簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鐘彩鳳
Chung, Tsai-Feng
論文名稱: 盈餘管理對於公司生產力影響
The Impact of Earnings Management on Productivity
指導教授: 張紹基
Chang, Shao-Chi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際企業研究所
Institute of International Business
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 27
中文關鍵詞: 生產力研發費用盈餘管理
外文關鍵詞: R&D Expenditure, Productivity, Earnings Management
相關次數: 點閱:68下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   1974年,美國財務會計準則委員會(FASB)基於提升會計報表透明化的原則之下,宣佈2號財務會計準則(SFAS No.2)規範公司將大多數的R&D支出認列為費用。然而,因為SFAS No.2會計準則的規範,公司認列的費用支出大幅的提升,造成盈餘大幅的下滑。因此,許多的學者便開始擔心R&D預算會淪為經理人用來操弄短期盈餘的工具之一。事實上,從過去的實證研究中我們發現,經理人確實會為了個人的利益或是為了達到財務分析師的預期等種種因素,刪減R&D的支出來提高微幅下降的短期盈餘。

      有鑒於過去文獻指出經理人的確會透過刪減R&D預算來操弄短期的盈餘,本研究想進一步探討此種透過刪減R&D費用的盈餘管理是否會傷害到公司根本的價值?然而,根據過去的文獻指出,一家公司價值的提升和獲利的提高,端賴這家公司是否擁有高度的生產力,因此,本研究採用生產力作為公司根本的價值,然後衡量藉由刪減R&D費用的盈餘管理和生產力之間的關係。回顧過去的文獻,先前學者的研究結果大多指出有盈餘管理的公司,通常股價反應和營運績效都會變得較糟。所以,本研究預期當公司刪除R&D預算來提高短期盈餘時,相較於其他沒有操弄管理的公司,應該會有較低的生產力。

      最後,本研究的實證結果顯示,當公司年度的盈餘如果微幅小於去年度的盈餘,經理人很有可能會大大的削減R&D支出,然而R&D削減和生產力之間存在著顯著負相關,因此導致公司的生產力大幅下滑且效率嚴重低於其他公司.故本研究證實了經理人為了某些特定的目的削減R&D預算來調整當年度盈餘的話,將會造成公司效率的降低,生產力大幅的下滑。再者,就如同先前的文獻所述,本研究結果也證實了不論經理人透過何種方式來從事盈餘管理,都將會傷害公司的價值,進而降低股東的利益。

     After SFAS 2 requires firms to expense their R&D expenditure, some academics consider that R&D budgets would become one tool that managers would use to manage short-term earnings upward to meet the expectations of analysts and shareholders. In fact, many empirical studies have provided evidence to support that managers cut R&D to turn small decrease earnings upward. Accordingly, this paper extends previous research and investigates if firms cut discretionary R&D expenditures to boost current earnings performance, would its fundamental value-productivity-be damage? Most previous researches find that earnings manipulate would damage operational performance and stock returns; consequently, I hypnotizes that the firms which manipulate earnings upward by R&D budget decrease would have worse productivity than other firms.

     Finally, in this paper, the empirical results suggest that the firms with small decrease earnings would cut R&D expenditure more seriously, consistent with the evidence provided by Baber, Fairfield and Haggard (1991) and Bushee (1998). Moreover, this paper also confirms that the association between R&D cut and productivity is significantly negative so that make the firms with small decrease earnings become less productive and more inefficient relative to other firms. The evidence suggests that if managers slash R&D budget so as to turn current earnings upward, the myopic behavior would indeed cause fundamental value-productivity injured grievously.

    I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 6 i. Earnings Management by R&D Cut 6 ii. R&D Expenditure, Market Value and Productivity 7 a. R&D Expenditure and Market Value 8 b. R&D Expenditure and Productivity 9 III. Data Sample and Construction of Variables 10 i. Productivity Measure 11 ii. Measure of Earnings Management 12 iii. The Impact of Earnings Management on Productivity Decline 13 a. Control Variables 14 IV. Do Firms with Small Decrease Earnings Have Less Productivity? 15 i. Descriptive Statistics 15 ii. Productivity Discount for Earnings Management 19 V. Robustness test 20 i. Empirical Result of Two-stage Least Squares Model 20 VI. Summary and conclusion 23 Reference 24

    Allen, Franklin, Gerald R. Faulhaber, and A. Craig Mackinlay, 1989, Unbalanced growth redux: Sectoral Productivity and Capital Markets, Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
    Baber, William R., Patricia M. Fairfield, and James A. Haggard, 1991, The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development, The Accounting Review 66, 818–829.
    Bange, Mary M, and Werner F. M. De Bondt, 1998, R&D budgets and corporate earnings targets, Journal of Corporate Finance 4, 153–184.
    Bizjak, John M., James A. Brickley, and, Jeffrey L. Coles, 1993, Stock-based incentive compensation and investment behavior, Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 349–372.
    Bushee, Brian J., 1998, The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior, The Accounting Review 73, 305–333.
    Chan, Louis K.C., Josef Lakonishok, and Theodore Sougiannis, 2001, The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures, Journal of Finance 56, 2431–2456.
    Chauvin, Keith, and Mark Hirschey, 1993, Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm, Financial Management 22, 128–140.
    Cheng, Shijun, 2004, R&D expenditures and CEO compensation, The Accounting Review 79, 305–328.
    Clark, Kim B., and Zvi Griliches, 1984, Productivity and R&D at the business level: Results from the PIMS data base, in Zvi Griliches, ed.: R&D, Patents and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp.393-4l6.
    Daniel, Kent, and Sheridan Titman, 2001, Market reactions to tangible and intangible information, Working paper, Northwestern University.
    Dechow, Patricia M., and Richard G. Sloan, 1991, Executive incentives and horizon problem, Journal of Accounting and Economics 14, 51–89.
    Eberhart, Allan C., William F. Maxwell, and Akhtar R. Siddique, 2004, An examination of long-term abnormal returns and operating performance following R&D increase, Journal of Finance 59, 623–650.
    Ehrlich, Isaac, Georges Gallais-Hamonno, Zhiqiang Liu, and Randall Lutter, 1994, Productivity growth and firm ownership: An analytical and empirical investigation, Journal of Political Economy 102, 1006–1038.
    Griliches, Zvi, 1980, Returns to research and development expenditures in the private sector, in John W. Kendrick and Beatrice N. Vaccara, eds.: New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 419–454.
    Griliches, Zvi, 1986, Productivity, R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s, The American Economic Review 76, l4l–l54.
    Griliches, Zvi, and Frank R. Lichtenberg, 1984, R&D and Productivity at the industry level: Is there still a relationship? in Zvi Griliches, ed.: R&D, Patents and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp.465–496.
    Griliches, Zvi, and Jacques Mairesse, 1984, Productivity and R&D at the firm Level in Zvi Griliches, ed.: R&D, Patents and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 339–374.
    Hall, Bronwyn H, 1993, The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the1980’s, The American Economic Review 83, 259–264.
    Hall, Bronwyn H, and Robert E. Hall, 1993, The value and performance of U.S. corporations, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1–49.
    Healy, Paul M., 1985, The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 85–107.
    Holthausen, Robert W., David F. Larcker, and Richard G. Sloan, 1995, Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics 19, 29–74.
    Idson, Todd L., and Walter Y. Oi, 1999, Workers Are More Productive in Large Firms, The American Economic Review 89, 104–108.
    Jaffe, Adam B., 1986, the search for R&D spillovers, The American Economic Review 76, 984–1001.
    Jensen, Michael C., 1993, The modern industrial revolution, exist, and the failure of internal control system, Journal of Finance 48, 831–880.
    Kim, Moshe, and Vojislav Maksimovic, 1990, Debt and input misallocation, Journal of Finance 45, 795–826.
    Lichtenberg, Frank R., 1992, Corporate Takeovers and Productivity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
    Lichtenberg, Frank R., and Donald Siegel, 1990, The effect of leveraged buyout on productivity and related aspects of firm behavior, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 164–194.
    Lichtenberg, Frank R., and Donald Siegel, 1991, The impact of R&D investment on productivity: New evidence using linked R&D-LRD data, Economic Inquiry 29, 203–229.
    Mansfield, Edwin, 1965, Rates of return from industrial research and development, The American Economic Review 55, 310–322.
    Minasian, Jora R., 1969, Research and development, production functions and rates of return, The American Economic Review 59, 80–85.
    Myers, Stewart C., 1984, The Capital Structure Puzzle, Journal of Finance 39, 575–592.
    Palia, Darius, and Frank R., Lichtenberg, 1999, Managerial ownership and firm performance: A re-examination using productivity measurement, Journal of Corporate Finance 5, 323–339.
    Perry, Susan, and Robert Grinaker, 1994, Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending, Accounting Horizons 8, 43–51.
    Porter, Michael E., 1992, Capital choice: Changing the way America invests in industry, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 5, 4–16.
    Porter, Michael E., 1992, Capital disadvantage: America’s failing investment system, Harvard Business Review 70, 65–82.
    Schankerman, Mark, 1981, The effects of double-counting and expensing on the measured returns to R&D, Review of Economic and Statistics 63, 454–458.
    Scherer, Frederic M., 1982, Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth, Review of Economic and Statistics 64, 627–634.
    Schipper, Katherine, 1989, Commentary on earnings management, Accounting Horizons 3, 91–102.
    Schoar, Antoinette, 2002, Effects of corporate diversification on productivity, Journal of Finance 57, 2379–2403.
    Sloan, Richard G., 1996, Do stock prices fully impound information in accruals about future earnings? The Accounting Review 71, 289–315.
    Solow, Robert M., 1957, Technical change and the aggregate production function, Review of Economic and Statistics 39, 214–231.
    Sougiannis, Theodore, 1994, The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D, The Accounting Review 69, 44–68.
    Teoh, Siew Hong, Ivo Welch, and T.J. Wang, 1998, Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings, Journal of Financial Economics 50, 63–99.
    Teoh, Siew Hong, Ivo Welch, and T.J. Wang, 1998, Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 53, 1935–1974.

    下載圖示 校內:2010-06-27公開
    校外:2010-06-27公開
    QR CODE