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
Vandewalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995.
Varvel, T., Adams, S. G., Pridie, S. J., & Ruiz Ulloa, B. C. (2004). Team effectiveness and individual myers-briggs personality dimensions. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(4), 141-146.
Wageman, R., & Baker, G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 139-158.
Weber, M. R., Finley, D. A., Crawford, A., & Rivera, D. (2009). An exploratory study identifying soft skill competencies in entry-level managers. Tourism & Hospitality Research, 9(4), 353-361.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.