| 研究生: |
董建明 Tung, Chien-Ming |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
群聚特性對群聚績效影響之研究-以大陸台商為例 The Effects of Cluster Characteristics on Cluster Performance - An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Firms in China |
| 指導教授: |
陳忠仁
Chen, Chung-Jen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 100 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 距離基礎理論論 、Ripley'K函數 、空間統計 、產業群聚 、群聚內相關及支援產業 、群聚間網路 、經濟地理學 、產業關聯表 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | related and supporting industry of cluster, spatial statistics, economic geography, cluster network, Input-Output Table, distance-based method, Ripley's K function, industry cluster |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:109 下載:6 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中國大陸自從鄧小平於1979年4月提倡經濟改革開放並成立經濟特區以來,過去20多年中台灣廠商即在其發展軌跡中扮演著一定重要的角色。其中藉由台灣過去成功的代工經驗複製移植到中國大陸,該套代工生產模式也成功協助將大陸轉型為全球的世界工廠。在此一現象的同時,眾多到大陸投資的台商們也陸續形成許多著名的台商聚落。從最早期的4個經濟特區中廣東省的深圳市、汕頭市、珠海市以及福建省的廈門市,而後擴展至同地理區域的廣州市、東莞市、中山市、福州市。之後更隨著投資類型從傳統產業轉往電子、半導體產業,台商的投資腳步重心也逐漸移往長江三角洲,並形成新的一群台商電腦產業聚落如上海市、江蘇省的蘇州市、吳江市、昆山市等。
而本研究初始欲探討台商在大陸所形成的諸多產業群聚及對企業績效之關聯性時,從過去文獻回顧中發現學者多以探討『群聚效應』下單一群聚對其群聚成員的影響性為主,對於本研究中台商所形成的諸多不同城市、不同產業的產業群聚間之交互影響性這狀況的研究則較為缺乏。因此,本研究即以產業面的觀點來分析台商在大陸所形成的眾多產業群聚,以產業群聚而非群聚內企業為衡量單位的次級資料實證方式,從總體經濟學的產業關聯表以及空間地理學的K函數來建立一整合性架構,進而探討台商的產業群聚規模、群聚內的相關及支援產業以及群聚間的互動網路,對台商的產業群聚績效之影響。
本研究之研究母體為台灣經濟新報資料庫中在台上市(櫃)母企業的739家廠商在2002至2004年三年期間對大陸投資之1571家子(相關)企業,由於後續進行資料處理時將對企業做群聚內與群聚外的進一步分類,因此屬於群聚內的觀察子(相關)企業樣本數僅1466家廠商(比率為93%)。之後本研究即以1466家廠商在中國各城市所形成的313個不同產業的產業群聚城市做產業關聯表的矩陣運算、空間統計的K函數處理,以多元迴歸的方式獲得下列的分析結果:
(1) 總體產業面來看群聚效應的確有助於群聚績效之提升,群聚規模對群聚績效有正面顯著的影響。而從個別產業面來看,對電子業產業群聚來說,群聚效應中的規模經濟對其績效影響則不顯著,需進一步分析。
(2) 群聚內相關及支援產業的規模,對該群聚績效有正面顯著的影響。本研究從對特定產業對的供給面與需求面產業來分析皆有此一結果。
(3) 從空間地理的觀點來探討,單一產業群聚與500Km半徑範圍內之其他相同產業群聚所建構的互動網路關係的確會對該群聚績效有顯著影響。半徑範圍過小網路成員數不足,或是半徑範圍過大涵蓋過多所建構的群聚網路關係其影響則不顯著。
(4) 群聚內相關及支援產業與群聚規模的交互作用對群聚績效具有正面顯著影響。然而群聚內台商相關及支援產業較低之族群績效反而較高者表現更為傑出,此一結果說明了對於『台商』產業群聚而言,隨著企業成長所實行在地化策略後將有利於之後獲得更好之經營績效。
(5) 群聚間網路與群聚規模的交互作用對群聚績效之影響在250Km半徑範圍內為正向顯著影響,呼應了群聚效應中所謂的『地理鄰近性』。然而在500Km半徑範圍外卻為負向顯著影響也表示隨著距離增加,群聚效應將消失轉為區域性競爭的關係。此外,對單一產業群聚而言,在空間上擁有較高的互動網路將有助於該群聚去面對在地與其他外商之競爭而獲得更高的區域經濟商機。反之,低互動網路反而隨著群聚規模成長而開始造成負向的『群聚擁擠』現象影響。
Since Deng Xiaoping, the general designer of the special economic zone of China, started to macroeconomic reform in April of 1979, Taiwanese manufacturers were sure acting an important role during its reform process in past decades. By duplicate and transplantation the past successful ODM/OEM model of Taiwan to China, this model of production make China the transition for the world global factory successfully, too. In this phenomenon, numerous Taiwanese enterprisers who went made the investment in China gathered at. designate special economic zones of Shenzhen, Shantou, Zhuhai of Guangdong Province and Xiamen of Fujian Province at early stage , had expanded the scope to Guangzhou , Dongguan , ZhongShan, Fuzhou which are adjacent to these special economic zone area at next stage. Later as the type of investment was transferred from the traditional industry to the electron, semiconductor industry, the investment focus of the Taiwanese firms is moved to the Changjiang Delta gradually too, and form a series of new computer industry agglomeration in Wujiang , Kunshan , Suzhou of Jiangsu Province and Shanghai ,etc..
This research initially intend to find the relation between these Taiwanese industry agglomeration and firm performance in China ,but while reviewing from the past scholar’s papers, we found that scholars one-sidedly emphasized on member of single industry cluster as the main factor for " Cluster Effect ", discussion for the mutual influence of multi-industry cluster of different city ,different industry that the Taiwanese manufacturers formed which this research has noticed is comparatively scarce .So this research try to analyze with the view of macroeconomics , use secondary date of these numerous Taiwanese industry clusters in China by cluster but not enterprise level as analytic unit , combining economic Input-Output Table and spatial geography theoretic Ripley’s K function as research structure for the assumption of related and support industry within a cluster and interactive network among different industry clusters, to analyze the influence for the performance of Taiwanese industry clusters.
The population of this research is listed in the Taiwan Economic Journal database of 1571 subsidiary companies in China which invested or hold by 739 Taiwanese public companies during three years from 2002 to 2004, because follow-up classification for secondary data, deduct these enterprises located outside the industry cluster, so belong to observation samples within cluster is only counted in 1466 enterprises (93%). Then ran the Input-Output Table matrix and K function for 313 different industry clusters formed by 1466 enterprises, using the multiple regression method, we obtain the following analysis results as below:
(1) Clustering effect really help improvement of the cluster performance in the overall industry, there is a positive influence of cluster scale for the cluster performance. Separately discuss the specific industry, the electron industry clusters, it is not apparent that the scale economic of production in the cluster effect related to its performance, and need to further analyze.
(2) The scale of related and supporting industry for a specific industry cluster within the same city area, there is a strongly positive influence to this cluster performance. This research for specific industry from both its supply side and demand side analysis indicates the same result.
(3) From the view of spatial geography, the network constructed by one and other same industry clusters, 500Km of radius network have apparent influence on the performance for each observed center cluster really. Smaller radius which covered little number of members as insufficient network, or radius too large to contain many unnecessary clusters of network both leads to the influence of network be unapparent.
(4) The interaction of the scale of related and supporting industry to the scale of a specific cluster have strongly positive influence on cluster performance. But with a comparatively lower related and supporting industry, on the contrary, have a better cluster performance than the higher one. The result proves that when "Taiwanese" industry cluster grew up, with lower related and supporting industry, have to adopt “Localization” to maintain its business function in tactics, and then feedback with better performance.
(5) The interaction of cluster network to the scale of cluster within the range of 250Km radius has a strongly positive influence on cluster performance, this result properly responds to the so-called "Geographic closeness" of cluster effect. But when distance over the 500Km, the relation between clusters transferred to regional competition without cluster effect. In addition, a single “Taiwanese industry cluster with higher cluster network will help it to face the competition from local and other foreign competitors on regional area . On the contrary, when a Taiwanese cluster with lower cluster network grow up, it begins to suffer from the “Cluster crowding effect” with worse performance.
參考文獻
一、網站
行政院主計處:http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/
經濟部投資審議委員會:http://www.moeaic.gov.tw/
中華人民共和國人民政府網站:http://big5.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/
中華人民共和國國家統計局:http://www.stats.gov.cn/
大陸台商經貿網:http://www.chinabiz.org.tw/
中國行政區劃網:http://www.xzqh.org/
中國投入產出協會:http://www.iochina.org.cn/
二、中文部分
司徒達賢,1994,策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法,台北:智勝文化
吳 萬 益,1995,企業研究方法,台北:華泰文化
大前研一,2004,中華聯邦,台北:商周出版社
三、英文部分
Amin,A.,& Thrift, N.(1992),Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,16,pp.571–587.
Anders Malmberg & Dominic Power (2005),(How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? ,Industry and Innovation; Dec 2005;12,4;ABI/INFORM Global pg. 409
Ann Echols & Wenpion Tsai (2005),Niche and Performance: The Moderating Role of Network Embeddedness , Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J.,26: pp.219–238
Arni, K. (1999), Finland’s national trade expansion strategies, 1999 Executive Forum, Helsinki, Finland.
Ashok Deo Bardhan & Subhrajit Guhathakurta (2004),Global linkages of subnational regions: coastal export and international networls , Contemporary Economic Policy; Apr 2004; 22, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 225
Athreye, S. S. (2001),Agglomeration and growth: a study of the Cambridge Hi-tech cluster. SIEPR Discussion Paper no. 00-42. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford, CA.
Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998), Do firms in clusters innovate more? , Research Policy, 27(5), pp.525–540.
Barff, R.A.(1987),Industrial clustering and the organization of production : a point pattern analysis of manufacturing in Cincinnati,Ohio , Annals of Association of American Geographers,77(1):pp.89-103.
Besag,J.E.(1977), comments on Ripley’s paper , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39(2): 193-195
Becattini, G. (1990), The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy (pp. 37–51), Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Becker, G. S. (2000), Global silicon valleys? First, kill all the subsidies, Business Week, 3674, 26.
Bjorn T. Asheim & Arne Isaksen (2002), Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local 'Sticky' and Global 'Ubiquitous Knowledge , Journal of Technology Transfer; Jan 2002; 27, 1 pg. 77
Bortagaray I., & Tiffin, S.(2000), Innovation clusters in Latin America, In Fourth International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Curitiba, Brazil, 28–31 August.
Boschma, R. & Lambooy, J. (1999), Evolutionary economics and economic geography, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9 (4): 411-429.
Boston Consulting Group (1998), Industria del calzado. Mexico City, Mexico: Secofi.
BRITE (2001), Basic research in industrial technologies Europe, European Commission’s Brite-EuRam, Research Directorate General, European Commission. B-1049 Brussels, Belgium. Available: http://europa. eu.int/comm/research/br-eur1.html. Tel.: +32-2-295-8220.
Brusco, S. (1999), Rules of the game in industrial districts. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial Competitiveness (pp. 17– 40). London, UK Routledge.
Buck, N., Crookston, M., Gordon, I., & Hall, P. (1997), A socio-economic assessment of London: A report by Llewelyn Davies and Partners, London: Association for London Government.
Christensen, C. M. (1997), The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Corina Huisman, Leo van Wissen1 (2004), Localization effects of firm startups and closures in the Netherlands , The Annals of Regional Science , 38:291–310
David B Audretsch (2001),The role of small firms in U.S. biotechnology clusters , Small Business Economics; Aug/Sep 2001; 17, 1,2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 3
DeBresson C, Amesse F. (1991), Networks of innovators:a review and introduction to the issue, Research Policy 20: 363–379.
Diggle PJ (1983), Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns, London Academic Press, London
Diggle PJ, Chetwynd AG (1991), Second-order analysis of spatial clustering for inhomogeneous populations, Biometrics 47:1155–1163
Dominguez-Villalobos, L., & Grossman, F.B.(1992),Employment and income effects of structural and technological changes in footwear manufacturing in Mexico. Geneva, Switzerland, International Labor Organization (ILO).
Duranton, G., Overman, H.G. (2002), Testing for location using micro-geographic data, Discussion Paper 3379 ,Centre for Economic Policy Research, London .
Ellison G, Glaeser EL (1999), The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration?, The American Economic Review 89:311–316
Emerson, R.M.(1962),“Power Dependence Relations”,American Sociological Review, Vol.27(1), 31-41.
Eric Marcon; Florence Puech (2003), Evaluating the geographic concentration of industries using distance-based methods , Journal of Economic Geography; Oct 2003; 3, 4; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 409
Ernst, D., Guerrieri, P., Iammarino, S., and Pietrobelli, C.(1999), New chanllenges for industrial clusters and districts: global production networks and knowledge diffusion. The Global Challenge to Industrial Districts: Small and Medium Enterprises in Italy and Taiwan, Northhampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, 96-131
Evans, P. A. L. (1993), Dosing the glue: applying human resource technology to build the global organization, Research in personnel and human resources management: Volume 3 (pp. 21–54). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
European Commission (2002), Regional clusters in Europe, Observatory of European SMEs 2002, No. 3. Brussels, Belgium.
Feloy, M., Gordon, I., Lloyd, P. E., & Roe, P. (1997), London employer survey. London, UK: London Training and Enterprise Councils.
Gary J. Young, Martin P. Charnsi & Stephen M. Shortell (2005), Top Manager and Network Effects on the Adoption of Innovative Management Practives : A Study of TQM in a public hospital system , Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J., 22: 935–951
Geoffrey G. Bell (2005), Clusters, Networks, and Firm Innovativeness , Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J., 26: 287–295
Glaeser, Edward L.; Kallal, Hedi D.; Scheinkman, Jose A.; Shleifer, Andrei(1992), Growth in Cities , The Journal of Political Economy; Dec 1992; 100, 6; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 1126
Gordon, I. & Mc Cann, P.(2000), Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?, Urban Studies, 37 (3): 513-532.
Granovetter, M.S.(1973), The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Grant, R. M.(1996), Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.,Strategic Management Journal,17:109–122.
GRG Benito , B Grøgaard, R Narula (2003), Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: economic integration and the Nordic countries , Journal of International Business Studies 34, 443–456
Harrison B. (1992), Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles?, Regional Studies 26(5): 469–483.
Harrison B.(1994), Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility, Basic Books: New York.
Harrison B, Kelley MR, Gant J.(1996), Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change, Economic Geography 72(3): 233–258.
Heiner Depner; Harald Bathelt (2003), Exporting the German Model: The Establishment of a New Automobile Industry Cluster in Shanghsi, Economic Geography; Jan 2005; 81, 1; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 53
Henry, N.,& Pinch, S.(2002), Spatializing knowledge: Placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley. In A. S. Huff & M. Jenkins (Eds.), Mapping strategic knowledge: 137–169. London: Sage.
Hicheon Kim, Robert E. Hoskisson & William P. Wan (2004), Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms , Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J., 25: 613–636
Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (1998), Trust and interfirm relations in developing and transition economies, The Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 32–45.
Ingley, C.(1999), The cluster concept: cooperative networks and replicability, In Proceedings of the international conference of small and medium enterprises, Naples, Italy.
J Myles Shaver & Fredrick Flyer (2000), Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , Strategic Management Journal; Dec 2000; 21, 12; pg. 1175
Keeble, D.,Lawson, C.,Moore, B.,& Wilkinson, F.(1999), Collective learning processes, networking and institutional thickness’in the Cambridge region, Regional Studies, 33(4), 319–331.
Krugman, P. (1991), Geography and trade. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
L Manning; R N Baines (2004), Globalisation: a study of the poultry-meat supply chain , British Food Journal; 2004; 106, 10/11; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 819
Lars Håkanson (2005), Epistemic Communities and Cluster Dynamics: On the Role of Knowledge in Industrial Districts ,Industry and Innovation; Dec 2005;12, 4; pg. 433
Lazerson, M. (1990), Subcontracting in the Modena knitwear district. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Leon, M. E. (1998), Analysis of cooperation networks in the SME’s telecommunication firms. Unpublished dissertation, Departamento de Engenharia de Produc ~ao, S~ao Paulo, Brazil
Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (2000), Gurus in the garage., Harvard Business Review, 78(6), 71–78.
Leyshon, A., & Thrift, N. (1994), Access to financial services and the process of financial infrastructure withdrawal: problems and policies. Area, 26, 268–275.
Lorenz, E. (1996), Collective learning processes and the regional labour market. Unpublished research note, European network on networks, Collective Learning and RTD in Regionally-clustered High Technology SMEs quoted in D.
Keeble & F. Wilkinson. (1999). Collective Learning in Regionally Clustered High Technology SMEs in Europe (p. 296). Regional Studies, 33 (4), 295–304.
Marshall A.(1920), Principles of Economics, Macmillan: London.
Maskell, P.(2001), Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10: 921–943.
Martin Kenney; Donald Patton (2005), Entrepreneurial Geographies: Support Networks in Three High-Technology Industrie , Economic Geography; Apr 2005; 81, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 201
Matthew Gorton; John White; Svetlana Chernyshova; Alexander Skripnik; et al (2003), The reconfiguration of post-Soviet food industries: Evidence from Ukraine and Moldova , Agribusiness; Fall 2003; 19, 4; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 409
Meyer-Stamer, J.(1998), Path dependence in regional development: persistence and change in three industrial clusters in Santa Catarina, Brazil., World Development,26(8), 1495–1511.
Meyer-Stamer, J.(1999), Regional and locational policy what can we learn from the ceramics and textiles clothing clusters of Santa Catarina, Brazil. In Building a modern and effective business development services industry in Latin America and the Caribbean. Duisberg, Germany/Joinville Brazil: Institute for Development and Peace/Fundac €ao Empreender.
Michael Beverland (2005), Creating value for channel partners: the Cervena case , The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing; 2005; 20, 2/3; pg. 127
Mishan, E.(1971), The postwar literature on externalities: an interpretative essay, Journal of Economic Literature, 9(1), 1–28.
Morosini, P.(1998), Managing cultural differences, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Morosini, P.(2002), Competing on social capabilities:a defining strategic challenge of the new millennium., IMD Working Paper 2002-1. IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Morgan, K.(1997), The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies, 31: 491–503.
Morris, A. S.,& Lowder, S.(1992), Flexible specialization: The application of theory in a poor-country context: Leon, Mexico, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(2), 190–201.
Newlands, D.(2003), Competition and cooperation in industrial clusters: the implications for public policy, European Planning Studies, 11 (5): 521-532.
Paija, L.(2001), Finnish ICT cluster in the digital economy. Helsinki, Finland, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA).
Pedersen, P. O., Sverrisson, A., & van Dijk, M. P.(1994), Flexible specialization: The dynamics of smallscale industries in the South. London, UK: Intermediate Technology.
Piero Morosini (2004), Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance , World Development Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 305–326, 2004
Piore, M. J.(1990), Fragments of a cognitive theory of technological change and organizational behaviour. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organisations: structure, form and action (pp. 430–444). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Piore, M.& Sabel, C.(1984), The second industrial divide, New York: Basic Books
Porter, M. E.,(1985),“Competitive Advantage:Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”,The Free Press, New York.
Porter, M. E.,(1993),“The Competitive Advantage of Nations”, The Free Press, New York.
Porter, M. E.,(1998),“Cluster and the New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, Nov. Dec., 77-90.
Puri, M., & Hellmann, T. (2000), The interaction of product market and financing strategy: the role of venture capital, Review of Financial Studies, 13(4), 959–984.
Pyke, F., Becattini, G.,& Sengenberger, W.(Eds.).(1990), Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva, Switzerland, International Institute for Labour Studies.
Rabellotti, R.(1995), Is there an industrial district flow’? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared, World Development, 23(1), 29–41
Ripley,B.D.(1796), The second-order analysis of stationary point process, Journal of Applies Probability,13: 255-266
Ripley,B.D.(1797), Modelling spatial patterns, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39(2): 172-212
Ronald Batenburg & Roel Rutten (2003), Managing innovation in regional supply networks: A Dutch case of “knowledge industry clustering”, Supply Chain Management; 2003; 8, 3/4; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 263
Rosenberg, D.(2002), Cloning Silicon Valley: the next generation high-tech hotspots, London, UK: Reuters/ Pearson Education.
Rui Baptista (2000), Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters? , International Journal of Industrial Organization 18 (2000) 515–535
Sanch ez, B.,del Castillo, J., Lacave, M., & Terras, J.(2000), Cluster game: Between local and international challenges. Bilbao, Spain: Infyde.
Sang M Lee; David L Olson; Silvana Trimi; Kris M Rosacker (2005), An integrated method to evaluate business process alternatives, Business Process Management Journal; 2005; 11, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 198
Saxenian, A. L.(1994), Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, A. L., & Hsu, J. Y.(2001), The Silicon Valley–Hsinchu connection: technical communities andIndustrial upgrading. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 893–920.
S Bryn Austin; Steven J Melly; Brisa N Sanchez; Aarti Patel; et al (2005), Clustering of Fast-Food Restaurants Around Schools: A Novel Application of Spatial Statistics to the Study of Food Environments , American Journal of Public Health; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 1575
Schmitz, H.(2000), Does local co-operation matter? Evidence from industrial clusters in South Asia and Latin America, Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 323–336.
Selen,W. & Soliman,F.(2002),“Operations in today’s demand chain management framework”, Journal of Operations Management ,vol.20 No.6,pp.667-73
Schmitz, H., & Nadvi, K.(1994), Industrial clusters in less developed countries, Review of experiences and research agendas. Brighton: IDS
Shaver JM, Flyer F.(2000), Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States, Strategic Management Journal 21(12): 1175–1193
Simmie, J., & Sennett, J.(1999), Innovative clusters: global or local linkages?, National Institute Economic Review, 170, 70–81.
Simpson, W.(1992), Urban Structure and the Labor Market: Worker Mobility, Commuting and Underemployment in Cities, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stephen Tallman, Mark Jenkins, Nick Henry,& Steven Pinch (2004), Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage, Academy of Management Review 2004, Vol. 29, No. 2, 258–271.
Stigler, G. J.(1951),The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market,Journal of Political Economy, 59, pp: 185-193
Swann, P., & Prevezer, M.(1996), A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology, Research Policy, 25, 1139–1157.
Sweeney,S.H.,Feser,E.J. (1998), Plant size and clustering of manufacturing activity, Geographical Analysis, 30(1):45-64
Timothy J. Sturgeon (2003), What really goes on in Silicon Valley? Spatial clustering and dispersal in modular production networks , Journal of Economic Geography , pp. 199–225
Ulf Andersson, Mats Forsgren & Ulf Holm (2002), The Strategic Impact of External Networks : subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J., 23: 979–996
Van Oort FG (2004) Urban growth and innovation. Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands. Aldershot, Ashgate