在組織科學探討已久的話題就是一個組織如何長期的保持好績效，組織學習分為兩類包括探險(Exploration)與開發(Exploitation)，這兩者之間的平衡點將會影響企業的績效。組織要長期保持優良的績效，除了二元化組織的佈置之外，人也是很重要的一個因素，本研究從探險與開發的觀點切入，以個案研究方式解析一間製造工廠，並探討探險與開發角色知識移轉的過程與重要因子。
本研究經由訪談內容的關鍵字分析，可以歸納個案公司在開發與探險角色下的知識移轉模式，本研究歸納出兩點是開發與探險知識移轉模式共同的重要流程步驟，分別是教育訓練系統與流程與不足知識與技能之辨識，另有三項雖是開發與探險知識移轉共同的重要流程步驟，但是探險角色的知識移轉模式特別強調這三個因子的重要性，分別是員工主動學習、個案、實作與練習與循環(持續改善)，本研究亦歸納不同之處，分別是開發角色的知識移轉過程重視員工取得最佳化平衡這關鍵流程步驟，而探險角色之知識移轉過程重視自我知識認知差異、員工背景知識與經驗、差異知識之建立與彌補、知識分享平台這些關鍵流程步驟。
而在個案公司開發與探險知識移轉模式關鍵因子異同分析，本研究歸納出四點是開發與探險知識移轉模式共同的重要關鍵因子，分別是教育訓練系統、個案、實作與練習、主管支持與問題解決，另有四項雖是開發與探險知識移轉共同的重要關鍵因子，但是探險角色的知識移轉模式特別強調其中三個因子的重要性，分別是員工自主性、知識接收者的個人特質與組織文化與平台，其中一項則是開發角色強調的重要關鍵因子是團隊支持，最後，本研究亦歸納不同之處，分別是開發角色的知識移轉過程重視平衡這關鍵因子，而探險角色之知識移轉過程重視自我察覺、知識接收者的背景知識經驗、知識來源多樣性這些關鍵因子。

There was a topic in orgnization science that discussed for a long time is how a orgnaization sustain the long term performance. There are two different types in organization learning include exploration and exploitation. The balance of exploration and exploitation will be a key factor for performance sustain. In this study, we used case study methology to study a mansufacturing factory stand on the exploration and exploitation point of view. And look for the knowledge transfer model and key factors.
For model and process in knowledge transfer, the key factors of knowledge transfer are training system, knowledge gap identification for both of exploration and exploitation. Active learning, practice and continous learning are the key factors for both of exploration and exploitation but more drive in exploration. The difference factors between exploration and exploitation, balance point is key for exploitation but exploration. And knowledge gap identification, background experience/knowledge, gap knowledge learning and share flotform are key factor in exploration but exploitation.
For the critical factors analysis, the key factors of knowledge transfer are training system, practice, support and solution for both of exploration and exploitation. Self-management, personality and organization cuture are the key factors for both of exploration and exploitation but more drive in exploration. And team support is the key factor for both of exploration and exploitation but more drive in exploitation. The difference factors between exploration and exploitation, balance point is key for exploitation but exploration. And self-perceieve background experience and multi-knowledge source are key factor in exploration but exploitation.

1. Allison, P. D., S. J. Long. 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 55(4) 469–478.
2. Andersen, B., J. Howells, R. Hull, I. Miles, J. Roberts, eds. 2000. Knowledge and Innovation in the New Service Economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
3. Arthur, M. B. 1994. The boundaryless career: A new perspective for organizational inquiry. J. Organ. Behav. 15 295–306.
4. Atuahene-Gima, K. 2005. Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. J. Marketing 69(4) 61–83.
5. Auh, S., B. Menguc. 2005. Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. J. Bus. Res. 58 1652–1661.
6. Becker, G. S. 1962. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 70(5) 9–49.
7. Beckman, C. M. 2006. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4) 741–758.
8. Benner, M. J., M. L. Tushman. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. 28 238–256.
9. Chaudhuri, S., B. Tabrizi. 1999. Capturing the real value in high-tech acquisitions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(5) 123–130.
10. Cleveland, H. (1985). The Knowledge Dynamic. The Knowledge Executive, New York: Human Valley Books.
11. Cummings, A., G. R. Oldham. 1997. Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Rev. 40(1) 22–38.
12. Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
14. DeFillippi, R., M. B. Arthur. 1994. The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 15 307–324.
15. Dixon, N. M. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston:.
16. Dixon, N. M. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston:.
17. Drucker, P. F. 1998. On the Profession of Management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
18. Duncan, R. B. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, D. P. Slevin, eds. The Management of Organization Design, Vol. 1. Strategies and Implementation. North-Holland, New York, 167–188.
19. Eccles, R. G., D. B. Crane. 1988. Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
20. Ernst, H., J. Vitt. 2000. The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management 30 105–119.
21. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
22. Friedson, E. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Gabarro, J. J. 1985. When a new manager takes charge. Harvard Bus. Rev. 63(3) 110–123.
24. Gibson, C. B., J. Birkinshaw. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47 209–226.
25. Groysberg, B., L. E. Lee. 2009. Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20(4) 740–758.
26. Gulati, R., P. Puranam. 2009. Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2) 422–440.
27. Gupta, A. K., K. G. Smith, C. E. Shalley. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49 693–706.
28. Harem, T., Krogh, G. & Roos, J. (1996). Knowledge-based Strategic Change: perspective on cooperation and competition . London: SAGE,.116-136.
29. Haspeslagh, P., D. Jemison. 1991. Managing Acquisitions. Free Press, New York.
30. He, Z.-L., P.-K. Wong. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15(4) 481–494.
31. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Infouence of ICT on Motivation for Knowledge Sharing?. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
32. Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw, G. Prennushi. 1997. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3) 291–313.
33. Jansen, J. J. P., F. A. J. van den Bosch, H. W. Volberda. 2006. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11) 1661–1674.
34. Kogut, B. & Zander U. (1993), Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4) pp.625-645
35. Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
36. Kordana, K. A. 1995. Law firms and associate careers: Tournament theory versus the production-imperative model. Yale Law J. 104 1907–1934.
37. Kyriakopoulos, K., C. Moorman. 2004. Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 21(3) 219–240.
38. Levinthal, D., J. March. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14 95–112.
39. Lubatkin, M. H., Z. Simsek, Y. Ling, J. F. Veiga. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J. Management 32(5) 646–672.
40. March, J. G. (1991). “Exploration and exploitation”, Organization Science, 2, pp. 71-87.
41. March, J. G. 2003. Understanding organizational adaptation. Presentation, April 2, Budapest University of Economics and Public Administration, Budapest University, Prague.
42. Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. Columbia University Press, New York.
43. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York, Oxford University Press.
44. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York, Oxford University Press.
45. Phillips, B. 1997. Free at last? Institutional Investor (August) 48–55.
46. Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20(4): 685-695.
48. Rees, A. 1973. The Economics of Work and Pay. Harper and Row, New York.
49. Rosen, S. 1981. The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(5) 845–858.
50. Sessa, D. 1999. All-star analysts 1999 survey: Early mornings, late nights mark an analyst’s days. Wall Street Journal (June 29) R13.
51. Smith, W. K., M. L. Tushman. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5) 522–536.
52. Song, J., P. Almeida, G. Wu. 2003. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4) 351–365.
53. Sorenson, Olav, and Sorensen, Jesper (2001). “Finding the right mix: Franchising, organization learning and chain performance.”, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 22, Issue 6-7, P.713–724.
54. Starbuck, W. H. 1992. Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. 29(6) 713–740.
55. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of The Best Practice Within The Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
56. Szulanski, G.（2000）. The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82（1）, 9-27.
57. Tampoe, M. 1996. Motivating Knowledge Workers—The Challenge for the 1990s. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
58. Turban, E. (1992). Expert Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence. Macmillan.
59. Tushman, M. L., C. A. O’Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. 38 8–30.
60. Tushman, M. L., C. A. O’Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. 38 8–31.
61. Useem, M., J. Karabel. 1986. Pathways to top corporate management. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51 184–200.
62. Verkasalo, M. & Lappalainen, P. (1998). A Method of Measuring the Efficiency of the Knowledge Utilization Process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 4( 45), 414-423.
63. Wiig K. M. (1993), Knowledge management foundation. New York: Oxford University Press
64. Woodruffe, C. 1999. Winning the Talent War. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
65. Zack, M. H. (1999a). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41, 125-145.