流動 (mobility) 一詞包含了許多概念,包含了移動、分流、引導、匯集等等的概念,進而衍生出許多輔助系統,好比標示、告示牌、紅綠燈等等,而這些設計已經融入在我們的建築空間之中,作為輔助人們的流動媒介,從過去的指標設計,再到現今科技的發展,現今的流動空間需要定義一種整合空間、資訊與實虛互動的系統來面對場所和機能的複雜度以及多元性。

本研究認為空間必須掌握預先存在的機能複雜性和紊亂的資訊信息,不僅是在非地方(non-place) 出現流動設計的議題,而是所有建築、城市都必須思考如此的轉變,建築理論開始考慮非線性、流體和動態形態發生的模型,強調實際和虛擬之間的振盪,流動本身反倒成為支應空間最主要的議題,任何使用者或是建築樣式都必須思考使用者流動與空間的互動關係,這種轉變正在改變我們在城市中移動和生活的方式,進而城市空間也逐漸整合虛擬與實體,塑造新的空間流動模式。

本研究透過互動建築整合流動空間的手法回應並操作當代的流動困境,透過物質性空間元素聯結至互動事件,並藉由互動事件來觸發資訊空間的聯結,進而可以使實體與虛擬之中相關聯的人本互動模式進而在實質空間與資訊空間整合,創造雙向的流動,讓使用者在與認知空間的整合創造出空間自明性(identity) 進而更加理解非定性的空間組構關係，讓使用者能藉由裝置的設計理解基地的地方意象。

於此,本研究也透過機能日益複雜的機場空間作為示範,設計各處空間面對流動議題時如何與互動設計作出整合,在這樣充滿大量人潮的空間下,各附屬的場所也都包含不單純只有一種的流動範疇,所以就主要所面對的流動議題去做三大分類分別是尋路對應至機場大廳 ( 報到劃位 )、分流對應到安檢區 ( 通關出境 )、停留對應至候機室 ( 聚集等待 ),使旅客在機場空間有順暢的流動性,結合標誌和信息等流動觸及建築的空間元素,並為流動空間帶來了不同於以往的表現,營造了前所未有的建築形態,重新定義為建築師在流動空間的新實踐領域。

Enthusiasm for mobility appears to be a growing trend in architectural practice, concomitant with an increasing consciousness regarding global phenomena, and therefore reflecting a certain acceptance of society’s recent transform. The study argues that the mobility space provides a new paradigm for architecture and urban design, also can be viewed as the operative design issue to rethink urban and architectural disciplines. By combining the concept of interactive design into architecture design, architects can integrate physical space and virtual space to create a two-way flow, allowing users to create spatial self-identity into the cognitive space.

Therefore, the study responds to airport architecture, which is full of words and signage for passengers to realize the organization of the space and reduce the difficulty of the flow. As the example of non-place, airports have increased in size with the popularization of air travel and the emergence of new technology, which in turn has created less than ideal facility configurations for users’ mobility purposes. For the reason, the study design the interaction system by using Arduino and Processing to connect cultural and historical products in order to create new experiences for users, not only resolving the mobility problem, but also redefining the meaning of mobility.

國內文獻
1. 王文娟. (2006). 物聯網概念及應用. 經濟前瞻
2. 余小玲. (2002). 網絡社會的形構－Castells論流動空間. 資訊社會研究, 3, 239-250
3. 伊東豐雄. (2008). 伊東豐雄建築論文選：衍生的秩序.田園城市文化
4. 邱浩修.(2011).世界建築雜誌2月號.北京清華大學
5. 劉磊.(2013). 从“玩乐宫”到“思想带”：塞德里克·普莱斯的智慧城市策略.寫城市,124-127
6. 謝哲人, 黃證翰, 林俊岳, 黃琨庭& 陸冠竹. (2012). 以機場導覽系統結合二維條碼之建置－以高雄國際機場為例. 文大商管學報, Vol.17, No.2, 107-122
7. 盧瑞琴, 葉上令, 楊智翔, 林育安, 簡淑芬& 李梨霙. (2008). 鐵路運輸標誌符號的認識度與辨識率之探討－以北中南鐵路運輸爲例, 商業現代化學刊, 4(3), 157-167
8. 鄭泰昇.(2003).資訊建築—實質與虛擬空間的整合設計, 田園城市文化
9. 鄭泰昇. (2011). 互動建築 : 空間即媒體、界面、與機器人, 田園城市文化
10. 赤瀬達三. (2015). 和設計大師一起逛車站, 李漢庭譯, 如何文化
11. 宮崎桂. (2016). 體驗設計：打造便利空間的指標規劃案例集, 陳家恩譯, 旗標文化
12. 經濟部工業局智慧城鄉計畫辦公室. (2018). MEC & LPWAN應用技術趨勢、國際案例說明
13. 游曉貞.(1999).資訊設計於視覺傳達設計之發展,跨世紀視覺設計研討會論文集
14. 林軒丞. (2005). 資訊驛站—智慧網路城市資訊入口探討, 成功大學建築研究所碩士論文
15. 吳亭葶. (2017). 臺灣六都城市動態標誌設計創作研究, 國立臺灣師範大學設計學系碩士論文
16. 李明祥. (2017). 臺灣美濃與日本岐阜紙傘工藝產業之比較研究,國立屏東科技大學客家文化產業研究所碩士學位論文
17. 沈揚庭. (2005). 行動地誌, 成功大學建築研究所碩士論文
18. 馬瑜嬪. (2012). 環境感知的互動美學設計, 成功大學建築研究所博士論文
19. 陳麒. (2002). 『互動式空間』資訊空間及建築空間的整合設計研究初探, 成功大學建築研究所碩士論文
20. 陳美杏. (2015). 尋路標識系統在空間中發展的應用─以亞洲國際機場與大眾運輸為例, 嶺東科技大學數位媒體設計研究所碩士論文

國外文獻
1. Alejandra, G.C. (2007). A user-perspective approach for the design of modern bilingual airport signage, Georgia Institute of Technology
2. Ann, B.M.& Chestnut, H.(2002).Perception and Visual Communication Theory, Journal of Visual Literacy, Volume 22, Number 1, 91-106
3. Anderson, K. (1991). Vancouver’s Chinatown: Racial Discourse in Canada, Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
4. Anna, H.(2015).Principles of Experience Design for Airport Terminals, Queensland University of Technology
5. Asada, A. (1998). Beyond the Biomorphic, in Tokyo Bay Experiment, Columbia University
6. Carlos, C. (2009). Interactive architecture design, Design and Technology Series
7. Denver International Airport (2015). City & County of Denver - Signage & Wayfinding Guidelines, City & County of Denver
8. Doreen, M. (1992). Politics and Space/Time, New Left Review, no 196
9. Dubberly, H., Pangaro, P., et al. (2009). What is Interaction? Are there different types?, ACM-Interactions, Volume XVI.1
10. Erving, G. (1959). Presentation of self in everyday life, Anchor Books
11. I.A.T.A. (2004).Airport development reference manual (9th ed ed.)
12. Ishii, H., Wisneski, C., Brave, S., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Ullmer, B., & Yarin, P. (1998), “ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space,” Summary of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98), pp. 173-¬‐174, ACM Press
13. Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997), “Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms,” InS. Pemberton (Ed.),Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,5, pp. 234-¬‐241, ACM
14. Jeng, T., Chen, C., Wang, J., Wu, C., Yang, J., Cheng, S., Fang, J.,& Chung, P. (2008), “House of the Future Relies on Multimedia and Wireless Sensors”, SPIE Newsroom.
15. Kevin, L. (1960). Image of the city, The MIT Press
16. Manuel, C. (1999). Grass-rooting the space of flows, Urban Geography, Volume 20
17. Marc, A. (1992). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Super-modernity, W W Norton & Co Inc.
18. Michael, S. (1995). Artificial Modernism in the Space of Flows, in Space
19. Michael G. & Ola S. (2010.) Mobility and the Transformation of Built Form, Re-Shaping the City, 3-19
20. Negroponte, N. (1975). Soft Architecture Machines, MIT Press
21. Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J.R. (1999). Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence, Island Press
22. Norberg, S. (1979). Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, The MIT Press
23. Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things, Basic Books
24. Shaheen, S. (2015). Shared Mobility: Definitions, Industry Developments, and Early Understanding, TSRC, UC Berkeley
25. Stanley, M. (2005). The Fun Palace: Cedric Price’s experiment in architecture and technology, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, Volume 3, Number 2
26. Sunde, Li. (2014). Follow Me 3,Send Point
27. Ullmer, B., Ishii, H., & Jacob, R. J. K. (2005), “Token+constraint systems for tangible interaction with digital information,” ACM Transactions on Computer-¬‐Human Interaction, 12(1), pp. 81–118, ACM.
28. Ullmer, B., & Ishii, H. (2000), “Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces,“(J. M. Carroll, Ed.) IBM Systems Journal,39(3), pp. 915-¬‐931. IBM
29. Victoria, B., Maribeth, B., et al. (2001). Making Sense of Sensing Systems: Five Questions for Designers and Researchers, ACM, 415-422
30. Weiser, M., (1993). Ubiquitous Computing, Computer, pp. 71-72, vol. 26
31. Willian J. Mitchell. (2003). The Cyborg Self and The Networked City, Me++. The MIT. Press Cambridge.
32. Whyte, W.H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York, NY: Project for Public Spaces, Visitor Behavior, Volume VIII, Number 1,17-18
33. William, W. (2006).How Do Buildings Mean? Some Issues of Interpretation in the History of Architecture History and Theory, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 153-177
34. Pala, Z., Inanc,N., (2007). 2007 1st Annual RFID Eurasia, IEEE

網站資料
1. App Inventor 中文學習網. (2019). http://www.appinventor.tw/
2. CAVEDU 教育團隊技術部落. (2013). Part0：App Inventor 透過藍牙傳送訊號給 Arduino, https://blog.cavedu.com/2013/11/08/appinventorandarduinowithbluetooth/
3. Connecting! Block Town. (2016). https://www.teamlab.art/w/block-town/
4. Cooper Maa. (2011). Arduino Coding Retrived ,from http://coopermaa2nd.blogspot.com/2011/03/processing-arduino.html
5. Digital Ad Wall at Traffic Signal By LuminoCoin. (2018). https://medium.com/@LuminoCoin/introduction-42adb0713dd5
6. Source.Code. (2007). https://ars.electronica.art/futurelab/en/project/source-code/
7. Konan Public Health Service Center・Konan Public Welfare Center.(2002). km-d.jp/works/2002-01/
8. Narita International Airport Terminal 3 / NIKKEN SEKKEI + Ryohin Keikaku + PARTY
9. Narita International Airport Terminal 3 / NIKKEN SEKKEI + Ryohin Keikaku + PARTY. (2015). https://www.archdaily.com/620345/narita-international-airport-terminal-3-nikken-sekkei-ryohin-keikaku-party
10. Navion the first holographic AR navigation system for cars. (2019). https://wayray.com/navion
11. Openprocessing. (2019). Processing Coding Retrived ,from https://www.openprocessing.org/sketch/452509 & https://www.openprocessing.org/sketch/481525
12. OUALALOU+CHOI Pitches Woven Tent Outside of Jean Novel’s Arab World Institute. (2014). https://www.archdaily.com/575721/kilospace-pitches-woven-tent-outside-of-jean-novel-s-arab-world-institute?ad　source=search&ad　medium=search　result　all
13. Qiball. (2007). http://km-d.jp/works/qiball/
14. Spotlight: Peter Cook. (2018). https://www.archdaily.com/440979/happy-birthday-sir-peter-cook