簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳禹叡
Wu, Yu-Jui
論文名稱: 造形限制介定法
A Method for Identifying Form Restrictions
指導教授: 周君瑞
Chou, Chun-Jui
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系碩士在職專班
Department of Industrial Design (on-the-job training program)
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 65
中文關鍵詞: 型態變異法造形限制介定法結構圖示
外文關鍵詞: form Variation, Identify form restriction method, structure graphics
相關次數: 點閱:149下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文主要目的在於將Form Variation(型態變異法)中的小步驟(功能表面分析法)予以改良發展成造形限制介定法,提供工業設計系的學生在設計產品時操作使用,其原因在於學生在大學階段對於產品設計的認識層級大部分只限於產品的外觀或是自身的使用經驗,對於產品內部的設計重點並無法確實掌握,造形限制介定法的主要目的就在於讓學生能夠依照自身的設計訴求將產品進行文字及圖形化的拆解,而後針對零件區塊間線段的連結讓學生去思考產品與人、產品與環境以及產品零件與零件之間的相互關係,希望藉由圖形與文字的結構圖示,讓學生在設計時對於產品能夠有進一步的認知與分析。

    The main purpose of this paper is to provide a new method to the students of the industrial design for designing products. The new method is modified from a small step of Form Variation and it called Identify form restriction method. Because the students of the universal degree can’t touch the design key point of the product design, they often design the product by their using experience, and detail of the parts can’t be solve. The target of Identify form restriction method is to allow students use text and structure graphics to analysis the products by their thinking. The student can analysis and think the relationship of the line of part and part, part and environment, part and people. The author hope the students can get advance information of products design by using Identify form restriction method.

    第一章 緒論.............................................1 1-1 研究背景......................................1 1-1-1 工業設計教育在台灣的定位.................1 1-1-2 工業設計學生應具備的特質及技能...........2 1-2 研究動機......................................2 1-3 研究目的......................................3 1-4 研究假設......................................3 1-5 研究限制......................................3 1-6 論文架構......................................4 第二章 相關研究.........................................5 2-1 工業設計教育的相關研究........................5 2-1-1 皮亞傑認知發展論階段觀...................5 2-1-2 布魯納(Jerome S. Bruner)的發現學習論.....6 2-1-3 工業設計學生的學習心態...................7 2-1-4 小結.....................................7 2-2 產品結構組成方法相關研究......................8 2-2-1 結構變異法...............................8 2-2-2 型態分析法...............................9 2-2-3 功能表面分析法..........................10 2-2-4 小結....................................13 2-3 功能模組概念相關研究.........................13 2-3-1 產品模組化加速回收......................13 2-3-2 功能模組(Functional Modeling)...........14 2-3-3 產品架構法 (Product Architecture).......16 2-3-4 小結....................................16 2-4 設計思考方法相關研究.........................17 2-4-1 KJ法....................................17 2-4-2 腦力激盪法..............................17 2-4-3 設計問題解決的偕同進化方法..............17 2-4-4 小結....................................18 2-5 研究方法.....................................18 2-5-1 問卷調查法..............................18 2-5-2 訪談法..................................18 2-5-3 有效性構想評估法........................19 第三章 研究方法與步驟..................................22 3-1 研究架構.....................................22 3-2 研究方法與步驟...............................24 3-2-1 使受測者了解功能表面分析法的使用法則....24 3-2-2 功能表面分析法的實際測試................25 3-2-3 將學生實驗結果進行分類..................25 3-2-4 利用有效性構想測量法的量化結果..........26 3-3 進行功能表面分析法的改善.....................27 3-4 研究驗證.....................................27 第四章 前階段之發展與分析結果..........................28 4-1 實驗結果檢視 ................................28 4-1-1 電器類實驗結果..........................28 4-1-2 非電器類實驗結果........................30 4-2 初步實驗結果分析.............................32 第五章 研究驗證與討論..................................34 5-1 方法規則修正.................................34 5-2 驗證一:學生實測以及數據分析..................37 5-2-1 驗證步驟及驗證項目說明.....................37 5-2-2 驗證結果...................................39 5-2-3 驗證結果分析...............................41 5-3 驗證二:受測學生訪談..........................47 5-3-1 受測者訪談.................................47 5-3-2 驗證結果與第一階段問題對應關係.............48 第六章 結論與建議......................................50 6-1 結論.........................................50 6-2 建議.........................................51 第七章 參考文獻........................................53 附錄一 非電器類實驗結果紀錄............................55 附錄二 驗證結果紀錄表一................................57 附錄三 驗證結果紀錄表二................................60 附錄四 受測者操作圖....................................63

    1.Chiodo, J. (2005). Design for Disassembly Guidelines, from http://www.activedisassembly.com/strategy/design-for-disassembly/

    2.Chu, C. H., Luh, Y. P., Li, T. C., & Chen, H. (2009). Economical green product design based on simplified computer-aided product

    3.structure variation. Computers in Industry, 60, 16.

    4.Dorst, K. (2007). Understanding design: Gingko Press.

    5.Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the designprocess: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 12.

    6.Elgård, P., & Miller, T. D. (1998). Designing Product Families. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IPS.

    7.Eppinger, S. D. (2001). Innovation at the Speed of Information. Harvard Business Review.

    8.Gero, J. S. (1998). Concept Formation in Design. Knowledge-Based System, 11, 429-435.

    9.KO, Y. T. (2008). Methodologies for Managing New Product Development and Innovation. National Cheng Kung University.

    10.Rolatadas, A. (1995). Planning and Control of Concurrent Engineering Projects. The International Journal of Production Economics, 38, 3-13.

    11.Rose, C. M., Ishii, K., & Masui, K. (1998). How product characteristics determine end-of-life strategies. Paper presented at the Electronics and the Environment, Oak Brook, IL.

    12.Shah, J., & Vagas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111-134. doi: 10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00034-0

    13.Skaggs, P. T. (2002). Aptitudes for Industrial Design. Paper presented at the The 2002 IDSA National Education Conference.

    14.Stone, R. B., Wood, K. L., & Crawford, R. H. (2000). A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Design Studies, 21(1), 5-31.

    15.Tinsley, A., Midha, P. A., Nagel, R. L., McAdams, D. A., Stone, R. B., & Shu, L. H. (2007, September 4-7, 2007,). EXPLORING THE USE OF FUNCTIONAL MODELS AS A FOUNDATION. Paper presented at the 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

    16.Tjalve, E. (1979). A Short Course in Industrial Design: Butterworths Inc.

    17.Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. T. (1995). Product Architecture Product Design and Development. Singapore: McGraw-Hill

    18.Zwicky, F. (1967). The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research and construction. New Method of Thought and Procedure: Symposium on Methodologies.

    19.李新富. (2012, 2012-10-12). 設計教育, from http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=2486#

    20.張春興. (1996a). 布魯納的發現學習論 教育心理學. 台北市: 東華書局股份有限公司.

    21.張春興. (1996b). 皮亞傑的認知發展論 教育心理學. 台北市: 東華書局股份有限公司.

    22.陳雅玲, & 張毅君. (2005, 12-19). 思考,深思考. 商業週刊.

    23.游萬來, 楊敏英, & 廖珮泠. (2007). 大學工業設計系學生的學習態度調查. 設計學報, 12(2), 22.

    24.楊敏英, 游萬來, & 陳斐娟. (2005). 探討工業設計系學生面臨的困擾及生涯輔導需求對設計教育的意涵. 設計學報, 10(2), 20.

    25.管倖生. (2010). 設計研究方法(第三版). 台北市: 全華圖書.

    26.鄭文俊. (2001). 意識形態與文化霸權對工業設計教育核心課程與教學影響之研究. 博士, 彰化師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文.

    下載圖示
    2014-06-27公開
    QR CODE