| 研究生: |
林幸民 Lin, Xing-Min |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
應用PZB服務品質模型與KANO二維品質模型探討共享經濟環境下順風車服務品質滿意度之研究 Application of PZB-Service Quality Model and Kano's Model in the Research of Satisfaction Degree of Service Quality of Hitchhiking Service in the Sharing Economy |
| 指導教授: |
何俊亨
Ho, Chun-Heng |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 244 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 共用經濟 、服務品質 、PZB 、L-QUAL量表 、Kano二維品質模型 、AHP層級分析法 、灰關聯度分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Sharing economy, Service quality, PZB, L-QUAL scale, Kano model, Analytic hierarchy process, Statistical analysis, Grey relational analysis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:168 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來隨著資訊技術、物聯網產業、電子支付在中國大陸的迅速發展,以網約車、共享住宿、線上外賣、共享醫療、共享物流等為代表的共享經濟新業態、新模式成為推動服務業結構優化、快速增長和消費方式轉型的新動能。順風車作為一種全新的綠色出行方式,也是網約車中重要的服務板塊,由於順風車O2O(online to offline)的消費模式的特性,高品質的網約車服務是提高消費者滿意度的重要保證。服務品質分為線上與線下整體服務品質,服務人員在提供服務過程中與消費者在服務品質的期望認知與實際服務感受、重視度與滿意度的不同,產生了服務品質的缺口,而造成消費者對服務品質的不滿意。如何改善服務品質,提升消費者滿意度,一直是本研究的重點。
由於順風車服務品質分為線上與線下整體特性,本研究為了能夠更好地提升順風車出行的服務品質,增加消費者對於順風車體驗的滿意度,本研究進行了三個階段的實驗,第一階段以PZB服務品質模型應用優化後的L-QUAL量表及重要度-滿意度模型(I-S Model)設計一個服務品質測試問卷,通过五大服务構面涵蓋了線上與線下服務項目進行研究,以探討消費者對於目前順風車提供服務的滿意程度及順風車的關鍵服務品質屬性,通過對消費者對於服務品質重視度與滿意度之差異性檢定,將重視度與滿意度之間的平均數差異排序,可以瞭解哪些要素是需要優先改善。第二個階段利用 Kano Model 設計問卷內容,將消費者需求歸類成不同的服務品質要素,以改善和提升服務的品質。為了更能瞭解目前市場上順風車服務的二維品質屬性,對影響消費者滿意度的產品品質特性能有更好的定義,在設計Kano Model的問卷內容時,先以評估服務品質問卷的結果,加上順風車專家、高涉入使用者對於順風車服務的使用經驗當作此模型輸入依據,挖掘出具有價值的服務要素。Kano 模型可以與PZB模型結合使用,可以用來建立消費者對順風車服務需求的品質特性之個別重要性,所以在產品開發的過程中,可以建構較佳的優先條件。研究的第二階段對於五大構面中的40項問項進行Kano二維品質歸類,並對消費者滿意係數指標分析,將增加滿意係數與消除不滿意係數繪製成滿意係數指標分析矩陣圖,並對其第一象限及第四象限中的品質項目進行優先改善。最後將研究中的40個品質問項提煉出優先改善的22項進行融入到順風車2.0優化版的開發中去。第三階段是專家問卷,專家組是由杭州滴滴出行科技有限公司應用軟體部、用戶體驗部及計算機技術部一共6名專家組成,將設計優化後的滴滴2.0優化版Demo由專家組進行評測, 使用AHP 評估尺度1-9的衡量值進行打分,瞭解消費者對於順風車服務品質具體項目的滿意度及品牌優先選擇性,AHP能夠合理地構建順風車決策分析模型,將複雜的問題系統化,對AHP建構層級結構、並根據專家問卷所得到的結果建立成對比較矩陣,再計算出各成對比較矩陣的特徵值與特徵向量,同時檢定矩陣的一致性,計算出各構面及其準則的重要性程度的權重數值。研究得出在五大構面中「經營者管理方式」、「監管機制」、「司機服務保障」消費需求屬性權重較高,位列前三。在服務的具體項目中「乘客可以在APP上看到拼車人地點」、「車輛安裝衛星定位、繞路監測、應急一鍵報警等基礎設施」、「消費者遇到危險發出警報時,周邊的車主會顯示定點並及時救援」、「醫療急救卡面向消費者與車主的應對急救場景的保障產品」、「順風車優惠活動多(順風加油、積分兌換、購車諮詢等)」、「車飾環境好、順風車車主素質較高、徵信良好、行為分高,可優先派單」、「順風車平臺的支付方式方便快捷」、「順風車平臺及車主提供安全的夜間出行服務」、「順風車城市安全綜合競爭力排名」、「星級順風車車主增加收入」為排名前十,由此結果,可以為各大順風車企業開發新產品服務時將這些需求設定為重點目標。最後的研究階段,找出市場佔比靠前的順風車品牌與本研究設計與優化後的滴滴2.0優化版進行驗證。使用灰色關聯分析(GRA)對採集專家不同評判的數據進行運算能夠將複雜的問題簡單化,對於系統開發過程中提供消費者更加品質感的服務有更明確的定位與目標。對於專家填寫的灰關聯問卷數據進行分析,通過數據的標準化、計算灰關聯距離( ∆0ij )、計算灰關聯係數(γ0ij)、最終將灰關聯度值與AHP多準則決策分析出的22個項目準則的權重相乘,並得研究的結果,各品牌的優劣排序為:滴滴2.0 優化版、滴答、滴滴、美團打車、哈囉。
本研究成果希望後期能夠將構建的綜合評估模型運用到實際的市場開發中去,並適用於O2O商業模式下不同服務行業及品牌的評估,可以達到消費者的期望且提高消費者滿意度,研究產出的客觀及標準化的數據能夠可作為專家咨詢報告提供給滴滴順風車企業,同時這些數據能夠對於企業設計師在設計開發上最重要的決策分析提供參考。
Recent years witnessed the fast development in technical advisory, Internet of things and online payment in Mainland China. Sharing economy is represented by ride-hailing services, online lodging arrangement, takeaway orderings through online platforms, sharing of medical services and resources, sharing in logistics. Those new industries and new models of the sharing economy have given impetus to restructuring of service industry, transformation of consumption and quick growth. As a wholly new green way of travel, ride-hailing constitutes a great part of online rides booking. High-quality ride hailing services guarantee the satisfaction and loyalty degree of consumers due to the online to offline (O2O) characteristics. The service quality of hitchhiling is comprised of two aspects-online and offline service quality. The gaps of service quality are formed owing to the differential awareness and expectations towards service quality, causing customers’ unsatisfactory in service. This research has been trying to find the way to improve service quality and to hoist consumer’s satisfaction.
Since the service quality of hitchhiking is divided into the overall characteristics of online and offline, this research conducted three-stage experiments to better improve the service quality of hitchhiking and increase consumer satisfaction with the experience of hitchhiking. The first stage is to design a service quality questionnaire by apply the SERVOQUAL in PZB service quality model and the importance-satisfaction model (IS Model). The questionnaire is conducted the five major service dimensions covering online and offline service items to explore consumers regarding the current satisfaction degree of the service provided by hitchhiking and its key service quality attributes. Then the to be improved elements will come out after ranking the average difference between the importance and satisfaction until the difference test of consumers' importance and satisfaction of service quality completed. The second stage uses the Kano Model to design the content of the questionnaire and classifies consumer needs into different service quality elements to improve and enhance the quality of services. In order to better understand the two-dimensional quality attributes of the current ride-hailing services in the market and have a better definition of product quality characteristics that affect consumer satisfaction, when designing the Kano Model questionnaire content, it should first evaluate the results of the service quality questionnaire then add experience of Hitchhiking experts and the experience of frequent users as the foundation of the questionnaire as to find valuable service elements. It should be known that The Kano model can be used in conjunction with the PZB model to establish the individual importance of the quality characteristics of consumers' demand for downwind services. Therefore, in the process of product development, better priority conditions can be constructed. In the second stage of the research, Kano two-dimensional quality classification was carried out for 40 items in the five dimensions, and the consumer satisfaction coefficient index was analyzed. The increase of satisfaction coefficient and the elimination of dissatisfaction coefficient were drawn into a satisfaction coefficient index analysis matrix. At the same time, giving priority to improve the quality items in the first and fourth quadrants. Finally, the 40 quality items in the study were refined and 22 items that were prioritized for improvement were incorporated into the development of Hitchhiking 2.0 optimized version. The third stage is the expert questionnaire. The expert group is composed of 6 experts from the application software department, user experience department and computer technology department of Hangzhou Didi Travel Technology Co., Ltd. The optimized version of Didi 2.0 Demo will be conducted by the expert group who will make evaluation by using AHP evaluation scale 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 to score. After understanding consumer satisfaction with specific items of Hitchhiking service quality and brand preference, AHP can reasonably build decision Hitchhiking analysis model, systematize complex problems, construct a hierarchical structure for AHP, and build pair comparison matrices based on the results of expert questionnaires, then calculate the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of each pair comparison matrix, and verify the consistency of the matrix at the same time, Calculate the weight value of the importance of each aspect and its criteria. The research shows that among the five dimensions, "management by operators", "regulatory mechanism", and "driver service guarantee" have higher consumer demand attributes and rank among the top three. Among the specific items of the service, "Passengers can see the carpooler location on the APP", "Vehicle installation satellite positioning, detour monitoring, emergency one-click alarm and other infrastructure", "When consumers encounter danger, the surrounding car owner will display the designated point and rescue in time", "Medical emergency card for consumers and car owners to respond to emergency scenarios of protection products", "Flying car discount activities (refueling, points exchange, car purchase consultation, etc.)", "Car decoration environment Good, hitchhiking owners have high quality, good credit, and high behavioral scores. They can give priority to the order", "The hitchhiking platform provides convenient and fast payment methods", "The hitchhiking platform and car owners provide safe night travel services", "Shunfeng“Windmill City Safety Comprehensive Competitiveness Ranking” and the “increased income of star riders” are among the top ten. As a result, these needs can be set as key targets when developing new products and services for major riders. In the final research stage, identify the top-ranked Shunfeng brand in the market and verify it with the optimized version of Didi 2.0 designed and optimized in this research. Using gray relational analysis (GRA) to calculate data collected from different judges by experts can simplify complex issues and have a clearer positioning and goal for providing consumers with more quality services during the system development process. Analyze the gray relational questionnaire data filled by experts, through the standardization of the data, calculate the gray relational distance (∆0ij), calculate the gray relational coefficient (γ0ij), and finally analyze the gray relational value and AHP multi-criteria decision-making analysis of 22 items The weights of the criteria are multiplied, and the results of the research are obtained. The ranking of the pros and cons of each brand is: Didi 2.0 optimized version, Dida, Gaode, Meituan Taxi, Hello.
The purpose of this study is to be able to apply the constructed comprehensive evaluation model to actual market development and to apply it to the evaluation of different service industries and brands under the O2O business model. The objective and standardized data of the research output can be provided as expert consulting reports to Didi Shunfeng companies. At the same time, these data can provide a reference for the most important decision analysis of enterprise designers in design and development.
Agatz, N., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M., & Wang, X. (2012). Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 295-303.
Al-Najjar, B., & Alsyouf, I. (2003). Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. International journal of production economics, 84(1), 85-100.
Alnawas, I., & Aburub, F. (2016). The effect of benefits generated from interacting with branded mobile apps on consumer satisfaction and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 313-322.
Arndt, J., Solomon, S., Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). The urge to splurge: A terror management account of materialism and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 198-212.
Babakus, E., & Mangold, W. G. (1992). Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. Health services research, 26(6), 767.
Baptista, P., Melo, S., & Rolim, C. (2014). Energy, environmental and mobility impacts of car-sharing systems. Empirical results from Lisbon, Portugal. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111(0), 28-37.
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600.
Berger, C., Blauth, R., Boger, D., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., DuMouchel, W., Pouliot, F., Richter, R.,Rubinoff, A.,Shen, D.,Timko, M., & Walden, D., (1993). Kano’s method for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), 3-35.
Botsman,R.,& Rogers,R.(2010).What's Mine is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper Collins.
Bowen, D. (2001). Antecedents of consumer satisfaction and dis-satisfaction (CS/D) on long-haul inclusive tours—a reality check on theoretical considerations. Tourism management, 22(1), 49-61.
Carman, J. M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of T. Journal of retailing , 66 (1), 33.
Cerri, S. (2012). Assessing the quality of higher education services using a modified SERVQUAL scale. Annales Universitatis Apulensis-Series Oeconomica, 14(2).
Chan, C., Entrekin, L., & Anderson, C. (2003). Psychometric assessment of the perception of service quality. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 11(1), 65-74.
Chan, N. D., & Shaheen, S. A. (2012). Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 93-112.
Chang, H. H., & Chen, S. W. (2009). Consumer perception of interface quality, security,and loyalty in electronic commerce. Information & Management, 46(7), 411–417.
Chang, T. C., & Lin, S. J. (1999). Grey relation analysis of carbon dioxide emissions from industrial production and energy uses in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 56(4), 247-257.
Chang, T. Z., & Chen, S. J. (1998). Market orientation, service quality and business profitability: a conceptual model and empirical evidence. Journal of services marketing.
Chase, R., Danielson, A., & Covell, P. (2003). U.S. Patent Application No. 09/785,408.
Chen, C. F., Ku, C. T., Tai, Y. H., Wei, P. K., Lin, H. N., & Huang, C. B. (2015). Creating optical near-field orbital angular momentum in a gold metasurface. Nano letters, 15(4), 2746-2750.
Cheng, X., Fu, S., & Yin, G. (2016). Does subsidy work? An investigation of post-adoption switching on car-hailing apps. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Forthcoming.
Chiu, N. H. (2009). An early software-quality classification based on improved grey relational classifier. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(7), 10727-10734.
Christoglou, K., Vassiliadis, C., & Sigalas, I. (2006). Using SERVQUAL and Kano research techniques in a patient service quality survey. World hospitals and health services: the official journal of the International Hospital Federation, 42(2), 21-26.
Cohen, B., & Kietzmann, J. (2014). Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 279-296.
Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006). Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journal of service research, 8(3), 260-275.
Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106(5), 177-82.
Crawford, C. M. (2008). New products management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Cronin Jr, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
Cronin Jr, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. Journal of marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
Dagger, T. S., & Sweeney, J. C. (2007). Service quality attribute weights: how do novice and longer-term customers construct service quality perceptions?. Journal of Service Research, 10(1), 22-42.
Dall’Olmo Riley, F., Pina, J. M., & Bravo, R. (2015). The role of perceived value in vertical brand extensions of luxury and premium brands. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(7-8), 881-913.
Dara,K.(2015).'Sharing economy' apps to boom with their lure of cheap and easy.Retrieved December 08, 2016 from https://www.cnet.com
/news/sharing-economy-expected-to-boom-customers-say-it-makes-life-cheap-and-easy
Darley, W. K., Blankson, C., & Luethge, D. J. (2010). Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: A review. Psychology & marketing, 27(2), 94-116.
David Mc A, B. (2013). Service quality and customer satisfaction in the airline industry: A comparison between legacy airlines and low-cost airlines. American Journal of Tourism Research, 2(1), 67-77.
Davidson, A., Habibi, M. R., & Laroche, M. (2018). Materialism and the sharing economy: A cross-cultural study of American and Indian consumers. Journal of Business Research, 82, 364-372.
Deng, J. L. (1982). Grey system fundamental method. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Deng, Z. Y., & Zeng, G. X. (1989). Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) on intension characteristic and analytic II. National Statistics Report, 1-15.
Dias, F. F., Lavieri, P. S., Garikapati, V. M., Astroza, S., Pendyala, R. M., & Bhat, C. R. (2017). A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services. Transportation, 44(6), 1307-1323.
Dillahunt,T.R., & Malone, A. R.(2015).The promise of the sharing economy among disadvantaged communities.Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
DUSTAR, M., MOSTAGHIMI, M., & ESMAILZADEH, M. (2016). ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND EXPLORING THE IMPACTS OF ITS DIMENSIONS ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT.
Dutka, A. F. (1995). AMA handbook for customer satisfaction. NTC Business books.
Engel, J. F., & Blackwell, R. D. (84). et Miniard PW (1995), Consumer behavior. Auflage, Fort Worth.
Fan, J., & Yang, W. (2015). Study on e-government services quality: The integration of online and offline services. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(3), 693-718.
Farmer,R.(2013). Share and care alike: What collaborative consumption can mean to families. Richmond Family Magazine. Retrieved December 11, 2016, from http://richmondfamilymagazine.com/article/share-care-alike/
Felson, M., & Spaeth, J. L.(1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: A routine activity approach. The American Behavioral Scientist,21(4),614.
Ferrari, E., & Manzini, R. (2003). The car - pooling problem: Heuristic algorithms based on savings functions. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 37(3), 243-272
Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2006). Classification of performance and quality indicators in manufacturing. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 2(3), 294-311.
Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh: Why the future of business is sharing. Penguin.
Gao, F., & Su, X. (2017). Online and offline information for omnichannel retailing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(1), 84-98.
Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2007). What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(3), 187-200.
Grau Galvany, A. (2018). The impact of shared mobility services-carsharing-on the public transportation funding (Master's thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya).
Hahn, S. E., Sparks, B., Wilkins, H., & Jin, X. (2017). E-service quality management of a hotel website: A scale and implications for management. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 26(7), 694-716.
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 67(9), 2047-2059.
Han, M., Zhang, R., Qiu, T., Xu, M., & Ren, W. (2017). Multivariate chaotic time series prediction based on improved grey relational analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 238.
He, H., & Li, Y. (2011). CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(4), 673-688.
Holbrook, M. B., & Corfman, K. P. (1985). Quality and value in the consumption experience: Phaedrus rides again. Perceived quality, 31(2), 31-57.
Hou denghua(2017).on the legal status of network plat for munder shared economy-taking the online car-hailings the research object. tribune of political science and law.,35(1):157-164.
Howard&Sheth,(1969),The theory of buyer behavior,John Wiley&Sons.
Huang, S. (2020). The rise of online Online car hailing services and their impact on urban transport in China. In Handbook on Transport and Urban Transformation in China. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hu, H. H., Kandampully, J., & Juwaheer, T. D. (2009). Relationships and impacts of service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and image: an empirical study. The service industries journal, 29(2), 111-125.
Hunt, R. C.(2000). Forager food sharing economy: Transfers and exchanges. Senri Ethnological Studies,53, 7-26.
Ijaz, A. T., & Ali, A. (2013). Assessing service attitude: Service quality measures taken by Islamic banks in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Management, 8, 61–68.
Jin, X., Min, G., & Wang, L. (2009, June). A comprehensive analytical model for weighted fair queuing under multi-class self-similar traffic. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Kano, N. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control), 14, 39-48.
Kano, N. (2007). Quality award and its evaluation method. Incheon, available at: anforq. org/activity/NKPresentatoinANQ2007. pdf (accessed 2008).
Khurana, S. (2008). Customer Preferences in Life Insurance Industry in India. ICFAI Journal of Services Marketing, 6(3).
Kim, M., & Lennon, S. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 146-178.
Kim, C., Tao, W., Shin, N., & Kim, K. S. (2010). An empirical study of customers’ perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems. Electronic commerce research and applications, 9(1), 84-95.
Kim, J., Yoon, Y., & Zo, H. (2015). Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: A Social Exchange Perspective. PACIS, 76.
Kotler.,P.(1994),Marketing Management:Analysis,Planning,Implementation and Control,8th ed,London:Prentice-Hall.
Kuo, Y. F., Wu, C. M., & Deng, W. J. (2009). The relationships among service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and post-purchase intention in mobile value-added services. Computers in human behavior, 25(4), 887-896.
Lanctot, R. (2017). Accelerating the future: The economic impact of the emerging passenger economy.Strategy analytics,5.
Lee, J. (2015). Recent Advances of Predictive Big Data Analytics and Industry 4.0 for Future Manufacturing and Service Innovation. Technical Report, University of Cincinnati, USA.
Lee, J., Kim, H. J., & Ahn, M. J. (2011). The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 222-230.
Leppäniemi, M., Karjaluoto, H., & Saarijärvi, H. (2017). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of willingness to share information. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 27(2), 164-188.
Li, X., & Ma, S. (2015). Research on Building Ecotourism Warning Sensor System Model Based on Support Vector Machine and Grey Relational Analysis. Sensor Letters, 13(2), 169-175.
Li, Y., & Chen, P. (2016, July). A Study on Regulatory Reform of China's Taxi Industry in the era of Internet Plus. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2016). Atlantis Press.
Liao, C., Liu, C. C., Liu, Y. P., To, P. L., & Lin, H. N. (2011). Applying the expectancy disconfirmation and regret theories to online consumer behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 241-246.
Lim, H. S. M., & Taeihagh, A. (2018). Autonomous vehicles for smart and sustainable cities: An in-depth exploration of privacy and cybersecurity implications. Energies, 11(5), 1062.
Lishan Sun, Shunchao Wang, Shuli Liu, LiyaYao, Wei Luo, Ashish Shukla. (2018) A completive research on the feasibility and adaptation of shared transportation in megacities – A case study in Beijing. Applied Energy, 230:1014-1033.
Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & management, 38(1), 23-33.
Liu, X., Sun, L., Sun, Q., & Gao, G. (2020). Spatial Variation of Taxi Demand Using GPS Trajectories and POI Data. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020.
Lo, V. H. Y., Sculli, D., Yeung, A. H. W., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2005). Integrating customer expectations into the development of business strategies in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8(1), 37-50.
Lovelock, C. H., & Lovelock, C. H. (1996). Services marketing (p. 29). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mahamad, O., & Ramayah, T. (2010). Service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty: A test of mediation. International business research, 3(4), 72.
Malghan R., Rao S and D'Souza R(2013). A Review of Developments in Web Based Manufacturing.International Journal of Engineering Research and Development , 8(2): 8–18.
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
Matzler, K. and Hinterhuber, H. H.(1998).How to make prodcuct development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment, Technovation, 18(1), 25-38.
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information systems research, 13(3), 334-359.
McKay, A, DePennington, A., & Baxter, J. (2001). Requirements management: A representation scheme for product. Computer Aided Design, 33(7), 511-520.
Melchers, R. E., & Beck, A. T. (2018). Structural reliability analysis and prediction. John Wiley & Sons.
Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard business review, 85(2), 116.
Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), 193-207.
Munusamy, J., Chelliah, S., & Mun, H. W. (2010). Service quality delivery and its impact on customer satisfaction in the banking sector in Malaysia. International journal of innovation, management and technology, 1(4), 398.
Mutiarin, D., Nurmandi, A., Jovita, H., Fajar, M., & Lien, Y. N. (2019). How do government regulations and policies respond to the growing online-enabled transportation service (OETS) in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Taiwan?. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance.
Nicolae, L. I., TĂNĂSESCU, D., & Popa, V. (2013). Customer Expectations Management. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, 4(3).
Ojasalo, J. (2001). Managing customer expectations in professional services. Managing service quality: An international Journal.
Papanikolaou, V., & Zygiaris, S. (2014). Service quality perceptions in primary health care centres in Greece. Health expectations, 17(2), 197-207.
Parasuraman, A. V. A . Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49 (1), 41-50.
Parasuraman, A. V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. (1988). SERVQUAL:A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 5-6.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy? and How to Make Them Work for You. WW Norton & Company.
Pearson, A., Tadisina, S., & Griffiffiffin, C. (2012). The role of e-service quality and information quality in creating perceived value: Antecedents to web site loyalty. Information Systems Management, 29(3), 201–215.
Pei, Y., Xue, W., Yang, Y., Li, D., & Li, Y. (2019). The Impacts of user experience on user loyalty based on O2O innovation platform. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 17(2), 79-87.
Piscicelli,L.,Cooper,T.,& Fisher,T.(2015). The role of values in collaborative consumption: Insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK.Journal of Cleaner Production,97, 21-29.
Ramaswami, A., Russell, A. G., Culligan, P. J., Sharma, K. R., & Kumar, E. (2016). Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities. Science, 352(6288), 940-943.
Ranchordás, S. (2015). Does sharing mean caring: Regulating innovation in the sharing economy. Minn. JL Sci. & Tech., 16, 413.
Rauch, D., & Schleicher, D. (2015). Like Uber, but for local governmental policy: the future of local regulation of the'sharing economy'. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper, (15-01).
Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., & Shaheen, S. (2016). Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy, 45, 168-178.
Rifkin, J. (2001). The age of access: The new culture of hypercapitalism. Penguin.
Robertson, T. S. (1984). Marketing's Potential Contribution to Consumer Behavior Reserach: the Case of Diffusion Theory. ACR North American Advances.
Saaty, T. L. (1971). On polynomials and crossing numbers of complete graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 10(2), 183-184.
Sachdev, S. B., & Verma, H. V. (2004). Relative importance of service quality dimensions: A multisectoral study. Journal of services research, 4(1).
Sauer, J., & Sonderegger, A. (2011). The influence of product aesthetics and user state in usability testing. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(6), 787-796.
Schor, J. B., & Fitzmaurice, C. J. (2015). Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy. In Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Schvaneveldt, S. J., Enkawa, T., & Miyakawa, M. (1991). Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality. Total quality management, 2(2), 149-162.
Scotti, D. J., Driscoll, A. E., Harmon, J., & Behson, S. J. (2007). Links among high-performance work environment, service quality, and customer satisfaction: an extension to the healthcare sector. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(2).
SHAO, Z. W., ZHU, P. W., & XU, D. (2017). Analysis of Online Car-hailing Services Management and Standardization Requirements.
Shen, R. (2016). User Experience in the Era of O2O-Service Design Revolution of the Online Education. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 216-226). Springer, Cham.
Smith, G. C., & Smith, S. (2012). Latent Semantic Engineering–A new conceptual user-centered design approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(2), 456-473.
Somerville, P. (2016). Understanding community: Politics, policy and practice. policy press.
Strombeck, S. D., & Wakefield, K. L. (2008). Situational influences on service quality evaluations. Journal of Services Marketing.
Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A., Yu, J., Cheng, J., & Ning, K. (2014). Customer satisfaction and competitiveness in the Chinese E-retailing: Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to identify the role of quality factors. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), 69-80.
Sun, D. J., Zhang, K., & Shen, S. (2018). Analyzing spatiotemporal traffic line source emissions based on massive didi online car-hailing service data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 699-714.
Taherdoost, H., Jalaliyoon, N., Namayandeh, M., Forghani, A., & Zamani, M. (2011). Adoption framework expansion based on the computer ethics’ related research models and ethical scenarios analysis. In 2010 International Conference on Economics, Business and Management, IPEDR vol (Vol. 2, pp. 219-223).
Tam, J. L. (2004). Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: an integrative model. Journal of marketing management, 20(7-8), 897-917.
Ter Huurne, M., Ronteltap, A., Corten, R., & Buskens, V. (2017). Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(6), 485-498.
Varian, H. (2004). System reliability and free riding. In Economics of information security (pp. 1-15). Springer, Boston, MA.
Vishwanath, V., & Mulvin, G. (2001). Multi‐channels: The real winners in the B2C internet wars. Business Strategy Review, 12(1), 25-33.
Wang, D., Cao, W., Li, J., & Ye, J. (2017, April). DeepSD: Supply-demand prediction for online car-hailing services using deep neural networks. In 2017 IEEE 33rd international conference on data engineering (ICDE) (pp. 243-254). IEEE.
Wang, D., & Nicolau, J. L. (2017). Price determinants of sharing economy based accommodation rental: A study of listings from 33 cities on Airbnb. com. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 62, 120-131.
Wangjing.(2016).regulatory quandary and its solutions of internet chauffeured car in China.Administrative Law Review,96(2);49-59.
Wang, T., & Zhao, L. (2017, October). The Analysis of Competitive Strategy and Suggestions for Didi under the Background of the New Car-hailing Regulation. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 910, No. 1, p. 012056). IOP Publishing.
Wei, H., Wang, Y., Wo, T., Liu, Y., & Xu, J. (2016, October). ZEST: a Hybrid Model on Predicting Passenger Demand for Chauffeured Car Service. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 2203-2208). ACM.
West, D. M. (2016). Moving forward: self-driving vehicles in China, Europe, Japan, Korea, and the United States. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings: Washington, DC, USA.
Westbrook, R. A., & Oliver, R. L. (1981). Developing better measures of consumer satisfaction: Some preliminary results. Advances in consumer research, 8(1).
Wu, T., Shen, Q., Xu, M., Peng, T., & Ou, X. (2018). Development and application of an energy use and CO2 emissions reduction evaluation model for China's online car hailing services. Energy, 154, 298-307.
Xu, J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2013). Integrating service quality with system and information quality: an empirical test in the e-service context. MIS quarterly, 777-794.
Xu, Q., Jiao, R. J., Yang, X., Helander, M., Khalid, H. M., & Opperud, A. (2009). An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis. Design studies, 30(1), 87-110.
Xu, Z., Li, Z., Guan, Q., Zhang, D., Li, Q., Nan, J., ... & Ye, J. (2018, July). Large-scale order dispatch in on-demand Online car hailing platforms: A learning and planning approach. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 905-913).
Yang, S., Lu, Y., Chau, P. Y., & Gupta, S. (2017). Role of channel integration on the service quality, satisfaction, and repurchase intention in a multi-channel (online-cum-mobile) retail environment. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 15(1), 1-25.
Yang, Z., & Jun, M. (2002). Consumer perception of e-service quality: from internet purchaser and non-purchaser perspectives. Journal of Business strategies, 19(1), 19.
Yıldızgöz, K., & Çelik, H. M. (2019). How to Level the Playing Field for Online car hailing and Taxis. In Scientific And Technical Conference Transport Systems Theory And Practice (pp. 37-51). Springer, Cham.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an Internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quarterly journal of electronic commerce, 2(1), 31-45.
YU, D. S., & SHANG, L. C. (2017). Opportunities and challenges faced by share economy: Taking sharing bicycle as an example. DEStech Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences, (icmed).
Yujie, J., Huanghe, L., Chunsheng, M., & Changxing, Z. (2017). An Analysis of the Impact of the Online Car-Hailing Service on Urban Residents' Travel Behavior. Automobile Applied Technology, 10, 085.
Yu, W., Yan, X., & Wang, Y. (2019, November). Exploring the impacts of online car-hailing service on individuals’ travel behavior. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 688, No. 4, p. 044021). IOP Publishing.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of marketing, 49(2), 33-46.
Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A. & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations, New York: The Free Press.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1-12.
Zenithal, V. A.& Bitner, M. J.(1996), Services Marketing, New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies. Inc.
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of marketing research, 54(5), 687-705.
Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Lu, Y., Wang, T., Li, Y., Song, C., & Duan, J. (2019). Research on Online Car-Hailing Service Quality Evaluation Based on SERVQUAL. In CICTP 2019 (pp. 5438-5449).
Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2009). Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7072-7079.
Zhijun, Y., Wenzhong, O., & Guixiu, X. (2016). Preliminary Modification on Multiple Streams Model Under the Perspective of Factor-embedded——Based on Design and Test the Case of “Online Car-hailing Service Reform”. Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 3, 007.