創業至今逐漸成為經濟發展中的強勁推動力，亦可作為職業選擇之一，無論是業界或是學術界，都對於創業現象表示出越來越強烈的關心，探討創業者除了在初期發想創新概念外，在醞釀的發展時期如何強化管理能力，透過鏈結周圍的資源及各種多元要素，檢視成功案例中的情境並進行模仿學習，再透過調整後內化形成自己特有的價值，進而成長為具有規模化的組織，在商業化的環境得以生存及佔有一席之地，因此創業者的獨特創業歷程是如何於脈絡之中開展而出乃是值得討論的議題。於此，本研究結合創業脈絡及創業歷程等學術文獻，針對個案的創業故事歷程，以文獻中提出的既有分類方式結合實務現象中發現之要素進行彙整，並奠基於此結果下，多層次分析多元要素於不同個案中的異同之處，以呈現並回答研究問題。
於研究方法處，本研究使用質性方法中的個案研究法，描述多元複雜的情境與現象，並依據多元化與多面向的資料，相互交叉分析來增加研究的可信度與有效度。同時於個案發現之處，為了使個案具有多樣性，選擇不同產業、創業時間的個案的創業歷程進行探討，關鍵不在於成功創業的條件或結構模式等制式的結果論，而是透過創業者的敘說來了解創業者如何透過多元要素而行動來引發創業歷程，是以呈現一種創辦人與脈絡全面性互動的歷程。此外，本研究亦於意涵處提出數點說明，期許藉此得以為學術界及實務界提供相關貢獻，並在文末處，進行研究限制與未來研究方向之說明。

Entrepreneurship has gradually become a strong driving force in economic development, and it can also be used as one of the career choices. Both the industry and the academia have expressed increasingly strong concerns about the phenomenon of entrepreneurship. In addition to the concept, how to strengthen management capabilities by linking the surrounding resources and various multiple elements, imitating and learning the context of successful cases and then forming their own unique value through adjustments and internalization, survive in a commercial environment. Therefore, how the entrepreneur’s unique entrepreneurial journey develops in the context is a topic worthy of discussion.
This research combines the entrepreneurial context and entrepreneurial process and other academic literature and focuses on the entrepreneurial story of the individual case. It combines the existing classification methods proposed in the literature and the elements found in the practical phenomenon to summarize, and based on this result, the multi-level analyze the similarities and differences between multiple elements in different cases to present and answer research questions.
In the research method section, this research uses the case study method of qualitative methods to describe diverse and complex situations and phenomena, and cross-analyzes based on diversified and multi-faceted data to increase the credibility and effectiveness of the research. At the same time, where the case is found, in order to make the case diversified, the entrepreneurial process of the case of different industries and entrepreneurial time is selected. The key is not the result theory of successful entrepreneurial conditions or structural models, but through the entrepreneur’s narrated to understand how entrepreneur act through multiple elements to trigger the entrepreneurial process. It is to present a process of comprehensive interaction between the founder and the context. In addition, this research also puts forward a few points of explanation in the meaning of this research, hoping to provide relevant contributions to the academic and practical circles, and at the end of the article, explain the research limitations and future research directions.
Keywords: Entrepreneurial Process, Entrepreneurial Context, Qualitative Research, Entrepreneuring

參考文獻
英文文獻
ALDRICH, H., & MARTINEZ, M. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary.
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2004). Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of business venturing, 19(5), 621-635.
Baumol, V. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5 Part 1), 893-921.
Baumol, W. J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. The American economic review, 58(2), 64-71.
Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performence in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of business venturing, 2(1), 79-93.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS quarterly, 369-386.
Bianchi, M., & Henrekson, M. (2005). Is neoclassical economics still entrepreneurless? Kyklos, 58(3), 353-377.
Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2016). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what do we know and what do we still need to know? Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 292-315.
Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la nature du commerce en general. In: Chez Fletcher Gyles Londres.
Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory: Rowman & Littlefield.
Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of business venturing, 30(5), 674-695.
Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Routledge.
Evans, D. S., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of political economy, 97(4), 808-827.
Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2009). Entrepreneurs as theorists: on the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 127-146.
Foss, N. J., & Garzarelli, G. (2007). Institutions as knowledge capital: Ludwig M. Lachmann's interpretative institutionalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(5), 789-804.
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the economic theory of the firm: any gains from trade? In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 55-80): Springer.
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm: Cambridge University Press.
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial discovery or creation? In search of the middle ground. Academy of management review, 42(4), 733-736.
Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & Bjørnskov, C. (2019). The context of entrepreneurial judgment: organizations, markets, and institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 56(6), 1197-1213.
Gartner, W. B. (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 25(4), 27-39.
Hayek, F. A. (1946). The meaning of competition. In.
Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational researcher, 12(2), 14-19.
Hui-Chen, C., Kuen-Hung, T., & Chen-Yi, P. (2014). The entrepreneurial process: an integrated model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 727-745.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of management review, 31(2), 386-408.
Kihlstrom, R. E., & Laffont, J.-J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of political economy, 87(4), 719-748.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Knight, F. H. The place of profit and uncertainty in economic theory.
Knight, F. H. (1921). The place of profit and uncertainty in economic theory. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, 3, 21.
Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The Legacy of Max Weber, Berkeley. Cal.: Glendessary Press.
Lazear, E. P. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94(2), 208-211.
Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of management, 14(2), 139-161.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.": ERIC.
Myers, M. D. (2019). Qualitative research in business and management: Sage.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge university press.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, ideology, and economic performance. Cato J., 11, 477.
Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship: Cambridge university press.
Ripsas, S. (1998). Towards an interdisciplinary theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 10(2), 103-115.
Ruhl, K. (2004). Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. In: JSTOR.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of management review, 26(2), 243-263.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). II. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 1942.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (1912/1934). Transaction Publishers.–1982.–January, 1, 244.
Shane. (2005). Finding fertile ground. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shultz, J. J., Florio, S., & Erickson, F. (1982). Aspects of the cultural organization of social relationships in communication at home and in school. Ethnography and education, 88-123.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, 69(1), 99-118.
Solesvik, M. Z. (2013). Entrepreneurial motivations and intentions: investigating the role of education major. Education+ Training.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (1999). Evolving perspectives of human information behavior: Contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. Paper presented at the Exploring the contexts of information behavior: Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Information Needs.
Spilling, O. R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business research, 36(1), 91-103.
Thornton, P. H. (1999). The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual review of sociology, 25(1), 19-46.
Venkataraman, S. (2019). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In Seminal ideas for the next twenty-five years of advances: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Von Mises, L. (1949). Human action: A treatise on economics. In: New Haven: Yale University Press.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation.
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 35(1), 165-184.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Research design issues in using the case study method to study management information systems. The information systems research challenge: Qualitative research methods, 1, 1-6.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods: Sage publications.
中文文獻
黃秋霞. (2016). 淺談量化與質性研究的反思. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 5(9), 149-154.
劉常勇, & 謝如梅. (2006). 創業管理研究之回顧與展望: 理論與模式探討. 創業管理研究, 第一卷第一期, 1-43.
2018台灣新創生態圈大調查https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-report/2018-taiwan-startup-ecosystem-survey.html
2020台灣新創生態圈大調查https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-report/2020-taiwan-startup-ecosystem-survey.html