| 研究生: |
徐瀅鈞 Hsu, Ying-Chun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
社會創新的美麗與哀愁-以臺南東山社區營造為例 The beauty and sadness of social innovation: A case study of community building in Dongshan, Tainan |
| 指導教授: |
周信輝
Cuou, Hsin-Hui |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 67 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 社會創新 、地方創生 、基礎資源 、資源拼湊 、利害關係人 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Social Innovation, Local Creation, Resource Base, Resource Patchwork, Stakeholders |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:161 下載:15 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近幾年政府為了解決經濟及社會問題積極提出多項「社會創新」策略,許多公部門協助民間單位共同推動各項創新,其中著重在改善城鄉差距的「地方創生」也逐漸讓更多人了解,臺灣有不少成功的地方創生,更有不少正準備嘗試推動的地區,如何能蛻變出美麗重生?或是最後留下落寞哀愁?
本論文以「資源拼湊」及「利害關係人」的觀點,嘗試整理出資源不足的偏鄉中,面臨人口老化、流失,受限的交通、經濟等各項發展條件,能否突破困境重新發展,以臺南市東山區為範圍分析「社會創新」及「地方創生」推動成敗的影響,研究發現:關鍵利害關係人與識別出可用的在地資源,以及利害關係人願意提供資源及拼湊者的運用能力和運用程度,是影響成敗的關鍵,相關參與人員的共識也是重要因素,本論文以東山區創新過程實例提供制定創生或創新策略之參考。
In recent years, the government has actively proposed a number of "social innovation" strategies in order to solve economic and social problems. Many public departments have assisted private units to jointly promote various innovations. Among them, the "local creation" that focuses on improving the gap between urban and rural areas has gradually allowed more people to I understand that there are many successful local creations in Taiwan, and there are many regions that are trying to promote them. How did they succeed? Or why did they fail?
This thesis uses the perspectives of "resource mosaicing" and "stakeholders" to try to sort out whether rural villages with insufficient resources can break through the difficulties and develop again in the face of population aging, loss, limited transportation, economic and other development conditions. , taking the Dongshan District of Tainan City as an example to analyze the influence of "social innovation" and "local creation" on the promotion of success or failure, the research found that: the key stakeholders and the identification of available local resources, as well as the willingness of stakeholders to provide resources and cobble together The ability and degree of application are the key to success or failure, and the consensus of relevant participants is also an important factor. This paper uses the example of the innovation process in Dongshan District to provide a reference for formulating creation or innovation strategies
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing:Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly(50), 329-366.
Clarkson. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review,, 20(1), 92-117.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strateric Management:A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman,Boston.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press.
Grant, R. M. (1991). “The Resource-BASED Theory of Competitive Advantage:Implications for Strategy Formulation,”. California Management Review,, 33(Spring), 114-135.
James A. Phills Jr., K. D., & Miller, D. T. (2008). "Rediscovering Social Innovation". Stanford Social Innovation Review.
Levi-Stauss, C. (1996). The savage mind(La pensee suavage). London:Weidenfeld&Niolson.
Penrose, E. (1995). The Theory of the Growthof the Firm. Oxford University Press.
Peter, M. d. (2000). 經濟學解說:第三版. 經濟科學出版社.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934/2005). 經濟發展理論 創新之父熊彼得。百年經典重譯版 (蕭美惠譯 ed.). 台北市:商周出版社.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration A, Sociological Interpretation. Harper&Row,New York.
Stanford Research Insitute. (1963). Those groups without whose support the organization would cease to exist.
“Source:Freeman,R.E.,Harrison,J.S.,Wicks,A.C.,Parmar,B.L.,De Colle,S.(2010).Stakeholder Theory.The state of the art. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
中文百科. https://www.newton.com.tw/wiki/%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E8%B3%87%E6%BA%90
中華民國教育部. (110). 《教育部重編國語辭典修訂本》臺灣學術網路第六版. . 中華民國教育部. https://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=129396&q=1&word=%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83
內政部. (1991). 社會工作辭典. 中華民國社區發展訓練中心印行.
文崇一, & 楊國樞. (2000). 訪問調查法. 臺北:東華.
王遠忠. (2003). 探討平衡計分卡在資訊服務業的運用─以外商資訊科技公司為例 淡江大學]. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3xhs6h
行政院. (2018). 社會創新行動方案(核定本).
李慶芳. (2013). 研究,到田野-不用數字的研究. https://reswithoutnumbers.blogspot.com/2013/04/blog-post_6.html
周睦怡, 熊慧嵐, & 陳東升. (2018). 在地社會創新網路:以人文創新與社會實踐在地實作為. 台灣政治學刊, 22(2), 147-202.
林振春. (2000). 營造新家園. 台北:光寶文教.
施文玲. (2006). 質性取向研究理論派典之探析. 52. https://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/52/52-14.htm
張碩玲. (2001). 臺北市國民小學與社區資源共享之研究 國立政治大學]. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ybc852
國小社會科教學研究, (1991).
經濟部中小企業處. 社會創新平台. https://si.taiwan.gov.tw/
謝文全. (1997). 教育行政-理論與實務. 臺北:文景出版社.
顧遠, & 周賢. (2015). 社會創新,到底是創什麼?(一):我們創造的是社會影響力. 社企流. https://www.seinsights.asia/article/2760