| 研究生: |
戴毓哲 Tai, Yu-Che |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
校園快閃活動的策劃準則 Planning Guidelines of Flash Activities within Campus |
| 指導教授: |
周君瑞
Chou, Chun-Jui |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2020 |
| 畢業學年度: | 108 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 74 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 快閃活動 、行為理論 、感官體驗 、校園新創 、使用者體驗 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Flash activities, Behavioral theory, Sensory experience, Campus creations, User experience |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:81 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年隨著社會運動的興起,加上學生族群逐漸對議題的重視與參與,使得社會運動的影響力達到前所未見的高峰,藉由網路的便利性,想舉辦一場快閃活動已非難事,但要稱得上是場成功的快閃活動,不僅要讓參與者對活動本身甚至是主辦單位留下深刻的印象,更要讓參與者有「被照顧」的感覺以及互動的體驗。本研究期望在校園內舉辦快閃活動,激發學生新創的潛力,找到適合學生族群且成本較低的活動方式,如何使學生能自主性的前來參與,或操控相關變項達到吸引學生族群的注意,藉由參與產生連結並延續話題性,並建立一套適用於校園快閃的策劃準則。本文將參考集體行動理論的相關文獻,加上同理心與道德感的感受,透過在校園內舉辦五次多重感官體驗的快閃活動,利用不同的主題、人數、時間以及互動方式去控制,並於快閃活動後以現場訪談和事後問卷等方式,從中了解學生族群對多種操控變項的反應及回饋,以了解學生族群在快閃活動中的行為動機與心理感受,透過實驗預測和對照實際情況之間的差異,期望能調查出學生族群對快閃活動的偏好與模式,探討出校園快閃活動的設計原則,以做為未來在校園內應用相關快閃活動的參考依據。
In recent years, with the rise of social movements, coupled with the students' increasing attention and participation, the influence of social movements has reached unprecedented peaks. With the convenience of the network, it is not difficult to hold a flash activity, but to become a successful flash activity, not only let the participants on the event itself and even the organizers impress, but also let the participants have " be taken care of " feeling and interactive experience. This study looks at flash activities within campus that will inspire students to create new potential and find a less costly way to attract students. How to enable students to participate autonomously, or manipulate related variables to attract students' attention, by participating to generate links and continue the topic, and establish a set of planning guidelines of flash activities within campus. This article will refer to the relevant literature of collective action theory, coupled with empathy and moral feelings, through the campus to organize five flash activities of multiple sensory experiences, using different themes, number, time and interaction to control, and after the flash activities to conduct on-site interviews and post-incident questionnaires, from which to understand the students' response to a variety of manipulation changes and feedback, to understand students in the flash activities of the behavior and psychological. Through the difference between experimental prediction and comparison of actual situation, it is expected that students' preferences and patterns for flash activities can be investigated, and the design principles of flash activities within campus can be explored as a reference basis for the future application of relevant flash activities within campus.
Antonia Mantonakis, Pauline Rodero, Isabelle Lesschaeve and Reid Hastie(2009), “Order in Choice Effects of Serial Position on Preferences”, Psychological 18 Science,Nov.1.
Blumer, Hebert (1951). Principlesof sociology, New York: Barnes and noble, Inc.
Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994) Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education.
Deutsch, M., 1990, “Forms of social organization: psychological consequences. In Himmelweit”, H.T., & Gaskell, G., (Eds.) Societal Psychology.
Dipayan Biswas, Dhruv Grewal and Anne Roggeveen (2010), “How the Order of Sampled Experiential Products Affects Choice”, Journal of Marketing Research, XLVII, P508-P517.
Dipayan Biswas, Lauren I. Labrecque, Donaid R. Lehmann, & Ereni Markos (2014), “Making Choices while Smelling, Tasting, and Listening: The Role of Sensory (Dis)similarity When Sequentially Sampling Products”, Journal of Marketing,78(1), P112-P126.
Gobe, M., Emotional branding: The New Paradigm for Connecting Brands to People. New York: Allworth Press, 2001.
Hutter, K., & Hoffmann, S. (2014). Surprise, surprise. Ambient media as promotion tool for retailers. Journal of Retailing.
Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology.
Lindstrom, M. (2005). BRANDsense. 2005, 1st, 69.
Mark, S. & Ernest, J. (1991) 。人因工程學 (Human factors engineering and ergonomics) (許勝雄、彭游、吳水丕譯)
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes.
R.E. Park & E.W. Burgess (1921) 。社會學科學導論。
Schmitt, B.H., Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense Feel Think Act Relate to Your Company and Brands, The Free Press, New York, 1999.
Sharma, G.K. and Kanojia. S. (2013) Systematics and Biostratigraphy. OJG, USA.
Skoda CoinciDance聰明的就懂
(http://work.roifestival.com/cn/index/works/detail!RC-W-2018-06484)
Smelser, N. J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. London: Routledge & Paul.
Solomon, M. (2003). Conquering Consumerspace: Marketing Strategies for a Branded World. New York: Amacom.
Triandis, H.C., 1989, “The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychology Review.
Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1957). Collective behavior. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.
Wyrley-Birch, M., 2013, “Experiential Marketing: Shaping the Future Face of Retail,”.
Zampini, M., & Spence, C. (2005). The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. Journal of Sensory Studies, 19(5), P347-P363.
王文科 (2006) 。教育研究法(第十版)。台北市:五南。
何明修(2005)。社會運動概論。台北:三民。
何明修(2011)。社會運動的年代 - 晚近二十年來的台灣行動主義。台北市:群學出版社。
李琪明(2005)。社會性同理:大學學生參與社會運動經驗之探討。
張春興(2009)。現代心理學:現代人研究自身問題的科學。台北:東華。
黃國彥(2000)。教育大辭書。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。
蔡保田(1987)。教育研究方法論。
蕭新煌、顧忠華(2010)。台灣社會運動再出發。台北:巨流圖書公司。