| 研究生: |
劉晉瑋 Liu, Chin-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
基於瀝青混凝土性能平衡與刨除料瀝青貢獻度之馬歇爾再生瀝青混凝土配比設計精進 Improvement of Performance-Balanced Marshall Design for Recycled Asphalt Concrete Incorporating Binder Contribution from Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement |
| 指導教授: |
楊士賢
Yang, Shih-Hsien |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 109 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 再生瀝青混凝土設計方法 、馬歇爾設計流程 、修正最佳瀝青含量方法 、可用性調整混合設計方法 、刨除料瀝青貢獻度 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Reclaimed asphalt concrete mix design method, Marshall mix design procedure, Corrected Optimum Asphalt Content (COAC) Method, Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD) Method, RAP Binder Contribution |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
再生瀝青混凝土是舊有道路鋪面刨除後的刨除料經破碎、篩分後,與新粒料和瀝青混合製備而成。目前,再生瀝青混凝土配比設計主要依據AI-MS2設計方法,該方法假設RAP瀝青貢獻度為100%,並依照Superpave設計流程進行設計。然而,一些研究指出RAP中瀝青並非完全參與拌合。為此,國際上提出考慮瀝青貢獻度的修正最佳瀝青含量方法(COAC),以及基於RAP黑曲線設計之可用性調整混合設計方法(AAMD)。
鑒於許多國家仍採用馬歇爾設計流程進行瀝青混凝土設計,本研究將基於該設計流程,使用相同的設計級配曲線來評估不同再生瀝青混凝土配比設計方法。所評估的設計方法包括:AI-MS2再生瀝青混凝土設計方法、修正最佳瀝青含量方法和可用性調整混合設計方法。研究將比較這些設計方法的馬歇爾試驗值結果,並進一步通過濕式漢堡輪跡試驗、間接開裂試驗以及殘餘強度試驗,評估各設計方法的性能表現。
實驗結果顯示,相同級配曲線於 AI-MS2設計時,能通過馬歇爾設計要求,但應用於AAMD設計時則無法滿足該要求。故在後續的成效試驗中,AAMD設計使用4%空隙率對應的瀝青含量進行實驗。經過比較本研究所有設計組別的結果,基於AI-MS2方法並考慮RAP瀝青部分貢獻額外添加瀝青的COAC設計方法,能夠設計出性能最佳且最接近0%RAP性能的再生瀝青混凝土。然而,根據現行馬歇爾規範,該設計結果未達到規範要求。因此,根據試驗結果,提出修正後的再生瀝青混凝土設計流程。
Reclaimed asphalt concrete is produced by crushing and screening the milled material from existing pavement, then mixing it with virgin aggregates and asphalt binder. Currently, the mix design of reclaimed asphalt concrete is primarily based on the AI-MS2 design method, which assumes a 100% binder contribution from the RAP and follows the Superpave design procedure. However, several studies have pointed out that the binder in RAP does not fully participate in the blending process. In response, alternative approaches have been proposed internationally, including the Corrected Optimum Asphalt Content (COAC) method, which considers partial binder contribution, and the Availability Adjusted Mix Design (AAMD) method, which bases the aggregate structure on the RAP black curve.
Given that many countries still adopt the Marshall mix design method for asphalt mixtures, this study applies the same design gradation to evaluate different reclaimed asphalt concrete mix design methods within the Marshall design framework. The evaluated methods include the AI-MS2 method, the COAC method, and the AAMD method. The study compares the Marshall test results of each design method and further assesses their performance through Hamburg wheel tracking tests, indirect tensile strength tests, and tensile strength ratio tests.
Experimental results indicate that, under the same gradation curve, the AI-MS2 design meets the Marshall design requirements, while the AAMD design fails to satisfy those criteria. Therefore, for subsequent performance testing, the AAMD design adopted the asphalt content corresponding to 4% air voids. After comparing the results of all design groups, the COAC method—based on the AI-MS2 framework but incorporating additional binder to account for partial RAP binder contribution—produced the reclaimed asphalt concrete with the best overall performance, most closely matching that of the 0% RAP mixture. However, according to the current Marshall specification, the COAC design does not fully comply with the specification requirements. Based on the experimental findings, this study proposes a modified reclaimed asphalt concrete mix design procedure.
CNS 15476,「半固態瀝青材料密度試驗法(比重瓶法)」,經濟部標準檢驗局。
CNS 10090,「瀝青/柏油針入度試驗法」,經濟部標準檢驗局。
CNS 2486,「瀝青軟化點試驗法(環球儀)」,經濟部標準檢驗局。
CNS 14248,「乳化瀝青蒸餾殘渣與非牛頓流體瀝青視黏度試驗法(真空毛細管黏度計法)」,經濟部標準檢驗局。
Asphalt Institute. (1997). MS-2 Asphalt Mix Design Methods 6th. Asphalt Institute.
Asphalt Institute. (2014). MS-2 Asphalt Mix Design Methods 7th. Asphalt Institute.
AASHTO M323. Superpave Volumetric Design. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO T324. Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO T312. Standard Method of Test for Preparing And Determining The Density of Hot Mix Asphalt Specimens by Means of the SHRP Gyratory Compactor. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO T283. Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to Moisture-Induced Damage. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO R30. Standard Practice for Mixture Conditioning of Hot Mix Asphalt. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO R35. Standard Practice for Superpave Volumetric Design for Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO T209. Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO T308.Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Asphalt Mixtures by the Ignition Method. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO M320.Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
AASHTO T269. Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C..
ASTM D8225. Standard Test Method for Determination of Cracking Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Indirect Tensile Cracking Test at Intermediate Temperature. American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM C127. Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate.American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM C128. Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate.American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM D2172. Standard Test Methods for Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures.American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM D5444. Standard Test Method for Mechanical Size Analysis of Extracted Aggregate.American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM D5821. Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate.American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM D70. Standard Test Method for Density of Semi-Solid Asphalt Binder (Pycnometer Method).American Society for Testing and Materials.
Abdelaziz, A., Epps Martin, A., Arambula Mercado, E., & Sobieski, T. (2021). Study of the quantification of recycled binder activity in asphalt mixtures with RAP. Construction and Building Materials, 309, 125189.
Al-Qadi, I. L., Yang, S.-H., Fini, E., Masson, J. F., & McGhee, K. (2009). Performance-Based Specification Guidelines for the Selection of Bituminous-Based Hot-Poured Crack Sealants. Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, 78, 491–532.
Bonaquist, R.(2007).Can I Run More RAP? Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2007, pp. 11-13.
Bressi, S., Dumont, A.-G., & Pittet, M. (2015). Cluster phenomenon and partial differential aging in RAP mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 99, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.024
Bruno, S., Loprencipe, G., Di Mascio, P., Cantisani, G., Fiore, N., Polidori, C., Riccio, G., D’Andrea, A., & Moretti, L. (2024). Eco-efficient asphalt recycling for urban slow mobility. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 92 957–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-024-00524-0
Castorena, C., Benjamin Shane Underwood, Youngsoo Richard Kim, Douglas Mocelin, Mayzan Isied, Maria Carolina Aparicio Alvis, & Abhilash Kusam. (2023). Modifying Existing Asphalt Mix Design Procedures for RAP/RAS Surface Mixtures. FHWA.
Castorena, C., S.E. Pape, D.M. Mocelin. (2022). Improving the Design of RAP and RAS Mixtures. NCDOT Report 2019-21.
Castorena, C., S. Pape, and C. Mooney. (2016).Blending Measurements in Mixtures with Reclaimed Asphalt: Use of Scanning Electron Microscopy with X-Ray Analysis. Transportation Research Record, No. 2574, pp. 57-63.
Daly, W.H. (2017). Relationship Between Chemical Makeup of Binders and Engineering Performance, NCHRP Synthesis 511, National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Elwardany, M. D. (2017). Phenomenological Modeling and Laboratory Simulation of Long-Term Aging of Asphalt Mixtures. PhD. Dissertation, North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC.
Epps, J.A., Little, D.N., Holmgreen, R.J., and Terrel, R.L. (1980). Guidelines for Recycling Pavement Materials, NCHRP Report No. 224, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Epps Martin, A., et al. (2015). The Effects of Recycling Agents on Asphalt Mixtures with High RAS and RAP Binder Ratios, Phase I Interim Report: NCHRP 9-58, National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Epps Martin, A., Arambula Mercado, E., & Abdelaziz, A.,. (2020). Synthesis for Quantification of Binder Availability in Recycled Materials, TxDOT 07-062, Texas Department of Transportation.
Epps M. A., et al. (2020).NCHRP 9-58 Report: Evaluating the Effects of Recycling Agents on Asphalt Mixtures with High RAS and RAP Binder Ratios, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
Georgia Department of Transportation. Standard Operating Procedure SOP 2: Control of Superpave Bituminous Mixture Designs. Office of Materials and Testing, Atlanta.
Howard, I.L., Cooley, L.A. & Doyle, J.D.(2009). Laboratory Testing and Economic Analysis of High RAP and Warm Mixed Asphalt. FHW/MS-DOT-RD-2009-200. Mississippi Department of Transportation,.
Joseph, S., Richard, W., & Ben, C. (2024). THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS A REFERENCE DOCUMENT FOR DECARBONIZATION. NAPA.
Jacques, C., J.S. Daniel, T. Bennert, G. Reinke, A. Norouzi, C. Ericson, W. Mogawer, and Y. R. Kim. (2016). Effect of Silo Storage Time on the Characteristics of Virgin and Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures, Transportation Research Record, No. 2573, pp. 76-85.
Kandhal, P.S. and R.B. Mallick. (1997). Pavement Recycling Guidelines for State and Local Governments Participant's Reference Book, Report FHWA-SA-98-042, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Kriz, P., Grant, D.L., Veloza, B.A., Gale, M.J., Blahey, A.G., Brownie, J.H., Shirts, R.D., and Maccarrone, S.(2014). Blending and Diffusion of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement and Virgin Asphalt Binder. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15 Supp. 1 78-112.
Kaseer, F., Arámbula-Mercado, E., & Epps Martin, A. (2019). A method to quantify reclaimed asphalt pavement binder availability effective RAP binder in recycled asphalt mixes. Transportation Research Record, 2673, 205-216.
Liphardt, A., Radziszewski, P., & Król, J. (2015). Binder Blending Estimation Method in Hot Mix Asphalt with Reclaimed Asphalt. Procedia Engineering, 111, 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.123
Lo Presti, D., Vasconcelos, K., Orešković, M., Pires, G. M., & Bressi, S.( 2020). On the degree of binder activity of reclaimed asphalt and degree of blending with recycling agents. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 218 2071–2090. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1607537
Martin, A. E., Kaseer, F., Arámbula-Mercado, E., Bajaj, A., Cucalon, L. G., Yin, F., Chowdhury, A., Epps, J., Glover, C., Daniel, J. S., Oshone, M., Rahbar-Rastegar, R., Ogbo, C., & King, G. (2020). Evaluating the effects of recycling agents on asphalt mixtures with high ras and rap binder. Transportation Research Board.
McDaniel, R.S., H. Soleymani, R.M. Anderson, P. Turner and R. Peterson. (2000). NCHRP Web Document 30: Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave Mix Design Method. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C.
Mensching, D. J. et al. (2014). Low-temperature properties of plant-produced RAP mixtures in the Northeast. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 15:sup1, pp. 1-27.
Menegusso Pires, G., Lo Presti, D., & Airey, G. D.. (2021). A practical approach to estimate the degree of binder activity of reclaimed asphalt materials. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 225 1093-1116.
Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Supplemental Specifications to the 1988 English Standard Specifications for Highways and Bridges and the 1995 Metric Standard Specifications for Highways and Bridges. Boston, MA.
Norouzi, A., Sabouri, M., Kim, Y. R. (2014). Evaluation of the fatigue performance of asphalt mixtures with high RAP content, in: Y. Kim Ed Asphalt Pavements, CRC Press, pp. 1069–1077.
Navaro, J., D. Bruneau , I. Drouadaine , J. Colin , A. Dony , and J. Cournet. (2012). Observation and evaluation of the degree of blending of reclaimed asphalt concretes using microscopy image analysis. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 37, pp. 135–143.
Park, B., Zou, J., Roque, R., Lopp, G., & Wu, Z. (2020). Approach for Determination of maximum reclaimed asphalt pavement content in polymer-modified asphalt mixture. Transportation Research Record, 26746 420-430.
Sabouri, M.. (2020). Evaluation of Performance-Based Mix Design for Asphalt Mixtures Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement RAP Construction and Building Materials. 235.
Saliani, S. S., Carter, A., Baaj, H., & Tavassoti, P. (2019). Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures Produced with Coarse and Fine Recycled Asphalt Particles. Infrastructures, 44 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040067
Shirodkar, P., Mehta, Y., Nolan, A., Sonpal, K., Norton, A., Tomlinson, C., Dubois, E., Sullivan, P., & Sauber, R. (2011). A study to determine the degree of partial blending of reclaimed asphalt pavement RAP binder for high RAP hot mix asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 251 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.045
Stimilli, A.; Canestrari, F.; Teymourpour, P.; Bahia, H. U. (2015).Low-Temperature Mechanics of Hot Recycled Mixtures through Asphalt Thermal Cracking Analyzer ATCA Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 84, pp. 54-65.
Sabouri, M., Bennert, T., Daniel, J., Kim, Y. R. (2015).A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Fatigue Behavior of Plant-Produced RAP Mixtures, Road Materials and Pavement Design. pp 1–26.
Sobieski, T., Arámbula-Mercado, E., & Epps Martin, A. (2021).A method for characterising RAP degree of binder activity. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 1-21.
Texas Department of Transportation. Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges, Item-341. Texas Department of Transportation.
Texas Department of Transportation. Laboratory Method of Mixing Bituminous Mixtures. TxDOT Tex-205-F. Austin, TX.
Wang, Y.(2018). Cold recycling of reclaimed asphalt pavement towards improved engineering performance. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Wen, H., and K. Zhang. (2016).Investigation of Blending Mechanisms for Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Binder and Virgin Binder in Laboratory-Produced Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures. Transportation Research Record, No. 2575, pp. 187-195.
Xu, Y., Chou, Z., Li, Y., Ji, J., Xu, S.(2019) Effect of Blending Degree between Virgin and Aged Binder on Pavement Performance of Recycled Asphalt Mixture with High RAP Content. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 2019. 15 p.
Yan, Y., Roque, R., Cocconcelli, C., Bekoe, M., & Lopp, G. (2017) Evaluation of cracking performance for polymer-modified asphalt mixtures with high RAP content. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18sup1 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1266774.
Yousefi Rad, F., Sefidmazgi, N. R., & Bahia, H. (2014). Application of Diffusion Mechanism: Degree of Blending Between Fresh and Recycled Asphalt Pavement Binder in Dynamic Shear Rheometer. Transportation Research Record, 2444, 71-77.
Zhou, F., et al. (2011). High RAP Mixes Design Methodology with Balanced Performance. Publication FHWA/TX-11/0-6092-2. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX.