簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 魏睿瑩
Wei, Rui-Ying
論文名稱: 資訊科技融入英語教學對中學生自主學習、英語自我效能與英語學習成就之研究
A Study of Technology Integrated into English Teaching for Secondary School Students’ Self-directed Use of Technology in Learning, Self-efficacy, and Learning Achievement
指導教授: 郭旭展
Kuo, Hsu-Chan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 教育研究所
Institute of Education
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 資訊科技自主學習英語學習成就英語自我效能
外文關鍵詞: Information and Communication Technology, self-directed learning, English learning achievement, English self-efficacy
相關次數: 點閱:106下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討教師使用資訊科技進行英語教學,中學生使用資訊科技自主學習英語,中學生英語自我效能,以及英語學習成效各變項之現況;其次,分析教師使用資訊科技進行英語教學,中學生使用資訊科技自主學習英語,中學生英語自我效能,以及英語學習成效各變項之差異情形;分析教師使用資訊科技進行英語教學,中學生使用資訊科技自主學習英語,中學生英語自我效能,以及英語學習成效各變項之關係;最後,分析教師使用資訊科技進行英語教學,中學生使用資訊科技自主學習英語,中學生英語自我效能,以及英語學習成效各變項之預測情形。
    為完成上述研究目的,本研究採問卷調查法進行研究資料之蒐集,研究參與之對象為433位國中學生。研究所得資料以描述性統計、變異數分析、相關分析與結構方程模式考驗各項假設。主要研究結果如下:
    (一)目前在教育現場,英語教師除了電視牆或投影機為經常使用之資訊科技設
    備外,使用其它科技設備進行教學並不多。而手機為學生最常用來學習英語的資訊科技設備。
    (二)女性在學生科技學習、自主學習、英語自我效能及聽力成效上都顯著高於男性。另外,在資訊科技使用上,研究結果指出隨著年級增加,教師資訊科技融入英語教學的程度越低;然而,八年級學生使用科技自主學習英文的狀況最佳。隨著年級的增加,學習英語時間較長者、曾參加過英語檢定的學生無論在使用自主學習、英語學習成就上均顯著高於其他組別的學生。
    (三)教師科技教學、學生科技學習、自主學習、英語自我效能,以及英語學習成就呈正向相關。教師科技融入英語教學程度較高時,學生越傾向使用科技自主學習英文,其英語自我效能較高,在學習成就上也有更好的表現。
    (四)以SEM結構方程模式探討個變項之間的預測關係,結果顯示教師科技教學會影響學生使用科技自主學習英文的程度;而學生使用科技進行自主學習的情況則會透過英語自我效能而影響其英語學習成效。
    本研究依據研究結果進行討論,並提供教育實務上、相關研究上的建議,供未來教育工作者、研究者參考。

    The aim of the present study was to investigate the current state of ICT integrated English teaching in junior high school, students’ self-directed use of technology for English learning (hereafter self-directed learning), students’ English self-efficacy, and students’ learning achievement. A comparison of the differences between teacher ICT use in English teaching, students’ self-directed learning, students English self-efficacy, and students’ learning achievement has been conducted. Later on, the dynamic relationships between teacher ICT use in English teaching, students’ self-directed learning, students’ English self-efficacy, and students’ learning achievement have been analyzed through a range of statistical methods.

    To achieve the purpose above, a survey research was conducted to gather essential quantitative data. In total, 433 junior high school students were recruited to participate in the study. Several statistical analysis methods were utilized throughout the study, including descriptive statistics, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), analysis of correlation, and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The findings of this study were as follows:
    1.Even though more than 50% of the participants reported that their teachers have used technology in English teaching every week, the technology device the teachers integrated into teaching was not varied. That is, TV/projector was the only device adopted in classroom. Differently, mobile phone was the technology device that the students used the most for their English learning.
    2.Based on the findings, there were significant gender differences found in student ICT use, self-directed learning, English self-efficacy, and listening comprehension achievement. More specifically, scores of the female participants were statistically higher than those of the male participants. Moreover, the implementation of ICT in English teaching was less frequently in higher grade when compared to lower grade. Eighth graders did more self-directed learning by using technology when compared to other graders. Furthermore, students in higher grade who are with the experience of taking a proficiency examination and longer years of learning English tended to spent more time on using technology in self-directed learning and they are with higher English learning achievement.
    3.There were positive relationships between teacher ICT use, student ICT use, self-directed learning, English self-efficacy, and learning achievement. That is, students tended to make use of technology for self-directed learning when the teachers integrated technology more in teaching.
    4.Structural equation modeling (SEM) was the analysis method that the researcher used to estimate the relationships between varibales. The results showed that self-directed learning and English learning achievement can be predicted by English self-efficacy.

    Some important pedagogical implications and suggestion for future studies are drawn from research findings.

    摘要 I 目錄 VIII 表目錄 IX 圖目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 名詞釋義 4 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 資訊科技融入英語教學之探討 7 第二節 資訊科技與英語自我效能、英語學習成效之探討 14 第三節 資訊科技融入英語教學與自主學習之探討 19 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節 研究架構 26 第二節 研究問題與假設 27 第三節 研究對象 28 第四節 研究工具與變項測量 29 第五節 資料分析與處理 35 第四章 研究結果 37 第一節 量表檢驗結果 37 第二節 基本統計分析 46 第三節 變項間之相關分析 55 第四節 自主學習歷程模式之適配度考驗 59 第五章 討論、結論與建議 69 第一節 討論 69 第二節 結論 73 第三節 研究限制 75 第四節 研究建議 75 參考文獻 77 附錄一 問卷 84 附錄二 閱讀測驗 88 附錄二 聽力測驗 92

    壹、中文部分
    王全世(2000)。資訊科技融入教學的意義與內涵。資訊與教育雜誌,80,23-31。
    王靚暄(2016)。探討數位遊戲式英語學習環境對自我效能與口語焦慮之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
    吳怡君(2010)。小筆電融入國小五年級英語科教學之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國
    立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊,39,59-78。
    沈慶珩(2011)。資訊科技融入英語教學之概念與應用。銘傳社科學報,1,57-72。
    林于婷(2012)。以智慧型手機收聽播客學習英語之成效研究(未出版之碩士論文)。
    國立臺灣師範大學。臺北市。
    林佳徵(2010)。iPod touch對國小四年級學童英語學習態度與英語學習成就之研究(未
    出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
    周啟葶(2006)。高中生英語自我效能、英語學習焦慮、英語學習策略與英語學習成
    就關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    周啟葶、程玉秀、宋秋美(2009)。英語自我效能、英語學習焦慮與英語學習成就之
    相關研究─以臺北市高中生為例。教育與心理研究,32(2),81-111。
    周啟葶、黃玟君、黃宇平(2011)英語自我效能、英語學習策略與英語學習成就之相
    關研究。高雄師大學報,31(1),35-60。
    沈慶珩(2011)。資訊科技融入英語教學之概念與應用。銘傳社科學報,1,57-72。
    施宥廷(2016)。英語學習動機與學習困擾:理論的觀點。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(7),
    111-128。
    陳啟明、梁仲正(2009)。高等回流教育學生自我導向學習之量表建構與自我認知之
    研究─以某科技大學附設進修學院學生爲例。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,23(2),205-230。
    徐新逸(2002)。教學科技融入領域學習之意義與需求。載於張霄亭(主編),教學科
    技融入領域學習(vii-x)。台北市:學富文化。
    許繼德、黃珮玲(2006)。數位化教材融入國小英語教學之行動研究。科技教育課程
    改革與發展學術研討會論文集,2005,379-385。
    張武昌(2006)。台灣的英語教育:現況與省思。教育資料與研究,69,129-144。
    教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(英語)。取自
    http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php?login_type=1&header
    國家教育研究院(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要綜合型高級中等學校(語文領
    域-英語文)【課程綱要】。未出版之課程綱要。取自:https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14379,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
    張嘉倩(2013)。開放式反思學習札記作業設計對強化自主學習的效益:以高階英語
    學習者的自主學習為例。英語教學,37(4),195-232。
    黃春騰(2002年12月2日)。英語教學活動設計【部落格文字資料】。2017年5月
    24日,取自http://www.cmjh.tn.edu.tw/english1/latest/root/activity.htm
    廖文韻(2009)。高職生英語學習動機、學習態度、自我效能與學習成就關係之研究:
    以台北市高職學校為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。 
    廖靖綺、楊惠琴(2000)。國中英語科教師使用新教材與教法研究-以台南縣市為例。
    教育研究資訊,8(2),9-27。
    趙珮晴、余民寧、張芳全(2011)。探討臺灣學生的自律學習:TEPS資料的縱貫分析。
    教育科學研究期刊,56(3),151-179。
    郭奕君(2018)。基於主動學習促進機制之行動遊戲對小學生英文學習成就及行為模
    式之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
    蔡宗翰(2012)。影響國中生利用電腦網路學習意圖之因素(未出版之碩士論文)。國
    立高雄應用科技大學,高雄市。
    盧思羽(2015)。行動載具融入國三英語課對學生學習成效與科技模式接受度之研究
    (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    顏明仁(2001)。Bloom認知分類在科技教育的應用。生活科技教育月刊,34(4),2-9。
    顏伯芳(2012)。輔以 YouTube 影片及小組海報的英文單字教學法:增進國中三年級學生之英文單字習得與存留之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
    貳、英文部分
    Allington, R. L. (2014). How reading volume affects both reading fluency and reading achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 13.
    Anyadubalu, C. C. (2010). Self-efficacy, anxiety, and performance in the English language
    among middle-school students in English language program in Satri Si Suriyothai School, Bangkok. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5(3), 193-198
    Arbaugh, J. B. (2004). Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. Internet & Higher Education, 7, 169–183.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic
    of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman and Company.
    Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-75.
    Brockett, R. G. (2002). Conceptions of self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly,
    52(2), 155-156.
    Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Carmines, E. G. & Zeller, R. A. (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills,
    CA: Sage.
    Caspi, A., Gorsky, P. & Privman, M. (2005). Viewing comprehension: Students’ learning
    preferences and strategies when studying from video. Instructional Science, 33, 31-47.
    Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14-30.
    Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27, 10-13.
    Egbert, J.L., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6, 108-126. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert/
    Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 19-33.
    Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
    Hasan, M. M., & Hoon, T. B. (2013). Podcast applications in language learning: A review of recent studies. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 128.
    Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university. Computers & Education, 54, 722-732.
    Kennedy, G., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.
    Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 114-126.
    Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 100-122.
    Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74-83.
    Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317-335.
    Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: the effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40-60.
    Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 59(2), 569-579.
    Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2015). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-21.
    Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out‐of‐class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278-308.
    Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3), 389-420.
    Lamb, M. (2002). Explaining successful language learning in difficult circumstances.
    Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 17, 35–52.
    Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2016). Use of computer technology for English language learning: do learning styles, gender, and age matter?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1033-1049.
    Lin, C. C., & Tseng, Y. F. (2012). Videos and animations for vocabulary learning: A study on difficult words. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 346-355.
    Lin, L. F. (2010). English learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition in the video-based CALL program. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 51-66.
    Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. London: Prentice Hall.
    Park, C. N., & Son, J. B. (2009). Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: Teachers’ perceptions and perspectives. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 80-101.
    Pickard, N. (1996). Out-of-class language learning strategies. ELT Journal, 50, 150–159.
    Rezaee, A. A., & Shoar, N. S. (2011). Investigating the effect of using multiple sensory modes of glossing vocabulary items in a reading text with multimedia annotations. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 25-34.
    Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5-22.
    Roblyer, M. D., & Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
    Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for
    language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68-84.
    Tanveer, M. (2011). Integrating E-learning in classroom-based language teaching: Perceptions, challenges and strategies. International Conference, “ICT for Language Learning” 4th edition. Retrieved from http://conference.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL2011/common/download/Paper_pdf/IEC141-252-FP-Tanveer-ICT4LL2011.pdf
    Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 151–163.
    Wang, C. H., Shannon, D.M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302-332.
    Young, S. S. C. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 447-461.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2023-07-20公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE