| 研究生: |
郭國振 Kuo, Kuo-Cheng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
工廠績效與新產品企劃、行銷管理、研發管理之相互關係研究
--以國內電源供應器產業為研究對象 The Interaction Research of Plant Performance、 New Products Planning、Sales Management and R&D Management---- Taiwan Power Supply Industry for Example |
| 指導教授: |
康信鴻
Kang, Hsin-Hong |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2010 |
| 畢業學年度: | 98 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 65 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 電源供應器 、新產品企劃 、研發管理 、行銷管理 、工廠績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | power supply, new product planning, R&D management, sales management, plant performance. |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:84 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在日益競爭的3C產品中,電源產業毛利逐漸下降,而電源產業之生產重心,研發中心亦轉往海外、大陸及東南亞。如何擬定策略提昇公司整體競爭力,乃是公司賴以永續經營的唯一方法, 而提升競爭力,除投入研發人力支出,增加生產設備外。如能整合重組現有各部門組織提升競爭力,則是另一項不錯選擇。本研究以影響工廠績效的主要因素去思考 ,進而依個人經驗擬出以新產品企劃、行銷管理與研發管理,對工廠績效的研究架構 ,並希望藉此研究印證經營電源產業相關公司的經營手法。
本研究屬探索性質,利用紙本及E- MAIL問卷,對電源產業及相關上下游產業從業人員 ,含零組件供應商進行問卷調查。根據收集相關資料結果,並利用描述性分析 、信度分析、相關性分析及迴歸分析,以驗證本研究架構。而根據問卷調查分析結果,對於電源供應器工廠之經營策略,加強新產品企劃功能 ,並整合研發管理 、行銷管理 ,確實能提升工廠績效;是故,如何建立新產品產品企劃、行銷及研發部門之有效管理機制,則是經營者必須思考之重要課題。
During these years, the 3C product industry is competitive and the gross profits of power industry are decreasing. The important R&D departments are also moved to the aboard. How to make the strategy to upgrade the organizational competitive is the way to keep the operating for the company. To raise the competitive ability, not only by upgrading the human capital, machines, but also by intergrating each department. According the working experience this study proposed the new products planning, sales management, R&D management factors which will influence the plant performance. By this research to explore the administration related to power supply industry.
In this research used the questionnaires which sent out by letter and e-mail in order to investigate the employees who working in the power supply industry and related region. From the collected data, this research used the descriptive analysis, reliability test and regression analysis to test the research framework. According to the analysis results shown that it can improve the plant performance for the power supply industry by enhancing the new product planning, sales management and R&D management. So, how to effectively manage the new product planning, sales and R&D are the important issues for the entrepreneur.
ㄧ、中文部份
1.林淑英 (1987)。新產品開發過程之組織互動分析—石化業、資訊業之實證研究。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
2.李克華 (1985)。新產發展成敗關鍵之研究-台灣高科技企業實證。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
3.李勝謙 (2003)。開發新產品過程中研發/行銷部門整合與組織績效關係之研究。國立中山大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
4.紀曉影 (2006)。研發管理策略、管理創新方案及組織績效之關聯。國立中央大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
5.黃俊英 (2001年)。行銷學的世界—新產品發展與產品生命週期。台北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
6.施晃嘉 (1997)。新產品開發行銷/研發部門整合與績效關係之研究。國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7.張存金、盧淵源 (2001)。研發團對結構特性及整合機制與研發績效關係之研究—因徑分析模式。企業管理學報,49,97-134。
8.曹中仁 (1990)。新產品發展過程中,研究發展與行銷部門整合因素之研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
9.游旭永 (1992)。新產品開發專案組織及組織氣候對產品創新績效影響之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
10.蔡金坤 (1999)。我國交換式電源供應器產業發展趨勢與競爭分析,工研院能資所ITIS計畫。
11.劉三文 (1995)。研發過程影響研發/行銷整合與新產品績效之因素,大同工學院事業經營研究所碩士論文。
12.劉常勇 (2008)。第四代研發管理。
13.賴士葆 (1990)。科技策略與新產品發展績效相關之研究。
14.賴士葆 (1994)。設計/製造整合機制與新產品開發績效相關之研究。
15.李逸泓 (2004)。台灣IC 設計公司新產品發展流程與績效之個案研究。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
16.呂佳穎 (2006)。新產品開發中產品設計策略之研究。銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部份
1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2003). The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter?. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 359-373.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-Mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
5. Bonoma, T. V., Slevin D.P., & Narayanan V. K. (1997). Organizational integration: three roads to more effective management. Working paper, Graduate school of business, Univ. of Pittsburgh.
6. Bozz, Allen & Hamilton (1982). New Product Management for the 1980s, New York:Booz. Allen and Hamilton Inc, pp. 140-155.
7. Coase R. H. (2008). The institutional structure of production. The American Economic Review, 82 (4), 713-719.
8. Cooper, R. G., (1983). The new product process:An empirically-based classification scheme. R&D Management, 13 (1), 1-13.
9. Cooper, R. G., (1984). New product strategies: what distinguishes the top performers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2, 151-164.
10. Cooper, R. G., & E. J. Kleinschmidt (2007). Winging business in product development: The critical success factors. Research Technology Management, 50(3), 52-66.
11. Droge, C. L., Jayaram, J. and Vickery, S. K. (2000). The ability to minimize the timing of new product development and introduction: An examination of antecedent factors in the North American Automobile Supplier Industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(1), 24-40.
12. Griffin, A., & Page, A. L. (1993). An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of product innovation management, 10 (4), 291-308.
13. Griffin, A., & Hauser J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing:A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of product innovation management, 13, 191-215.
14. Gupta, A. K., Raj S. P., & Wilemon D. (1985). The R&D-marketing interface in high technology firms. Journal of product innovation management, l2 (2), 12-24.
15. Gupta, A. K., Raj S. P., & Wilemon D. (1985). R&D-marketing dialogue in high-tech firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 14, 289-300.
16. Gupta, A. K., Raj S. P., & Wilemon D. (1986). A model for studying in R&D marketing interface in the product innovation process. Journal of marketing, 50 (2), 7-17
17. Gupta, A. K., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, D. L.(1987). Managing the R&D and marketing interface. Research Management, 3 (4), 38-43.
18.Hauptman, O. (1986). Influence of task type on the relationship between communication and performance:The case of software development. R&D Management, 16 (2), 127-139.
19. Hoopes, D. (2001). Why are there glitches in product development? R&D Management, 31(4), 381.
20. Hopkins, D. S. (1980). The product winners and losers. Conference Board Report, No.773.
21. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing Management:analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
22. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorch, J.W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 12, 1-47.
23. Mula, J., Poler, R., Garcı´a-Sabater J.P. , & Lario F.C. (2006). Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review. Int. J. Production Economics, 103, 271–285.
24. Moenaert, R. K., Meyer, A. D., Souder, W. E., & Deschoolmeester, D. (1994). R&D-Marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows, and innovation success. Journal of product innovation management, 11, 31-45.
25. Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, O. C. (1987). Marketing’s interaction with other functional units:A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of product innovation management.
26. Souder, W. M., 1980, “Industrial Marketing Management, Feb.,” pp.30-39.
27. Von Hippel, E. A.,1978, “Users as innovators” Technology, Vol.80,Jan., pp.30-40.
校內:2020-12-30公開