近年來樂活生活漸漸被重視，代表人們對健康及永續生活的嚮往，本研究對於樂活的概念，劃分出一個新的範疇，研究包含人類肢體活動的樂活產品，在此稱為「活動樂活」。這些產品的特性有著科技的介入來促使人們的肢體活動，希望透過肢體活動來得到健康及永續兩方面的益處，從永續的角度，人們的肢活動所產生的動能可以轉換成電力加以運用，從健康的角度，人們經常性的肢體活動可以帶來身體驗康的益處。本研究希望可以運用說服科技的概念及案例式推理方法，結合能源採集科技及其他科技應用，協助此類產品的設計與開發，因此本研究目的在於為活動樂活產品設計者提供一套開發產品的輔助方法，給予產品設計者設計建議以協助開發。本研究先蒐集有關肢體活動的80個活動樂活產品，運用案例式推理，將之建立案例資料庫及領域模型，而領域模型提供了五項:說服要素、設計法則、設計技巧、科技應用及行為矩陣，針對個別案例來檢視運用到的領域模型項目，之後會進行這些項目的統計分析，並提供兩種使用方式:啟發模式及指示模式，讓設計者依照其研究的目標或喜好來執行，而本研究會示範三種使用方式的流程，如加入行為要素的動機及能力並結合顧客目標行為，將可以更精確分析顧客的行為模式，列出詳細的使用步驟，並提出具體改善產品的建議，以供產品設計者參考。

In recent years, people have gradually paid their attention to LOHAS lifestyle, it means the lifestyle of health and sustainability become an important part of our life. This research narrows down the scope, focusing on LOHAS product with physical activities. The products we collect in this research using technology to promote human bodily movement, let us get the benefits of health and sustainability. From the sustainable aspect, human bodily movements can be transferred into a source of energy harvesting that helps reduce conventional energy consumption. From the health aspect, keeping human bodily movements frequently also bring great benefits for our health. This research use persuasive technology and case-based reasoning, combing technologies to facilitate LOHAS with physical activities the conceptual product design. The initial step is to collect 80 cases, and use case-based reasoning to structure domain model, then combining 80 cases of case library and domain model to propose a tool for product designers. The domain model of the case library consists of five attributes, behavior matrix, design patterns, design principles, persuasive factors, technology applied. Cases inspected through the domain model are recorded into case profiles and then indexed to store into the case library database for statistical analysis. The research provide two ways for product designer to choose, prescription mode and inspiration mode, it depends on designer’s preference or target customers. In final phrase, three demonstration will perform the step, in order to focus the target customer feature accurately, and propose a useful suggestions for LOHAS product designer.

中文部分
1. 呂幸軒(2009)。以案例式推理輔助產品服務系統策略之選定。國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文，台南。
2. 幸漢恩(2012)。活動樂活產品之說服設計。國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文，台南。
3. 張苡絃(2011)。家用ICT產品之為永續行為而設計。國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文，台南。
4. 黃士哲(2009)。以物質場分析法發展產品服務系統創新設計。國立成功大學機械工程研究所碩士論文，台南。
5. 楊永全(2010)。整合仿生學與TRIZ理想化和演化趨勢之綠色創新設計方法。國立成功大學機械工程研究所碩士論文，台南。
英文部分
1. Aamodt, A. and Plaza,E. (1994). “ Case-based reasoning: foundational issues,methodological variations, and system approaches.” AI Communications. IOS Press,Vol. 7: pp. 39- 59.
2. Aha, D. W. (1998). “ The omnipresence of case-based reasoning in science and application.” Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 11(5-6), pp 261-273.
3. Bergmann, R. and Althoff, K. D. (2003). “ Developing industrial case-based reasoning applications.” The INRECA Methodology. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 1612. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Boks, J. and Schmalz, J. (2010). “ Sustainable, user behaviour centered design applying linked-benefit strategies.” Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation Conference, ERSCP-EMSU conference, Delft, The Netherlands.
5. Clark,R.A.,Pua,Y.H.,Fortin,K.,Ritchie ,C.,Webster,K.E.,Denehy,L.,Bryant,A.L.(2012) “ Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control” Gait & Posture Vol.36, pp.372–377
6. Finnie, G. and Sun, Z. (2003). “ R5 model for case-based reasoning.” Knowledge-Based Systems , Vol.16(1), pp. 59-65.
7. Fogg, B. J.(1998). “ Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems.” Los Angeles, California, United States, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pp.225-232.
8. Fogg, B. J. (2003). “ Motivating, influencing, and persuading users.” The human-computer interaction handbook. A. J. Julie and S. Andrew, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc, pp. 358-370.
9. Fogg, B. J. (2002). “ Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do.” Ubiquity
10. Fogg, B. J.(2009). “ A behavior model for persuasive design.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Claremont, California, ACM, pp.1-7.
11. Fogg, B. J. and J. Hreha (2010). “Behavior wizard: A method for matching target behaviors with solutions.” LNCS 6137, pp.117-131.
12. Hamari, J. & Lehdonvirta, V(2010) “ Game design as marketing: How game mechanics create demand for virtual goods” Int. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, Vol 5, Issue 1
13. Haji, M. N. and Lau, K. (2010). “ Human power generation in fitness facilities." Proceedings of the ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, pp.495-501
14. Herring, H. and Roy, R. (2007). “ Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect.” Technovation,Vol.27(4), pp. 194-203.
15. Jansen, A. (2011). “ Human power empirically explored.” Product Engineering Research Group, Publication No.3. Delft University of Technology
16. Kolodner, J. (1993). “ Case-based reasoning” San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Leake, D. B. (1996). “ Case-based reasoning: experiences, lessons and future directions.” Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press.
18. Lilley, D. (2009). “ Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions.” Design Studies Vol.30(6), pp.704-720.
19. Lockton, D. and Harrison D. (2008). “Design with Intent: Persuasive technology in a wider context.” Persuasive Technology: Third International Conference, Oulu, Finland, Proceedings, Springer, Berlin, pp.274-278.
20. Lockton, D. and Harrison D. (2009). “ Influencing interaction: development of the design with intent method.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology.” Claremont, California, ACM, pp.1-8.
21. Lockton, D. and Harrison D. (2010a). “ The design with intent method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour.” Applied Ergonomics Vol.41(3), pp.382-392.
22. Lockton, D., Harrison, D.,and Stanton, N.A.(2010b). “ Design with intent :101 patterns for influencing behavior through design.” UK: uquifine from: http://danlockton.com/dwi/Main_Page
23. Maslow, A. H., Frager, R., Fadiman, J. (1970). Motivation and personality
24. McCalley, L. T. and Midden, C. J. H. (2002). “ Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation.” Journal of Economic Psychology Vol.23(5), pp. 589-603.
25. Mukhtar, H., Ali, A., Belaid, D., Lee, S. “ Persuasive healthcare self-management in intelligent environments” 8th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Environments, pp.190-197
26. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa M. (2009). “ Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 24, Article 28, pp. 485-500.
27. Riesbeck, C. and Schank, R. (1989). “ Inside case-based reasoning, lawrence erlbaum associates.” Lecture Notes for Computer Science, Hillsdale, N.J.
28. Sawyer, B. and Smith, P. (2008) “ Serious games taxonomy.” Presented at the Game Developers Conference. http://www.dmill.com/presentations/serious-games-taxonomy-2008.pdf
29. Skip, R.A., L. B., Suma, EA and Bolas, M. (2011). “ Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: new tools to address obesity and diabetes.” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technologies Vol.5, pp. 256-264.
30. Vargas, J. E. and S. Raj (1993). “ Developing maintainable expert systems using case-based reasoning." Expert Systems Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.219-266
31. Wever, R. and Kuijk, J.,and Boks,C. (2008). “ User‐centred design for sustainable behaviour.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering,Vol.1(1), pp. 9-20.
32. Yang.C.J. and Chen J.L. (2011). Accelerating preliminary eco-innovation design for products that integrates case-based reasoning and TRIZ methed. Journal of Clear Production, Vol. 19, pp.998-1006
網路資料
1. 蓋德科技公司網站，取自
http://www.guidertech.com/
2. 喬山(JOHNSON)健康科技網站，取自
http://www.johnsonfitness.com.tw/