簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高達偉
Kao, Ta-Wei
論文名稱: 從跨組織因素、企業內部因素、科技因素探討跨組織資訊系統使用程度對跨組織資訊績效及組織長期關係之影響
IOS Usage and Benefits: The Influences of Inter-Organizational, Organizational, and Technological Factors
指導教授: 張心馨
Chang, Hsin- Hsin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 94
中文關鍵詞: 跨組織資訊系統(IOS)IOS績效IOS使用程度長期關係
外文關鍵詞: IOS usage, Long-term relationship, Inter-organizational system (IOS), IOS performance
相關次數: 點閱:75下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 企業為有效的管理整體供應鏈活動,更需要和供應端與客戶端分享資訊。
    因此,有效地導入與執行跨組織資訊系統(IOS)已成為供應鏈管理的成功重要關鍵。本研究探討跨組織、組織、以及科技三個構面對於IOS使用程度的影響,並探討IOS使用程度對於IOS績效及長期關係的影響。本研究採用了質性以及量性的研究方法,首先利用質性的個案研究方法,在三家企業的個案訪談後,本研究建立了研究模型以及修正原始假設。從理論探討及個案研究中,分別從跨組織、組織、及科技構面中獲知信任、行使權力、管理者支持、組織規模、察覺利益、及察覺複雜度等因素進行量化分析,資料分析的結果發現行使權力、管理者支持是影響企業IOS使用程度的重要因素。IOS使用程度、IOS績效及長期關係是有正向的影響。

    To properly manage supply chains, firms need to exchange information with their trading partners more frequently. Therefore, how to properly implement IOSs becomes a key to successful supply chain management. This study investigates the influence of inter-organizational factors, organizational factors, and technological factors on the extent of IOS usage and on both long-term relationship and IOS performance. In the research methodology, this study adopted both qualitative and quantitative methods. An initial qualitative case study of three enterprises provides the basis of our models of the IOS and this study revises the original hypotheses according to the result of case studies. From the literature and from our case studies, we consider the inter-organizational, organizational, and technological factors to be made up of trust, exercised power, top-management support, organizational size, perceived benefit, and perceived complexity. Our results indicate that exercised power and top-management support are important factors influencing extent of IOS usage. Furthermore, this study also discovered that the extent of IOS usage is positively associated with IOS performance and long-term relationship.

    CONTENTS List of Tables---------------------------------------------------------------VI List of Figures-------------------------------------------------------------VII Chapter 1.Introduction--------------------------------------------------------1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation----------------------------------------1 1.2 Research Objectives-------------------------------------------------------3 1.3 Research Procedure--------------------------------------------------------3 1.4 Research Structure--------------------------------------------------------5 Chapter 2.Literature Review---------------------------------------------------7 2.1 Introduction of Inter-Organizational Systems (IOS) -----------------------7 2.2 Three Perspectives on IOS Researches -------------------------------------9 2.3 Inter-Organizational Factors --------------------------------------------14 2.4 Organizational Factors---------------------------------------------------17 2.5 Technological Factors---------------------------------------------------19 2.6 Extent of IOS Usage -----------------------------------------------------21 2.7 IOS Performance----------------------------------------------------------24 2.8 Long-Term Relationship---------------------------------------------------25 Chapter 3.Research Hypotheses and Methodology -------------------------29 3.1 Research Hypotheses and Framework----------------------------------------29 3.2 Research Methodology ----------------------------------------------------37 Chapter 4.Case Study --------------------------------------------------------39 4.1 Case Studies ------------------------------------------------------------39 4.2 Summary of Case Study Organizations -------------------------------------44 4.3 Modified Research and Hypotheses ----------------------------------------46 Chapter 5.Second Survey of IOS: Data Analysis ----------------------------50 5.1 Questionnaire Design and Test -------------------------------------------50 5.2 Questionnaires Delivery and Collection ----------------------------------51 5.3 Descriptive Analysis ----------------------------------------------------51 5.4 Exploratory Factor Analysis and Reliability Test ------------------------52 5.5 Structural Equation Model (SEM) and Path Analysis -----------------------54 5.6 Cluster Analysis and T-test ---------------------------------------------59 Chapter 6.Research Conclusions and Suggestions --------------------------63 6.1 Research Conclusions ----------------------------------------------------63 6.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research -------------------------66 References ------------------------------------------------------------------68 Appendix A ------------------------------------------------------------------73 Appendix B ------------------------------------------------------------------80 Appendix C ------------------------------------------------------------------94 LIST OF TABLES 2-1 Relevant Constructs of Three Perspectives on IOS Researches -----------12 2-2 Definitions of Trust and Exercised Power ------------------------------16 2-3 Definitions of Top-Management Support and Organizational Size ---------19 2-4 Definitions of Perceived Benefit and Perceived Complexity -------------21 2-5 Definitions of Breadth and Depth --------------------------------------24 2-6 Definitions of IOS Performance ----------------------------------------25 2-7 Definitions of Long-Term Relationship ---------------------------------26 2-8 The Constructs of This Study-------------------------------------------28 3-1 The Hypotheses of This Study ------------------------------------------35 4-1 Results of Case Study -------------------------------------------------48 4-2 Summary of Revised Research Hypotheses after Input from Case Study ----49 5-1 Pilot Test (N=34) -----------------------------------------------------50 5-2 The Characteristics of Sample Firms (N=100) ---------------------------52 5-3 The Result of Factor Analysis and Reliability Test --------------------53 5-4 Latent Constructs Correlation -----------------------------------------55 5-5 The Result of Structural Equation Model (N=100) -----------------------57 5-6 The Model Fit Statistics of SEM----------------------------------------58 5-7 Comparison between Firms with Different Levels of Exercised Power and Top-Management Support ------------------------------------------------------60 5-8 Comparison between Firms with Different Levels of Breadth and Depth----62 6-1 Summary of Hypotheses Testing Results ---------------------------------63 LIST OF FIGURES 1-1 This Study’s Research Procedure --------------------------------------4 2-1 A Typology of Inter-Organizational Systems ----------------------------9 2-2 External Integration of Inter-Organizational Systems -----------------27 3-1 The Research Model of This Study -------------------------------------36 4-1 The Modified Framework of This Study ---------------------------------49 5-1 The Structural Equation Model of This Study --------------------------56

    References

    1.Ahmad, S. and Schroeder, R. G. (2001) “The impact of electronic data interchange on delivery performance,” Production and Operations Management, 10(1), 16-30
    2.Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A. (1990) “A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships,” Journal of Marketing, 54, 42–58
    3.Ansari, A. and Modarres, B. (1990) Just in time purchasing., New York: The Free Press
    4.Bakos, Y. J. and Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) “From vendor to partners: The role of information technology and incomplete contracts in buyer-supplier relationship,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 3(3), 301-328
    5.Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988) “On the evaluation of structural equation model,” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94
    6.Bensaou, M. (1999) “Portfolio of buyer-supplier relationship,” Slogan Management Review, 40(4), 35-44
    7.Bentler, P. M. and Bonnett, D. G. (1980) “Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures,” Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606
    8.Bloomfield, B. P. and Coombs, R. (1992) “Information technology, control, and power: The centralization and decentralization debate revisited,” Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 459-484
    9.Bouchard, L. (1993) “Decision criteria in the adoption of EDI,” Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on information systems, Orlando, FL, 365-376
    10.Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1993) Alternative Ways of Accessing Model Fit, Sage Publication, Newbury Park,
    11.Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A. S. (2001) “Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model,” Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304-321
    12.Clemen, E. (1990) “MAC-Philadelphia national bank’s strategic venture in shared ATM networks,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 5-25
    13.Clemen, E. K., Reddi, S. P., and Row, M. C. (1993) “The impact of information technology on the organization activity: The move to the middle hypothesis,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 9-35
    14.Cragg, P and King, M. (1993) “Small firm computing: motivators and inhibitors,” MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 47-60
    15.Dai, Q. and Kauffman, R. J. (2002) “Business models for Internet based B2B electronic markets,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(4), 41-72
    16.Eisenhardt, K. H. (1989) “Building theories from case study research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    17.Frohlich, M. T. (2002) “E-integration in the supply chain: Barriers and performance,” Decision Science, 33(4), 537-556
    18.Frohlich, M. T. and Westbrook, R. (2001) “Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies,” Journal of Operations Management, 19(5), 185-200
    19.Frohlich, M. T. and Westbrook, R. (2002) “Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: Web-based integration, drivers and performance,” Journal of Operations Management, 20(6), 729-745
    20.Gaski, J. F. (1984) “The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution,” Journal of Marketing, 48, 9-29
    21.Gaski, J. F. and Nevin, J. R. (1985) “The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power source in a marketing channel,” Journal of Marketing, 48, 9-29
    22.Ganesan, S. (1994) “Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19
    23.Gatignon, H. and Robertson, T. S. (1989) “Technology diffusion: An empirical test of competitive effects,” Journal of Marketing, 53, 35-39
    24.Grover, V. (1993) “An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational Systems”, Decision Sciences, 24(3), 603-640
    25.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. L., and Tatham, W. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
    26.Handfield, R. B. (1993) “A resource dependence perspective of just-in-time purchasing,” Journal of Operation Management, 11, 289-311
    27.Hart, P. J. and Saunders, C. S. (1997) “Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange ,” Organizational Science, 8, 23-42
    28.Hart, P. J. and Saunders, C. S. (1998) “Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier’s perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 87-111
    29.Heide, J. B. and John, G. (1990) ”Alliance in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research , 27(2), 24-36
    30.Hill C. A. and Scudder, G. D. (2002) “The use of electronic data interchange for supply chain coordination in the food industry,” Journal of Operation Management, 20(4), 375-387
    31.Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A. S. (1995) “Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology,” MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465-485
    32.Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Ives, B. (1991) ”Executive Involvement and participation in the management of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 205-227
    33.Jasperson, J., Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Bulter, B. S., Croes, H. J. P., and Zheng, W. (2002) “Review: power and information technology research : A metatriangulation review,” MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 397-459
    34.Johnston, H. R. and Vitale, M. R. (1988) “Creating competitive advantage with inter-organizational information systems,” MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 153-165
    35.Johnson, J. L. (1999) “Strategic integration in distribution channels: Managing the interfirm relationship as a strategic asset,” Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 27(1), 4-18.
    36.Jun, M., Cai, S., and Peterson, R. T. “EDI use and participation models: From the inter-organizational relationship perspective,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(9), 412-429
    37.Kalwani, M. U. and Narakesari, N. (1995) “Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationships: Do they pay off for supplier firms?” Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 1-16
    38.Kearns, G. S. and Lederer, A. L. (2004) “The impact of industry contextual factors on IT focus and the use of IT for competitive advantage,” Information & Management, 41(7), 899–919.
    39.Kent, J. L. and Mentzer, J. T. (2003) “The effect of Investment in interorganizational information technology in a retail supply chain,” Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), 155-175
    40.Kwon, I. G. and Suh, T. (2004) “Factors affecting the level of trust and commitment in supply chain relationship,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(2); 4-14
    41.Kwon, T. H. and Zmud, R. W. (1987) “Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In R.J. Boland and R.A. Hirschheim (eds.)”, Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, New York: John Wiley, 257-252.
    42.Kumar, K. and van Dissel, Han G. (1996) “Sustainable collaboration managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems,” MIS Quarterly, 20(30), 279-300
    43.Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., and Scannell, T.V. (1998) “An empirical investigation of supplier development: Reactive and strategic processes,” Journal of Operations Management, 17, 39-58
    44.Lee, S and Lim, G. G. (2005) “The impact of partnership attributes on EDI implementation success,” Information & Management, 42, 503–516
    45.Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. (1988) ”Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology,” Management Science, 34(10), 1252-1265
    46.Malone, T. W., Yate, J., and Benjamin, R. I. (1987) ”Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies”, Communication of the ACM, 30(6), 484-497
    47.Manheim, M. (1993) ”Integrating global organizations through task/team support systems” in Global Networks: Computers and international Communication, L.M Harasm (ed), MIT press, Cambridge, MA
    48.Markus, M. L. (1983) “Power, politics and MIS implementation,” Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430-444
    49.Massetti, B. and Zmud, R. W. (1996) “Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: Strategies and illustrative examples,” MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 331-345
    50.Moorman, Zaltman, G. ,and Deshpande, R. (1992) “Relationship between providers and users of marketing research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 314-329
    51.Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D. (1994) “The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38
    52.Narasimhan, R. and Jayaram, J. (1998) “Causal linkage in supply chain management: An exploratory study of North American manufacturing firms,” Decision Science, 29(3), 579-605
    53.Noordewier, T. G., John, G., and Nevin, J. R. (1990) “Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 80-93
    54.O’Hanlon, J. (1993) Financial Electronic Data Interchange: Closing the Loop, Bank Technology Ltd., London
    55.Pfeiffer, H. K. C. (1992) The Diffusion of Electronics Data Interchange, Springer-Verlag, New York
    56.Powell, W. (1987) “Hybrid organizational arrangements: New form or transitional development,” California Management Review, 30(1), 67–87.
    57.Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Nilakanta, S. (1994) “Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157-187
    58.Premkumar, G. and Ramamurthy, K. (1995) “The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganiazational systems,” Decision Sciences, 26(3), 303-336
    59.Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Crum, M. R. (1997) “Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry,” European Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 107-121
    60.Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R. W. (2001) ”The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation,” Organization Science, 12(2), 117-135
    61.Quinn, J. B. (1985) “Managing innovation: Controlled chaos,” Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 73-84
    62.Rogers, E. M. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York
    63.Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations,4th ed, Free Press, New York
    64.Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., and Grover, V. (2005) “Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer-supplier dyads,” Decision Sciences, 36(3), 365-396
    65.Saunders, C. S. and Clark, S. (1992) “EDI adoption and implementation: A focus on interorganizational linkages,” Information Resources Management Journal, 5(1), 9-19
    66.Sharma, R. and Yetton, P. (2003) “The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation,” MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 533-555
    67.Teo, H. H., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K. K. (1995) “Innovation diffusion theory as a predictor of adoption intention for financial EDI,” Proc. 1995 Internat. Conf. Inform. System, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 155-165
    68.Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., and Benbasat, I. (2003) “Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective,” MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19-49
    69.Tornatzky, L. G., and Klein, K. J. (1982) “Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta analysis of findings,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 28-45.
    70.Volkoff, O., Chan, Y. E., and Peter Newson, E. F. (1999) “Leading the development and implementation of collaborative interorganizational systems,” Information & Management, 35, 63-75
    71.Yin, K. (2003) Case Study Research – Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    下載圖示 校內:2008-07-18公開
    校外:2009-07-18公開
    QR CODE