簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 戴伯佑
Tai, Po-Yu
論文名稱: 違約相關實證研究─ 台灣上市櫃市場為例
The Empirical Research of Default Correlation─ A Perspective of Taiwan Market
指導教授: 劉裕宏
Liu, Yu-Hong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 54
中文關鍵詞: 信用風險違約相關Zhou模型
外文關鍵詞: credit risk, Zhou Model, default correlation
相關次數: 點閱:123下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   近年來,企業財務危機頻傳,相關金融機構監理機制及信用風險等議題開始廣泛為投資人所重視,由Merton於1974年提出違約機率模型開始,產業與學術界無不爭先針對違約機率模型提出更完整的討論與模型,近十年來,對於違約相關的議題也開始為人所矚目,1995年Lucas首先提出違約相關的議題之後,學者便紛紛展開違約相關模型研究。然而,違約相關模型多半複雜且具實際運用上的困難,故本研究將違約相關事件簡化為兩兩公司的情況,以2001年Zhou所提出的模型為基礎。

      為了消除公司規模的影響,本研究遵循2002年Lopez的實証研究將公司依總資產分為三類,再依兩公司間產業的位置分為同業競爭者、上下游廠商與同一集團的情況來進行違約相關的實証研究。實證結果發現,整體而言Zhou模型對於台灣資本市場確實具有違約相關的預測能力,能反應兩家公司間可能的違約相關事件。

      Recently, many companies face financial distress crisis, and therefore, investors begin to focus on regulations of financial institutions and crdit risk issues. Merton (1974) first proposed the model of default probability and from then on studies of default probability have grown tremendously. Besides, the issues of default correlation have also been main concerns of invertors during the last decades. However, the models of default correlation are often complicated and difficult to use in practice. As a result, in this thesis we simply disscuss the default correlation between two companies and our model is based on the paper ”An Analysis of Default Correlations and Multiple Defaults” proposed by Zhou (2001).

      In order to eliminate the impact of firm size, our study uses Lopez’s (2002) concept to classify total assets into three categories. In each category, we study the default correlation from three aspects : competitors in the same industry, firms in the supplydemand relation, and firms in the same conglomerate. Our results show that Zhou’s model has good prediction on default correlation of Taiwan market generally.

    1. 序論..................................................1  1.1 研究動機..........................................1  1.2 研究目的..........................................2  1.3 研究架構..........................................3 2. 文獻探討..............................................4  2.1 信用風險結構法相關文獻............................4  2.2 信用風險縮減法相關文獻............................9  2.3 違約相關研究文獻.................................12  2.4 公司價值評估法...................................15 3. 研究模型.............................................18  3.1 Tobin's Q 模型...................................18  3.2 Zhou 模型........................................21 4. 研究方法.............................................26  4.1 研究假設與架構...................................26  4.2 違約情況的定義...................................27  4.3 資料來源與處理...................................29 5. 實證結果.............................................32  5.1 大規模公司競爭者.................................32  5.2 大規模公司上下游廠商.............................35  5.3 大規模公司同一集團...............................37  5.4 中規模公司競爭者.................................39  5.5 中規模公司上下游廠商.............................41  5.6 中規模公司同一集團...............................43  5.7 小規模公司競爭者.................................45  5.8 小規模公司上下游廠商.............................47 6. 結論與建議...........................................49  6.1 結論.............................................49  6.2 後續建議.........................................50 7. 參考文獻.............................................51

    [1] Black, F.,and J. Cox, ”Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions, ”Journal of Finance, 31, 351-367, 1976.
    [2] Black, F., and M. Scholes, ”The Pricing of Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654, 1973.
    [3] Briys, E., and F. de Varenne, ”Valuing Ricky Fixed Rate Debt: An Extension,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32, 239-248, 1997.
    [4] Cao, M., and J. Wei, ”Vulnerable Options, Risky Corporate Bond, and Credit
    Spread,” The Journal of Future Markets, 21, 301-327, 2001.
    [5] Cathcart, L., and L. el Jehel, ”Multiple Defaults and Merton’s Model,” The Journal of Fixed Income, 14, 60-69, 2004.
    [6] Campbell, J., and B. Taskler, ”Equity Volatility and Corporate Bond Yields,” Journal of Finance, 58, 2321-2350, 2003.
    [7] Chung, K.H. and S.W. Pruitt, ”A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q,” Financial Management, Vol. 23, 70-74, 1994.
    [8] Das, S. and T. Tufano, ”Pricing Credit Sensitive Debt when Interest Rates, Credit Rating and Credit Spread are Stochastic,” Journal of Financial Engineering, 5,161-198, 1996.
    [9] Duffie, D. and K. Singleton, ”Simulating Correlated Defaults,” Working Paper, 1999.
    [10] Duffie, D. and K. Singleton, ”Modeling Term Structures of Defaultable Bonds,” Review of Financial Studies, 12, 687-720, 1999.
    [11] Giesecke, K., ”Correlated Default with Incomplete Information,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 1521-1545, 2004.
    [12] Giesecke, K. and L.R. Goldberg, ”Sequential Defaults and Incomplete Information,” Journal of risk, 7, 1-25, 2004.
    [13] Huang, J, and W. Kong, ”Explaining Credit Spread Cihanges: Some New Evidence from Option Adjusted Spreads of Bond Indexes,” Journal od Derivatives, 11, 2003.
    [14] Hull, J., and White, A., ”The Valuation of Correlation-Dependent Credit Derivatives Using A Structural Model,” working paper, 2005.
    [15] Jarrow, R.A. and S.M. Turnbull, ”Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk, ” Journal of Finance, 50,53-85, 1995.
    [16] Jarrow, Lando and Turnbull, ”A Markov Model for the Term Structrue of Credit Risk Spread,” The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 10, No.2, 481-525, 1997.
    [17] Jarrow, R.A. and F. Yu, ”Counterparty Risk and the Pricing of Defaultable Securities,” Journal of Finance, 56, 1765-1799, 2001.
    [18] Johnson, H., ”Options on the Maximum or the Minimun of Several Assets,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, 277-283, 1987.
    [19] Lang, L.H.P., and R.M. Stulz, ”Tobin’s Q, Corporation Diversification and Firm Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1248-1280, 1994.
    [20] Lang, L.H.P., R.M. Stulz and R.A. Walking, ”Managerial Performance, Tobin’s Q , and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers,” Journal of Financial Economics, 24, 137-154, 1989.
    [21] Li, D.X., ”On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach,” Journal of Fixed Income, Vol. 9, 43-54, 2000.
    [22] Lindenberg, E. and S. Ross, ”Tobin’s Q Ratio and Industrial Organization,” Journal of Business, Vol. 54, 1-32, 1981.
    [23] Longstaff, F. A., and E. S. Schwartz, ”A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky and Floating Rate Debt,” Journal of Finance, 50, 789-819, 1995.
    [24] Lopez, J. A., ”The Empirical Relationship between Average Asset Correlation, Firm Probability of Default and Asset Size,” working paper, 2002.
    [25] Lucas, D.J., ”Default Correlation and Credit Analysis,” The Journal of Fixed Income, 76-87, 1995.
    [26] Madan, D. and H. Unal, ”Pricing the Risks of Default,” working paper, University of Maryland, 1993.
    [27] McConnell, J. and H. Servaes, ”Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value,” Journal of Finance Economics, Vol. 27, 595-612, 1990.
    [28] Merton, R. C., ”On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance, 29, 449-470, 1974.
    [29] Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny, ”Management ownership and market
    valuation,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, 293-315, 1988.
    [30] Zhou, C., ”An Analysis of Default Correlation and Multiple Default,” Review of Financial Studies, 14, 555-576, 2001.

    下載圖示 校內:2007-06-30公開
    校外:2007-06-30公開
    QR CODE