簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 丁豪
Ting, Hao
論文名稱: 碳排放量與企業價值及短期財務績效之關聯性探討:台灣上市櫃企業三範疇碳排放量之新證據
The Association between Carbon Emissions and Firm Value and Financial Performance: New Evidence on Three-Scope Carbon Emissions from Taiwan Listed Firms
指導教授: 黃華瑋
Huang, Hwa-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 51
中文關鍵詞: 碳排放範疇三碳排放自願性揭露公司價值財務績效
外文關鍵詞: Carbon emissions, Scope 3 emissions, Voluntary disclosure, Firm value, Financial performance
相關次數: 點閱:307下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 先前的研究發現企業價值與碳排放量呈現正向關聯性,支持非西方背景的研究與西方背景之研究結果不一致的結論,本篇研究欲接續先前以台灣背景對碳排放與企業價值之間關聯性所做的研究,蒐集期間為2017年至2021年的台灣上市櫃非金融業公司資料,同時將碳排放量依據三個來源範疇進行區分,分別探討與短期財務績效之間及與公司價值之間的關聯性。針對範疇一及範疇二碳排放量的實證結果發現,碳排放量與企業價值仍然具有正向的顯著關聯性,支持先前台灣背景的實證結果,顯示在現行法規之陸續推動下,台灣市場的投資人對於碳排放議題之觀念尚未發生明顯改變。而在範疇三碳排放量與企業價值之間,則未觀察到足夠顯著的關聯性,但是觀察到自願揭露範疇三碳排放與企業短期財務績效之間具負向關聯性,這樣的結果可能也解釋了本研究的另一項發現,即對於不需向監管機關申報範疇一與範疇二碳排放量的企業,自願揭露範疇三碳排放與企業價值之間具負向關聯性。

    SUMMARY

       This study expands on previous research by investigating the association between carbon emissions and firm value in the context of Taiwan. Data was collected from non-financial companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) and the Taipei Exchange (TPEx) between 2017 and 2021. The study examines carbon emissions categorized into three scopes and their associations with firm value and short-term financial performance. The empirical results show a significant positive association between scope 1 and scope 2 carbon emissions and firm value, aligning with previous studies conducted in an Asian context. This suggests that the perception of carbon emissions among investors in the Taiwanese market remains unchanged, despite ongoing regulatory efforts. However, for scope 3 carbon emissions, no significant association with firm value was found. Interestingly, voluntary disclosure of scope 3 emissions was negatively associated with short-term financial performance. This finding may explain the negative association between voluntary disclosure of scope 3 emissions and firm value for companies not required to report scope 1 and scope 2 emissions. Overall, these findings highlight the complexity of the association between carbon emissions and firm value in Taiwan. They emphasize the need for further research and the consideration of different scope categories when examining this association.

    Key words: Carbon emissions, Scope 3 emissions, Voluntary disclosure, Firm value, Financial performance.

    摘要 I 誌謝 VI 目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第一章、緒論 1 第二章、文獻探討與研究假說 3 第三章、研究設計 6 第一節 樣本 6 第二節 實證模型 7 第四章、實證結果與分析 13 第一節 敘述性統計 13 第二節 相關性分析 21 第三節 迴歸分析 26 第五章、結論與建議 35 第一節 研究結論 35 第二節 限制與建議 36 參考文獻 38 附錄:變數定義 43

    Barth, M. E., and M. F. McNichols, 1994. Estimation and market valuation of environmental liabilities relating to superfund sites. Journal of Accounting Research 32: 177-209.
    Busch, T., M. Johnson, T. Pioch, and M. Kopp. 2018. Consistency of corporate carbon emission data. University of Hamburg. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/paper_timo_busch.pdf
    Brouwers R, Schoubben F, Van Hulle C, Van Uytbergen S. 2012. The relevance to investors of carbon performance under the EU ETS: a long term perspective. Working Paper, KU Leuven.
    Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business & Society, 50(2), 233-265.
    Campbell, K., Sefcik, S. E., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2003). Disclosure of private information and reduction of uncertainty: environmental liabilities in the chemical industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 21, 349-378.
    Chapple, L., P. M. Clarkson, and D. L. Gold. 2013. The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus 49 (1): 1-33.
    Chen, L. H., & Silva Gao, L. (2012). The pricing of climate risk. Journal of Financial and Economic Practice, Vol12 (2), Spring, 115-131.
    Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, organizations and society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
    Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, M. Pinnuck, and G. D. Richardson. 2015. The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Union carbon emissions trading scheme. European Accounting Review 24 (3): 551-580.
    Cohen, M. A., Fenn, S. A., & Konar, S. (1997). Environmental and financial performance: Are they related? (Working paper). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Cooper, S. A., K. K. Raman, and J. Yin. 2018. Halo effect or fallen angel effect? Firm value consequences of greenhouse gas emissions and reputation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 37 (3): 226-240.
    Cox, C. A., & Douthett, E. B. (2009). Further evidence on the factors and valuation associated with the level of environmental liability disclosures. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 13(3).
    De Villiers, C., and van Staden, C., 2011. Shareholder requirements for compulsory environmental information in annual reports and on websites. Australian Accounting Review, 21(4), 317-326.
    Delmas, M. A., Nairn-Birch, N., & Lim, J. (2015). Dynamics of environmental and financial performance: The case of greenhouse gas emissions. Organization & Environment, 28(4), 374-393.
    Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?. Management science, 46(8), 1059-1074.
    European Commission. 2018. Communication from the Commission. Action place: Financing sustainable growth.
    Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0097
    Feng, Z. Y., Wang, M. L., and Huang, H. W., 2015. Equity financing and social responsibility: further international evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(3), 247-280.
    Frankel, R., McNichols, M., & Wilson, G. P. (1995). Discretionary disclosure and external financing. Accounting Review, 135-150.
    Freedman, M., and Jaggi, B. , 1988. An analysis of the association between pollution disclosure and economic performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(2), 43-58.
    Greenhouse Gas Protocol. 2013. Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard.
    Available at: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Corporate-Value-Chain-Accounting-Reporing-Standard_041613_2.pdf
    Griffin, P., D. Lont, and E. Sun. 2017. The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research 34 (2): 1265-1297.
    Han, Y. G., Huang, H. W. S., Liu, W. P., and Hsu, Y. L., 2022. Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures Evidence from Taiwan. Accounting Horizons.
    Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.
    Hassan, O. A., & Romilly, P. (2018). Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights. Business strategy and the environment, 27(7), 893-909.
    Huang, Y. A., Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2009). Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting.
    Iwata, H., & Okada, K. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1691-1700.
    King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of industrial ecology, 5(1), 105-116.
    Lang, L. H., Stulz, R., & Walkling, R. A. (1989). Managerial performance, Tobin's Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of financial Economics, 24(1), 137-154.
    Lewandowski, S. (2017). Corporate carbon and financial performance: The role of emission reductions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1196-1211.
    Luo L, Tang Q. 2014. Carbon tax, corporate carbon profile and financial return. Pacific Accounting Review 26: 351–373.
    Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Muñoz SC. 2014. Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Accounting Review 89: 695–724.
    Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Munoz, S. C. (2011, August). Carbon emissions and firm value. AAA.
    Misani N, Pogutz S. 2015. Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: a non-linear approach. Ecological Economics 109: 150–160.
    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 293-315.
    Nakao, Y., Amano, A., Matsumura, K., Genba, K., & Nakano, M. (2007). Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(2), 106-118.
    Ott, C., and F. Schiemann. 2019. The market value of decomposed carbon performance. European Commission - joint TEG-CoPFiR Conference. Academic Conference on “Promoting Sustainable Finance”
    Peng, J., Sun, J., & Luo, R., 2015. Corporate voluntary carbon information disclosure: Evidence from China's listed companies. The World Economy, 38(1), 91-109.
    Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), 2016. Investor obligations and duties in six Asian markets. Available at: https://www.unpri.org/download_report/22605.
    Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
    Saka, C., & Oshika, T., 2014. Disclosure effects, carbon emissions and corporate value. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 22-45.
    Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73 (4): 459-474.
    Stanny, E. 2013. Voluntary disclosures of emissions by U.S. firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 22 (3): 145-158.
    Stanny, E., and K. Ely. 2008. Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15 (6): 338- 348.
    Trumpp C, Guenther T. 2015. Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 26: 49–68.
    Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., Wehrmeyer W., 2002. The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the Eu- ropean paper industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9 (3), 133-146.
    Wang L, Li S, Gao S. 2014. Do greenhouse gas emissions affect financial performance? – an empirical examination of Australian public firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 23: 505–519.
    Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300.
    BCG. 2022. 9 out of 10 Companies Fail! How to Conduct Carbon Inventory for Carbon Reduction? BCG's Two Recommendations Illustrated. Available at: https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/65093
    Wang, C.-C. 2017. Does cost cutting cause problems? National Policy Foundation. Available at: https://www.npf.org.tw/1/17206

    無法下載圖示 校內:2028-06-19公開
    校外:2028-06-19公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE