過往文獻對於動員(mobilization)的探索，雖然有提到持續性動員的重要性，但卻少有學者對此深入探討，而在服務主導邏輯(service-dominant logic)文獻當中，大多著重在探討服務系統間進行資源的整合能夠共創出價值，很少談論到如何向外獲取或連結組織內原本沒有的資源，因此本研究結合動員和服務主導邏輯觀點來探索持續性動員如何發生以及動員對於服務生態系統如何產生影響，並且藉此擴展對於兩個理論的理解。
本研究採用質性研究方法，透過單一個案研究法來深入瞭解嘉義整合照護服務的發展歷程，將視其為一個服務生態系統，觀察在這之中活動者的互動行為、資源的整合應用以及各個互動之間的關係，並且將發展歷程分為五個時期進行深入地分析以探索研究的議題。
以動員和服務主導邏輯觀點為基礎，本研究發現當不同組織的活動者為了追求共同的願景，彼此之間利用關係不斷地推動其他活動者，以獲取所需的資源，持續性動員便會發生，在這之中科技的應用是讓持續性動員有效發生的關鍵。此外，動員能夠促使服務系統之間產生連結並且能夠促進服務系統間進行資源的整合，當動員持續不斷地發生，便能使得更多其他的服務系統相互連結，獲得更多必要的資源進行整合運用，形成一個服務生態系統。

Previous researches of mobilization have mentioned the importance of sustained mobilization, but few of them deeply discuss the point. On the other hand, service-dominant logic has focused on resource integration and value co-creation but rarely explains how to get or connect resources which service systems do not own. Therefore, this research combine the perspectives of mobilization and service-dominant logic to explore how sustained mobilization happens, and how mobilization influences service ecosystem, to have more understanding of the perspectives.
This research applies qualitative research method and single case study to profoundly explore the developing process of Chiayi integrated healthcare service. Chiayi integrated healthcare service will be viewed as a service ecosystem. Interactions between actors, integration of resources, and relationships between interactions within Chiayi integrated healthcare service will be observed and analyzed. This research divides the developing process into five periods to examine the issue.
Based on mobilization and service-dominant logic, this research finds that for pursuing the shared vision, when different actors from different organizations take use of relationship to keep moving other actors to get the resources they need, sustained mobilization will happen. Moreover, mobilization can connect service systems and enhance the integration of resources. As mobilization sustains happening, there will be more service systems connected and more resources applied to form a service ecosystem.

Akaka, M. A., & Chandler, J. (2010). Practices, processes, positions and propositions: a resource-based approach to value co-creation in value networks. Paper presented at the Forum on Markets and Marketing, Cambridge, UK.
Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Technology as an operant resource in service (eco) systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 367-384.
Akaka, M. A., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). An exploration of networks in value cocreation: A service-ecosystems view. Review of Marketing Research, 9(Special Issue), 13-50.
Axelsson, B., & Johanson, J. (1992). Foreign market entry : the textbook vs. the network view. London: Routledge.
Casanueva, C., Gallego, A., Castro, I., & Sancho, M. (2014). Airline alliances: Mobilizing network resources. Tourism Management, 44, 88-98.
Casanueva, C., Gallego, A., & Revilla, M. A. (2015). Access and mobilization of network resources and competitive advantage in hotels: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 1279-1300.
Constantin, J. A., & Lusch, R. F. (1994). Understanding resource management, Oxford, OH.
Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327-339.
Finch, J., Wagner, B., & Hynes, N. (2012). Resources prospectively: How actors mobilize resources in business settings. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 164-174.
Ford, D., & Hakansson, H. (2005). The idea of business interaction. The IMP Journal, 1(1), 4-17.
Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 133-139.
Hakansson, H. (1987). Product development in networks. In H. Hakansson (Ed.), Technological development: A network approach. New York: Croom Helm.
Hakansson, H. (1997). Organization networks. In S. A & W. M (Eds.), The IEBM handbook of organizational behaviour. London: International Thompson Business Press.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Hardyman, W., Daunt, K. L., & Kitchener, M. (2015). Value co-creation through patient engagement in health care: a micro-level approach and research agenda. Public Management Review, 17(1), 90-107.
Hermes, J. W. S., & Mainela, T. (2014). Mobilizing crisis management networks — Entrepreneurial behavior in turbulent contexts. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 967-976.
Holttinen, H. (2014). Contextualizing value propositions: Examining how consumers experience value propositions in their practices. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 22(2), 103-110.
Hunt, S. D. (2004). On the service-centered dominant logic of marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 21-22.
Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The role of customer engagement behavior in value co-creation a service system perspective. Journal of service research, 1094670514529187.
Joiner, K. A., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Evolving to a new service-dominant logic for health care. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Health, 3, 25-33.
Layton, E. T., Jr. (1974). Technology as knowledge. Technology and culture, 31-41.
Lundgren, A. (1992). Coordination and Mobilisation Processes in Industrial Networks. In B. Axelsson & G. Easton (Eds.), Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality. London: Routledge.
Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5-18.
Lutz, S., & Ellegaard, C. (2015). The mobilization of supplier resources for complex projects: A case study of routines in the offshore wind turbine industry. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 23(2), 107-116.
Madhavaram, S., & Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 67-82. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0063-z
Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18-20.
Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 395-406.
McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Vargo, S. L., Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C., & van Kasteren, Y. (2012). Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. Journal of service research, 15(4), 370-389.
Mouzas, S., & Naudé, P. (2007). Network mobilizer. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 22(1), 62-71.
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management: Sage.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage : creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan.
Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I. F., & Johnston, W. J. (2004). Managing in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175-183.
Ritvala, T., & Salmi, A. (2010). Value-based network mobilization: A case study of modern environmental networkers. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(6), 898-907.
Ritvala, T., & Salmi, A. (2011). Network mobilizers and target firms: The case of saving the Baltic Sea. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 887-898.
Rusanen, H., Halinen, A., & Jaakkola, E. (2014). Accessing resources for service innovation – the critical role of network relationships. Journal of Service Management, 25(1), 2-29.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Snehota, I., & Hakansson, H. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge
Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer(1), 71-77.
Thornton, S. C., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2013). Understanding types of organizational networking behaviors in the UK manufacturing sector. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), 1154-1166.
Vargo, S. L. (2009). Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service‐dominant logic perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 373-379.
Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2012). Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re)Formation: A Service Ecosystems View. Service Science, 4(3), 207-217.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What It Is, What It Is Not, What It Might Be. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions (pp. 43-56). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2010). From Repeat Patronage to Value Co-creation in Service Ecosystems: A Transcending Conceptualization of Relationship. Journal of Business Market Management, 4(4), 169-179.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181-187.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). The Nature and Understanding of Value: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective Special Issue – Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Value in Markets and Marketing (pp. 1-12).
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., & Morgan, F. W. (2006). Historical perspectives on service-dominant logic. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions (pp. 29-42). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145-152.
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63-72.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of economic literature, 38(3), 595-613.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4 ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Zimmermann, E. W. (1951). World Resources and Industries. New York: Harper and Row.
李慶芳. (2013). 質性研究之經驗敘說：質化研究的六個修煉. 新北市: 高立.
侯勝宗. (2012). 見所未見：詮釋性個案研究方法探索. [Making the Invisible Visible: A Methodological Journey of an Interpretative Case Research]. 組織與管理, 5(1), 111-153.
紀金山, & 陳韋庭. (2011). 自發型社區組織的發展與資源動員：以雲林縣老人長期照護協會為例. [The Growth of Community Organization and Resource Mobilization: The Example of Yunlin Elderly Long-term Care Association]. 台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊, 1(2), 1-58.
國家發展委員會. (2014). 中華民國人口推計－103 至 150 年. 台北市: 國發會.
陳亮恭. (2015). 高齡醫療服務的發展－由片斷走向整合. [Healthcare Services for Older People: From Fragmentation to Integration]. 護理雜誌, 62(5), 23-29.
黃明發. (2014). 從全球化老人照顧之發展趨勢對臺灣長期照顧之省思. 社區發展季刊, 148, 146-158.