| 研究生: |
吳玲玲 Wu, Ling-Ling |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
地工合成材料應用於鐵路穩定的設計與績效分析 Design and Performance Analysis of Geosynthetic Applications in Railroad Track Mitigation |
| 指導教授: |
陳景文
Chen, Jin-Wen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2003 |
| 畢業學年度: | 91 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 132 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | Tensar-Pave 軟體 、沈陷 、FLAC 程式 、實驗段鋪設 、鐵路 、加勁 、地工織物與地工格綱合成材料 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Tensar-Pave, Geotextile-Geogrid Composite, Reinforcement, Rail-road track, Testing installation, Stress-strain distribution, FLAC, Settlement |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:142 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究的目的,針對地工合成材料在軌道工程上的應用,探討鐵道穩定的設計與績效分析。在道床設計中加入工地合成材料,可以增加道床的承載能力、隔離黏土層與級配層、防止上方級配層侵入下方細料層、幫助排水與降低激發孔隙水壓,改善因軌道長時間使用與超載所造成的道床湧泥現象。
配合中國鋼公司廠內魚雷車實際運行所造成道床湧泥現象,利用地工合成材料的鋪設,以FLAC與Tensar-Pave程式進行數值分析,並與沈陷板、水準儀的量測結果做一比較,籍以提供軌道道床在實際應用上的穩定分析。
本研究首先將利用FLAC 數值模式去模擬現場鐵路狀況,然後配合Tensar-Pave軟體作為輔助分析。透過此研究的成果,我們可以驗證地工合成材料可以有效的減緩軌道道床的沈陷,其減少量約為一般的30%左右;其加勁功能可有效地減少級配料20-40%的使用量;延長軌道床使用年限、節省人力、物力、降低維修頻率與提高經濟效益。
This research project was an effort to improve our understanding of the design and performance analysis of geosynthetics application in railroad track mitigation. Insert of geosynthetic layer at the subgrade and subbase interface, increase the bearing capacity of the track, separate the aggregate base course and the subgrade to prevent two dissimilar material from intermixing, and acts as a filter to prevent stone aggregate intrude into the fine soil or fine soils migrating up into voids of stone aggregate due to high pore water pressure induced by cyclic loading.
This research project was collaboration with China Steel Company , in order to mitigation railway ballast and aggregate degrade and deterioate progressively under cyclic loading by using geosynthetics reinforcement. The railroad track deformation and economic benefit were analyzed using numerical technique, FLAC program and Tensar-Pave software. FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) was selected for this research because of its excellent capability of modeling geotechnical engineering related stability problems and its extended programming ability.
First, FLAC model and Tensar-Pave software were used to simulate the field instrumentation measurments in real railroad track situation and then comparing with field measuring data (from settlement plates), in purpose to provide the mitigation of geosynthetic railroad track.
Results shown that the geosynthetics reinforced test section of the railroad track produced lower settlement about 30 % off compare to the unreinforcd test section and because of geosynthetics reinforcement function saving the amount of aggregate/ballast thickness about 20-40 %. Thereby, design cooperated with numerical techniques (FLAC) and Tensar-Pave software, would improved techniques for analyzing the track deformation, economic benefits (aggregate saving) and reduce the railraod track maintenance cost.
1.Ashpiz, E.S., Diederich, R., & Koslowski, C.(2002)”The use of spunbonded geotextile in railway track renewal St. Peterburg-Moscow.” International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, 22-27 September 2002. vol.3, pp1173-1176.
2.Indraratna, B., Salim, W., & Christie, D.(2002) “Improvement of recycled ballast using geosynthetics.” International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, 22-27 September 2002. vol.3, pp1177-1182.
3.Nancey, A., Imbert, B., & Robinet, A.(2002) “Thick and abrasion resistant geotextile for use under the ballast in railways structure.” International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, 22-27 September 2002. vol.3, pp1191-1194.
4.Redman, C.B., & James, G.M.(2002) “Geosynthetics provide sound economics, performance and constructability in coal line rehabilitation.” International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, 22-27 September 2002. vol.3, pp1195-1198.
5.Tebay, R.N., Lawrence, C.A., Caddick, V.R., Warwick, R.G.(2002) “Geosynthetic protection of ballast and sub-grade in railway foundation structures.” International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, 22-27 September 2002. vol.3, pp901-904.
6.Athanasopoulos, G.A., Katsas, C.E., Ioannidis, A.A., Pelekis, P.C.(2002) “Evaluation of sand-geotextile interface friction angle by a modified 300*300 mm direct shear box.” International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, 22-27 September 2002. vol.3, pp1301-1304.
7.Lee, W.F. (2000) “Internal stability analyses of geosynthetic reinforced retaining walls.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington.
8.Koerner, Robert M.(1997) “Designing with geosynthetics.” Four edition, pp1-pp380.
9.Rayan R., Berg, P.E., Barry, R., Christopher, P.E., & Steven Perkins, P.E.(2000) “Geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base/subbase course of pavement structures.” pp1-109.
10.Robert, D., Holtz, Barry, R., Christopher, Ryan, R., Berg “Geosynthetic engineering.” pp135-172.
11.Jewell, R.A. “Soil reinforcement with geotextiles.” pp235-289.
12.Alexander, K., Appea, Imad, L. “Assessment of falling weight deflectometer data for stabilized flexible pavements.” Transportation research record 1709, paper No. 00-1302.
13.Standard Test Method for Water Permeability of Geotextiles by Permittivity (1999), ASTM Standard D4491-99a, American Society for Testing and Material.
14.Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Geotextiles by the Wide-Width Strip Method (2001), ASTM Standard D4595-86, American Society for Testing and Material.
15.Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter (2002), ASTM Standard D5084-00, American Society for Testing and Material.
16.Standard Test Method for Determining Filtering Efficiency and Flow Rate of a Geotextile for Silt Fence Applicatioon Using Site-Specific Soil (1999), ASTM Standard D5141-96, American Society for Testing and Material.
17.Standard Test Method for Permittivity of Geotextiles under Load (1998), ASTM Standard D5493-93, American Society for Testing and Material.
18.Standard Guide for Selecting Test Methods for Experimental Evaluation of Geosynthetic Durability (1999), ASTM Standard D5819-99, American Society for Testing and Material.
19.Standard Test Method for Determining Apparent Opening Size of a Geotextile (1999), ASTM Standard D4751-99a, American Society for Testing and Material.
20.Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Unconfined Tension Creep Behavior of Geosynthetics (1997), ASTM Standard D5262-97, American Society for Testing and Material.
21.Standard Test Method for Measuring the Soil-Geotextile System Clogging Potential by the Gradient Ratio (2001), ASTM Standard D5101-01, American Society for Testing and Material.
22.Standard Test Method for Hydraulic Conductivity Ratio (HCR) Testing of Soil/Geotextile Systems (2001), ASTM Standard D5567-94, American Society for Testing and Material.
23.Standard Test Method for Index Puncture Resistance of Geotextiles, Geomembranes, and Related Products (2000), ASTM Standard 4833-00, American Society for Testing and Material.
24.Standard Test Method for Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles (1996), ASTM Standard D4632-91, American Society for Testing and Material.
25. Chen, J.W., Lee, W. F. et al., ”The research of Local pumping mitigation under W12 torpedo ladle car railroad track .” Taiwan construction research institute (TCRI) final report (2003).
26. Rankilor, P.R., “Membranes in ground engineering.” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, England (1981).
27. Kinney, T.C. and Barenberg, E.J., 1982, “The strengthening effect of geotextiles on soil-geotextile-aggregate systems,” Preceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotextiles, Las Vegas, NV, USA, vol.2. , pp.347-352.
28. Perkins, S.W., Ismeik, M. and Fogelsong, M.L., 1998a, “Mechanical response of a geosynthetic-reinforced pavement system to cyclic loading,” Proceeding of the Fifth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, Trondheim, Norway, vol.3, pp.1503-1512.
29. Kinney, T.C., Stone, D.K. and Schuler, J., 1998a, “Using geogrids for base reinforcement as measured by falling weight deflectometer in full-scale laboratory study,” Transportation Research Record 1611, Washington, DC, pp.70-77.
30. Selllmeijer, J.B., 1990, “Design of geotextile reinforced paved roads and parking areas,” Proceddings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, The Hague, The Netherlands, Balkema, vol.1, pp.177-182.
31. Houlsby, G.T. and Jewell, R.A., 1990, “Design of reinforced unpaved roads for small rut depths,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, The Hague, Netherlands, vol.1, pp.171-176.
32. Haliburton, T.A., Lawmaster, J.D. and McGuffey, V.C. (1981), Use of Engineering Fabrics in Transportation Related Applications, FHWA DTFH61-80-C-00094.
33. Christopher, B.R. and Holtz, R.G., 1985, Geotextile Engineering Manual, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-TS-86/203, Washington, DC, USA, 1044 p.
34. Holtz, R.D., Christopher, B.R. and Berg, R.R., [Technical Consultant-DiMaggio, J.A.] 1998, Geosynthetic Design and Construction Guidelines, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, FHWA-HI-98-038, 460 p.
35. Ryan R., Berg & Associates, Inc., “Geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base/subbase courses of pavement structures,” GMA White Paper II prepared for AASHTO Committee 4E, Geosynthetic Material Association, pp.83-152 (2000).
36. AASHTO-AGC-ARTBA (1990), Guide Specifications and Test Procedures for Geotextiles, Task Force 25 Report, Subcommittee on New Highway Materials, American Association of State Transportation and Highway Officials, Washington, D.C.
37. Steward, J., Williamson, R. and Nohney, J. (1977), Guidelines for Use of Fabrics in Construction and Maintenance of Low-Volume Roads, USDA, Forest Service, Portland.
38. AASHTO, 1997, Standard Specifications for Geotextiles – M 288, Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 18th Edition, American Association of State Transportation and Highway Officials, Washington, DC.