簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 翁煜棱
Weng, Yuh-Leng
論文名稱: 三種不同Er:YAG雷射尖端照射後對牙本質表面之影響:體外實驗
Effects of 3 Different Er:YAG Laser Tips Irradiation on the Dentin Surface: An In-Vitro Study
指導教授: 丁羣展
Ting, Chun-Chan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 口腔醫學研究所
Institute of Oral Medicine
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 45
中文關鍵詞: Er:YAG雷射 、雷射尖端 、牙本質表面 、硬度 、粗糙度
外文關鍵詞: Er:YAG laser, Laser tips, Dentin surface, Hardness, Roughness
相關次數: 點閱:115  下載:0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Er:YAG雷射波長2940 nm,是一種於牙科治療時可用來處置軟、硬組織的雷射。Er:YAG 雷射可交換使用不同型態的雷射尖端,根據不同的尖端設計,對於照射表面預期會有不同切削效果。本研究目的是想探討不同型號的雷射尖端,於不同能量設定下,照射後對於牙本質表面的影響。本研究的牙本質樣本是使用牛的前齒來製作。牛齒拔除後,使用Gracey curettes No. 1/2 和 3/4做牙根整平,室溫下保存於0.9%生理食鹽水中。之後切下牙根,並使用環氧樹脂進行包埋,再利用砂紙研磨露出的牙本質表面。露出的牙本質表面硬度的測量是使用維氏硬度儀。四組不同雷射能量設定為50mJ/20pps, water (+);100mJ/20pps, water (+);50mJ/20pps, water (-);100mJ/20pps, water (-)。三種不同雷射尖端型號分別是C600F, PS600T, R600T。雷射照射是雷射尖端與牙本質表面呈 45°直接接觸,以掃描式移動照射 10秒。照射後牛齒牙本質表面的刻痕深度與型態變化是使用粗度計檢測器、光學同調斷層掃描儀及掃描式電子顯微鏡來進行分析與觀測。組織切片是採用蘇木精-伊紅染色來進行觀測。結果顯示使用相同雷射尖端與不同的能量設定下,牙本質表面硬度較大者,雷射照射後產生的刻痕深度無差異;而硬度較小者,刻痕深度有出現差異。在硬度相近的組別,使用不同雷射尖端進行照射,刻痕型態有差異出現,以PS600T最為明顯。在硬度相近的組別,PS600T 所造成的表面粗糙度比起其他兩組有統計學上的顯著差異(p< 0.05)。掃描式電子顯微鏡結果發現,雷射照射後牙本質表面呈現粗糙、牙本質小管有暴露的現象。在組織切片染色下也發現牙本質表面的切削刻痕。本研究結果發現使用Er:YAG雷射進行牙根表面照射的時候,除了要選擇合適的能量設定外,必須考量到牙齒硬度與不同雷射尖端型號,特別是尖端型號PS600T,也會造成牙本質表面粗糙度、刻痕深度等的型態異。

    The Er:YAG laser has a wavelength of 2940 nm, which provides the capability to be used on soft and hard tissues. There are different types of laser tips with different cutting effects for different dental purposes. The aim of this in-vitro study was to analyze the characteristics of dentin surfaces after Er:YAG laser irradiation using 3 different types of tips. Extracted anterior teeth from cattle were used in this study. After extraction, the teeth were root planed with hand instruments (Gracey curets No. 1/2 and 3/4). The teeth were stored in 0.9% normal saline at 25°C. The teeth were cut by high-speed diamond bur and fixed in the resin blocks. The exposed dentin surfaces were ground with silicon carbide abrasive papers. The hardness of teeth was measured using Vickers hardness testing machine. There were 4 laser settings: G1–50mJ/20pps, with water spray 70%; G2–100mJ/20pps, with water spray 70%; G3–50mJ/20pps, without water spray and G4–100mJ/20pps, without water spray. The dentin surface was irradiated with 3 types of tips (C600F, PS600T, R600T) according to the settings mentioned above respectively. The optical fiber was positioned 45 degrees to the surface of the sample with swiping motion. The irradiation time was 10 seconds. The irradiation was carried out manually to simulate clinical conditions. Afterwards, the dentin surfaces were analyzed using optical coherence tomography (OCT), surface roughness measuring instrument and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Histological analysis was done using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stain. OCT analysis revealed that PS600T produced the most obvious ablation. Among the groups of similar hardness, the groups of PS600T showed the statistically significant higher in surface roughness (p< 0.05). SEM analysis revealed alterations on the root surfaces. There were different degrees of rough surfaces and sharp-pointed projections resulting from the ablation of dentin. The samples also revealed exposure of dentin tubules without smear layer. The histological analysis of HE staining also revealed the defect of laser irradiation on dentin surface and charring of the dentine tubules. Based on the results of this study, in addition to appropriate laser settings, it can be concluded that the differences between teeth hardness and types of laser tip, especially for PS600T, would also contribute to the differences of surface roughness, ablation depths and morphological alterations.

    ABSTRACT I 中文摘要 II LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IX CHAPTER 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Er:YAG laser 1 1.2 Bovine teeth 3 1.3 Study aim 3 1.4 Study hypothesis 3 CHAPTER 2 4 MATERIALS AND METHODS 4 2.1 Sample preparation 5 2.2 Hardness evaluation 6 2.3 Laser irradiation 7 2.4 Surface roughness measurement 11 2.5 OCT observation 12 2.6 SEM observation 13 2.7 Histological observation 14 2.8 Statistical analysis 15 CHAPTER 3 16 RESULTS 16 3.1 Hardness analysis 16 3.2 Roughness analysis 17 3.3 OCT analysis 19 3.4 SEM analysis 23 3.5 Histological analysis 26 CHAPTER 4 27 DISCUSSION 27 CHAPTER 5 31 CONCLUSION 31 REFERENCES 32

    Agoob Alfergany, M., Nasher, R., & Gutknecht, N. (2019). Calculus Removal and Root Surface Roughness When Using the Er:YAG or Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Compared with Conventional Instrumentation Method: A Literature Review. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery, 37(4), 197-226.
    Bollen, C. M., Papaioanno, W., Van Eldere, J., Schepers, E., Quirynen, M., & van Steenberghe, D. (1996). The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 7(3), 201-211.
    Damante, C. A., Ducati, P., Ferreira, R., Salmeron, S., Zangrando, M. S. R., de Rezende, M. L. R., . . . Magalhaes, A. C. (2016). In vitro evaluation of adhesion/proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on demineralized root surfaces by toluidine blue O in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 13, 303-307.
    F Wegehaupt , D. G., A Wiegand, T Attin. (2008). Is bovine dentine an appropriate substitute for human dentine in erosion⁄abrasion tests? Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 35(5), 390-394.
    Feist, I. S., De Micheli, G., Carneiro, S. R., Eduardo, C. P., Miyagi, S., & Marques, M. M. (2003). Adhesion and growth of cultured human gingival fibroblasts on periodontally involved root surfaces treated by Er:YAG laser. J periodontol, 74(9), 1368-1375.
    Folwaczny, M., Aggstaller, H., Mehl, A., & Hickel, R. (2003). Removal of bacterial endotoxin from root surface with Er:YAG laser. Am J Dent, 16(1), 3-5.
    Folwaczny, M., George, G., Thiele, L., Mehl, A., & Hickel, R. (2002). Root surface roughness following Er:YAG laser irradiation at different radiation energies and working tip angulations. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 29(7), 598-603.
    Folwaczny, M., Thiele, L., Mehl, A., & Hickel, R. (2001). The effect of working tip angulation on root substance removal using Er:YAG laser radiation: an in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol, 28(3), 220-226.
    Hariri, I., Sadr, A., Shimada, Y., Tagami, J., & Sumi, Y. (2012). Effects of structural orientation of enamel and dentine on light attenuation and local refractive index: An optical coherence tomography study. Journal of Dentistry, 40(5), 387-396.
    Herrero, A., Garcia-Kass, A. I., Gomez, C., Sanz, M., & Garcia-Nunez, J. A. (2010). Effect of two kinds of Er:YAG laser systems on root surface in comparison to ultrasonic scaling: an in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg, 28(4), 497-504.
    Jia, L., Jia, J., Xie, M., Zhang, X., Li, T., Shi, L., . . . Zhang, X. (2020). Clinical attachment level gain of lasers in scaling and root planing of chronic periodontitis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Lasers Med Sci, 35(2), 473485.
    Karthikeyan, R., Padmanabhan, K., Sivaram, G. R., Yadalam, P., & Anand, A. J. (2020). Morphological and chemical alterations of root surface after Er:Yag laser, Nd:Yag laser irradiation: A scanning electron microscopic and infrared spectroscopy study. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 10(2), 205212.
    Kepic, T. J., O'Leary, T. J., & Kafrawy, A. H. (1990). Total calculus removal: an attainable objective? J periodontol, 61(1), 16-20.
    Kokuzawa, C., Ebihara, A., Watanabe, S., Anjo, T., Bolortuya, G., Saegusa, H., & Suda, H. (2012). Shaping of the root canal using Er:YAG laser irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg, 30(7), 367-373.
    Lee, B. S., Jeng, J. H., Lin, C. P., Shoji, S., & Lan, W. H. (2004). Thermal effect and morphological changes induced by Er:YAG laser with two kinds of fiber tips to enlarge the root canals. Photomed Laser Surg, 22(3), 191-197.
    Letícia H. Theodoro, P. H., Luciano Bachmann, Valdir G. Garcia, José E.C. Sampaio, Denise M. Zezell, and Carlos de P. Eduardo. (2003). Effect of Er:YAG and Diode Laser Irradiation on the Root Surface: Morphological and Thermal Analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 74(6), 838-843.
    M. Straßl, B. Ü., A. Bäcker, F. Beer, A. Moritz, E. Wintner. (2004). Comparison of the Emission Characteristics of Three Erbium Laser Systems – A Physical Case Report.
    Matthias Folwaczny, A. M., Cornelius Haffner, Christoph Benz, and Reinhard Hickel. (2000). Root Substance Removal With Er:YAG Laser Radiation at Different Parameters Using a New Delivery System. Journal of Periodontology, 71(2), 147-155.
    Mikami, R., Mizutani, K., Sasaki, Y., Iwata, T., & Aoki, A. (2020). Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 15(9), e0238659.
    Miremadi SR, C. J., Schaubroeck D, Lang NP, De Moor RJ, De Bruyn H. (2014). Effects of root surface debridement using Er:YAG Laser versus ultrasonic scaling – a SEM study. Int J Dent Hyg., 12(4), 273-284.
    Morlock, B. J. P., David J.; Cobb, Charles M.; Killoy, William J.; Rapley, John W. (1992). The Effect of Nd:YAG Laser Exposure on Root Surfaces When Used as an Adjunct to Root Planing: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Periodontology, 63(7), 637-641.
    Nahas, P., Zeinoun, T., Namour, M., Ayach, T., & Nammour, S. (2018). Effect of Er:YAG laser energy densities on thermally affected dentin layer: Morphological study. Laser Ther, 27(2), 91-97.
    Quirynen, M., Bollen, C. M., Papaioannou, W., Van Eldere, J., & van Steenberghe, D. (1996). The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11(2), 169-178.
    Ritz L, H. A., Rateitschak KH. (1991). An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. J Clin Periodontol, 18(9), 643-647.
    Sabnis S, G. G., Chandra KK, Mehta DS. (2016). Comparison of Adhesion of Blood Components on Root Surfaces treated with Citric Acid, Nd:YAG, Er:YAG, and CO2 Lasers: An in vitro Analysis. International Journal of Laser Dentistry, 6(1), 18-23.
    Schwarz, F., Sculean, A., Berakdar, M., Georg, T., Reich, E., & Becker, J. (2003). Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser combined with scaling and root planing for nonsurgical periodontal treatment. A controlled, prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol, 30(1), 26-34.
    Shoji, S., Hariu, H., & Horiuchi, H. (2000). Canal enlargement by Er:YAG laser using a cone-shaped irradiation tip. J Endod, 26(8), 454-458.
    Stambaugh, R. V., Dragoo, M., Smith, D. M., & Carasali, L. (1981). The limits of subgingival scaling. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1(5), 30-41.
    T F Flemmig, G. J. P., A Mehl, R Hickel, B Klaiber. (1998). Working Parameters of a Magnetostrictive Ultrasonic Sealer Influencing Root Substance Removal In Vitro. J periodontol, 69(5), 547-553.
    Theodoro, L. H., Sampaio, J. E., Haypek, P., Bachmann, L., Zezell, D. M., & Garcia, V. G. (2006). Effect of Er:YAG and Diode lasers on the adhesion of blood components and on the morphology of irradiated root surfaces. J Periodontal Res, 41(5), 381-390.
    Ulrich Keller, K. S., Raimund Hibst. (1997). Morphology of Er:YAG laser-treated root surfaces. SPIE Proceedings of lasers in dentistry, 3192, 24-31.
    Yaghini, J., Naghsh, N., Attaei, E., Birang, R., & Birang, E. (2015). Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry. J Dent (Tehran), 12(12), 899-905.

    下載圖示
    2026-07-30公開
    QR CODE