全球能源轉型是全球共同的發展目標，而風力發電也是近年來發展最為快速的再生能源之一。台灣離岸風電由於政策的推動加上天然條件優勢，近年大量的資金投入於產業中，也因此增加離岸風電產業對技術人才的需求。離岸風電運維人員工作時會面臨必須在危險的環境中工作，為了確保工作安全以及合法作業，運維人員培訓需要通過全球風能組織所制定的培訓課程。而培訓所需的時間和金錢成本是相當可觀，為了降低訓練成本和提高成效，各國的培訓認證廠商和離岸風電廠商近年也在積極尋求有效率且提升作業技術的教學方式，尤其是與遠程和電子輔助培訓課程的解決方案。
嚴肅遊戲可以藉由模擬讓學習者體驗因安全、金錢、時間成本而難以進行實際訓練情況，適合做為風機運維訓練的高成本和高風險場域的訓練替代方案，因此本研究與金屬中心的海洋科技創新專區合作，開發一款離岸風電機電力系統維修的嚴肅遊戲，讓學員在進行基礎訓練後在電腦上進行模擬練習，並期望以此做為運維人員使用之維修模擬教學的發展基礎。嚴肅遊戲開發注重專業領域和特別目標用戶，所以必須強調領域專家和使用者的參與。因此研究以參與式設計的理念結合敏捷設計流程進行開發，將領域專家和使用者納入設計流程和決策中，進行遊戲原型的迭代。而開發嚴肅遊戲的過程會針對使用者進行原型測試的結果進行分析評估，做為下一代原型推進的重要參考和方向。
本研究使用參與式設計和敏捷設計的混合方法，改善過去嚴肅遊戲開發過程中的問題，以離岸風電機電力系統維修之案例呈現這種嚴肅遊戲開發流程對於高風險技術學習嚴肅遊戲開發的過程。研究經過三次使用者測試，得到的使用者和專家回饋及後測問卷數據進行分析，探討此設計方法的適用性和可能面臨的問題。研究發現運用參與式設計和敏捷設計的混合方法在嚴肅遊戲設計中，專家參與校驗教學內容、專業用語和情境引入可提升學習實用性。遊戲化和互動元素可增進使用者的理解程度。而專家、使用者和設計團隊運用敏捷設計的合作方式可確保了遊戲內容的準確性、製作的可行性和符合使用者真實需求。

Global energy transformation is a common developmental objective worldwide, and wind power generation has rapidly become one of the most prominent forms of renewable energy in recent years. Due to the advocacy of policy and favorable natural conditions, Taiwan's offshore wind energy sector has attracted considerable investment, thereby increasing the demand for skilled personnel in the industry. Offshore wind farm maintenance workers operate in hazardous environments; to ensure safety and compliance, these workers must complete training programs stipulated by global wind energy organizations. The time and financial costs associated with such training are substantial. Consequently, training certification providers and offshore wind energy companies are actively seeking more efficient and effective instructional methods, especially solutions related to remote and electronically assisted training courses.
Serious games offer a simulation-based environment where learners can experience situations that are difficult to train for due to safety, financial, and time constraints. They serve as a viable alternative for high-cost and high-risk training in wind turbine maintenance. This study collaborates with the Marine Technology Innovation Section of the Metal Center to develop a serious game focused on the maintenance of offshore wind energy electrical systems. Following basic training, trainees can engage in computer-based simulated exercises. The project aims to lay the foundation for the development of maintenance simulation training for maintenance personnel. The design and development of serious games focus on specialized fields and targeted user groups, necessitating the involvement of domain experts and end-users. Accordingly, this study employs participatory design concepts integrated with agile development processes. Domain experts and end-users are incorporated into the design process and decision-making, contributing to iterative game prototype development. User feedback from prototype testing is analyzed and evaluated to guide the next iteration.
This research employs a hybrid method combining participatory and agile design to address issues in past serious game development processes. Using the case of offshore wind energy electrical system maintenance, this study presents how this development process applies to serious games designed for high-risk technical learning. The study underwent three rounds of user testing and analyzed the resulting user and expert feedback, as well as post-test survey data, to explore the applicability and potential challenges of this design method. The study found that integrating participatory and agile design in serious game development ensures content accuracy, feasibility, and alignment with real user needs. Expert involvement in content validation, professional terminology, and scenario incorporation enhances learning practicality, while gamification and interactive elements improve user comprehension.

Albert, B., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics: Newnes.
Asian, S., Ertek, G., Haksoz, C., Pakter, S., & Ulun, S. (2017). Wind Turbine Accidents: A Data Mining Study. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(3), 1567-1578. doi:10.1109/jsyst.2016.2565818
Barnum, C. M. (2020). Usability testing essentials: ready, set... test! : Morgan Kaufmann.
Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., . . . Jeffries, R. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development.
Brandt, E. (2006). Designing exploratory design games : a framework for participation in participatory design?. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design-Volume 1 (pp. 57-66).
Carroll, J., McDonald, A., & McMillan, D. (2016). Failure rate, repair time and unscheduled O&M cost analysis of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy, 19(6), 1107-1119. doi:10.1002/we.1887
Chen, S., & Michael, D. (2005). Proof of learning: Assessment in serious games. Retrieved October, 17, 2008.
Corti, K. (2006). Games-based Learning; a serious business application. Informe de PixelLearning, 34(6), 1-20.
Cridland, E. K., Jones, S. C., Caputi, P., & Magee, C. A. (2015). Qualitative research with families living with autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for conducting semistructured interviews. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(1), 78-91.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological review, 87(3), 215.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 178-186.
Ferreira, J., Noble, J., & Biddle, R. (2007). Agile development iterations and UI design. Paper presented at the Agile 2007 (AGILE 2007).
Forum, C. W. I. (2021). Summary of Wind Turbine Accident data to 30 September 2022. Retrieved from https://scotlandagainstspin.org/turbine-accident-statistics/
Global Wind Organisation, G. (2023). The Global Wind Organisation Basic Technical Training Standard v8. In. Copenhagen, Denmark: GWO.
Graafland, M., Schraagen, J. M., & Schijven, M. P. (2012). Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Journal of British Surgery, 99(10), 1322-1330.
Hansson, C., Dittrich, Y., Gustafsson, B., & Zarnak, S. (2006). How agile are industrial software development practices? Journal of systems and software, 79(9), 1295-1311.
Henderson, R. D., Smith, M. C., Podd, J., & Varela-Alvarez, H. (1995). A comparison of the four prominent user-based methods for evaluating the usability of computer software. Ergonomics, 38(10), 2030-2044.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The counseling psychologist, 25(4), 517-572.
IJsselsteijn, W. A., De Kort, Y. A., & Poels, K. (2013). The game experience questionnaire.
International Renewable Energy Agency, International Labour Organization (2022). Renewable energy and jobs: Annual review 2022. Retrieved from Abu Dhabi, Geneva:
International Renewable Energy Agency (2022). Renewable Energy Statistics 2022. Retrieved from Abu Dhabi
Iversen, O. S., Smith, R. C., Blikstein, P., Katterfeldt, E.-S., & Read, J. C. (2015). Digital fabrication in education: Expanding the research towards design and reflective practices. Int. J. Child Comput. Interact., 5, 1-2.
Joghee, S. C. (2021). Mixed Reality Applications for Safety Trainings in Wind Energy Sector: A Case Study. (Master's thesis, uis).
Kensing, F., & Madsen, K. H. (1992). Generating visions: Future workshops and metaphorical design. In Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 155-168).
Khaled, R., & Ingram, G. (2012, December). Tales from the front lines of a large-scale serious game project. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 69-78).
Khaled, R., & Vasalou, A. (2014). Bridging serious games and participatory design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(2), 93-100. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.03.001
Lewis, C., & Rieman, J. (1993). Task-centered user interface design. A practical introduction.
Lewis, J. R. (1995). Computer system usability questionnaire. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.
Lukosch, H., Van Ruijven, T., & Verbraeck, A. (2012, December). The participatory design of a simulation training game. In Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (pp. 1-11). IEEE.
Martin, R. C. (2003). Agile software development: principles, patterns, and practices: Prentice Hall PTR.
Martinez, W., Threatt, A. L., Rosenbloom, S. T., Wallston, K. A., Hickson, G. B., & Elasy, T. A. (2018). A Patient-Facing Diabetes Dashboard Embedded in a Patient Web Portal: Design Sprint and Usability Testing. JMIR Human Factors, 5(3), e26. doi:10.2196/humanfactors.9569
McLeod, M., Barber, N., & Franklin, B. D. (2015). Facilitators and Barriers to Safe Medication Administration to Hospital Inpatients: A Mixed Methods Study of Nurses’ Medication Administration Processes and Systems (the MAPS Study). PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128958. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128958
Mildner, P., & ‘Floyd’ Mueller, F. (2016). Design of Serious Games. In (pp. 57-82): Springer International Publishing.
Mitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning. A review of the literature.
Nielsen, L., & Madsen, S. (2012). The usability expert's fear of agility.
Nisansala, A., Weerasinghe, M., Dias, G. K. A., Sandaruwan, D., Keppitiyagama, C., Kodikara, N., . . . Samarasinghe, P. (2015). Flight Simulator for Serious Gaming. In (pp. 267-277): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Nunes, E. P. S., Luz, A. R., Lemos, E. M., & Nunes, C. (2016). Approaches of Participatory Design in the Design Process of a Serious Game to Assist in the Learning of Hospitalized Children. In (pp. 406-416): Springer International Publishing.
Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & gaming, 23(3), 261-276.
Robertson, T., & Simonsen, J. (2012). Participatory Design: an introduction. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 1-17): Routledge.
Rodríguez, Z. R., Silva, H., Iliana Amabely, & Núnez, L. A. E. (2018). Development Serious Games Using Agile Methods. Test Case: Values and Attitudinal Skills. In (pp. 270-281): Springer International Publishing.
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction: Morgan Kaufmann.
Silva, F. G. M. (2019). Practical Methodology for the Design of Educational Serious Games. Information, 11(1), 14. doi:10.3390/info11010014
Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2003). Harnessing the power of games in education. Insight, 3(1), 5-33.
Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology: Jossey-Bass.
Szczurek, M. (1982). Meta-analysis of simulation games effectiveness for cognitive learning: Indiana University.
Tarja, S., Mikael, J., & Per, B. (2007). Serious Games – An Overview. Technical Report, HS- IKI -TR-07-001.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource: John Wiley & Sons.
Vanden Abeele, V., De Schutter, B., Geurts, L., Desmet, S., Wauters, J., Husson, J., . . . Geerts, D. (2012). P-III: A Player-Centered, Iterative, Interdisciplinary and Integrated Framework for Serious Game Design and Development. In (pp. 82-86): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
經濟部能源局（2020）. 能源轉型白皮書. 取自https://energywhitepaper.tw/#/whitepaper [Ministry of Economic Affairs Bureau of Energy, Taiwan, ROC. (2020). 2020 Energy Transition White Paper. Retrieved from https://energywhitepaper.tw/#/whitepaper]
經濟部能源局（2021）.能源轉型執行報告. 取自https://energywhitepaper.tw/#/report [Ministry of Economic Affairs Bureau of Energy, Taiwan, ROC. (2021). 2020 Energy Transition Executive Report. Retrieved from https://energywhitepaper.tw/#/report]
經濟部能源局（2021）.109年度能源轉型關鍵指標. 取自https://energywhitepaper.tw/#/kpi [Ministry of Economic Affairs Bureau of Energy, Taiwan, ROC. (2021). Key Indicators of Energy Transition in 2020. Retrieved from https://energywhitepaper.tw/#/kpi]