| 研究生: |
王上函 WANG, Shang-Han |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
第六代行動通訊系統於人工智慧場域之研析 A Study on Sixth-Generation Mobile Communication Systems in Artificial Intelligence Application Domains |
| 指導教授: |
陳文字
Chen, Wen-Tzu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 電信管理研究所 Institute of Telecommunications Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 93 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 第六代行動通訊系統 、人工智慧 、投入評估構面 、專家訪談 、主題分析 、照護機器人 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Sixth-Generation Mobile Communication Systems, Artificial Intelligence, investment evaluation framework, expert interviews, thematic analysis, care robots |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:30 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著國際電信聯盟提出IMT-2030願景,第六代行動通訊系統(Sixth-Generation Mobile Communication Systems, 6G)不僅延續行動通訊在傳輸速率、低延遲與連線能力上的提升,也逐漸朝向感知、資料處理、跨域連結與智慧化服務整合發展。另一方面,人工智慧(Artificial Intelligence, AI)應用逐步進入醫療照護、智慧製造、遠端控制、沉浸式體驗與公共服務等場域,不同AI應用對通訊能力、資料處理、系統整合與導入條件之需求並不相同。因此,如何判斷特定AI場域應用是否需要6G支援、是否具備導入條件與投資價值,成為值得進一步探討之議題。
本研究以「第六代行動通訊系統於人工智慧場域之應用」為主軸,透過文獻回顧、專家訪談與主題分析,整理6G系統在AI場域中的發展背景、應用機會、導入挑戰與投入評估條件。研究首先區分AI-native 6G 與6G系統於AI場域應用之差異。前者主要指AI被納入 6G 網路本身,用於網路狀態判斷、資源配置、服務品質維持與自動化管理;後者則指6G作為通訊、感知與連結基礎設施,支援AI應用於不同場域中落地。此一區分有助於避免將6G網路架構設計與AI場域應用導入混為一談。
研究結果顯示,並非所有 AI 應用皆需要 6G 支援,是否值得投入應回到應用需求、通訊必要性、組織承接能力、外部監理條件與經濟價值進行判斷。經由專家訪談與主題分析結果修正後,本研究提出四項評估構面,包含技術發展構面、組織導入條件構面、外部監理構面與經濟構面,並進一步建立前置篩選、四大構面評估、應用情境與角色調整,以及投入評估結果四個階段流程。最後,本研究以照護機器人作為示範案例進行架構套用,初步判定照護機器人目前較適合先以場域試驗方式推動,而非直接全面優先投入。本研究提出之投入評估架構,可作為未來政策規劃、產業布局與AI場域中6G相關應用導入前期判斷之參考。
With the International Telecommunication Union proposing the IMT-2030 vision, Sixth-Generation Mobile Communication Systems (6G) are expected to move beyond higher transmission speed, lower latency, and enhanced connectivity toward integrated sensing, data processing, cross-domain connection, and intelligent services. Meanwhile, Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly being introduced into healthcare, smart manufacturing, remote control, immersive experiences, and public services. Since different AI applications have different requirements for communication capability, data processing, system integration, and implementation conditions, it is necessary to examine whether specific AI domain applications require 6G support and whether they possess investment value.
This study focuses on the application of 6G systems in AI domains. Through literature review, expert interviews, and thematic analysis, this study first distinguishes between AI-native 6G and 6G systems supporting AI domain applications. The former refers to the integration of AI into the 6G network itself for network status assessment, resource allocation, and automated management, while the latter refers to 6G serving as communication, sensing, and connectivity infrastructure to support AI applications in different domains. This distinction helps avoid conflating 6G network architecture design with the implementation of AI applications in specific domains.
The findings indicate that not all AI applications require 6G support. Whether an application is worth investing in should be assessed based on application needs, communication necessity, organizational absorptive capacity, external regulatory conditions, and economic value. Based on expert interviews and thematic analysis, this study proposes four evaluation dimensions: technological development, organizational implementation conditions, external regulatory conditions, and economic value. It further establishes a four-stage evaluation process, including preliminary screening, four-dimensional evaluation, application context and role adjustment, and investment evaluation outcomes.
Finally, this study applies the proposed framework to the case of care robots. The results show that care robots have clear care-related needs and AI application necessity, and also demonstrate value as an example of 6G systems supporting AI domain applications. However, whether they are suitable for expanded investment still depends on advanced communication necessity, technological stability, organizational absorptive capacity, external regulatory conditions, and business model feasibility. Therefore, this study preliminarily concludes that care robots are currently more suitable for field trials rather than direct full-scale priority investment. The proposed investment evaluation framework can serve as a reference for future policy planning, industrial deployment, and preliminary decision-making before introducing 6G-related applications in AI domains.
3rd Generation Partnership Project. (2022, July 1). NTN & satellite in Rel-17 & 18. 3GPP News. https://www.3gpp.org/news-events/partner-news/ntn-rel17
3rd Generation Partnership Project. (2024). Architecture enhancements for 5G system (5GS) to support network data analytics services (3GPP TS 23.288, Version 18.5.0, Release 18). European Telecommunications Standards Institute.https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/etsi/2d09f09a-b320-42df-92a0-024326c953cc/etsi-ts-123-288-v18-5-0-2024-05
3rd Generation Partnership Project. (2025, September). Study on 6G use cases and service requirements; Stage 1 (Release 20) (Technical Report 3GPP TR 22.870 V0.4.0). 3GPP. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/22_series/22.870/22870-040.zip
5G Americas. (2025, July 14). 5G-Advanced overview [White paper]. https://www.5gamericas.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/5G-Advanced-Overview.pdf
Ahokangas, P., Gisca, O., Matinmikko-Blue, M., & Gordon, J. (2023). Toward an integrated framework for developing European 6G innovation. Telecommunications Policy, 47(8), 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102598
Bai, L., Cao, J., Zhang, M., & Li, B. (2025). Collaborative edge intelligence for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Network. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2024.3520166
Bariah, L., Zhao, Q., Zou, H., Tian, Y., Bader, F., & Debbah, M. (2024). Large generative AI models for telecom: The next big thing? IEEE Communications Magazine, 62(11), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2300364
Bernroider, E. W. N., & Schmöllerl, P. (2013). A technological, organisational, and environmental analysis of decision making methodologies and satisfaction in the context of IT induced business transformations. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.025
Bisio, I., Fallani, C., Garibotto, C., Haleem, H., Lavagetto, F., Hamedani, M., Schenone, A., Sciarrone, A., & Zerbino, M. (2025). AI-enabled Internet of Medical Things: Architectural framework and case studies. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 8(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2400150
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Charpentier, V., Landi, G., Giannopoulou, E., Brenes, J., Camelo, M., Marquez-Barja, J. M., & Slamnik-Krijestorac, N. (2025). Advancing vertical services for 6G: Future directions and innovations. IEEE Network. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2025.3550929
de Sousa, G. C., & Castañeda-Ayarza, J. A. (2022). PESTEL analysis and the macro-environmental factors that influence the development of the electric and hybrid vehicles industry in Brazil. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(1), 686–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.030
Dong, H., Liu, Y., Chu, T., & El Saddik, A. (2025, January–February). Bringing robots home: The rise of AI robots in consumer electronics. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2024.3381573
Ericsson. (2024). Co-creating a cyber-physical world [White paper]. https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/white-papers/co-creating-a-cyber-physical-world
Faiz, F., Le, V., & Masli, E. K. (2024). Determinants of digital technology adoption in innovative SMEs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100610
Fu, I.-K., Charbit, G., Medles, A., Lin, D., Hung, S.-C., Chen, C.-C., Liao, S., & Calin, D. (2023). Satellite and terrestrial network convergence on the way toward 6G. IEEE Wireless Communications, 30(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2023.10077212
Geraci, G., López-Pérez, D., Benzaghta, M., & Chatzinotas, S. (2023). Integrating terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks: 3D opportunities and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 61(5), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.002.2200366
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Halmosi, P., Kister, B., & Brambilla, A. (2024). Exploring macro-environmental catalysts and barriers of Healthcare 4.0 transformation in Central Europe through PESTLE analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123495
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Yang, J. (2022). Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing. Research Policy, 51(1), 104417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104417
International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector. (2023a, November). Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond (Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0). https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M.2160-0-202311-I!!PDF-E.pdf
International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector. (2023b). IMT for 2030 and beyond (IMT-2030): Relationship and timelines. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/study-groups/rsg5/rwp5d/imt-2030/Documents/PDF_Relationship%20and%20Timelines.pdf
Jamshed, M. A., Kaushik, A., Dajer, M., Guidotti, A., Parzysz, F., Lagunas, E., Di Renzo, M., Chatzinotas, S., & Dobre, O. A. (2025). Non-terrestrial networks for 6G: Integrated, intelligent and ubiquitous connectivity. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 9(3), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.2025.3572635
Kapoor, R., & Teece, D. J. (2021). Three faces of technology’s value creation: Emerging, enabling, embedding. Strategy Science, 6(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0124
Khosravy, M., Gupta, N., Pasquali, A., Dey, N., González Crespo, R., & Witkowski, O. (2024). Human-collaborative artificial intelligence along with social values in Industry 5.0: A survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 16(1), 165–176.
Letaief, K. B., Chen, W., Shi, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y.-J. A. (2019). The roadmap to 6G: AI-empowered wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 57(8), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2019.1900271
Liu, W., Lai, Z., Wu, Q., Li, H., Zhang, Q., Li, Z., Li, Y., & Liu, J. (2024). In-orbit processing or not? Sunlight-aware task scheduling for energy-efficient space edge computing networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2024 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (pp. 881–890). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM52122.2024.10621268
Maduranga, P., Madduma Wellalage, M. W., Munasinghe, K., & Jamalipour, A. (2024). AI-enabled 6G Internet of Things: Opportunities, key technologies, challenges, and future directions. IoT, 5(3), 386–417. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot5030041
Mölleryd, B., Özger, M., Westring, M., Nordlöw, A., Schupke, D., Engström, U., Cavdar, C., Lindborg, M., & Sciammetta, N. (2025). Regulatory and spectrum policy challenges for combined airspace and non-terrestrial networks. Telecommunications Policy, 49(1), 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102875
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
NGMN Alliance. (2021). 6G drivers and vision (Version 1.0). https://www.ngmn.org/wp-content/uploads/NGMN-6G-Drivers-and-Vision-V1.0_final.pdf
NIS Cooperation Group. (2020). Report on Member States’ progress in implementing the EU toolbox on 5G cybersecurity. Publications Office of the European Union.
Nokia. (2023). AI opportunities in 6G Layer 2 [White paper]. https://www.nokia.com/asset/213703/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). OECD employment outlook 2025: Can we get through the demographic crunch? OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/07/oecd-employment-outlook-2025_5345f034.html
Padhan, S., Mohapatra, A., Ramasamy, S. K., Agrawal, S., & Ramasamy, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in elderly healthcare: Enabling independence and quality of life. Cureus, 15(8), e42905. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42905
Ravankar, A. A., Tafrishi, S. A., Salazar Luces, J. V., Seto, F., & Hirata, Y. (2023). CARE: Cooperation of AI-robot enablers to create a vibrant society. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 30(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2022.3223256
Sehad, N., Bariah, L., Hamidouche, W., Hellaoui, H., Jäntti, R., & Debbah, M. (2025). Generative AI for immersive communication: The next frontier in Internet-of-Senses through 6G. IEEE Communications Magazine, 63(2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2400199
Sharma, M., Tomar, A., & Hazra, A. (2025). From connectivity to intelligence: The game-changing role of AI and IoT in Industry 5.0. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 14(5), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2024.3470340
Showkat, N., & Parveen, H. (2017). In-depth interview. e-PG Pathshala. https://www.uop.edu.pk/ocontents/Lecture%204%20indepth%20interview.pdf
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Teichert, R. (2019). Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1673–1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2020). Technology readiness assessment guide: Best practices for evaluating the readiness of technology for use in acquisition programs and projects (GAO-20-48G). https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-48g.pdf
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research: An introduction (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com/c/mass-media-research-10e-wimmer-dominick/9781133307334/
World Health Organization. (2025, October 1). Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
Yang, J., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2022). Benefiting from innovation—Playing the appropriability cards. In R. Agarwal, R. Green, E. Patterson, & S. Pugalia (Eds.), Innovation (pp. 310–332). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346033-20
Yrjölä, S., Ahokangas, P., & Matinmikko-Blue, M. (2022). Value creation and capture from technology innovation in the 6G era. IEEE Access, 10, 16299–16319. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3149590
Zhang, S., & Zhu, D. (2020). Towards artificial intelligence enabled 6G: State of the art, challenges, and opportunities. Computer Networks, 183, 107556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107556
Zheng, J., Luan, T. H., Zhang, Y., Li, G., Su, Z., & Wu, W. (2024). Digital twin in 6G: Embracing comprehensive network intelligence. IEEE Wireless Communications, 31(6), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.017.2300604
宋健生(2026年3月22日)。魏哲家:台積製造95%機器人大腦 長照是下波熱門應用。《經濟日報》。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/9394990
胡本致(2025)。VWA-6G AI rApp 輔助之開放架構持續資安監控系統。國立臺北大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5x69jm
黃子瑜(2022)。探討企業導入物聯網科技之關鍵因素-運用 Fuzzy DEMATEL 方法。國立屏東大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8uku6t
楊晉旻(無日期)。超越泛化:動態 6G 環境下自我調適無線電資源管理之框架。國立中央大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wn687x
樊幗馨(2025)。我國第六代行動通訊發展非地面網路之研析。國立成功大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8r8443
陳思璇(2022)。以主題分析、隨機森林與多準則決策分析法探勘第六代行動通訊技術專利。國立臺灣師範大學。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201579
謝明惠(2022)。跨國性製造業數位轉型策略關鍵成功因素之探討。國立彰化師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/44pcza