近年來，合作學習的方式越來越受到重視。然而合作式學習並非解決學生學習問題之萬靈丹，研究指出認知性及社會性的變因將削弱合作式學習之優勢。本研究由認知性問題著手，以資訊科技為輔助，設計一數位化合作式學習引導機制，基於專家智識構成之學習鷹架以改善學習者之認知情形，協助數位化合作學習流程，使學習者清楚學習目標，加強認知技能，並促進深度理解。

Cooperative learning is widely applied in education. However, it is not an ultimate solution for solving students’ learning problems. Previous researches have shown that cognitive and social factors may weaken cooperative learning’s benefits. In this paper, we proposed an expertise-based learning guidance mechanism to aid learner’s cognitive process in cooperative learning, with a focus on learning destination, enhancing cognitive skills, and increasing students’ comprehension.

英文文獻

[1] Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18 (2), 159-174.
[2] Artzt, A., & Newman, C. (1990). How to use cooperative learning in the mathematics class. Reston, VA: The Nation Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
[3] Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The knowledge integration environment: Theory and design. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL '95: Bloomington, IN) (pp. 14-21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Berk L.E., Winsler A. (1995), Scaffolding children's learning; Vygotsky and Children's early childhood education.
[5] Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-Regulated Learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, and students. Learning and Instrtuction, 7(2).161-186.
[6] Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanism. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Ed), Meta-Cognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[7] Chen C.M. (2009), Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance. Expert System with Applications (3, pp. 8816-8829)
[8] Chiang, T. H., Chang, J. S., Lin, M. U., & Su, K. Y. (1992). Statistical models for word segmentation and unknown word resolution. Proceedings of COLING-92, pp.101-107.
[9] Davenport, T. H., Prusak, L. (1998), “Working Knowledge: How Organization Manage What They Know”, Harvard Business School, Boston.
[10] Eccles, J. (1983), Expectancies, values & academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp.75-146).San Francisco: Freeman.
[11] Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research on Teaching, 20, 1-54.
[12] Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cofnitive development inquiry .American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
[13] Grueneberg K. K, & Lam R. (1998), "Education on the net: Constructing collaborative learning communities". In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computers, pp.543-545, Beijing, China.
[14] Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[15] Harris D. B. (1996), ”Creating a Knowledge Centric Information Technology Environment”, Available: http://www.techined.com/ckc.htm.
[16] Hooper, S., Temiyakarn, C., & Williams, M. D. (1993). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high-and average-ability students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41 (2), 5-18.
[17] Janis, I. L & Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
[18] Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The new circles’ of learning cooperation in the classroom and school. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[19] Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Leading the cooperative school (2nd ed.): Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
[20] Liu, X. (2004). Using Concept Mapping for Assessing and Promoting Relational Conceptual Change in Science, Science Education, 88. 373396.
[21] Livingston, Jennifer A. (1977), Metacognition: An Overview.
[22] Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H. & Novak, J.D. (1998). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[23] Nonaka, I. (1994), “A Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science (5:10), pp.14-37.
[24] Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995), “The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies Create the dynamics of innovation”, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
[25] Novak J. D. & Cañas A. J. (2006). "The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct and Use Them", Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Accessed 24 Nov 2008.
[26] Novak, J.D. & Gowin, D.B. (1996). Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press: New York, p. 7.
[27] Paris, S. G. & Gross, d. R. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of Children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Education Psychology, 80, 131-142.
[28] Parker, R. E. (1985). Small-group cooperative learning improving academic, social gains in the classroom. MASS Bulletin, 69 (479), 48-57.
[29] Pasmore, W., and Purser, R. (1993). Designing knowledge work systems. 29
[30] Pea R.D (1993), "The Collaborative Visualization Project", Communication of the ACM, pp60-63,
[31] Pintrich P. R. (2000), The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning, In Boekaerts M. and Pintrich P. R. (Eds), Handbook of self-regulation(pp. 451-502), SanDiego, CA: Acdemic Press.
[32] Pintrich, P.R., & Garcia, T.(1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 7, pp.371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
[33] Quinn, J. B., Anderson P. and Finkelstein S. (1996), “Managing Professional Intellect：Making the Most of the Best”, Harvard Business Review, March- April, pp.71-80.
[34] Qunitas, Paul. (1997). “Knowledge Management ： A Strategic Agenda,” Long Range Planning, 30(3), 385-391.Journal of Quality and Participation, July-August, 78-84.
[35] Resta, P. & Lafferriere, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
[36] Rowley, Jennifer (2007). "The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy". Journal of Information Science 33 (2): 163–180.
[37] Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
[38] Slavin, R. E. (1995) Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48, 71-82.
[39] Susman, E. B. (1998). Cooperative learning: A review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18 (4), 303-322.
[40] Willg, K. M. (1993), “Knowledge Management Foundation”, Schema Press, Arlington.
[41] Williams, L. A, & Kessler, R. R. (2000). All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kinder garden. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 108-114.
[42] Yeh C. L. and Lee H. J. (1991), “Rule-based word identification for mandarin Chinese sentences- a unification approach”, Computer Processing of Chinese and Oriental Languages, 5(2) p:97-118.
[43] Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of educational psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
[44] Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective, In M., Boekaerts & P.R., Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego: Academic Press.

中文文獻
[45] 尹玫君、劉蓁蓁 (1998)。國小實施遠距教學的教學方法、學習策略及互動之個案研究。國立台南師範學院初等教育學報，11，1-45。
[46] 石維婷 (2006)。研究Electronic Portfolio系統應用在專案管理課程。世新大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
[47] 何宗穎 (2003)，有意義的學習－概念圖與心智圖，數學與科學教育，94-2，13-20。
[48] 吳青蓉、張景媛 (2003) 。國中生英語學習歷程模式之驗證。教育心理學報，35(2)，121-140。
[49] 易國良 (2004)。「網路合作學習」對「問題導向學習」成效的影響-以國中自然科學為例。新竹市：國立交通大學理學院網路學習碩士在職專班論文。
[50] 林佳芃 (2009)，專家與生手的認知效能，北縣教育，66，pp65-67。
[51] 林彥志 (2002)。從後設認知理論談數學解題的學習與教學。教育趨勢導報，第2期。
[52] 林致瑋、林永順 (2007)。鷹架理論對技術教學的省思—以機械實習為例。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術研究所。中華民國品質學會第43屆年會暨第13 屆全國品質管理研討會。
[53] 林清山、張景媛 (1991)。國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關係研究。教育心理學報，27，141-174。
[54] 林筱雯 (2002)。運用概念構圖為後設認知工具於國小二年級自然科之行動研究，國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。
[55] 胡永崇 (1995)。後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究。彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
[56] 孫春在、林珊如 (2007)，網路合作學習，心理出版社。
[57] 張春興 (1991)。現代心理學。台北：東華書局。
[58] 張憲卿 (2002) 。大學生行動控制之研究：學習動機之機轉。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
[59] 許桂英 (2004)。合作學習應用於國小三年級數學領域學習成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
[60] 陳思穎 (2006)。在行動化合作學習環境中利用流程引導控制降低團體迷思現象，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
[61] 陳秋芳 (2002)。公共衛生護理人員建構實務知識的過程－運用批判反思研究法，國立陽明大學社區護理研究所碩士論文。
[62] 程炳林 (2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報，46(1)，67-92。
[63] 程炳林、林清山 (2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信、效度研究。測驗年刊，48，1 期，1-41。
[64] 程炳林、林清山 (2002) 。學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報，34 (1)，頁43-60。
[65] 黃政傑、林佩璇 (1996)。合作學習。臺北市：五南
[66] 蔡鎮聰 (2003)。教師專業成長團體中互動關係之研究－以開發自然科教學模組為例。國立台中師範學院自然科學教育學系碩士論文。
[67] 蔣葆琳 (2002)。大學生在非同步網路教學環境中自我效能研究。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文。
[68] 盧珍瑩 (2005)。運用鷹架理論於小學二年級科學概念學習之研究。國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所碩士論文。
[69] 蕭智允 (2004)。電腦輔助自律學習管理系統之研製。國立暨南國際大學資訊管理研究碩士論文。
[70] 龍美娟 (2003)。利用教學網站輔助國小學童探究「天象」相關概念之學習歷程研究。國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
[71] 鍾樹椽 (1999)。性別和能力混合分組在電腦合作學習成就和態度上之研究。國民教育研究學報，2，81-105。
[72] 魏瑜雯 (2005)。後設認知技能涉入諮商員個案概念化過程研究:以專家與新手諮商員為例，淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士論文。