簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 梁珮熏
Liang, Pei-Shiun
論文名稱: 門檻模型的應用:執行長之權益薪酬與盈餘管理之不對稱關係
The Asymmetric Relationships between CEO's Equity-based Compensation and Earnings Management: An Application of Panel Threshold Models
指導教授: 黎明淵
Li, Ming-Yuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 28
中文關鍵詞: 盈餘管理門檻模型權益薪酬
外文關鍵詞: discretionary accruals, earnings management, equity-based compensation
相關次數: 點閱:102下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 許多文獻已經探討了執行長之權益薪酬的比例與公司之盈餘管理之間的關係,大部份的文獻指出其關係為正向,亦即當執行長持有較高比例之權益薪酬時,執行長較傾向於操弄盈餘,然而,仍有少數的文獻指出,其關係為顯著負相關或者是無法證實之間的關係。此篇研究以Hansen(1999)之單門檻模型為依據,延伸Hansen之單門檻模型為雙門檻模型,並以執行長之權益薪酬和BM比率為門檻變數,探討執行長之權益薪酬的比例與公司之盈餘管理之間的不對稱關係。實證結果顯示,若執行長目前權益薪酬的比率高於最適比率(亦即門檻值),則執行長會傾向於操弄盈餘,特別是當公司的成長機會較小時(亦即BM比率較大時)。

    Previous studies have discussed the relationship between CEO’s equity-based compensation and earnings management. Most of them showed a positive relationship but some are not. Following Hansen’s (1999) methodology, use the single threshold model to examine the relationship between CEO’s equity-based compensation and the discretional accruals which is a proxy of earnings management. Beside we extend the single threshold model into the double threshold model. Our empirical results show that CEOs with higher proportion of equity-based compensation are prone to do earnings management, especially for firms in the lower growth potential.

    1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 3 2.1 STUDIES ON EQUITY COMPENSATION AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT 3 2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH QUESTION 5 2.2.1 THE ASYMMETRY DUE TO THE LEVEL OF CEO EQUITY BASED COMPENSATION 5 2.2.2 THE ASYMMETRY DUE TO BM RATIO 6 3. MODELS AND METHODOLOGY 7 3.1MODEL SPECIFICATION 7 3.1.1 THE NON-THRESHOLD MODEL 7 3.1.2 PANEL DATA MODEL WITH A SINGLE THRESHOLD MODEL AND TWO REGIMES 8 3.1.3 PANEL MODEL WITH TWO THRESHOLD VARIABLES AND FOUR REGIMES 9 3.2 ESTIMATION PROCEDURE 10 4. DATA AND VARIABLES 11 4.1 DATA 11 4.2 VARIABLES 11 4.3 DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS 13 5 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 14 5.1 THE RESULTS OF NON-THRESHOLD MODEL 14 5.2 THE RESULTS OF SINGLE THRESHOLD MODEL APPLYING EQCOM AS THE THRESHOLD VARIABLE 14 5.3 THE RESULTS OF SINGLE THRESHOLD MODEL APPLYING BM AS THE THRESHOLD VARIABLE 16 5.4 THE RESULTS OF DOUBLE THRESHOLD MODEL APPLYING BOTH EQCOM AND BM AS THE THRESHOLD VARIABLES 17 6. CONCLUSIONS 18 REFERENCES 28

    Armstrong, C. S., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Larcker, D. F. Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(2), 225-271. 2010.
    Baber, W. R., Kang, S.-H., Liang, L., & Zhu, Z. Shareholder Rights, Corporate Governance and Accounting Restatement. SSRN eLibrary. 2009.
    Bergstresser, D., & Philippon, T. (2006). CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 511-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.011
    Burns, N., & Kedia, S. The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 35-67. 2006.
    Cheng, Q., & Warfield, T. D. Equity Incentives and Earnings Management. [Article]. Accounting Review, 80(2), 441-476. 2005.
    Efendi, J., Srivastava, A., & Swanson, E. P. Why do corporate managers misstate financial statements? The role of option compensation and other factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 667-708. 2007.
    Erickson, M., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. Is There a Link between Executive Equity Incentives and Accounting Fraud? [Article]. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(1), 113-143. 2006.
    Hansen, B. E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345-368. 1999.
    Harris, J., & Bromiley, P. Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation. Organization Science, 18(3), 350-367. 2007.
    Harris, R. S., & Marston, F. C. Value versus Growth Stocks: Book-to-Market, Growth, and Beta. Financial Analysts Journal, 50(5), 18-24. 1994.
    Johnson, S. A., Ryan, J. H. E., & Tian, Y. S. Managerial Incentives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives Matter. [Abstract]. CFA Digest, 39(3), 16-18. 2009.
    Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197. 2005.
    Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, İ. Corporate Governance, Accounting Outcomes, and Organizational Performance. [Article]. Accounting Review, 82(4), 963-1008. 2007.

    下載圖示 校內:2013-07-27公開
    校外:2013-07-27公開
    QR CODE