| 研究生: |
趙文綺 Chao, Wen-Chi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
臺灣桃園國際機場公司企業社會責任策略之研究 Developing Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies for Taiwan’s Taoyuan International Airport |
| 指導教授: |
張有恆
Chang, Yu-Hern |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 交通管理科學系 Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science |
| 論文出版年: | 2014 |
| 畢業學年度: | 102 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 150 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 機場策略 、企業社會責任 、價值鏈 、鑽石模型 、層級分析法 、決策實驗室分析法 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Airport Strategy, Corporate Social Responsibility, Strategy Development, Strategy Evaluation and Planning |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:145 下載:15 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
企業社會責任之全球浪潮下,學者們與各式國際組織紛紛為企業社會責任進行績效評估、範疇規範及擬定衡量指標,各式文獻亦指出企業社會責任與財務績效、競爭優勢乃相輔相成。而社會大眾亦相信企業需對其股東負責外,於環境、員工、社區和其他利害關係人皆負有責任。
然桃園國際機場公司化已屆三年,尚未能積極貫徹企業化經營之精神,作為臺灣最主要之國際機場,應成為臺灣國際機場實施企業社會責任之領頭羊。此外鄰近之各標竿競爭機場,如新加坡樟宜機場、香港國際機場、韓國仁川機場皆積極實施企業社會責任或融入永續發展理念,並發布完整之報告書以及完整揭露相關資訊。
而過去研究較少探討機場之企業社會責任,因此本研究藉由文獻回顧、價值鏈與鑽石模型,以期提供一套具有競爭利益之機場公司企業社會責任實施目標並研擬其策略。並進一步透過專家問卷發放,佐以層級分析法(AHP)與決策實驗室分析法(DEMATEL),以相對重要性、因果關係、可行性/可達成性等多元面向,探究策略之執行優先次序。
綜整分析結果,本研究認為「落實企業化管理與強化董事會職能」,「專業教育訓練制度,以強化員工職能與工作態度」,之影響力相當深遠,將有助帶動其餘策略之推行,為機場公司最值得投入資源且優先執行之策略。故本研究實為桃園機場公司提供一較完善之企業社會責任架構、目標與策略,亦以專家評估,使桃園機場公司能更具競爭力,以達永續經營。
As the leading airport in Taiwan, Taoyuan International Airport (TIA) has been corporatized since 2010 and is yet to develop CSR strategies to fulfill its corporate citizenship and to enhance its competitiveness. The purpose of this paper is to help TIA develop sustainable CSR strategies with an effective implementation plan. Based on TIA’s CSR-related activities, 18 development strategies grouped into 5 CSR goals (corporate governance and finance, green airport and environmental management, service quality and social relationship, employee and working environment, and safety and security) are developed using the CSR value chain and diamond framework. The analytic hierarch process and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory methods are used respectively to evaluate the relative importance, feasibility and achievability of these 18 strategies and to analyze their causal relationships via expert questionnaire surveys. The viewpoints of both internal and external experts are incorporated to determine an effective implementation plan. The result suggests that the CSR strategies in relation to airport safety and security, service quality and corporate governance are most significant and have a high implementation priority. This paper contributes to the airport industry and literature by proposing a new structured approach for developing, evaluating and planning CSR strategies.
參考文獻-英文
1.Airport Cooperative Research Program (2008). Strategic Planning in the Airport Industry. Transportation Research and Board Business Office, Washington, D.C.
2.Albers, S., Koch, B., & Ruff C. (2005). Strategic alliances between airlines and airports – theoretical assessment and practical evidence. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11, 48-58.
3.Annual Report of Changi Airport Group (2013). Changi Airport Group, Singapore.
4.Bernstein, A. (2000). Too much corporate power. Business Week, 11 September, 149.
5.Bodin, L., Gass, S. I. (2003). On teaching the analytic hierarchy process. Computers and Operations Research 30(10), 1487-1497.
6.Boli, J., & Hartsuiker, D. (2001). World culture and transnational corporations: sketch of a project. the International Conference on Effects of and Responses to Globalization, Istanbul.
7.Bowen, H. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper.
8.Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.
9.Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, July–August, 39–48.
10.Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38, 268–295.
11.Carroll, A.B, & Buchholtz, A.K. (2009). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 7th edn. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
12.Carroll, A.B, & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
13.Chang, Y.H., & Wong, K.M. (2012). Human risk factors associated with runway incursions. Journal of Air Transport Management, 24, 25-30.
14.Chang, Y.H., Yeh, C.H., & Wang, S.Y. (2007). A survey and optimization-based evaluation of development strategies for the air cargo industry. International Jounal of Production Economics, 106, 550-562.
15.Chiu, Y.J., Chen, H.C., Tzeng, G.H, & Shyu, J.Z. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2), 143-165.
16.Chiu, Y.C., Sun, C.C., & Yen, H.Y. (2012). Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Applied Soft Computing, 12(1), 64-71.
17.Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), 1-13.
18.Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, June, 312–322.
19.Ferrell, O.C, Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2008). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases: CengageBrain. com.
20.Fontela, E., & Gabus, A., (1976). The DEMATEL observe. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland.
21.Friedman, M. (1962). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, September, 126.
22.Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, September, 13.
23.Frederick, W.C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: deep roots, flourishing growth, promising future. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 522–531.
24.Gabus, A, & Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland.
25.Hayek, F.A. (1969). The corporation in a democratic society: in whose interest ought it and will it be run? In Ansoff, H. (ed.), Business Strategy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 225.
26.Hay, R., & Gray, E. (1974). Social responsibilities of business managers. Academy of Management Journal, March, 135–143.
27.Huang, C.Y., Shyu, J.Z., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan’s SIP Mall industry. Technovation, 27, 744-765.
28.Jackson, K.T. (2004). Building Reputational Capital: Strategies for Integrity and Fair Play that Improve the Bottom Line. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.Khan, N. (2012). Analysis of Airport and Airline Relationship. ACI Asia-Pacific.
30.Knudsen, F.B. (2004). Defining Sustainability in the Aviation Sector. Brussell: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
31.Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Companyyou’re your Cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
32.Kurucz, E., Colbert, B., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–112.
33.Laszlo, C. (2003). The Sustainable Company: How to Create Lasting Value through Social and Environmental Performance. Washington: Island Press.
34.Lee, M.P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 53–73.
35.Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 41-50.
36.Lin, Y.T., Yang, Y.H., Kang, J.S., & Yu, H.C. (2011). Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: An empirical case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 6262-6268.
37.Martilla, J. A., & James, J.C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
38.McGuire, J. (1963). Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D.S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480-1495.
40.Murphy, P.E. (1978). An evolution: corporate social responsiveness. University of Michigan Business Review, November, 20–22.
41.Najmi, A. & Makui, A. (2010). Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(2), 199-212.
42.Oum, T.H, Adler, N., & Yu, C. (2006). Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world's major airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 12(3), 109-121.
43.Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantages: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc..
44.Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
45.Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Havard Business Review, December, 78-93.
46.Raut, R.D., Bhasin, H.V., & Kamble, S.S. (2011). Evaluation of supplier selection criteria by combination of AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL method. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(4), 359-392.
47.Rawson, R., & Hooper, P.D. (2012). The importance of stakeholder participation to sustainable airport master planning in the UK. Environmental Development, 2, 36-47.
48.Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process-Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw Hill.
49.Saaty, T. L. (1990). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publication, USA.
50.Saaty, T. L., & K. P. Kearns. (1985). Analytical Planning. New York: Pegramon.
51.Safety Management, Annex 19 to the Comvention on International Civil Aviation (2013). Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
52.Sethi, S.P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytic framework. California Management Review, Spring, 58–64.
53.Sexty, R.W. (2010). Canadian Business and Society: Ethics & Responsibilities: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
54.Seyed-Hosseini, S.M., Safaei, N, & Asgharpour, M.J. (2006). Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(8), 872-881.
55.Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., & Moraitis, S. (2012). Accountability and stakeholder engagement in the airport industry: An assessment of airports’ CSR reports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 18(1), 16-20.
56.Smith, A.D. (2007). Making the case for competitive advantage of corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy Series, 8(3), 186-195.
57.Sustainability Report (2013). Incheon International Airport Corporation. Incheon, Korea.
58.Sustainability Reporting Guidelines G4 (2013). Global Reporting Initiative.
59.Tsai, W.H., & Chou, W.C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 1444-1458.
60.Tsai, W.H., & Hsu, J.L. (2008). Corporate social responsibility programs choice and costs assessment in the airline industry—A hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(4), 188-196.
61.Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., & Li, C.W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
62.Vale, B., & Vale, R.J.D. (1991). Towards a green architecture: six practical case studies: Riba Publications.
63.Vogel, D.J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47, 19–45.
64.Waddock, S. (2002). Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision, Values, Value-added. New York: McGraw-Hill.
65.Wu, H.H., Shieh, J.I., Li, Y., & Chen, H.K. (2010). A combination of AHP and DEMATEL in evaluating the criteria of employment service outreach program personnel. Information Technology Journal, 9, 569-575.
66.Wu, W.W., & Lee, Y.T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499-507.
67.Yeh, C.H., & Chang, Y.H. (2009). Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 464-473.
參考文獻-中文
1.上海機場建設指揮部,「綠色機場-上海可持續發展探索」,上海:上海科學技術出版社,2010年。
2.交通部民用航空局,「民航運輸統計101年度資料」,台北市:交通部民用航空局,2012年。
3.交通部運輸研究所,「運輸政策白皮書」,台北市:交通部運輸研究所,2013年。
4.江玫芬,「桃園國際機場公司之營運發展策略探討」,國立成功大學交通管理科學系未出版碩士論文,2012年。
5.江振邦,「提升國際機場飛航空收入之商業特許經營方式研究」,國立成功大學交通管理科學系未出版碩士論文,2012年。
6.邵珮琪,「臺灣航空器事故模型分析暨機場安全管理系統績效評估」,國立成功大學交通管理科學系博士論文,2013年。
7.香港國際機場,「可持續發展報告書」,香港:香港國際機場,2012年。
8.桃園國際機場公司,「年度報告書」,桃園縣:桃園國際機場,2005至2012年。
9.桃園機場改善小組,「臺灣桃園國際機場經營管理改善報告」,桃園縣:桃園國際機場,2010年。
10.翁望回,「企業正當性之實證研究:社會責任的觀點」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,1987年。
11.楊政衡,「國際機場服務品質評估之研究-以桃園國際機場為例」,國立成功大學交通管理科學系未出版碩士論文,2011年。
12.張有恆,「飛航安全管理」,台北市:華泰文化,2005年。
13.張有恆,「桃園、松山雙機場聯結-營運加分」,聯合報,2010年。
14.張紹勳,「模糊多準則評估法及統計」,台北市:五南圖書,2012年。
15.鄧振源,「計畫評估:方法與應用(二版)」,台中市:鼎茂經銷,2005年。
16.廖珣如,「臺灣發展商務航空策略之探討」,國立成功大學交通管理科學系未出版碩士論文,2013年。
17.蔡敦浩、方士杰,「策略管理」,台中市:滄海書局,2012年。
18.錢為家,「企業社會責任實務全書:第四代企業的價值驅動優勢」,台北市:商周出版,2009年。
參考文獻-網頁
1.Airports Council International, http://www.aci.aero/, 2013.10
2.BSR: The Business of a Better World, http://www.bsr.org/, 2013.10
3.Changi Airport Group, http://www.changiairportgroup.com/cag/html/the-group/sustainability/, 2013.11
4.Committee for Economic Development, http://www.ced.org/, 2013.10
5.CSR International, http://www.csrinternational.org/, 2013.09
6.European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/, 2013.09
7.Incheon Airport, http://www.airport.kr/iiacms/pageWork.iia?_scode=C1402030101, 2013.10
8.Skytrax: http://www.airlinequality.com/, 2013.10
9.World Business Council for Sustainable Development: WBCSD, http://www.wbcsd.org/home.aspx, 2013.09
10.天下企業公民,http://issue.cw.com.tw/issue/csr/analysis.jsp, 2013.08
11.中華民國企業永續發展協會,http://www.bcsd.org.tw/domain_node/domaintool/203/322, 2013.11
12.交通部民用航空局,http://www.caa.gov.tw/big5/index.asp, 2013.09
13.香港國際機場企業社會責任網站,http://www.hongkongairport.com/chi/csr/, 2013,10
14.桃園縣環保局網站,http://aviation.tyepb.gov.tw/TYAN_WEB/Subsidize/Search.aspx, 2014.03
15.遠見雜誌企業社會責任獎,http://www.gvm.com.tw/2013CSR/, 2013.08
16.經濟部投資業務處企業社會責任網站,http://www.dois.moea.gov.tw/main.asp, 2013.11