前修未密，後出轉精。本研究之目的乃從管理學與哲學角度，以臺灣養豬產業的智慧轉型為例，試圖對當前臺灣智慧農業的困境進行一系列「轉精」的策略反思。農業是國家的根基，糧食是民生的保障。是以，農業不僅是一種產業，更是一種使命，守護著我們的土地和生命。在數位文明的時代巨輪下，智慧農業作為一項極具潛力的全新「國安」使命，不僅可以提高農業效益，還可以降低對環境的影響，改善農民的價值獲取與生活品質。然而，臺灣當前農業智慧轉型的管理與策略正面對著棘手的挑戰和問題，需要我們深入反思，集思廣益。此研究反思的核心論點是：當前國內「農業轉型」策略，必須儘速從以科技效率與商業利益為導向的「智農效能轉型」，轉向以批判思考與價值共創為導向的「智農生態系轉型」。為此，本研究運用「科技哲學」、「價值共創」及「生態系策略」理論，以臺灣養豬產業（臺糖）現代化轉型現況為例，「問題化」（Problematization）當前智農策略管理的六項具體缺失。最後，藉由六項缺失的反思性研究發現，提出具備「批判思考」、「價值共創」與「永續生態」特色的智農生態系架構與策略建議，期能兼顧科技的「聚置本質」與農業的「共存本質」，適時協助推動國內智慧農業發展的再轉型。

Invoking an ancient proverb, “The antecedent’s lack of meticulous cultivation will be refined by subsequent researchers,” this study critically examines the contemporary challenges facing smart agriculture in Taiwan, utilizing the intelligent transition of the pig farming industry as an illustrative case. Agriculture transcends industry boundaries to become a mission, crucial to preserving our land and sustaining our lives. Amid the era of digital civilization, smart agriculture surfaces as a powerful “national security” endeavor that bolsters agricultural efficiency, mitigates environmental impact, and uplifts farmer welfare. Nonetheless, the strategic management steering Taiwan’s agricultural transformation grapples with formidable challenges, demanding deep introspection and collective ideation. Central to this study is the argument that Taiwan’s current “agricultural transformation” strategies need a rapid pivot from a focus on technology-driven efficiency and commercial profits to a “smart agriculture ecosystem transformation,” underpinned by critical thinking and value co-creation. This study applies the theories of “philosophy of technology,” “value co-creation,” and “ecosystem strategies” to explore the modernization of Taiwan’s pig farming industry. In doing so, it identifies six shortcomings in current smart agriculture management strategies. Ultimately, the research formulates an ecological framework and strategic recommendations for smart agriculture that reflect the elements of “critical thinking,” “value co-creation,” and “sustainable ecology.” This approach hopes to advance Taiwan’s smart agriculture development in a timely manner in terms of the essence of “Gestell” in technology and “coexistence” in agriculture.

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Araújo, S. O., Peres, R. S., Barata, J., Lidon, F., & Ramalho, J. C. (2021). Characterising the agriculture 4.0 landscape—emerging trends, challenges and opportunities. Agronomy, 11(4), 667.
Bach, H., & Mauser, W. (2018). Sustainable agriculture and smart farming. Earth observation open science and innovation, 261-269.
Bao, J., & Xie, Q. (2022). Artificial intelligence in animal farming: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, 129956.
Berkowitz, H., & Dumez, H. (2016). The concept of meta‐organization: Issues for management studies. European Management Review, 13(2), 149-156.
Bos, J. M., Bovenkerk, B., Feindt, P. H., & Van Dam, Y. K. (2018). The quantified animal: precision livestock farming and the ethical implications of objectification. Food Ethics, 2, 77-92.
Bu, Y., Parkinson, J., & Thaichon, P. (2022). Influencer marketing: Homophily, customer value co-creation behaviour and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102904.
Canguilhem, G. (2012). On the Normal and the Pathological (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N., & Radziwon, A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138-164.
Derrida, J. (2012). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning and the new international. routledge.
Dharmaraj, V., & Vijayanand, C. (2018). Artificial intelligence (AI) in agriculture. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(12), 2122-2128.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. MIT Press.
Ekanayake, J., & Saputhanthri, L. (2020). E-AGRO: Intelligent chat-bot. IoT and artificial intelligence to enhance farming industry. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 12(1), 15-21.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1988). The care of the self.
Foucault, M. (2021). Confessions of the Flesh: The History of Sexuality, Volume 4. Pantheon.
Foucault, M., & Hurley, R. (1985). The use of pleasure.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Wohlgezogen, F. (2012). Roaring out of recession. Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 62-69.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (pp. 3-35). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. New York, 214.
Hoły-Łuczaj, M. (2023). The “other” measure—the “other” technology? Heidegger and Far East traditions—commentary on Shan Wu’s refining technopoiesis: Measures and measuring thinking in ancient China. Philosophy & Technology, 36(2), 19.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Kramer, K., & Meijboom, F. L. (2022). How Do Technologies Affect How We See and Treat Animals? Extending Technological Mediation Theory to Human-animal Relations. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 25(4), 595-611.
Laviolette, E. M., Arcand, S., Cloutier, L. M., & Renard, L. (2022). Same but different: Meta-organization and collective identity dynamics. M@ n@ gement, 25(2), 45-59.
Lioutas, E. D., & Charatsari, C. (2020). Smart farming and short food supply chains: Are they compatible? Land Use Policy, 94, 104541.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196-205.
Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: concept and measurement. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 44, 290-315.
Snihur, Y., & Bocken, N. (2022). A call for action: The impact of business model innovation on business ecosystems, society and planet. Long Range Planning, 55(6), 102182.
Trevisan, A. H., Castro, C. G., Gomes, L., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept: Evolution, current research, and future directions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 286-298.
Van der Burg, S., Bogaardt, M.-J., & Wolfert, S. (2019). Ethics of smart farming: Current questions and directions for responsible innovation towards the future. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100289.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152.
Wang, S., Jiang, H., Qiao, Y., Jiang, S., Lin, H., & Sun, Q. (2022). The Research Progress of Vision-Based Artificial Intelligence in Smart Pig Farming. Sensors, 22(17), 6541.
Zhai, Z., Martínez, J. F., Beltran, V., & Martínez, N. L. (2020). Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 170, 105256.
Zimmerman, M. J. (1990). Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, and Art. Indiana University Press.
中央畜產會（2022）。2021臺灣養豬手冊。中央畜產會。
中央畜牧會（2022）。養豬頭數調查報告。 https://www.naif.org.tw/upload/47/20230309_134444.84085.pdf
方世杰（2020）。價值共創的迷思與省思。VCC價值共創社群。https://8d9c7177-d4a4-4561-9fa5-638559376efd.filesusr.com/ugd/cf5587_f8f61172b1684331b7f40ddb736d1789.pdf
艾德納（Adner, R.）（2022）。生態系競爭策略（Winning the Right Game: How to Disrupt, Defend, and Deliver in a Changing World）（黃庭敏譯）。臺北：天下雜誌。（原著出版於2021年）
行政院農業委員會(1992)。80年11月底養豬頭數調查報告。
周信輝、方世杰、李慶芳、蔡馥陞、劉亭蘭（2022）。與機器共舞：以交織理論探索人機協作的能動性。中山管理評論，30(5)，857-897。https://doi.org/10.6160/SYSMR.202212_30(5).0003
柏沙特（Brossat, A.）（2012）。一個危險的哲學家 （羅惠珍譯）。麥田，城邦文化。（原著出版於2012年）
楊凱麟（2003）。德勒茲哲學中虛擬性建構的特異性（singularité）及其系列化（mise en série）（NSC 92-2411-H-343-004-）。行政院國家科學委員會。
滕守堯（1996）。海德格。臺北，生智。
賴俊雄（2020）。批判思考。聯經。