台灣半導體產業的發展自1977年開始，經過幾十年來的發展，形成了產業群聚並建立完整的上中下游半導體生態系統；其中在半導體設備產業也吸引了國際大廠在台灣建立完整的供應鏈，以提供半導體製造商就近且即時的服務。
在台灣半導體設備產業鏈中相關的利害關係人大致可以分為：半導體設備商、半導體設備代理商、半導體機台代工/組裝廠、廠務設施、專業裝移機、半導體零組件等相關的分工業者；隨著專業化程度越高企業間的合作依存度就越高，台灣也因為這些利害關係人串連的群聚效應，建立了完整且即時的半導體設備產業的供應鏈；同時這些利害關係人透過互動與協作的過程提升企業技術與能力。
本研究以台灣半導體產業中的半導體設備商漢民科技為研究對象，採取質性研究方法中的單一個案研究法，以漢民科技為研究對象，以「價值共創」的理論觀點來探討「利害關係人」的互動與協作，並為台灣半導體產業共創價值的過程。
本研究目的在於說明，第一：漢民科技如何透過願景與使命，吸引利害關係人參與並創造雙贏的過程；第二：如何藉由整合多利害關係人的技術與協作為產業創造價值，希望藉由理論與個案的實際成功經驗來提供相關企業做為經營上的參考。

Since 1977, Taiwan's semiconductor industry has developed over several decades, forming industrial clusters and establishing a comprehensive upstream, midstream, and downstream semiconductor ecosystem. Within this ecosystem, the semiconductor equipment industry has also attracted international giants to establish a complete supply chain in Taiwan, providing locally and timely services to semiconductor manufacturers. The stakeholders in Taiwan's semiconductor equipment industry can generally be categorized into semiconductor equipment manufacturers, semiconductor equipment agents, semiconductor machine OEMs/assemblers, facility service providers, professional movers, and semiconductor component manufacturers. As the degree of specialization increases, the level of cooperation and interdependence among enterprises also increases. The clustering effect created by these stakeholders in Taiwan has established a comprehensive and timely supply chain for the semiconductor equipment industry. Moreover, through the process of interaction and collaboration, these stakeholders enhance their technological capabilities.
This study focuses on the Taiwan’s semiconductor equipment company Hermes-Epitek, adopting a qualitative research method through a single case study. Using the theory of "value co-creation," the study explores the interactions and collaborations among stakeholders in the context of Taiwan's semiconductor industry, and the process of co-creating value within the industry. The objectives of this study are to explain: First, how Hermes-Epitek attracts stakeholder participation and creates win-win situations through its vision and mission; Second, how integrating the technology and collaboration of multiple stakeholders creates value for the industry. It is hoped that the theoretical and practical successful experiences of this case study will provide relevant enterprises with operational references.

中文文獻
工商時報楊晴安. (2024). 比亞迪超越特斯拉成全球最大電動車商. https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20240104700799-430704
天下雜誌. (2022). 半導體新戰略：化合物半導體市場夯. https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5122212
方世杰. (2016). 發展「執行價值共創流程」的四個架構. http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2016/04/blog-post_53.html
方世杰, & 嚴玉華. (2020). 價值共創理論與實證研究: 生態系統之建構與治理.
方世杰, 馮., 嚴玉華,. (2017). 公私部門夥伴關係之價值基礎策略: 理論與實證研究. http://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/176447
台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司. (2022). 資源中心＿利害關係人資本主義衡量指標-台積公司企業社會責任. https://esg.tsmc.com/ch/resources/WEF_IBC.html
徐文元. (2017). 半導體設備代理商的創新之路-以漢民科技為例 國立清華大學].
財經新報. (2024). 無法彎道超車台積電成拓海，三星恐被英特爾與 Rapidus 追上 https://www.wealth.com.tw/articles/e1f22b73-05a6-4d83-925b-bbdadddcd396
黃正忠, 侯家楷, & 邱筠真. (2021). 透過社會創新實踐利害關係人資本主義. 會計研究月刊(433), 107-112.
漢民科技大事記. (2024). https://www.hermes.com.tw/about/history/
潘文淵文教基金會, 張. (2006). 矽說台灣: 台灣半導體產業傳奇. 天下遠見出版股份有限公司. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=s7C1AAAAIAAJ
優分析. (2023). https://uanalyze.com.tw/articles/611973966
 

英文文獻
Bosse, D. A., & Coughlan, R. (2016). Stakeholder Relationship Bonds. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1197-1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12182
Brandenburger, A. M., & Stuart Jr, H. W. (1996). Value‐based business strategy. Journal of economics & management strategy.
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2013). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2089
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. (2014). Business research methods. Mcgraw-hill.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Eldor, L. (2019). How Collective Engagement Creates Competitive Advantage for Organizations: A Business‐Level Model of Shared Vision, Competitive Intensity, and Service Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 177-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12438
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing theory, 11(3), 279-301.
Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. (2012). The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 531-583. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.691646
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58-74.
Hollebeek, L. D., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2022). From Customer-, to Actor-, to Stakeholder Engagement: Taking Stock, Conceptualization, and Future Directions. Journal of Service Research, 25(2), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520977680
IBS. (2023). 2奈米晶圓比3奈米貴50％ 單片成本估近百萬. https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/4532149
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2019). Organizational Governance Adaptation: Who Is In, Who Is Out, and Who Gets What. Academy of Management Review, 44(1), 6-27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0459
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Service‐dominant logic: a necessary step. European journal of marketing, 45(7/8), 1298-1309.
McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Vargo, S. L., Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C., & Kasteren, Y. v. (2012). Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. Journal of Service Research, 15(4), 370-389.
Michael E, P., & James E, H. (2015). 波特描繪企業新形貌. HBR哈佛商業評論.
Paine, L. S. (2023). 一次釐清利害關係人資本主義. Havard Business Review. https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/22437/what-does-stakeholder-capitalism-mean-to-you
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2007). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0
Pera, R., Occhiocupo, N., & Clarke, J. (2016). Motives and resources for value co-creation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem: A managerial perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4033-4041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.047
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). Building the co-creative enterprise. Harvard business review, 88(10), 100-109.
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The co-creation paradigm. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-10-2014-0141
Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2014). Value co-creation: concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0397-2
Saha, V., Mani, V., & Goyal, P. (2020). Emerging trends in the literature of value co-creation: a bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(3), 981-1002.
Storbacka, K., Brodie, R. J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P. P., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3008-3017.
Subramaniam, M. (2020). Digital ecosystems and their implications for competitive strategy. Journal of Organization Design, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-020-00073-0
Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314-329.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2014). Service-dominant logic: What it is, what it is not, what it might be. In The service-dominant logic of marketing (pp. 43-56). Routledge.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152. http://sfx.lib.ncku.edu.tw:3410/sfxlcl41
Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 283-290.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative research methods, 5(14), 359-386.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.