| 研究生: |
劉玉芬 Liu, Yuh-Fen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
共同設計與產品創新對品牌知覺價值與購買意願之研究–-以品牌偏好為干擾變數 The Effect of Co-design and Product Innovation on Perceived Brand Value and Purchase Intention – Brand Preference as Moderating Variable |
| 指導教授: |
莊雙喜
Chuang, Shuang-Shii |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 76 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 共同設計 、產品創新 、品牌知覺價值 、購買意願 、品牌偏好 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Co-design, Product Innovation, Brand Perceived Value, Purchase Intention, Brand Preference |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:113 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著全球化競爭與消費者快速變化的需求與喜好,企業需不斷的研發提供創新服務與創新產品,以提昇企業之競爭優勢。為滿足消費者多樣化與個別的須要,近幾年大量客製化和共同設計已被一些知名品牌運用,如運動鞋愛迪達、耐吉或服飾公司…等,有些研究已證實企業提供大量客製化或共同設計會提昇顧客的滿意度。
本研究目標探討「消費者對共同設計與產品創新之新手錶品牌知覺價值與購買意願–以品牌偏好為干擾變數」,提供手錶產業在未來面對研究自有品牌的經營層面上;能以有限資源確實掌握消費者對創意手錶的購買意願之因素。
本研究共回收有效問卷300 份。以SPSS統計方法,對樣本進行因素分析、信度檢定、敘述性統計、獨立t檢定、差異性分析、層級迴歸和典型相關分析。
研究結果顯示:
1)共同設計與產品創新之間具有正向影響。
2)共同設計與產品創新對購買意願之關係具有顯著的影響。
3)產品創新、共同設計與創新產品共同設計對品牌知覺價值,均有顯著的影響。
4)品牌知覺價值對購買意願有顯著的影響。
5)品牌知覺價值對創新產品共同設計與購買意願之中介效果成立。
6)品牌偏好對品牌知覺價值與購買意願具有干擾效果,品牌偏好的程度會干擾品牌知覺價值與購買意願之間的關係,當品牌偏好愈強時,對購買意願會有顯著的干擾效果。
Globalization competition & rapid changes in customer demands, companies have to consistently develop new products or service innovation to create niche profit for the company needs. For the demand of customer individual needs, mass customization is surging, Co-design is one of a mass customization options, where a product’s design is based on the customer’s selection from a range of design feature offerings. For those reasons, the concept of mass customization has been applied in the many brand companies for example: Adida, Nike, & apparel firm…etc..
The study aims to examine the effect of watch co-design and new product innovation on perceived brand value and purchase intention;and to find out whether the brand preference moderate the relationship between new product innovation ,co-design & purchase intention of new watch brand. Moreover, the mediating effects of brand perceived value towards the co-design of new product innovation can positively affect purchase intention. In order to providing watch companies the reference on what factors will affect the customer purchase intention.
300 valid questionnaires were collected. The date were analysis by Statistical package for social science (SPSS) including the research methods of factor analysis, coefficient alpha test, Descriptive Statistics, Independent t-test, Anova Analysis , Hierarchical Regression and Canonical Correlation.
The major conclusion of the research are:
1. Co-design factors had positive influence on new production innovation.
2. New product innovation had positive influence on co-design
3. Co -design factors had direct effect on purchase intention.
4. New product innovation had direct effect on purchase intention
5. New product innovation & co-design had direct effects on brand perceived value.
6. Brand perceived value had direct effect on purchase intention.
7.Brand perceived value had mediating effect between co-design/new product innovation & purchase intention.
8.Strong brand preference moderated the purchase intention of the new watch brand.
參考文獻
英文文獻
Anderson-Connell, L. J., P. V. Ulrich , and E. L. Brannon (2002), “A Consumer-Driven Model for Mass Customization in the Apparel Market,”Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 6(3), pp.240-258.
Aaker, David A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. The Free Press: New York
Aaker, D. (1996). Building Strong Brand, New York: The Free Press.
Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Consideration.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no.6 (1986): pp.1173-1182.
Bilkey, W. J. and E. Nes, (1982), “Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations” , Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.13, Summer, pp. 89-99
Changa, M. K., Cheung, W. and Lai, V. S.(2005), “Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping”, Information and Management, Vol. 42, Issue 4, pp. 543–559.
Christensen, C.M. (2000), “Mutative advantage, Clayton Christensen”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Cambridge, 42(2), pp.105-111.
Calantone, R. J., Schmidt, J. B. & Benedetto, C. A(1997). New Product Activities and Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment Hostility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14,.pp.179-189
Cabb-Wallgren, C. J., Ruble, C. A., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand Equity, Brand Preference, and Purchase Intent. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), pp.25-40.
Chandran & Morwitz (2005), “Effects of participative pricing on consumers' cognitions and actions: A goal theoretic perspective”, The Journal of consumer research,vol:32 iss:2 pp.249
Cornwell, T.B., Roy, D.P., & Steinard, II E.A. (2001), Exploring Managers’ Perceptions of the Impact of Sponsorship on Brand Equity, Journal of Advertising, 30(2), pp. 41-51
Cross, S. E., Bacon, P.L. and Morris, M. L. (2000), “The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 791-808.
Dodds, W. B. and Monroe, K. B., 1985, The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations, Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), pp.85-90.
Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal, (1991), “ Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, August, pp.307-319.
Fiore, A. M., and P. A. Kimle(1997), Understanding Aesthetics for the Merchandising and Design Profession, New York: Fairchild Publication.
Higie, R. A., & Murphy, A. S. 1991. Using recall and brand preference to evaluate advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(3):pp.56-63.
Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003).Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model.European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), pp.1762-1800.
Fiore, A. M., S. -E. Lee, G.. Kunz, and J. R. Campbell(2001), “Relationships Between Optimum Stimulation Level and Willingness to Use Mass Customization Options,” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 5(2), pp.99-107.
Fiore, A. M., S. -E. Lee, and G.. Kunz (2004), “Individual Differences, Motivations, and Willingness to Use A Mass Customization Option for Fashion Products,” European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), pp.835-849.
Foxall, Gordon R. & Greenley, Gordon E. (1999), “Consumer’ Emotional Responses to Service Enviroments”, Journal of Business Research, 46(1), pp. 131-45.
Franke, N. and Schreier, M. (2008), “Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 93-107.
Kay, M. J. “Making Mass Customization Happen: Lessons for Implementation.” Planning Review 21, no.1 (1993): pp.14-18
Kaplan, A. M. and M. Haenlein. “Toward a Parsimonious Definition of Traditional and Electronic Mass Customization.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 23, no.2 (2006):pp.168-182.
Lemon, K. N., Rust, R. T. and Zeithaml, V. A., 2001, What drives customer equity, Marketing Management, 10(1),pp.20-25.
Nikolaus Franke and Frank Piller, (2004) “Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2004;21: pp.405
Oliver, L. R. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty?. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), pp.33-44.
M. Venkatesan, College Park, MD: Association for Consumer Research, pp.167-179.
Piamphongsant, T. and Mandhachitara, R. (2007), “Psychological antecedents of career women‟s fashion clothing conformity”, Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 438-455.
Pine, J. B. II (1993), Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Pine, J.B. II and Gilmore, J.H.(1999), The Experience Economy: Work Is Theater and Every Business Stage, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Roy,D.P. and Cornwell, T.B., (2003), Brand Equity’s Influence on Response to Event Sponsorships, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(6-7), pp..377-393
Ravi, D. 1999. Comparison effects on preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3): 293-306
Schiffman, L. G. and L. L. Kanuk, (2000), Consumer Behavior (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I. and Gross B. L. (1991), “Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Value,” Journal of Business Research, 22(1), pp. 159-170.
Tan, Thomas T.W., 2003. Factors affecting new product adoption in the consumer electronics industry, Singapore Management Review, 25(2):pp. 51.
Vigneron, F. & Johnson, L.W.(1999), “A Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige-seeking Consumer Behavior” Academy of Marketing Science Reviw, Vol.1999, No.1, pp. 1-15
Vigneron, F. & Johnson, L.W.(2004), “Perceptions of Brand Luxury” Joural of Brand Management, Vol. 11, No.6, pp. 484-506
Zeithaml, V. A. 1988, Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence, Journal of Marketing, 52(3), pp..2-22
中文文獻
林明杰;陳育平;莊閔越 (2008) 「產品創新程度與產品優勢及顧客對產品熟悉度於新產品開發績效之相關研究」-中華管理學報 卷期:9卷4期
王祥珍(2008) 「不同生活型態消費者產品知識對產品創新接受度影響之研究-以咖啡為例」國立臺灣大學管理學院商學研究所碩士論文
邱毓阡(2009) 「大量客製化對顧客價值與顧客忠誠度的影響─ 以品牌形象為干擾變數」大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文
陳俊宇(2009) 「 宗教性、利他性與主觀規範 對於綠色產品購買意願之影響」- 國立臺灣大學管理學院國際企業研究所碩士論文
詹宜佩(2006) 「以服裝興趣、動機探討流行商品使用共同設計意願之研究─NIKE 球鞋為例」淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士班碩士論文
王靖邦(2010) 「心理因素影響虛擬社群樂於使用共同設計之研究」- 淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士班
許士軍(1990),管理學,第十版,台北市:東華書局
許士軍,1987,「現代行銷管理」。台北市:商略印書館。
高曰萍, 美學經濟之消費行為研究, 2006 年, 彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文
陳俊宇(2009) 「宗教性、利他性與主觀規範對於綠色產品購買意願之影響」- 臺灣大學國際企業學研究所學位論文
孫瑋佑(2009) 「Web2.0 協同設計模式探討-以紡織產業為例」- 臺北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所學位論文
薛榮棠(2006) 「事業網絡鑲嵌、知識管理與新產品開發績效關聯性之研究」- 國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文
蔡舜如(2008) 「星巴克咖啡連鎖店消費者之商店形象、知覺價值與購買意願之研究」 -淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文
廖世義,黃鈺婷,譚子文 (2009) 「行銷管理美學要素之初探」行銷評論,2009 年秋季第6 卷,第3 期,頁391-422
鄭邵夫、鄭群嫻、黃嘉彥(2009) 「遊戲機玩家涉入程度與消費行為關係之研究」 國立勤益科技大學管理學術研討會
廖啟順 (2009)「知覺品質、品牌定位與產品創新行銷策略之研究」-中原大學管理研究所博士學位論文
陳冠瑜(2009)「影響精品品牌購買意願因素之研究—社會比較觀點」-靜宜大學企業管理研究所學位論文
洪世雄、陳曉天、葉欣愷(2010)「行銷知識管理能力、產品創新對顧客滿意度之影響-以知覺價值為中介變數」- 東亞論壇、卷期:469期
謝岱玲 (2010) 「不同產品類別下,自我一致對於品牌忠誠度之影響-以品牌知覺價值為中介變數」-成功大學企業管理學系碩士班學位論文
李欣怡、陳正強(2007) 「安泰人壽贊助台北國際馬拉松對消費者品牌權益及購買意願影響之研究」-運動事業管理學術研討會論文集-第六期
滕家詮 (2008) 「產品創新績效之個案研究」-成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班學位論文
校內:2016-08-31公開