簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉立群
Liou, Li-Chun
論文名稱: 新型切削式箱型鋼柱耐震性能研究
Seismic performance of the innovative reduced section steel box columns
指導教授: 鍾育霖
Chung, Yu-Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 139
中文關鍵詞: 箱型柱局部挫屈準靜態反覆加載試驗損傷控制數值模擬
外文關鍵詞: Box column, Local buckling, Quasi-static cyclic test, Damage control, Numerical analysis
相關次數: 點閱:53下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 大地震中建築結構的底層柱同時承擔垂直以及彎矩荷重,於柱底部降伏後可能會伴隨局部挫屈現象,進而導致強度衰減以及鋼柱的軸向變形,震後損傷修復須處理鋼板複雜的變形以及底層柱所負擔的高垂直荷重,使得修復過程較其他結構構件困難,需要使用重型支撐機以及現場切削、熱整形及焊接等作業,不僅消耗許多的人力資源以及時間成本外,較長的復原時間也會造成受災戶心理及生活上的壓力,為減低上述修復上的困難,使結構物快速回復原有的性能,本研究提出新型的切削式箱型鋼柱,於箱型柱的底部內側底部增設斷面小、高強度的核心柱,使其在大變形底下仍然保持彈性並且負擔垂直以及彎矩荷重,且為了維持此區域的柱斷面與其餘斷面相近,於核心柱區域的外柱進行四面切削開口方式以減少斷面積,在地震中塑性行為將集中在切削區域附近,震後針對外柱的切削區域進行補強可恢復耐震性能,能夠減少修復上的困難。
    本研究設計了兩組足尺箱型柱試體,並以靜態反覆加載的實驗評估其性能,結果顯示切削式箱型柱最大強度與一般箱型柱接近,可達到層間變位角5.0%兩個迴圈,至加載結束強度呈現穩定的遲滯迴圈,實驗過程無明顯的挫屈發生,由應變分布趨勢可以觀察到切削式箱型柱的塑性區域集中在切削孔的左右兩側,而核心柱至加載結束除了靠近內柱焊接鋼板處有進入塑性外其餘區域保持彈性。數值模擬結果顯示,在中等軸力下的兩試體耐震性能差異更顯著,切削式箱型柱的最大強度可以維持外,軸向壓縮量有顯著的改善且數值模擬中無明顯的局部挫曲,塑性範圍集中於切削孔周圍,而核心柱區域塑性範圍集中於上下兩端以及核心柱上下焊接的鋼板以及加勁板,核心柱保持部分彈性可以支撐結構垂直以及彎矩荷重,符合設計的預期。

    This study proposed a new type of reduced section column. A core column with a smaller section and high strength is added at the bottom of the inner side of the box column, and the outer column in the core column area is cut with openings to control the total section areas of the columns. In this way, the plastic behavior would concentrate in the reduced area under the earthquake, and the core column can maintain the elasticity to sustain the vertical and horizontal loads. In the post-seismic repair stage, the reduced area of the outer column can be strengthened to restore the seismic performance by localized heat forming or simple welded steel plate.
    Two sets of full-scale box columns were tested, and the test results show that the maximum strength of reduced section columns is close to the normal column, both show stable hysteresis behaviors. For the reduced section column, the plastic area is concentrated in the reduced region of the outer columns, while the core columns remain elastic at the end of loading. The numerical analysis shows that the difference in vibration resistance between the two specimens is more significant while the columns sustained higher axial forces. The maximum strength of the reduced section column can be maintained, the axial shortening is significantly smaller than that of the normal column and the plasticity area is concentrated in the reduced area of the outer column, while the core column maintains part of the elasticity.

    摘要 i 誌謝 xv 目錄 xvi 表目錄 xviii 圖目錄 xix 第一章 緒論與文獻文顧 1 1.1研究動機與目的 1 1.2研究方法 2 1.3設計規範與文獻回顧 3 1.3.1我國箱型柱相關設計規範 3 1.3.2文獻回顧 6 第二章 箱型柱靜態反覆加載實驗規劃與設計 16 2.1切削式箱型柱設計概念與目的 16 2.2切削式箱型柱設計強度 19 2.3實驗規劃 22 2.3.1實驗加載系統 22 2.3.2靜態反覆加載歷程 25 2.4試體設計 26 2.4.1一般箱型柱試體設計 26 2.4.2切削式箱型柱試體設計 27 2.5感測器安裝 31 2.5.1應變計安裝位置 31 2.5.2位移計安裝位置 33 2.6材料拉伸試驗 34 第三章 實驗結果 36 3.1一般箱型柱實驗觀察與遲滯迴圈 36 3.2切削式箱型柱實驗觀察與遲滯迴圈 38 3.3應變分布與應力集中、軸向壓縮量 40 3.3.1一般箱型柱應變分布與應力集中 41 3.3.2切削式箱型柱應變分布與應力集中 44 3.3.3一般箱型柱、切削式箱型柱的軸向壓縮量 50 3.4耗能 52 3.5小結 53 第四章 有限元素法模擬 54 4.1分析模型 54 4.2數值模擬與實驗比較 59 4.2.1一般箱型柱數值模擬 59 4.2.2切削式箱型柱數值模擬 64 4.3設計參數分析 70 4.3.1箱型柱受中等軸力影響分析 71 4.3.2切削孔尺寸以及材料材質影響分析 81 4.3.3各項設計參數對性能影響 105 4.4小結 109 第五章 結論與建議 110 結論 110 改善與建議 111 附錄一 112 附錄二 113 參考文獻 114

    [1] Zargar S, Medina RA, Miranda E. Cyclic behavior of deep steel columns subjected to large drifts, rotations, and axial loads. Proceedings of the 10th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK, 2014.
    [2] 陳浚愿, 箱型鋼柱於高軸壓力與層間變位下之耐震行為, 國立交通大學, 2021
    [3] Chung-Che Chou, Guan-Wei Chen, Lateral cyclic testing and backbone curve development of high-strength steel built-up box columns under axial compression, Engineering Structures 223(2020) 111147, 2020
    [4] FEMA352-Recommended seismic evaluation and repair criteria for welded steel moment-frame building
    [5] Antonella B. Francavilla, Massimo Latour, Vincenzo Piluso, Gianvittorio Rizzano, Design criteria for beam-to-column connections equipped with friction devices, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 172 (2020) 106240, 2020
    [6] Hiroshi Tagawa, Yuta Nagoya, Xingchen Chen, Bolted beam-to-column connection with buckling-restrained round steel bar dampers, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 169 (2020) 106036, 2020
    [7] 蔡榮軒, 鋼柱基底含形狀記憶合金裝置之自復位與消能, 國立交通大學, 2013
    [8] Chung-Che Chou, Jun-Hen Chen, Analytical model validation and influence of column bases for seismic responses of steel post-tensioned self-centering MRF systems, Engineering Structures 33 (2011) 2628–264
    [9] Yu-Lin Chung , Li-Jyun Du, Huang-Hsing Pan, Performance evaluation of a rocking steel column base equipped with asymmetrical resistance friction damper, Earthquakes and Structures, Vol. 17, No. 1 (2019) 49-6
    [10] 池永昌容, 中島正愛 , セルフセンタリング柱脚を用いた鉄骨骨組の残留変形低減効果, 日本建築学会構造工学論文集, Vol. 54B, pages 657-664, 2008
    [11] Hoseok Chi, Judy Liu, Seismic behavior of post-tensioned column base for steel selfcentering moment resisting frame, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 78 (2012) 117–130, 2012
    [12] 內政部營建署, 鋼結構極限設計法規與解說, 中華民國內政部營建署, 2011
    [13] Takanori Ishida, Yang Dong b, Shoichi Kishiki , Satoshi Yamada , Takashi Hasegawa , Cyclic behaviors of SHS columns subjected to small amplitude loading, Engineering Structures 252 (2022) 113611
    [14] 卓英儒, 自復位箱型鋼柱腳耐震性能研究, 國立成功大學土木系碩士論文, 2023
    [15] Shoichi KISHIKI, Yusuke IWASAKI,Seismic Repair To The Damaged RHS Column With Strength Deterioration Due To The Local Buckling, 日本建築学会構造工学論文集, Vol. 83, No.743, pages 179-189, 2018
    [16] AISC, Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, 2016

    無法下載圖示 校內:2027-08-31公開
    校外:2027-08-31公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE