| 研究生: |
李季珍 Lee, Chi-Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業併購與經營績效關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司為例 The Relationship between Mergers & Acquisitions and Management Performance-A Perspective of Listed Companies in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
陳耀光
Chen, Yaw-kuang 吳宗正 Wu, Chung-Cheng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2007 |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 75 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 企業併購 、經營績效 、併購動機 、台灣上市公司 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Listed Stock in Taiwan, Motives of M&A, Management Performance, Mergers & Acquisitions |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:174 下載:13 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討企業併購與經營績效關聯性之研究,以台灣上市公司為研究對象,問卷發放時間為2007年5月21日至6月4日,共計發放300份問卷,回收90份問卷,扣除7份無效問卷,總得有效問卷83份,問卷回收率為30.00%。
本研究主要的研究方法包括敘述性統計、因素分析、信效度分析、相關性分析以及變異數分析等統計方法。本研究透過文獻回顧、問卷調查進行資料的蒐集與分析,依據資料分析結果,獲得以下結論:
1.企業併購與經營績效有顯著影響。
2.公司員工人數及公司資本額在企業併購與經營績效上沒有顯著差異。
3.公司成立年數對經營績效有顯著的差異,但對企業併購並不顯著。
關鍵字:企業併購、經營績效、併購動機、台灣上市公司
The purpose of this paper is to understand the relationship between mergers & acquisitions and management performance, talking the Listed Companies in Taiwan as research objects. 300 questionnaires were sent out from 21 May to 4 June of 2007 and 90 questionnaires were returned, deducting 3 invalid questionnaires, 87 effective questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire retrieve rate is 30.00%.
The research mothed of this paper includes descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability and validity analysis, correlation Analysis and one-way ANOVA et al. Through collecting and analyszing materials by means of literature study and questionnaire investigation, the research obtains the following conclusion:
1.The mergers & acquisitions slightly significantly influences the management performance.
2.The number of employee and sizes of capital for different company data showed no significant differences toward mergers & acquisition and management performance.
3.The years of establishment has significant differences toward management performance, but unremarkable difference toward mergers & acquisitions.
Keywords: Mergers & Acquisitions, Management Performance, Motives of M&A, Listed Stock in Taiwan
一、中文
1.方弘文(1998),高科技產業知識創造與產品創新之研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理學系研究所碩士論文。
2.王泰允(1993),企業併購實用,遠流出版公司。
3.王毓仁(2000),公部門績效指標的設計與運用,人力發展月刊,第82期,頁35-45。
4.丘昌泰(2002),邁向績效導向的地方政府管理,研考雙月刊,第26卷第3期,頁47-56。
5.伍忠賢(2001),企業購併理論與實務,新陸書局出版。
6.吳萬益(2000),企業研究方法,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
7.林盛昌(2002),JIT生產體系績效衡量之研究-平衡計分卡觀點,東吳大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
8.范祥偉、王崇斌(2000),政府績效管理:分析架構與實務策略,中國行政評論,第10卷第1期,頁169-170。
9.陳水金(2004),企業併購成功關鍵因素及其併購績效與價值之研究-以P科技公司併購C建設公司借殼上市案為例,國立中正大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
10.陳漢波(2003),探討台灣電子產業水平購併對財務經營績效之影響-以三家特定電子公司為例,中原大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
11.游中凱(2004),企業購併後經營績效及其影響因素之研究-以平衡計分卡觀點探討,東吳大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
12.游淦皓(2002),企業合併終止個案的比較研究,國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
13.黃仁正(2002),台灣上市公司併購動機、動機達成程度與經營績效之研究,東海大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
14.黃英忠、曹國雄、黃同圳、張火燦、王秉鈞(2002),人力資源管理,華泰圖書有限公司。
15.應國卿(1992),我國企業國際併購之失敗因素研究,國立台灣科技大學工程技術研究所碩士論文。
16.薛明玲(1990),成功購併的要件:標的與軍師並重,會計研究月刊,第60期,頁104-107。
17.謝劍平(1999),現代投資銀行,智勝文化事業有限公司。
18.謝劍平(2002),新觀念與本土化,智勝文化事業有限公司。
二、英文
1.Amihud, Y. & Lev, B. (1981). Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for
Conglomerate Mergers. The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 12( 2), pp. 605-617.
2.Bacal, R., (1999). Performance Management. New York: McGraw- Hill.
3.Brealey, R. A. & Myers, S. C. (2000). Principles of Corporate Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.Brigham, E. F. & Gapenski, L. C.(1991). Financial Management-Theory and Practice. The Dryden Press.
5.Copeland, T. E., & Weston, J. F. (1979). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
6.Drucker, P. F., (1981). Five Rules for Successful Acquisition. The Wall Street Journal, Vol. 15, pp.28.
7.Eccles, R.G., (1991). The Performance Measurement Manifesto. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69(1), pp.131-137.
8.Evans, H., Ashworth, G., Gooch, G., & Davies, (1996). Who needs Performance Management?.Management Accounting, pp.20-25.
9.Eynon & Nodine (1991). Seven Critical Success Factors for Value-creating Acquisitions,.M & A Europe, May/Apr, pp. 50.
10.Grandy, M. W., (1991). Performance Measurement: Implementing Strategy. Management Accounting, Vol.12, No. 72, pp. 49-53.
11.Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3(3), pp. 305-360.
12.Kanji, G. K., (2002). Business Excellence: Make it Happen. Total Quality Management, Vol.13(8), pp. 1115-1124.
13.Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard -Measures That Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70(1), pp.71-79.
14.Paine, F. T. & Power, D. J. (1984). Merger Strategy: A Examination of Drucker’s five rules for Successful Acquisition. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5(2), pp. 99-110.
15.Roll, R. (1986). The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers. Journal of Business, Vol. 59, pp.197-216.
16.Seth, A. (1990). Value Creation in Acquisitions: A Reexamination of Performance Issues. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11(6), pp. 99-115.
17.Simon, R., (2000). Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. New York: Prentice Hall.
18.Singh, H. & Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate Acquisition Strategies and Economic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18(2), pp. 337-386.
19.The Economist (1999). How to Make Mergers Work. 9th, pp. 13-14.
20.Triantis, J. E. (1986). Forecasting for Acquisitions and Joint Venture Projects. Journal of Business Forecasting, Vol.15(3), pp.3-6.
21.Weston, J. F., Chung K.S., & Hoag, S. E. (1990). Mergers, Restructuring, and Corporate Control. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.