簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 尤傑蘭
Yu, Chieh-Lan
論文名稱: 介入實現宜居街道──美國都市與台南案例
Achieving Livable Streets by Interventions: Cases in American Cities and Tainan
指導教授: 吳玉成
Wu, Yu-Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 都市介入宜居街道戰術性都市主義美國都市台南市
外文關鍵詞: Urban Intervention, Livable Streets, Tactical Urbanism, American Cities, Tainan City
相關次數: 點閱:267下載:30
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 二十一世紀的當代社會所面臨的宜居問題,並不在意識或思想層面,而是在於實踐方法,意識與行動必須有效連結。而戰術性都市主義(Tactical Urbanism)似乎展示了一條通往宜居街道的新途徑。它運用小規模、低成本、實驗性的短期活動,建立群眾意識,發展利益關係人間的信任,並創造長期變化。若解讀其在都市中的作用與意義,則顯現事件可能從質疑現況開始,鬆動既定狀態、產生思想和實踐的流動性,而探索新可能或開闢新方向。
    本研究運用案例研究法,探討美國都市案例的成功途徑為何,包括舊金山的PARK(ing)案例、紐約的honku案例以及達拉斯的Better Block案例,分別面對公共空間、居住環境以及衰敗街區中的不同宜居街道議題,都成功扭轉了地區的命運從而實現宜居街道。再討論面對相仿議題的台南案例,包括好望角計畫、烏桕巷以及正興街等案例,以美國及台南案例兩者所展現的發展特性,在不同都市環境背景下,探討其共通性、相異性,以提出對台南的啟發。
    研究發現美國案例的成功途徑,在於「運用介入行動特性喚起共鳴或轉變觀點」、「傳播與集結群眾意識及力量」、「群起行動引發政府回應」,此三件事的連結。而途徑背後所展現的關鍵性意義,也為台南帶來啟發,包括議題、行動、群眾意識等方面。

    The issue of livability faced by contemporary society in the twenty-first century is not at the level of consciousness or thought, but in practical methods.
    Tactical Urbanism seems to show a new way to achieve livable streets. It uses small-scale, low-cost and experimental short-term activities to build mass awareness, develop trust among stakeholders, and create long-term change.
    This study uses case studies to explore successful approaches to urban cases in the United States, including the PARK(ing) in San Francisco, the honku in New York, and the Better Block in Dallas. Then discuss the Tainan cases facing similar issues, including the Good Looking Coner, the Wujing Lane and Zhengxing Street.
    The study found that the successful way of the U.S. case lies in using the characteristics of intervention to resonate or change perspectives, spread and assemble mass awareness and strength, and rally the government's response, a link between three things. The meaning behind the path also inspires Tainan.

    第 1 章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究方法與範圍 2 第三節 研究架構 3 第 2 章 理論基礎與分析觀點 4 第一節 都市改造新途徑 4 一、風潮的背後 5 二、優勢特性 6 第二節 臨時事件在都市中的作用與意義 8 第三節 案例分析架構 11 第 3 章 美國經驗 13 第一節 舊金山市中心:從PARK(ing)、PARK(ing) Day到parklet 14 一、過程 14 二、解析發展過程、要徑與關鍵要素 23 三、重要成就 25 第二節 紐約布魯克林社區:從honku、honku.org到實質交通改善 27 一、過程 27 二、解析發展過程、要徑與關鍵要素 33 三、重要成就 35 第三節 達拉斯社區:從凝聚意識、Better Block到規範及政策革新 36 一、 過程 36 二、解析發展過程、要徑與關鍵要素 45 三、重要成就 47 第四節 小結 49 第 4 章 台南經驗 51 第一節 台南市中心:從好望角計畫、民間及企業響應到都審原則 52 一、過程 52 二、解析發展過程、要徑與關鍵要素 61 三、重要成就 63 第二節 烏桕巷:從凝聚情感、植樹到整體環境提升 64 一、過程 64 二、解析發展過程、要徑與關鍵要素 72 三、重要成就 74 第三節 正興街:從產生街區認同、一連串街區活動到街區活化 75 一、過程 75 二、解析發展過程、要徑與關鍵要素 81 三、重要成就 83 第四節 小結 84 第 5 章 結論 87

    一、英文文獻
    AARP Livable Communities. (n.d.). Project: Pop-Up Streetscape Revitalization. AARP.org. Retrieved Sep. 25, 2019, from https://www.aarp.org/livable-communities/tool-kits-resources/info-2016/pop-up-streetscape.html
    Assemble. (2010) The Cineroleum. Assemble. Retrieved Jan. 7, 2020, from https://assemblestudio.co.uk/projects/the-cineroleum
    Better Block Foundation. (n.d.-a). How to Build a Better Block. Better Block Foundation. Retrieved April 28, 2019, from http://betterblock.org/how-to-build-a-better-block/
    Better Block Foundation. (n.d.-b). Our Work. Better Block Foundation. Retrieved April 28, 2019, from http://betterblock.org/services/
    Better Block Foundation. (2010). Fort Worth Better Block a Success! Better Block Foundation. Retrieved Sep. 25, 2019, from http://betterblock.org/blog/2010/10/19/fort-worth-better-block-a-success/
    Better Block Foundation. (2011). A Living Plaza for Dallas City Hall. Retrieved Sep. 25, 2019, from http://betterblock.org/blog/2011/06/03/a-living-plaza-for-dallas-city-hall/.
    Boom, J. (2017). Cyclists Hack Bike Lanes In Nebraska With Toilet Plungers. Retrieved Jan. 7, 2020,from https://popupcity.net/observations/cyclists-hack-bike-lanes-in-nebraska-with-toilet-plungers/
    Coombs, G. (2012). Park(ing) day. Contexts, 11(3), pp.64-65.
    Endres, D., Senda-Cook, S. & Cozen, B. (2014). Not Just a Place to Park Your Car: Park(Ing) as Spatial Argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50(3), 121-140, DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2014.11821814
    Farley, M. (2002). Versed in Traffic Control. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved Oct. 16, 2019, from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-may-18-na-honku18-story.html
    Greenwald, J. (2011). Park(ing) Day’s Roadside Attraction. SMITHSONIAN.COM. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/parking-days-roadside-attraction-78730864/
    Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Garcia, T., Preston, R.& Woudstra, R. (2012). Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action, Long-Term Change Vol.2 [PDF File]. The Streets Plans Collaborative, Inc.
    Lydon, M.& Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change [PDF File]. The Streets Plans Collaborative, Inc.
    Madanipour, A. (2017). Cities in Time: temporary urbanism and the future of the city. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    MoreLab. (n.d.). PARK(ing). MoreLab. Retrieved March 18, 2019, from http://morelab.com/portfolio/parking/#prettyPhoto
    Naparstek, A. (2003). Story of Honku. Honku.org. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from http://www.honku.org/story.shtml
    Naparstek, A. (2012). Hacking the City. LinkedIn Corporation. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from https://www.slideshare.net/naparstek/hacking-the-city
    PARK(ing) Day. (n.d.). ABOUT PARK(ING) DAY. PARK(ing) Day.org. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://parkingday.org/about-parking-day/
    Paumgarten, N. (2002). THE BASHO OF HONK. The New Yorker. Retrieved Oct. 16, 2019, from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/03/25/the-basho-of-honk
    PPS. (2006). NEW YORK CITY STREETS RENAISSANCE. PPS. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from https://www.pps.org/projects/new-york-city-streets-renaissance
    Pratt, L. (2010). Divisadero Trial Parklet Impact Report [PDF file]. sfgreatstreets.org.
    Pratt, L. (2011). Parklet Impact Study [PDF file]. sfgreatstreets.org.
    Pham, D. (2011). Park(ing) Day 2011: Pop-Up Parks Spring Up Around the World-Exclusive Photos! Retrieved Sep. 23, 2019, from https://inhabitat.com/parking-day-2011-pop-up-parks-spring-up-around-the-world-exclusive-photos/
    Pavement to Parks. (2013). San Francisco Parklet Manual Version1.0.[PDF file]. pavementtoparks.org.
    Panganiban, J.& Ocubillo, R. (2014). Citywide Assessment of Parklets& Plazas[PDF file]. pavementtoparks.org.
    Peckenham, E. (2014). Talking Public Space and Urban Intervention With San Francisco’s Rebar Studio. Inhabitat.com. Retrieved March 18, 2019, from https://inhabitat.com/talking-public-space-and-urban-intervention-with-san-franciscos-rebar-studio/
    Ross, R. (2012). Building a Better Block in Oak Cliff. Retrieved May 7,2019, from https://www.texasobserver.org/building-a-better-block-in-oak-cliff/
    Roberts, J. (2012a). How to build a better block: Jason Roberts at TEDxOU [Video File]. TEDx Talks.
    Roberts, J. (2012b). Becoming the Change. The White House Blog. Retrieved May 7, 2019, from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/07/30/becoming-change
    Roberts, J. (2016). BETTER BLOCK IS URBAN DESIGN. THE FIELD, The American Society of Landscape Architects. Retrieved April 28, 2019, from https://thefield.asla.org/2016/03/17/better-block-is-urban-design/
    Schmitt, A. (2013). Q&A With Jason Roberts, the Brains Behind “Better Blocks”. STREETSBLOG USA. Retrieved May 7, 2019, from https://usa.streetsblog.org/2013/05/31/qa-with-jason-roberts-the-visionary-behind-the-better-block/
    Schneider, B. (2017). How Park(ing) Day Went Global. Citylab.com. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://www.citylab.com/life/2017/09/from-parking-to-parklet/539952/
    Speck, J. (2012). Walkable city: how downtown can save America, one step at a time. New York: North Point Press. ISBN: 978-0-86547-772-8.
    The Bicycle Story. (2014a). Aaron Naparstek: the Evolution of an Advocate from Honku to StreetsBlog and Beyond (Part 1). The Bicycle Story. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from http://www.thebicyclestory.com/2014/04/aaron-naparstek-part-1/
    The Bicycle Story. (2014b). Aaron Naparstek: the Evolution of an Advocate from Honku to StreetsBlog and Beyond (Part 2). The Bicycle Story. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from http://www.thebicyclestory.com/2014/04/aaron-naparstek-part-2/
    Thorpe, A. (2016). A day for turning parking spaces into pop-up parks. The Conversation Media Group Ltd. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://theconversation.com/a-day-for-turning-parking-spaces-into-pop-up-parks-65164
    TEAM BETTER BLOCK. (2019). Team Better Block 2018 Best Practice[PDF file]. TEAM BETTER BLOCK. Retrieved Sep. 25, 2019, from https://issuu.com/teambetterblock

    二、中文文獻
    Carmona, M.,Tiesdell, S., Heath, T.& Oc, T. (2013) 趙子元譯,Public places-urban spaces(公共場所與都市空間),臺北市:六和。
    Montgomery, C. (2016) 鄭煥昇譯,HAPPY CITY(是設計,讓城市更快樂:找回以「人」為本的大街小巷,創造人與人的互動連結),臺北市:時報文化。
    內政部營建署 (n.d.) 翡翠大地動凡心,內政部營建署,2019年十月13日自http://trp.cpami.gov.tw/ch/AllInOne_Show.aspx?path=187&guid=738de06e-dc75-45de-b9fa-6d581d957df2&lang=zh-tw#01。
    內政部營建署 (1998) 第一屆魅力城鄉大獎-全國優良城鄉風貌評選結果揭曉,2019年十月13日自http://trp.cpami.gov.tw/ch/AllInOne_Show.aspx?path=270&guid=cd588613-ff64-4d64-9bbd-268de7298bd1&lang=zh-tw
    內政部營建署 (2008) 小角落的大驚艷[PDF file],魅力城鄉二部曲,內政部營建署。
    台南市都發處 (n.d.) 好望角專案計畫成果,台南市都發處,2019年五月十日自https://web.archive.org/web/20160317180428/http://bud.tncg.gov.tw/bud_new/doc/ud1-1-1.asp
    台南市都發處 (2010) 台南市綠地系統與好望角計畫執行機制經驗分享[PPT file],台南市都發處。
    台南市都發局 (n.d.) 臺南市好望角專案計畫統計資料,台南市都發局 ,2019年五月十日自 https://data.tainan.gov.tw/dataset/garden-corner
    台南市都發局 (2003) 台南府城都市發展月報第1、2、3、13、19 期,台南市都發局。
    台南市都發局 (2005) 台南市都市景觀白皮書,台南市都發局。
    台南市都發局 (2005) 都市願景戰略──新古都台南的公共論述,台南市都發局。
    台南市都發局 (2007) 台南市「好望角都市設計審議原則」審議通過,台南市都發局,2019年五月五日自http://ud.tainan.gov.tw/UPBUD_sys/Mobile/Article?CId=7f9f81cc-9c8e-4708-8d40-d0d0c982e667&TId=958c529a-ce45-43ad-853a-d7bc56287a91
    吳振福 (2001) 台南市東明里,跨世紀生活環境改造─營造新桃花源,行政院環保署,pp.60-62。
    吳玉成 (2011) 從先進永續策略與方案看台南市健康城市的環境提升計畫,健康城市學刊(四),衛生福利部國民健康署,pp.12-16。
    林少雯 (2003) 巷的傳奇故事,吾愛吾家第289期。
    侯志仁 (2013) 城市造反:全球非典型都市規劃術,新北市:左岸文化。
    商業周刊 (2016) 台南正興街的幸福革命[Video file],商業周刊。
    高耀威 (2017) 不正常人生超展開;正興街櫃男的理想生活指南,臺北市:遠流。
    高耀威 (2019) 台南正興街的溫柔革命,不正常人生超展開![Video file],TEDx Talks。
    陳姵綸 (2007) 台灣城鄉風貌改造計畫發展與專案執行的經驗分析,國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院園藝學系碩士論文。
    楊永妙 (2002) 社區總體營造讓文化看得見,遠見雜誌2002年12月號。
    蔡宜珊 (2016) 探討新商家對於市中心鄰里街區再生之影響──臺南市正興街個案研究,國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
    謝國鐘 (2015) 東山河的八十年代──一段人與土地的深刻對話,新北市:遠足文化。

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE