| 研究生: |
王君豪 Wang, Jun-Hao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
行動廣告表現方式對廣告效果影響之探討 The Effects of Advertising Exposures on Mobile Advertisement |
| 指導教授: |
陳文字
Chen, Wen-Tzu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 電信管理研究所 Institute of Telecommunications Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2003 |
| 畢業學年度: | 91 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 148 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 行動廣告 、廣告效果 、廣告強迫性 、產品涉入 、適地性 、多媒體 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Interacting with environment, Mobile advertisement, Product involvement, Force level exposure, Advertising Effect, Multimedia |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:99 下載:35 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
廣告為促進產品銷售的重要工具之一,目前為止廠商多以傳統廣告或是網路廣告作為廣告媒介,但是隨著行動通訊的日益發達,手機與PDA等行動終端設備亦漸漸成為傳達廣告訊息的新工具,這種與實體環境的廣告雖尚未普及,其中卻隱藏了無數商機;因此,找尋出適當的行動廣告機制,將為廣告廠商非常重要的策略。
然而當業者在發展行動廣告時,到底應該以何種方式呈現?是彈跳性視窗還是橫幅廣告的效果較好呢?當終端設備的技術日益發達,多媒體的運用會提高或是降低廣告效果?行動廣告與環境互動的機制,是否真能達到較好的廣告效果?而面對不同產品涉入的觀賞者時,廣告的表現方式又該為何?為了深入分析這些影響廣告效果的重要問題,本研究由消費者的角度為出發點,利用實驗設計的方式,討論廣告強迫性、多媒體效果、環境互動性、產品涉入,個別以及彼此交互作用下對廣告滲入效果與廣告說服效果的影響。
本研究首先回顧網路廣告與行動廣告的相關文獻以建立研究假設,而後運用實驗設計方法蒐集研究資料並驗證假設,並藉由研究結果提出實務建議供業者參考。本研究主要結論有以下幾項:1.強迫性大小對廣告滲入效果有顯著影響,對廣告說服效果則無顯著影響。2.多媒體效果可提高廣告說服效果,且在強迫性小的廣告下有較明顯的作用。3.適地性廣告中,強迫性大的表現方式將產生較佳的廣告滲入效果,而對廣告說服效果則無顯著影響。4. 產品涉入程度高低並不影響強迫性與廣告效果之關係。5.多媒體運用對廣告說服效果的影響為正向或負向,將取決於觀賞者為產品涉入高或低。6. 涉入程度造成強迫性對廣告態度與購買意願的干擾效果,將受適地性與否影響。
Advertisement is an important tool for product promotion. With the soaring development of wireless communication, mobile terminals, such as mobile phone or PDA, have gradually become a new medium of advertising message. Although this kind of advertisement communicating with physical environment has not been popular yet, it indeed reveals numerous chances for companies to earn profits. Therefore, it becomes very important for advertising companies to find the most suitable mobile advertisement model.
However, what does mobile advertisement look like? Pop-up window or banner? Will the use of multimedia have the positive or negative effect on advertisements? Will interacting with physical environment actually bring to a better result? Besides, will audience with different product involvements lead to different effects? To analyze these important issues, we take the customer’s view and use experimental design to figure out the relations among advertising exposure, multimedia effect, interacting with environment, and product involvement.
We, firstly, review some references about internet and mobile advertising to develop our hypotheses. Then, verifying these hypotheses by experimental design to develop the conclusion and practical suggestion. It is found that: 1. forced level exposure has effect on advertising intrusiveness. 2. Use of multimedia has a positive impact on advertising persuasion, and low force level will cause a more obvious result. 3. As for advertisement interacting with environment, forced-level exposure has effect on advertising intrusiveness. 4. Product involvement doesn’t change the relation between force level and advertisement effect. 5. Multimedia will positively or negatively influence advertising persuasion, depending on the audience’s product involvement. 6. Product involvement interfering in the relations between force level and advertising persuasion will depend on whether the advertisement interact with environment or not.
<中文部分>
1.ICP小組(民90),2001東方ICP消費者行銷資料庫。
2.王孟昭(民90),「無線應用簡短訊息服務之廣告效果研究」,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文
3.吳萬益、林清河(民89 ),企業研究方法,華泰書局,台北市
4.苑守慈(民91),「適地化適性化行動廣告推薦機制」,天主教輔仁大學資訊管理系碩士論文
5.陳順宇(民90),多變量分析,華泰書局,台北市
6.蕭鈺蓉(民90),「廣告出現位置、品牌熟悉度、廣告擷取線索、廣告涉入程度對競爭性廣告干擾程度的影響」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
<西文部分>
1.Aaker, D. A. and D. M. Stayman (1990), “Measuring audience perceptions of commercials and relating them to ad impact,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Aug), pp. 7-17.
2.Allport, G. W. (1935). A Handbook of Social Psychology, Clark University Press, Worcester.
3.Andersson, A. and J. Nilsson (2000). Wireless Advertising Effectiveness – Evaluation of an SMS Advertising Trial, Stockholm School of Economics
4.Bagozzi, R. P. and A. J. Silk (1983), “Recall, recognition, and the measurement of memory for print advertisements,” Marketing Science, Vol.2, pp. 95-134.
5.Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking, in Dynamic Marketing in the Changing World, R. S. Hancock, eds, American Marketing Association, Chicago, pp. 389-398
6.Beatty, S. E. and S. M. Smith (1987), “External search effort: an investigation across several product categories,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, No. 1 (June), pp. 83-95.
7.Belch, G. E. and M. A. Belch (1999). Advertising and Promotion: an Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
8.Bezjian-Avery, A., B. Calder and D. Iacobucci (1998), “New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 38, No. 4 (July), pp. 23-32.
9.Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, McGraw-Hill, New York
10.Berthon, P., L. F. Pitt and R. T. Watson (1996), “The world wide web as an advertising medium: toward an understanding of conversion efficiency,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36, No. 1 (Jan), pp. 43-53.
11.Bhargava, M. and N. Donthu (1999), “Sales response to outdoor advertising,” journal of advertising research, Vol. 39, No. 4 (July), pp. 7-18.
12.Brackett, L. K. and B. N. Carr Jr. (2001), “Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: consumer vs. mature student attitudes,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 41, No. 5 (Sept), pp. 23-33.
13.Briggs, R. and N. Hollis (1997), “Advertising on the web: is there response before click-through?,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 37, No. 2 (March), pp. 33-45.
14.Bruner, G. C. Ⅱ and A. Kumar (2000), “Web commercials and advertising hierarchy-of-effects,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40 (Jan), pp. 35-41.
15.Burton, C. (1995), “Learning what they need, when they need it,” The Bankers Magazine, Vol. 178 ( Jul ), pp. 42-46
16.Celsi, R. L. and J. C. Olson (1988), “The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 (Sept), pp. 210-222.
17.Cho, C. H.(1990), “How advertising works on the www: modified elaboration likelihood model,” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 21, pp. 33-50
18.Cho, C. H., J. G. Lee and M. Tharp (2001),“Different force-exposure levels to banner advertisements,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 41, No. 4 (July), pp. 45-55.
19.Chen, Q. and W. D. Wells (1999), “Attitude toward the site,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 39, No. 5 (Sept), pp. 27-37.
20.Coyle, J. R. and E. Thorson (2001), “ The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites,” Journal of Advertising, Vol 30, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 65-77.
21.Dahlen, M. (2001), “Banner advertisements through a new lens,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 41, No. 4 (July), pp. 23-43.
22.Deighton, J. (1996), “The future of interactive marketing,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 6 (Nov), pp. 151-162.
23.Diercks, R. (2001), “Mobile advertising:not as bad as you think,” Wireless Internet Magazine. http://www.wirelessinternetmag.com/news/0108/0108_research_ads.htm
24.Ducoffe, R. H. (1996), “Advertising value and advertising on the web,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36, No. 5 (Sept), pp. 21-35.
25.Fazio, R. H. and M. P. Zanna (1981), “Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.14, pp.161-202
26.Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
27.Gannon, M. (1999), “E-business targeting college students rakes in $6 million, ” Venture Capital Journal, Vol.1 (May)
28.Ghose, S. and W. Dou (1998), “Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 38, No. 2 (March), pp. 29-43.
29.Ha, L. (1996), “Observations: advertising clutter in consumer magazines: dimensions and effects,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36, No. 4 (July), pp. 76-84.
30.Hansell, S. (1998 ), “Selling soap without the soap operas,” The New York Times, Vol. 7(Aug), pp.7-17
31.Hoffman, D. L. and T. P. Novak (1997), “A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce,” The Information Society, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Jan), pp. 43-54.
32._____ and _____ (1996), “Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, No. 3 (July), pp. 50-68.
33._____, _____and P. Chatterjee (1995),“Commercial scenarios for the web:opportunities and challenges”http://shum.huji.ac.il/jcmc/voll/issue3/hoffman.html.
34._____ and M. A. Peralta (1999), “Information privacy in the marketspace: implications for the commercial users of anonymity on the web,” The Information Society, Vol. 15, No. 2 (April), pp. 129-139.
35.Holbrook, M. B. and R. Batra (1987), “Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Dec), pp. 404-420.
36.Homer, P. M. (1990), “The mediating role of attitude toward the ad: some additional evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 27 (Feb), pp. 78-86.
37.Howard, J. A. (1994). Buyer Behavior in Marketing Strategy, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
38._____ and J. D. Sheth (1995). A Theory of Buyer Behavior, Marketing Classics: A Selection of Influential Articles, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
39.Kaufman, L.(1990). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York
40.Korgaonkar, P. K. and P. G. Moschis (1982),“An experimental study of cognitive dissonance, product involvement, expectations, performance and consumer judgement of product performance,”Journal of Advertising, Vol.11 (Fall), pp.32-44.
41.Kotler, P., (1997). Marketing Management-Analysis, Planning, Implementatiion, and Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
42._____ and G. Armstrong (1991). Principles of Marketing, Prentice-Hall, Engleswood Cliffs USA.
43.Lavidge, R. J. and G. A. Steiner (1961), “A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25 (Oct), pp. 59-62.
44.Leclerc, F., B. H. Schmitt, and L. Dube (1994), “Foreign branding and its effects on product perceptions and attitudes,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31 (May), pp.263-270.
45.Li, H. and J. L. Bukovac (1999), “Cognitive impact of banner ad characterisitics: an experimental study,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 341-353.
46.MacKenzie, S. B. and R. J. Lutz (1989), “An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, No. 2 (April), pp. 48-65.
47._____ and _____ and G. E. Belch (1986), “The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 23, No. 2 (May), pp. 130-143.
48.May, M. D., S. S. Sundar, and R. B. Williams (1997), “The effects of hyperlinks and site maps on the memorability and enjoyability of web content,” Communication & Technology Division at the 47th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, (May), Montreal
49.Meyerowitz, B. E. & S. Chaiken (1987), “The effect message framing on breast self-examination attitudes intentions and behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psyshology, Vol.52, pp.500-510
50.Hawkins, D. T. (1994). Electronic advertising: on online information systems, in Online, Hawkins, J. M. Wieman, and S. Pingree eds, Sage Publications, , Newbury Park, pp. 110-134.
51.Mehta, A. (2000), “Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40, No. 3 (May), pp. 67-72.
52.Meyer, M. H. and M. H. Zack (1996). “The design and development of information products, ” Sloan Management Review. Vol.37, pp.43-59.
53.Mitchell, A. A. and J. C. Olson (1981), “Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 (Aug), pp. 318-332.
54.Morrison, B. J. and M. J. Dainoff (1972), “Advertisement complexity and looking time, ”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.9 (Fall), pp.396-400
55.Murphy, P. E. and B. M. Enis, “Classifying products strategically,” Journal o f Consumer Research, Vol.18 (Jan), pp.92-104
56.Nowland and Company (1962). The Effects of Media Context on Advertising: A study Conducted for Life, Nowland and Company, New York.
57.Park, C. W. and S. M. Young (1986), “Consumer response to television commercials: the impact of involvement and background music on brand attitude formation,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol 23 (Feb), pp. 11-24.
58.Pan, Y., B. H. Schmitt, and N. T. Tavassoli (1994), “Language and consumer memory : the impact of lingustic differences between chinese and english”, Journal of consumer marketing, Vo.21, pp. 419-431
59.Petty, R. E., J. T. Cacioppo, and D. Schumann (1983), “Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10 (Sept), pp. 135-146.
60.Rafaeli, S. (1998). Interactivity: From New Media To Communication in advertising Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Process.
61.Rothschild, M. L. (1987). Marketing Communications, Health and Company, Lexington D.C.
62.Shamdasani, P. N., J. S. Stanaland, and J. Tan (2001), “Location, location, location: insights for advertising placement on the web,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 41, No. 4 (July), pp. 7-21.
63.Shimp, T. A. (1981), “Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 10, pp. 9-15.
64.Short M. and F. Harrison (2002), “ A wireless architecture for a multimedia world,” Journal of Communication Networks, Vol.1, part1
65.Simon, C. J., and M. W. Sullivan (1993), “The measurement and determinants of brand equity: A financial approach, ” Marketing Science, Vol.12, pp. 28-52
66.Smith, R. E. and W. R. Swinyard (1983), “Attitude-behavior consistency: the impact of product trial versus advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20 (Aug), pp. 257-267.
67.Steuer, J. (1992), “Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence,” Journal of Communication, Vol. 42, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 73-93.
68.Stevenson, J. S., G. C. BrunerⅡ and A. Kumar (2000), “Webpage background and viewer attitudes,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40 (Jan), pp. 29-34.
69.Tse, D. K. (1989), “Becoming a consumer society: a longitudinal and cross-cultral content analysis of print ads from Hong Kong, PRC, Taiwan,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 (Mar), pp.457-473
70.Turban, L. K. and Chung (2000). Electronic Commerce-A Managerial Perspective, 1st., Prentice Hall, New York
71.Vaughan, T. (1993). Multimedia: Making It Work, McGraw-Hill, New York
72.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985), “Measuring the involvement construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Dec), pp.341-352
73.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994), “Research notes: the personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising,” Journal of Advertising, Vol 33 (Nov), pp. 59-67.
74.Zeff, R., and B. Aronson (1997). Advertising on the Internet, Wiley Compute Publishing, New York
<網站部分>
1.AgentGo 調查報告
http://b-b.home.texas.net/blakegrugett/agentGO/
2.ARC Group 調查報告
http://www.arcgroup.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?GXHC_gx_session_id_=45b2bfd93a7ffa45&pagename=marlin/home&MarlinViewType=INDEX&proceed=true&MarEntityId=1050989521986&entHash=e8d4a53af8&siteid=30000000390&marketingid=20001109785
3.Carat Interactive 網路調查報告
http://www.carat-interactive.com/dhtml_home.asp
4.Forrester網路調查報告
http://www.forrester.com/home/0,6092,1-0,FF.html
5.Frost & Sullivan 網路調查報告
http://www.frost.com/prod/corp.nsf/LuCorporatePortals/MEAwards?OpenDocument&fcmstyle=
6.Gartner Dataquest 網路調查報告
http://www3.gartner.com/Init
7.Jupiter Communications 網路調查報告
http://www.jup.com/bin/home.pl
8.Media Post 2000 調查報告
http://www.mediapostinc.com/
9.Nielsen NetRatings 網路調查報告
http://pm.netratings.com/nnpm/owa/NRpublicreports.usagemonthly
10.UMTS Report 調查報告
http://www.umts-report.com/
11.人事線上
http://udnjob.com/NASApp/article/ArticlePrint?articleid=9016
12.美國互動廣告局( Interactive Advertising Bureau ) 調查報告
http://www.iab.net/about/index.asp
13.美國行銷協會( American Marketing Association ) 調查報告
http://www.marketingpower.com/