簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳宏裕
Chen, Hong-Yu
論文名稱: 估計現金流量風險值之比較模型-台灣資料實證
A Comparable Method to Estimate Cashflow-At-Risk From Taiwan
指導教授: 王明隆
Wang, Ming-Long
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 51
中文關鍵詞: 同質性現金流量風險值厚尾Foster模型
外文關鍵詞: homogeneity, Cash flow at risk, Fatter-tailed, Foster model
相關次數: 點閱:212下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • none

     VaR combines with a variety of risk into a single number. The definition of VaR is: the expected maximum loss or worst loss during a target horizon in a given confidence level. In this paper, we will use two kinds of methods to calculate the C-FaR. In the first method, we assembled 9,600 forecast errors into a pooling data. Then, we sorted the forecast errors into 16 subsamples by the four dimensions. Under the concept of homogeneity, we calculated the C-FaR of each subsample by the percentile method. In the first method, we used two kinds of forecast model, one is the Foster model, the other is AR(4) model. The second method is reverse procedure of the first method, we calculated the C-FaR for each firm first, then created a pooling data of C-FaRs and sorted data by four dimension.

     The empirical result showed that if the firm has low assets, high stock price volatility, and low EPS, than this kind of firm should be more risky. We had significant empirical evidence to show that the higher EPS, the smaller C-FaR is. EPS is the most relevant factor that affects the C-FaR. Moreover, the stock price volatility is the secondary important factor, the higher the stock price volatility, the higher C-FaR will be.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………………II THANK NOTES…………………………………………III TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST……………………………IV LIST OF TABLES………………………………………V LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………VI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION…………………………VII 1.1 Motivation………………………………………1 1.2 Objective……………………………………….3 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW…………………..4 2.1 Introduction VaR……………………………4 2.1.1 Definition……………………………4 2.1.2 Normal distribution…………………6 2.1.3 Fatter-tail distribution……………………8 2.2 Downside risk……………………….………11 2.3 Definition of Cash Flow and C-FaR…………12 2.3.1 The important of seasonality on forecast……………13 2.4 Forecast Model………………………………13 2.4.1 Autoregressive specification………13 2.4.2 The Foster model………………………14 2.5 Altman bankrupt model……………………………15 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY……………………….....…17 3.1 Data Collection and Operating cashflow…17 3.2 Model of forecast cashflow…………………18 3.3 Sorting the forecast errors………………20 3.4 The two methods of Calculated C-FaR………22 CHAPTER 4 EMPIRICAL RESULTS ……………………27 4.1 Empirical Results………………...……..27 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS ……….……………………32 5.1 Conclusion……………………………………….32 5.2 Further Research…………………………………33 REFERENCE……………………………………………….49

    [1]Altman, E. I., “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. XXIII, No.4, September 1968, 589-609.

    [2]Amado, P., “The distribution of stock returns: international evidence”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 4, 1994, 431-439.

    [3]Bekaert G., B. E. Claude, R. H. Campell and T. E. Viskanta, “Distributional characteristics of emerging market returns and asset allocation”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 24, Winter 1998, 102-115.

    [4]Brender, A., “Cash-flow valuation and value at risk”, North American Actuarial Journal, Vol. 3, No.2, 1999, 26-29.

    [5]Breuer T., G. Krenn and F. Pistovcak, “Stress Tests, Maximum Loss, and Value at Risk”, July 2002.

    [6]Darryll, H., “Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models Using Historical Data”, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol. 2, April 1996, 39-69.

    [7]Duffie D. and J. Pan, “An Overview of Value at Risk”, The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 4, Spring 1997, 7-49

    [8]Foster, G., “Quarterly Accounting Data: Time-Series Properties and Predictive-Ability Results”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 52, No.1, 1977, 1-21.

    [9]Henrard M., “Comparison of cash flow maps for value-at-risk”, Journal of Risk, Vol. 3, No.1, Fall 2000, 57-71.

    [10]Hull J. and White A., “Value at Risk When Daily Changes in Market Variables are not normally distributed”, The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 5, Spring 1998, 9-19.

    [11]Hull, J. C., Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, Prentice Hall, 2003.(5 th)

    [12]Introduction to business analysis & Valuation, Palepu, Bernard & Healy.

    [13]James M. and T. Christopher, “Could Companies Use Value-at-Risk?”, Euromoney, October 1995, 84-86.

    [14]Jensen M. C., “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, 1986, 323-329.

    [15]Kataoka, S., “A stochastic programming model”, Econometrica, Vol. 31, 1963, 181-196.

    [16]Longin, F. M., “Beyond the VaR”, The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 8, Summer 2001, 36-48.

    [17]Ming-Yuan Leon Li, Hsiou-wei William Lin, “Estimating Value at Risk via Markov Switching ARCH Models-An Empirical Study on Stock Index Returns”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 11, 2004, 679.

    [18]Philippe Jorion, Value at risk : The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, McGraw-Hill, 2000.(2nd ed).

    [19]Roy, A. D., “Safety-first and the holding of assets”, Econometrics, Vol. 20, July 1952, 431-449.

    [20]Stein J. C., S. E. Usher, D. LaGattuta and J. Youngen, “A Comparables Approach to Measuring Cashflow-at-Risk for Non-financial Firms”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 13, No.4, July 2000, 100-109.

    [21]Telser, L.G., “Safety first and hedging”, Rev. of Econ, 1955, 410-9.

    [22]李吉元 , “風險值限制下最適資產配置”, 國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文, 2003。

    [23]張惠渝 , “Optimal asset allocation under VaR constraint”,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文, 2002。

    下載圖示
    2005-06-30公開
    QR CODE